Lieberman Pulls the Brakes on the Public Option
Tuesday 27 October 2009
by: Scott Galindez, t r u t h o u t | NewsWire

(Illustration: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t)
Liberal and progressive Democrats were ecstatic yesterday when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced there would be a public option in the Senate version of health care reform legislation. Reid said he was confident that he could hold his caucus together and get the 60 votes needed to clear procedural hurdles in the Senate.
Today all that has changed as Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Connecticut) has once again bucked the party by announcing that he will support a Republican filibuster unless the public option is removed from the bill.
Also see below:
Jason Leopold | Senate Bill to Include Public Option "Opt-Out" Plan β’
According to talking points memo, Lieberman told reporters on Tuesday:
"I told Senator Reid that I'm strongly inclined - I haven't totally decided, but I'm strongly inclined - to vote to proceed to the health care debate, even though I don't support the bill that he's bringing together because it's important that we start the debate on health care reform because I want to vote for health care reform this year. But I also told him that if the bill remains what it is now, I will not be able to support a cloture motion before final passage. Therefore, I will try to stop the passage of the bill."
If Lieberman holds through to his threat, the Democrats will need to win the support of at least one Republican in the Senate to bring the bill before the Senate for a final vote. The one GOP senator who has shown support for the Democrats' health care reform effort is Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine). Senator Snowe issued the following statement on Monday:
"I am deeply disappointed with the Majority Leader's decision to include a public option as the focus of the legislation. I still believe that a fallback, safety net plan, to be triggered and available immediately in states where insurance companies fail to offer plans that meet the standards of affordability, could have been the road toward achieving a broader bipartisan consensus in the Senate."
In a meeting with reporters today Sen. Reid defended his decision to include the public option: "I believe that a public option can achieve the goal of bringing meaningful reform to our broken system. It will protect consumers, keep insurers honest and ensure competition. And that's why we intend to include it in the bill that we submitted -- that will be submitted to the Senate."
When asked by a reporter if he believes they have the 60 votes needed to block a filibuster Reid said: "I believe that -- I believe that we will be -- as soon as we get the bill back from CBO and people have a chance to look at it, which we'll have ample time to do that, I believe we clearly will have the support of my caucus to move to this bill and start legislating."
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs responded to the news of Lieberman's defection by telling reporters:
I haven't seen the report from Senator Lieberman or why he's saying what he's saying. I think Democrats and Republicans alike will be held accountable by their constituents who want to see health care reform enacted this year. We see it in the polling that you guys do every day that they want the system, as it is now, to be fixed to ensure accessibility for those that don't have it, for cutting costs for those who do, and for important insurance reforms like pre-existing conditions to be addressed. And we know that if that doesn't happen, people say they'll be very disappointed by that, and we think people will make progress to ensure that this gets done.
This is not the first time that the junior senator from Connecticut had angered members of his caucus. Lieberman, now an Independent who caucuses with the Democrats, lost the Democratic primary in 2006 as a result of his strong support for the war in Iraq and other controversial Bush administration policies. The real question here is how long the Democrats will maintain their ties to Lieberman, while he continues to stab them in the back on important legislation.



Comments
This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.
If the Republicans -- and
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 21:44 β Active Voice (not verified)The people of CT ought to be
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 21:47 β Rowland Scherman (not verified)WTF how could Al Gore have
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 21:49 β Anonymous (not verified)Joe Liebermann, I hate you!
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 21:53 β Anonymous (not verified)I'm not a violent man but
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:02 β Roger (not verified)Last I heard, Lieberman's
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:08 β Larry (not verified)Let's see... How about
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:18 β Andrew (not verified)Lieberman and the
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:20 β JHannan (not verified)Lieberman has never fooled
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:24 β Anonymous (not verified)Democrats should have seen
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:26 β Anonymous (not verified)Stab them in the back is
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:29 β Anonymous (not verified)I wonder what Leiberman's
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:30 β BillyDoc (not verified)To me Senator Joseph
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:31 β WILLIAM NEWMAN (not verified)I'm not surprised at
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:34 β Anonymous (not verified)THEY SHOULD HAVE CAMPAIGNED
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:42 β fred fep (not verified)How we love our Joe! Break
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:44 β Oligarch 23 (not verified)lieberman has failed the
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:50 β Anonymous (not verified)Is Joe Lieberman a pimp for
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:55 β MT Guy (not verified)Lieberman, Lieberman --
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 22:57 β Anonymous (not verified)Why am I not surprised? I
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:00 β Cynthia (not verified)What, I wonder, will his old
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:02 β Anonymous (not verified)It is a mystery to me why
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:04 β Anonymous (not verified)Once again Lieberman shows
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:04 β Anonymous (not verified)I'd like to see the press
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:05 β Leila L (not verified)Just another example of how
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:09 β Anonymous (not verified)No surprise given his well
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:11 β Anonymous (not verified)No big surprise here.
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:17 β Jon Hill (not verified)Lieberman ? caucus with the
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:22 β Anonymous (not verified)Leiberman not supporting the
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:24 β Eliot (not verified)Traitor Joe, as I call him,
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:51 β Syd (not verified)If Harry Reid comes back
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:58 β Anonymous (not verified)The bills that are FINALLY
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:59 β Regina (not verified)Lieberman has always been a
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:59 β mkd in Akron (not verified)Lieberman, what phoney.
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:03 β Anonymous (not verified)It's really ironic that the
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:08 β Berry Ives (not verified)Lieberman is a leach, he
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:17 β Anonymous (not verified)60 votes aren't needed.
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:31 β L.D. Freitas (not verified)here goes Lieberman again
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:36 β Anonymous (not verified)Lieberman is a traitor to
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:36 β divadab (not verified)Listen to what Lieberman
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:42 β Anonymous (not verified)I think the following is
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:45 β Jan Boudart (not verified)Lieber-ican Republic-man
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:55 β Anonymous (not verified)That's it. I'm moving to
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:57 β jruss (not verified)Lieberman is despicable. He
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 01:25 β Karen (not verified)Is he bored w/ being chair
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 01:27 β JW (not verified)The only surprise is that
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 01:34 β Anonymous (not verified)As one of the apparently
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 01:35 β Anonymous (not verified)I agree with Robert Gibbs
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 01:43 β Anonymous (not verified)Well, I know that
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 01:53 β Devon J. Noll, MPA (not verified)I knock on the door of
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 02:20 β Anonymous (not verified)This is a country run 'of
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 02:28 β Robert Whitbread (not verified)What an asshole!
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 02:30 β Anonymous (not verified)Let 'em filibuster!
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 02:31 β Carlisticeday (not verified)Lieberman's a sham. why is
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 02:35 β randombyter (not verified)Lieberman is nothing but the
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 02:39 β Anonymous (not verified)Who did not know, back in
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 02:44 β Staggo Lee (not verified)What a little piece of
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 02:49 β Anonymous (not verified)Yes loathsome and a cretin
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 03:11 β refuge (not verified)Connecticut is not to blame
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 03:39 β Robert Whitbread (not verified)Obama and the Dems need to
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 04:03 β Pissed in Los Angeles (not verified)Notice the AP has a
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 04:22 β Anonymous (not verified)Is Lieberman a Global
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 04:44 β Anonymous (not verified)WOW. Everyone hates
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 05:08 β institutionalizednonsense (not verified)Something to
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 05:15 β Anonymous (not verified)The Democratic and
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 05:21 β Thomas Rusch (not verified)The Democratic and
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 05:22 β Thomas Rusch (not verified)Be careful what you wish
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 06:29 β Anonymous (not verified)Until a few years ago, Joe
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 06:56 β RoughAcres (not verified)Is it possible to IMPEACH a
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 07:48 β ER (not verified)How about a general strike
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 08:33 β Anonymous (not verified)Send Mr. Lie-Berman to his
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 10:56 β Anonymous (not verified)Lieberman was re-elected by
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 10:58 β bookmanjb (not verified)The Lieberman Party is the
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 10:59 β Anonymous (in Cascadia) (not verified)Wow...Joe never seems to
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 11:52 β Anonymous (not verified)Based on the comments above,
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 13:01 β Anonymous (not verified)Twelve steps: 1.Obama to
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 13:12 β granny (not verified)Want to defeat Lieberman in
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 13:54 β Anonymous (not verified)I strongly agree with the
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 14:55 β HG (not verified)Democrats be warned: Passage
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 15:25 β Anonymous (not verified)Absolute garbage.
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 15:39 β Based on the comments above 2 (not verified)I say, Democrats should
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 16:11 β Anonymous (not verified)The only thing keeping
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 16:21 β Don Brennan (not verified)For the record Sen.
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 17:11 β Journey Home by Paul Burke (not verified)Its plain and simple from
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 17:40 β Anonymous (not verified)BASE TO DEMOCRATS... BASE TO
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 17:43 β Anonymous (not verified)They should have dumped this
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 18:19 β Anonymous (not verified)Some one should show where
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 19:19 β Anonymous (not verified)Lieberman is a Zionist and
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 20:50 β Anonymous (not verified)"In current practice, Senate
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 22:43 β From Wikipedia (not verified)This issue reveals a deeper
Wed, 10/28/2009 - 23:01 β HG (not verified)Senator Liberman is against
Thu, 10/29/2009 - 14:34 β Anonymous (not verified)Ya feelin all the Love
Thu, 10/29/2009 - 16:29 β Anonymous (not verified)Democrats, Progressives and
Fri, 10/30/2009 - 01:10 β Robert Uttaro (not verified)Where is Clinton in all of
Fri, 10/30/2009 - 11:12 β joedee1969 (not verified)Senator Leiberman is truly a
Fri, 10/30/2009 - 18:28 β giovanna Lepore (not verified)Cut the lifeline to
Fri, 10/30/2009 - 21:31 β old Bill (not verified)The senate needs to go ahead and vote affirmatively on Reid's proposal. Let those who vote against HEALTH be dumped by their constituencies, Democratic and Republican alike.
Plus,The Independent Lieberman has got to have some dirty money on him, so where is the FBI?
Finally, if Lieberman cries for help, throw him both ends of the rope.
Bought and paid for by the
Fri, 10/30/2009 - 22:39 β Greg Field (not verified)Lieberman. Let's see, he
Thu, 11/05/2009 - 14:43 β Anonymous (not verified)