News

First-Ever Layoffs Loom at Postal Service

»

by: David Yao, Labor Notes

photo
The US Postal Service faces the first-ever layoff of career employees. (Photo: CNN)

    The U.S. Postal Service faces a serious financial shortfall that is accelerating reductions in its workforce and raising the possibility of the first-ever layoffs of career employees.

    Reduced mail volume, rising costs, and a newly enacted cap on rate increases all have taken a toll on the Postal Service's finances. A gradual shift to electronic communications and bill payment is shrinking the number of first-class letters, a mainstay of postal revenues. And the current economic downturn has led to drops in advertising mail volume.

    Increasing fuel prices have been a big factor in worsening postal finances, compounded by a legal restriction enacted two years ago against raising the price of most services beyond the rate of inflation. The cap on rate increases was a major victory for the big mailing industry, but combined with rising costs, it has seriously squeezed the postal budget.

    Unionized postal workers have not yet experienced layoffs, which have been confined to casual employees, a small percentage of the workforce.

    But Postmaster General John Potter, after reporting losses of $2.3 billion in the fiscal year ending September 30, informed the unions that 16,000 craft employees (out of approximately 600,000) are not protected by contractual, seniority-based no-layoff clauses.

    The Postal Service is offering early retirement which, based on acceptance rates thus far, will have around 7,000 takers. In early 2009, when the number of early retirees will be known and income can be assessed for the traditionally profitable fourth quarter, there's a chance that the first layoffs of craft employees may occur.

    Day Shift Endangered

    Cost pressures are having other effects. Most of the sorting and processing of mail already occurs between 3 p.m. and 6 a.m. But, without notice to the affected unions, postal plant managers have been told to plan for ending day shift operations. If implemented, this would force thousands of clerks (represented by American Postal Workers Union) and mailhandlers (National Postal Mailhandlers Union) out of the more desirable day-shift assignments.

    The elimination of daytime jobs would disrupt the family lives and the physical health of those displaced, mostly high-seniority workers. APWU President Bill Burrus has speculated that this action is partly aimed at pushing them to retire.

    One proposal to recoup costs would be to ask Congress for an exception to the rate cap, pointing to the cost of fuel. However, one union president has cautioned that too big an increase might further reduce business and drive the shift to e-communication.

    The situation may encourage management, or the U.S. government, to push for more subcontracting or privatization, areas of longstanding battles with the unions. For example, the Postal Service recently asked for bids from private companies to outsource work carried out by its network of bulk mail centers. Unions have responded by pushing for favorable legislation, and by pointing out the disagreements on privatization between major-party candidates in the presidential and congressional elections.

    Postal workers have been relatively immune from the concessions that have hit other industries. We now face a set of circumstances, termed "a perfect storm" by Burrus, that will challenge the ability of the unions to protect postal jobs, pay, and working conditions.

    -------

    David Yao is vice president of the Greater Seattle Area Local APWU.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

First, we've got to GET

First, we've got to GET Obama elected, and after that, be sure that he is crystal-clear on the fact that most Americans don't want their legitimate governmental functions privatized! The privatizers would probably go out and hire a private police force to patrol their city...at least in their own sheltered enclaves! A pox on all of them!

First, USPS is still an

First, USPS is still an agency, that hasn't changed. And although they CAN make a profit in some areas (mainly parcel services), they haven't and won't given the recent burden of 5.6 billion each year for the next ten years to fully fund their retirees health benefit. USPS still has some of the cheapest rates in the world. Second, while Burrus has some good points, he has essentially overseen the creation of a two tiered wage system, foregoing getting protection of everyone against layoffs, and instead focusing on wage increases. Those 16,000 people who might be affected by the layoffs have been sold down the river by the union management. Third, the best hope is that when Obama gets elected, we can changed a number of the board members of the USPS from the "privitize now" outlook to the "universal service" outlook. The only reasons the USPS is running a deficit is because the bulk mailing rates were intentially set too low by the privization crowd, AND the 5.6 billion being put into escrow.

not to worry, there will

not to worry, there will still be jobs for the relatives and political cronies.

Why can't the "Postal

Why can't the "Postal Service" be returned to being a government agency? The whole idea of having a legitimate governmental service reduced to being a for-profit corporation is ludicrous. Not everyone can afford a home computer and the expensive monthly fees for Internet access; some of us only have access at work, during break times. The delivery of mail is too important to be done as a for-profit business; it should return to being a function of government.

"another brick in the wall".

"another brick in the wall".