Truthout Original

For Whom the Bailout Tolls

by: Michael Winship, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
(Photo: hoboken411.com)

    During the Stock Market Crash in 1929, that curtain-raising overture to the Great Depression, stories abounded of Wall Street brokers rushing to their office windows and leaping to their deaths. But according to the late John Kenneth Galbraith and other economic historians, those accounts of suicide were, by and large, fairy tales. Perhaps they were more dark-hearted, wishful thinking than reality - revenge fantasies on the part of those whose real life savings had been wiped out by ravenous speculators.

    Nonetheless, the myth of those fatal plunges, like so many urban legends, is hard to shake. With more than a drop of cold blood, some have asked why, during this current fiscal crisis, we haven't seen similar tragedies in the ranks of high finance.

    A close look at the recent government bailouts may explain why. The fat cats at the top had nothing to worry their pretty little whiskers about. Not only have most of their businesses been saved, for now at least, but they've already been pretty successful at protecting their high-rolling lifestyles, and finding bailout loopholes that allow them to keep hauling in the big bucks. To that ancient business axiom, "Buy low, sell high," add this amendment: When you get into trouble, beg for a bailout. Then, new money in hand, continue to act with the rapacious greed of Caligula or the Sun King.

    You may already have heard how AIG, the insurance giant, after being saved to the tune of $85 billion, threw a $440,000 shindig at a California spa and then blew another $86,000 on a hunting trip to the English countryside, picking off partridges just as they were asking the Feds for an additional $38 billion. Bit of a sticky wicket, that.

    Caught red-handed, AIG canceled plans for another 160 sales and promotion events that would have cost a cool $80 million AND - get this - agreed to stop spending millions of their newly gained tax dollars on lobbying efforts against increased government regulations - this after being rescued from extinction by that very same government. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you! New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is demanding that AIG get back from its execs millions of dollars the insurer paid out as the company neared collapse, and on Wednesday, the insurance giant agreed to freeze $600 million worth of deferred compensation and bonuses for its top brass.

    There are "claw back" provisions in the big $700 billion bailout passed by Congress three weeks ago, requiring that financial institutions get money back from their senior executives, if the payments were "based on statements of earnings, gains, or other criteria that are later proven to be materially inaccurate."

    But the executive pay limits in the legislation apparently have so many loopholes you could fly a fleet of Gulfstream corporate jets through them. Oregon Congressman Peter de Fazio caught at least seven, "that will protect their outrageous paychecks and golden parachutes," he wrote fellow Democratic House members, adding, "Imagine how many more loopholes the Wall Street lawyers will find."

    No doubt the nine banks into which the US is planning to inject billions in capital - again, all taxpayer dollars - have their lawyers searching for those escape hatches. Writing in the Seattle Post Intelligencer, Sarah Anderson and Sam Pizzigati of the Institute for Policy Studies calculated that last year the CEO's of those nine banks took home "on average, $32.2 million each, nearly triple the average CEO pay at the 500 biggest US companies. This is more than $600,000 a week." Apiece.

    Bloomberg News columnist Jonathan Weil figures that since the start of fiscal 2004, the once Mighty Five of Wall Street - Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns - lost around $83 billion in stock market value. But they reported employee compensation of around $239 billion. In other words, the engineers who dug this disastrous hole paid themselves almost three dollars for every dollar they lost.

    The cost to the taxpayer of all the bailouts, as calculated by the internet investigative newsroom ProPublica.org, is a whopping $8,750 per household, more than two and a half times what lucky us got to fork over 20 years ago during the savings and loan crisis.

    But the masters of the universe are just fine, thank you, in no small part due to the tolerance and largesse of their guru, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, late of Goldman Sachs, where Forbes magazine reports that during a 32-year-career he accumulated more than $700 million. He said limiting compensation too punitively might prevent some institutions from participating in his plan to save the economy.

    No, the people suffering are the nearly 800,000 out of work so far this year. More families with children are homeless. Delinquencies and foreclosures are at their highest in nearly three decades, and The Los Angeles Times reported earlier this month that, "Worries about home foreclosures, job losses and plunging stock prices have sparked a surge in mental health problems."

    Including suicide. In California recently, where professionals say mental health referrals have tripled in the last year, unemployed financial adviser Karthik Rajaram killed himself and four members of his family, including his wife, children and mother-in-law. In two suicide notes, he said he was broke and had run out of options. Variations of his story are appearing all over the country, from Colorado to Tennessee.

    There are some happier stories. Tom Dart, the sheriff of Cook County, Illinois, suspended all foreclosure evictions because they were throwing into the street tenants of buildings who had nothing to do with their landlords' inability to make payments. Jocelyn Voltaire, an immigrant from Haiti, was about to lose her home after the death of her eldest son, a Marine in Iraq who had been sending her money to help meet the mortgage.

    After seeing a report produced by the American News Project, members of the antiwar group CodePink raised $30,000 to save Voltaire's house.

    Testifying before the House Budget Committee this week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke agreed that homeowners in jeopardy of foreclosure need help. "I agree that stopping preventable foreclosures is extremely important," he said. "I hope we continue to look for ways to do that."

    But so far the government and the businesses bailed out haven't looked very hard. They've done little or nothing and it's every man for himself, devil take the hindmost. In his history of the 1929 market crash, John Kenneth Galbraith wrote, "The sense of responsibility in the financial community for the community as a whole is not small. It is nearly nil."

In other words, virtually nonexistent, somewhere around zero. In other words, my fellow Americans, look out below. Do not ask for whom the bailout tolls. It tolls for thee.

»


Michael Winship is senior writer of the weekly public affairs program Bill Moyers Journal, which airs Friday nights on PBS. Check local airtimes or comment at The Moyers Blog at www.pbs.org/moyers.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

I am an employee of Deutsche

I am an employee of Deutsche Bank AG. I have read many stories about the "credit crisis," and in relation to my firm, I think the media has missed the real story. Our poor results are a "management debacle," a natural outcome of management's actions and failures to act. Management took too much risk, failed to manage this risk, and broke too many laws and regulations. A better question is, "Where are the shareholders, and why haven't shareholders sought to address the executive compensation issue directly?"

Paulson fits the mold of

Paulson fits the mold of Bush appointees - former lobbyist for, or employee of, the industry he/she now oversees. I'm mad as hell - but I'm not surprised.

I have to say, in 2000 I

I have to say, in 2000 I warned against voting for an "undrunk" alcoholic with a coke habit. But no one was listening to me. Then in 2004 I predicted a landslide, now we call it election stolen. IF, I say, Obama Wins and well he mite, Well deserved I might add, it will be Landslide denied! Now that the house of cards is sliding into the abyss, where are all these people who derided me so much and so often for years because I was against the housing bubble, et al? No responsibility......ever?

So what if " limiting

So what if " limiting compensation too punitively might prevent some institutions from participating in his plan to save the economy." Let them chose to not participate. The arrogance is almost unbelievable.

So now you know. The $700

So now you know. The $700 billion was given to the banks without any oversight so that they could use it to enrich themselves at our expense. As foreclosures and layoffs mount, the healthy banks that got the money are using it to buy up assets of failed banks for pennies on the dollar. They are allowing your economic situation to worsen so you won't have the strength to fight them. Even though 90% of you told your legislators not to do it, they did it anyway. http://ewebsmith.com/Finance/notlistening.html

The first act of the newly

The first act of the newly elected Congress, which should be overwhelmingly Democratic, should be to pass a law, as quickly as the bailout bill, to establish that: government shares are voting shares, that executive compensation in "rescued" banks should be limited to civil service grade pay; and that all who might be guilty of deceptive, fraudulent practices, and all those who may have aided in these practices (and had the responsibility to approve or stop them) be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and should be imprisoned for the number of years equivalent to the millions of dollars misappropriated by unjustified pay packages or insider trading arrangements. Bet it would pass, and be signed, if the President is named Obama AND people have been demanding it since his election. If McCain steals the election, we'll have to have a revolution first

BANG--The Feds very

BANG--The Feds very carefully chose to take non-voting so-called preferred stock as their stake in the welfare queen banks they put on the dole. That way, they cannot vote on any internal issue including, oddly, executive compensation. Tying one's own hands is a pretty neat trick, but ol' Paulson managed it not once but nine times. Henry justified his hand tying act by claiming "limiting compensation too punitively might prevent some institutions from participating in his plan to save the economy." Yet, word is, he locked these guys in a room until they agreed to take our money, sort of executive jail I guess. And the Brits fired the top management of the firms they bailed out without a ripple in the economy or the firms. Guess he figured the mere possibility ("might") of limiting exec compensation too much ("too punitively") meant that that any pay limitation whatsoever would imperil his reward for incompetence and greed. Better not take the slimmest chance the former masters of the universe wouldn't run with his con. Hell, what's the worry? The lower orders, those after all born to serve the masters, are the ones who are gonna bleed. Perhaps no clearer demonstration of class in the US, where we’re all in the same boat when the doo-doo is in the fan but otherwise on our own, is that when the lower sorts loot the police and National Guard (those not in Iraq) and Blackwater are called out in force, but when the country club set loots they’re giving trucks to help them haul away their swag. Don’t want to do nothin’ that’d limit the privileges of rank.

""Am I the only one here

""Am I the only one here who Sun, 10/26/2008 - 01:40 — Anonymous (not verified) Am I the only one here who realizes that all you people are doing is griping online, which is absolutely ineffectual? What goals do you think this will serve? Seek the root of the problem..."" Actually you are just one of those people who for want of a bit of imagination and a bit more intellect, doesn't realise that everyone who writes here, does other things as well. You have no idea what other activities people engage in, when not discussing issues like this online. As it happens the act of learning and sharing etc online is what gives activist people the information and understanding to know what to change.

Some prime indicators that

Some prime indicators that government insiders knew that a financial storm of unprecedented scope was forming was when.... Sen. Grassly rewrote and added to the (bankruptcy laws) a few years ago, as of last September. When the Supreme Court over turned (Eminent Domain Laws) giving all government bodies the power to give private property to any corporate entity that promised to increase tax revenues. And last but not lest when states where allowed to sell off publicly owned and or financed resources. Example (Indiana Toll Road System). All these and more examples point to a shared government knowledge that was being kept from the general public of impending financial problems of unprecedented scope. The only question now is (did other nations governments also withhold this information from its own people also)?

All Americans should refuse

All Americans should refuse to pay income taxes.

Let's be clear with AIG. We

Let's be clear with AIG. We are not only disgusted, we are outraged. They are a corporation that has exercised extraordinarily poor judgement! WHY should they be bailed out? If the banks still hold the "bailout money," taxpayers need to make sure AIG does not get the money. I am a taxpayer who is unwilling to support giving away millions to profit-making organizations, like AIG, while the non-profits that are saving the planet, feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, providing health services to the uninsured, and educating the public with truth-telling media are having fall fund-raisers, stretching every dollar, and running out of food before Thanksgiving. Corporate minds haven't grasped the need to be frugal and their conscious decisions seem immoral or at least unethical. Another fine example of absolute perverse waste was the killing by General Motors of theEV1 electric cars.

Am I the only one here who

Am I the only one here who realizes that all you people are doing is griping online, which is absolutely ineffectual? What goals do you think this will serve? Seek the root of the problem...

IF THEY ARE RESELLING OUR

IF THEY ARE RESELLING OUR MORTGAGES TO OTHER INSTITUTIONS AT SAY 50 CENTS ON A DOLLAR WHY CANT THEY MAKE IT LAW IF A MORTGAGE IS SOLD THE CURRENT OWNER OF THE HOME MORTGAGE IS ON HAS ..RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL AT THE SAME PRICE ITS TO BE SOLD FOR" THEN WE CAN BUY OUR MORTGAGE FOR ALMOST HALF ...IT OUGHT TO BECOME LAW IN EVERY MORTGAGE THAT OWNER HAS RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL ON SAME TERMS IN EVERY MORTGAGE

"Treasury Secretary Henry

"Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, late of Goldman Sachs, where Forbes magazine reports that during a 32-year-career he accumulated more than $700 million." How big a hole will Mr Paulson be buried in? Probably about 8' by 4' like the rest of us. Reminds me of a story by Tolstoy: How much land does a man need? Look it up. Jim of Olym

Americans still do not get

Americans still do not get it, They want is all there will be no stopping foreclosures they want to confiscate and eventually resell .They most definitely want you out of your house ans this is going to get much worse.the govt all three branches do not care about the people nor do they listento you or heed your words it is in deed time for Bastille day but Americans as always are asleep albeit on a park bench now

"anonymous- masters of the

"anonymous- masters of the universe" Exactly right. Exactly right. This whole affair is a total failure of the political, economic and moral and ethical system. The banks won't release the bailout money until they are SURE they can make a profit on it. Then witness the conduct of the AIG executives: spending the taxpayers bailout money for a good time. I told my US Representative at the time the Blackmail-Bailout was the wrong way to go. We needed to invest money from the bottom up- infrastructure, health care whatever, just not the black hole of Wall Street and the banks.

It is most interesting that

It is most interesting that the bank bailout doesn't even look into their books. If any intelligent company is giving another company money they AT LEAST look into the state of affairs and who owes what and to whom. Even the banks refused to loan to each other suggesting strongly that there is more to the picture. I suspect strongly that the credit card debt (currently at one trillion) is a major factor in the big banks problem. There has been a doubling each year of debt repayment default and the problem here is at the end of the day there is nothing. At least with the sub prime there is a house sitting there but with credit cards there is nothing and I think we will find this is the biggest negative impact to the banks. I really believe the banks will use the bailout money, not to create credit to improve the economy but to cover the tremendous losses they are carrying and then they will just sit on what is left over (if anything!).

Instead of taxpayers paying

Instead of taxpayers paying hundreds of billions, the government should assist in the prosecution of those people who engaged in misrepresentation of risk when selling fancy bundles of leveraged securities or swaps. The lawsuit could proceed on the basis of the principle of unjustified enrichment, in those cases where due diligence (or more) was lacking. It seems that many tens of trillions of dollars are involved, and recouping even $10 trillion would be worth it.

I'm glad I was raised during

I'm glad I was raised during the depression! I learned that having any debts took away my own power to survive and flourish. Later on I learned the biggest problem with schools and their curriculum is not teaching "critical analysis" High emphasis being the following: 1. Who wins and who loses? 2. What is won or lost? 3. Who controls those in power & how will they use us next? (Kurzrok & buncoed.)

This article really puts

This article really puts into perspective recent rants from the McCain campaign against "spreading the wealth". What McCain's corporate friends have been doing is precisely that, except they have been acting like reverse Robin Hoods, taxing and exploiting average Americans and spreading the wealth to themselves. This is a fine companion piece to Steve Weissman's article "Spread the Wealth? Soak the Rich?" http://www.truthout.org/102408A, demonstrating precisely why we need to reverse decades of doing the exact opposite.

Paulson should be fired then

Paulson should be fired then thrown in jail. Along with every other fat cat "leader" of these criminally negligent corporations. And they call themselves Christians, most of them... do unto others as you'd have them do unto you. Well, wow. I'm waiting for my $36 million any day. I'm holding my breath, too. Cuz I know it will come. Any day. I'm just sure of it. Ahhh... karma, my only hope.

Let me know when and where

Let me know when and where they are recruiting for the revolution. Sign me up.

Amen to anonymous. Long past

Amen to anonymous. Long past time to nationalize the banks. They are *obviously* not more efficient than a democratically controlled and accountable government agency could be.

Thank you for posting the

Thank you for posting the "numbers" of this ongoing greedy horror show! Puts it in stark perpective for me...Wow, the thieving darlings on Wall $treet grabbed three dollars for every one dollar that they 'lost'. What gall! Note to Congress; get on top of that "claw back", and damn fast!

The vultures are circling

The vultures are circling the victims of the burned out economy.

The grand pyramid scheme (as

The grand pyramid scheme (as he human condition) continues, as such. The favourite few at the top keep the underlings sated with MallWart "pretend" opulence, while carting big bags of US treasury issued currency to the trunks of their Lincolns and Benzes... . Two out of three CEOs have already figgered out how to "get theirs" from the 700 billion buck bailout. Cracks me up that we have socialised Wall Street, but we can't get health care for the folks that really need it. What was that quote again? "Give me you tired, your poor...". Umm, I forget the rest... .

As long as our realistic

As long as our realistic political choice is limited to two basically aligned parties, the owners of those parties will always come out on top. The only plausible change can be through a radically democratic- and justice-oriented political grouping that has the courage and the power to change the economic system. Before that happens, we are all just whistling Dixie.

If the government has taken

If the government has taken a 'shareholder' position by pouring capital into these FAILED corporations, they should also exert the same 'shareholder' pressure that as former employees we were always told limited our worker compensation (not the management team compensation). And it is not only the CEO that gets over compensated... several layers of "senior" managers abound in large corporations. The schema for limiting compensation should be the inverse of the management pyramid... top execs take a much larger pay cut than the lower rungs of the pay ladder.

This is indeed a perverse

This is indeed a perverse society!

" But the masters of the

" But the masters of the universe are just fine, thank you, in no small part due to the tolerance and largesse of their guru, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson... He said limiting compensation too punitively might prevent some institutions from participating in his plan to save the economy." You want to save the economy? Then nationalize the banks-permanently--to start with. Then use government funds to create jobs-green jobs. Finally, the high finance bandits should be sent to jail. Paulson should be fired then given job retraining.