Opinion

Facebook DIGG

The Extreme Team Behind Amendment 48

by: Cristina Page  |  Visit article original @ RH Reality Check

photo
In Colorado, Amendment 48 would outlaw in-vitro fertilization treatment and would add commonly used forms of birth control alongside abortion to the list of banned procedures. (Photo: Mahalie)

    Earlier this month, Colorado Governor Bill Ritter announced his opposition to Amendment 48, which seeks to grant a fertilized egg the status of a human being, complete with equal rights. The groups pushing the amendment advertise it as a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide, but it targets far more than that. In fact, even those opposed to legal abortion, like Ritter, have good reason to reject the proposal.

    The creators of Amendment 48 have been coy since the start. They haven't fully explained the implications of their plan and with good reason-it's extreme. Amendment 48, if passed, would undermine our right to have a baby by establishing the legal groundwork to outlaw IVF treatment. It threatens our right to plan a family by adding the most commonly used forms of birth control alongside abortion to the list of banned procedures. The state, under this proposal, could intervene in a woman's life, even a woman with cancer and deny her life saving medical treatment if it could endanger a fertilized egg.

    This constitutional amendment is not about protecting life. Amendment 48 does nothing less than rob us of the ability to make many of life's most important decisions.

    The architects of the proposed amendment know this. The initiative's sponsor Kristi Burton asserts, "As far as birth control, IVF and abortion and all that, our amendment doesn't ban anything." But then she slyly admits, "That would be up to the legislature and courts. If our amendment passes and that's (a fertilized egg) considered a person you'd have to view those issues in that way." Ms. Burton knows full well that the only purpose to granting a fertilized egg full human rights is to target the right to birth control, IVF and stem cell research. If it were simply about targeting the right to an abortion, then Amendment 48 would have attempted to define life as starting at the moment a pregnancy begins and not before, as Amendment 48 does.

    The groups supporting Amendment 48, as listed on the Personhood Colorado website, represent the most extreme wing of the right to life movement. These groups and individuals lead campaigns against contraceptive access. They don't believe that individuals should decide hat's best for themselves according to their values. For example, the American Life League hopes to ban contraception entirely and this year launched a campaign called "The Pill Kills." Its purpose was to confuse the public into thinking the most common and effective forms of birth control, like the birth control pill, cause abortion. They held protests outside of family planning clinics nationwide trying to convince Americans to stop using contraception.

    Another backer, Human Life International, targets the poorest and most desperate places on earth. In these distressed countries, it seeks to block access to birth control and to de-fund relief agencies that distribute contraception. The Pro-Life Action League, another Amendment 48 supporter, held a conference several years ago entitled "Contraception is Not the Answer." Many of the individuals signed on in support of Amendment 48 are most famous for their anti-contraception work and activities. Dr. David Hager is credited with helping to block over-the-counter access to emergency contraception. He led the FDA to ignore the advice of its own scientists and for the first time in its history make a decision based exclusively on ideology. Neil Noesen, another supporter, is a Wisconsin-based pharmacist who made national news by denying a woman her prescription for birth control and refusing to transfer it to a nearby pharmacy that would fill it. Supporter Dr. William Colliton published an article entitled "Birth Control Pill: Abortifacient and Contraceptive" in which he said, "There is an unarguable logic connecting the contraceptive act and the abortive act. They are both anti-life."

    Access to birth control options including emergency birth control is the only proven way to reduce unintended pregnancy and abortion rates. That's why even 80% of self-described "pro-life" Americans support access to contraception.

    Voters must know that Amendment 48 threatens much more than the right to a safe and legal abortion. For women to achieve equality, they must have access to birth control. We need to respect people's ability to make their own life decisions and not impose our values and views upon others. The extreme team assembled in support of Amendment 48 knows its hidden purpose and potential-and they are committed to making sure that before Election Day you don't.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Millions of "people" are

Millions of "people" are frozen in IVF Freezers. How sad, and yet these people would rather bomb Women's Clinics, etc, than protest the suspension of what they define as "human life" in the hundreds of IVF Freezers across the nation and world.--------->Life doesn't always give us what we WANT.

That ain`t the half of it, a

That ain`t the half of it, a rapist while serving his sentence could sue the VICTIMS for spousal support and visitation rights!

This is the latest insanity

This is the latest insanity on the part of the right wing "morality" squad, who really believe that science is something they can legislate. They never study science, they contradict it in all areas, and they just declare their ignorance as truth. If they understood human gestation, they would know that a fertilized ovum that fails to implant is lost in a "miscarriage" -- for which, incidentally, the technical term is "spontaneous abortion." That non-life state is also true of a fertilized ovum that becomes implanted in the wrong site, such as a fallopian tube, an outcome that cannot be corrected without loss of a cellular mass that is in no way a "human being." But hey, we can't burden these ignoramuses with truth -- they have "faith."

I don't get it. The so

I don't get it. The so called people of faith want to legislate morality as they call it, and give rights to the unborn, while they want to take rights away from the born. They are playing God for the rest of us, trying to indoctrinate us with their "one way" approach. I believe in the sanctity of life, and I wish these religious nuts would pay more attention to the sanctity of peoples lives after they are born. I distrust anyone who says they believe in the sanctity of life but will support war, or will not help the poor and needy. Sanctity of life is only for the unborn? I believe religion has done more harm than good and it's time we stop letting religious nuts dictate our morals because they do not have any better moral substance than a gang of thieves.

So if you give zygotes

So if you give zygotes (fertilized eggs) "human rights," then a visit to the doctor can be construed as an invasion of the fertilized egg's PRIVACY, and so no medical tests can be done for the mother unless she gives consent to VIOLATE the zygote's privacy. And if it's suspected that the zygote can be expelled naturally then the mother can be charge with MANSLAUGHTER or attempted MURDER unless she can prove her innocence. So if the zygote is legally considered a human being then you get into the LANDMINES of INSURANCE coverage TECHNICALITIES. So if the mother has a drink of an alcoholic beverage, and she doesn't know she has a fertilized egg, is she charged with forcing alcohol to a MINOR? If the mother holds a job, is she in violation of CHILD LABOR LAWS? If the mother goes into an area only for adults, is she charged with REGULATORY VIOLATIONS for bringing a minor into the area? So what next in the irrational, unscientific, extremist ideology of the Religious Right? Give unfertilized eggs and sperm, legal rights and protections as well, without the knowledge of the person? Will they also make any suspected violation of ABSTINENCE a CRIME? Under the Religious Right's legal manipulations, will MENSTRUATING or MASTURBATION become ILLEGAL? They already view the latter as a SIN OF LUST, and for the former, proof of the spiritual INFERIORITY or IMPERFECTION of women. How do they plan to ENFORCE these laws? By having everyone's social behavior CLOSELY MONITORED by law enforcement, the government, the churches? Maybe place monitoring VIDEOCAMS in all of our bedrooms and bathrooms, perhaps? Or institute a program to secretly spy on, and REPORT ON YOUR NEIGHBOR, and REWARD those who catch possible violators?

Considering the lack of

Considering the lack of concern for the infant once it is borne, or even real concern and support for prenatal care, much less feeding and educating the children already alive in this country, one can only deduce that it is an attempt to punish any woman or child who becomes pregnant out of wedlock. Once this is in place we can go back to handing out scarlet A's for adultery, or like our Muslim allies in Saudi Arabia, simply behead the women or stone them to death. So much for "pro-life".

Amendment 48 is much more

Amendment 48 is much more than extreme. It's a naked attempt to enshrine into the laws of the state a religious doctrine, in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution. Not only does Amendment 48 violate the Establishment of Religion Clause of the First Amendment, it also clashes with the Fourteenth Amendment, which grants full civil and human rights to persons BORN in the Unites States or become naturalized citizens thereof. Amendment 48 is nothing less than an attempt to codify into state law the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church -- shared by many arch-conservative Protestant evangelicals -- that life begins at the moment of conception. To make this doctrine the law of the state is not permissible under the First Amendment separation of church and state. As far as the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is concerned, life begins at birth. Anti-abortion advocates have long championed protecting "the rights of the unborn," but that's legally impossible without a birth certificate. Even if Amendment 48 passes, its chances of surviving a federal constitutional challenge are remote.

Regarding the reader's post,

Regarding the reader's post, "So if you give zygotes..." by "bailerjailer064, Columbia U," this person has got it right I think, but it's only the proverbial tip of the iceberg. The legal implications of this irrational amendment proposal are far-raging in the depth and breadth it can take in affecting how women live in this country. It will even have a negative impact upon the decisions that men make with women, consenting adults, and business employers in ways we can only imagine this point. But it comes to historians like myself as no surprise, considering how bad the Dark Ages were.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.