News

Facebook DIGG

Job Losses Accelerate, Signaling Deeper Distress

by: Neil Irwin and Michael S. Rosenwald  |  Visit article original @ The Washington Post

photo
Employers are moving to aggressively cut jobs and reduce costs in the face of the nation's economic crisis. (Photo: Thomas Northcut / Getty Images)

    Employers are moving to aggressively cut jobs and reduce costs in the face of the nation's economic crisis, preparing for what many fear will be a long and painful recession.

    The labor market has been weak all year, with a slow drip of workers losing their jobs each month. But the deterioration of the job market is now emerging as a driver of economic distress, according to a wide range of data and anecdotal reports from corporate America.

    In September, there were more mass layoffs - instances in which employers slashed 50 or more jobs at one time - than in any month since September 2001, the Labor Department said yesterday. And nearly half a million Americans have filed new claims for unemployment benefits in each of the past four weeks, the highest rate of such claims since just after the terrorist attacks seven years ago.

    Anecdotal reports suggest that the hemorrhaging in the job market has only begun. Companies that announced plans this week to cut jobs include Internet company Yahoo (1,500 positions), pharmaceutical company Merck (7,200), National City bank (4,000) and Comcast, the cable company (300).

    The weakening employment outlook is part of the reason that investors have become more fearful of a deep, prolonged recession - fears that led to yet another miserable day on Wall Street yesterday, with the Dow Jones industrial average down 514 points, or 5.7 percent.

    "The customers I've spoken to are all living under a sense of fear," said Paul Villella, chief executive of HireStrategy, a Reston company that matches employers and workers. "They have very limited visibility into the future and have a great degree of uncertainty, so they just want to sit steady and be conservative in hiring."

    Villella and others who work with employers said that for many companies, the pullback in hiring is not a direct result of tightening credit. Rather, firms simply don't know whether their own customers will be affected by the financial crisis; as a result, they want to hold their breath and delay hiring decisions until they have a better sense of the future.

    The nation has shed jobs every month this year, but at a slower overall pace than in past economic downturns. The slide accelerated in late summer, with declines similar to those in past recessions. Last month, employers shed 159,000 jobs, the most this year and more than the average number of monthly job losses in the terrible labor markets of 2001 and 2002.

    More obscure indicators monitored by economists at the Federal Reserve and in the private sector also show an inflection point in late summer. For example, employers had 214,000 fewer job openings in August than in July, according to a Labor Department report. Over the past year, the number of openings dropped by a more modest average of 74,000 per month.

    Indeed, many companies are imposing hiring freezes. Such moves don't often get the kind of headlines that layoffs do, but because they shrink the number of places people can turn to for jobs, they still hurt the economy.

    VMware, a Palo Alto, Calif., software company, is one firm that has curbed hiring. Earlier this week, after reporting third-quarter earnings that beat Wall Street's expectations, VMware told analysts on a conference call that despite a 32 percent jump in revenue, a "hiring pause" had been imposed for all jobs except critical ones.

    "We are just being conservative," VMware spokeswoman Mary Ann Gallo said yesterday.

    The nation's unemployment rate was 6.1 percent last month, not astronomical by historical standards. But the rate was up from 5 percent in April, and many forecasters now expect it to hit 7 percent or more by the end of this downturn.

    The construction and manufacturing sectors have been losing jobs for more than a year. But lately, job losses have begun or accelerated in a wide range of other fields. Retailers, stung by less consumer spending, cut 87,000 jobs in the three months ended in September. Employment services shed 100,000 positions in that span, reflecting the fact that companies are slashing temporary jobs. The leisure and hospitality industry cut 51,000 jobs, as people had less money to stay in hotels and eat in restaurants.

    In the greater Los Angeles area, Manpower, one of the nation's largest temp agencies, has noticed a steady increase in job seekers since early September. Paul Holley, a spokesman for the company, said there are more applicants for fewer openings and better-qualified candidates seeking work.

    What's particularly noteworthy, Holley said, is what's happening in Phoenix. Job applications have held steady, but since September more applicants have had backgrounds in general labor and warehouse distribution. That's unusual because warehouse and logistics jobs usually hold steady in the fall to support retailing for holiday shopping.

    Randstad USA, another large temp agency, reports that job applications are up in the Tucson area and that the firm is even getting inquires from people who still have jobs. "In general, a lot of people seem to be insecure about their current jobs even if they are still employed," said Emily Cline, Randstad's area vice president for Tucson.

    As reports of layoffs continue to pile up around the country, executives at Randstad said they have noticed a shift in psychology among job seekers.

    "Employees are much more willing to work extra hours and to take on additional duties to enhance job security and improve their employability," said Eric Buntin, managing director for marketing and operations at Randstad. "In a changing market, they know that's a valuable resource."

    They are also willing to make less money, even as the cost of living goes up. Cline said some call center jobs that were paying $9 an hour in the Tucson area last year are now paying $8.50. "Their option becomes to take the job or not have the job," she said.

    With workers losing their leverage to negotiate raises, there could be greater downward pressure on wages, which in turn could drive down overall economic growth. Workers are already having a hard time getting raises; inflation-adjusted pay for non-managerial workers fell 1.9 percent in the year ended in September, according to the Labor Department.

    -------

    Staff writer Michael A. Fletcher in Cleveland contributed to this report.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Today at my university

Today at my university faculty meeting we decided to take a three thousand dollar cut in our upcoming salaries to make sure that no more cuts to our faculty or programs would occur due to the fact that we have to resend millions of dollars to the state due to losses in revenue to the education as a whole.. These folks make about forty thousand dollars a year and have families and yet they are willing to cut their own salaries to continue the mission of our school. How pathetic and how sad. Most of my colleagues drive old cars, wear old clothes, and can barely afford to live - and these are university professors - it is not only sad, but pathetic. What has happened to this nation that we won't endorse or support higher education?

because you have a very

because you have a very large percentage of the electorate who not only supports, but is wild about a VP candidate who, among other things, belittles basic research in science (fruit flies) and her candidate in chief who thinks one of the worst things in the US Congress is that they spend money on such things as funding planetariums. Pathetic indeed.

When science offers "only a

When science offers "only a theory" and "beliefs" are superior in every way to fact, what else did you expect? When we financially reward companies to send good jobs overseas and then wonder why few would-be engineers sign up for a curriculum that will yield few jobs, what else did you expect? When many scientists send out warnings about serious problems that need attention now, and our government forces them to keep silent (or ruins their careers) what else did you expect? When we all know how to delegate the consequences of our folly to Jesus (it's in His hands now), what else did you expect? When we spend more time warming a pew listening to politicking from the pulpit, what else did you expect? When critical thinking skills are essentially unheard of, what else did you expect? When this country endured 8 years of George Bush in the hopes that one day soon, we could repeal a woman's right to decide for herself what reproductive care she is allowed to have, WHAT ELSE DID YOU EXPECT? This country needs a whole lot more rational thinkers and a whole lot less Jesus. It was the religious that brought Bush to office (twice) and damned near destroyed this country. Do you "get" it yet? Belief in mythology might be stylish but it is no way to run a country!

I understand completely what

I understand completely what the other "posters" desire to say. The US has been shanghaied by a group of predatory SOBs and the result is a nation rapidly sinking in status,politically, economically, and ethically. Maybe it has to do with the term American exceptionlism, and we exceptionally stupid? At the moment the answer would seem to be a resounding yes. While many of us fell for the myth that hard work would be its own reward and translate into financial security if not flat out affluence, the predator class sucker punched us and made of with our nest eggs, dreams and hopes.

Americans can blame the

Americans can blame the "predatory" or wealthy class all they want, but we have nobody to blame in the end but ourselves. When Bush started an illegal unethical war in violation of international law, did we rise up and impeach him? When the Enron scandal happened, did we rise up and demand change? After Bush stole the 04 election, did we demand the truth? After 9/11, did we take a step back and think exactly why the rest of the world is so hateful towards us? No...we let religious fanaticism, laziness and excess, and pedantic self-interest govern all our actions and keep our heads in the sand, allowing the bourgeoisie to run away with all the hardwork of the past 60 years. Only now are people finally starting to wake up, and its too late. Congratulations, America - you missed your chance and now we'll have a depression. I only hope we learn from this and don't make the same mistake again in this generation with the even more important upcoming issues, like climate change and overpopulation and global resource shortages.

The outsourceing of jobs in

The outsourceing of jobs in the US is been happning a long time. Just like every one else, but they better start saveing or go on social security which is not much fun.

Yes, the predatory wealthy

Yes, the predatory wealthy class IS to blame, not their victims. To blame the American people is to suggest that they have some choice in the matter. They don't. They protest, and make known their very real disagreements with the whole range of policies, yet the elected do nothing, year after year. The root cause for our distress, however, is never pointed out. This system of government is rapacious at its core, based as it is on a rapacious economic system that demands constant expansion and the exploitation that is profit. Until we restore democracy, and acknowledge and act on the belief that government, the people organized, provides the necessary bulwark against an exploitative economic system, we will always be in the hands of those who have only their own selfish motives at heart. There has been a class war going on, the wealthy against the rest of us, for decades, if not centuries. Speaking truth to power is a waste of time. The rich and powerful already know the truth about the class war. It's the rest of us, stupefied by television and empty promises, that must be told the truth. Not much has changed since Madison spoke of the Federal government's role as "protecting the minority of the opulent against the majority". What does it tell you about a country that has law schools that teach property rights (as if property has rights), but not human rights? Wage-slavery was once understood for what it was, even in the US. It was disgusting then, and is even more so now. That 700 Billion isn't even the end of the dole that has been passed from the poor to the rich; could there be any clearer evidence that the two political parties are just two factions of the same political party: the Business Party, the Party of money, the Party of property? If voting could change things, it would be illegal!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.