Share

More Than 30,000 Registered Coloradans Barred From Voting

by: Naomi Zeveloff  |  The Colorado Independent

photo
Election judge Donna Sanders-Woolfolk checks her mail-in ballot count. (Photo: David Zalubowski / AP)

    Thousands of Coloradans have been denied the right to vote because of a policy that may violate federal law.

    Colorado Secretary of State Mike Coffman has authorized county clerks to purge newly registered voters under the so-called 20-day rule. Here, county clerks must send non-forwardable letters to newly registered voters. If the mail bounces back to the clerks, then they must remove the voter applicants' names from the rolls.

    Voting rights advocates say that the policy violates the 1965 National Voting Rights Act. The Advancement Project, a voter protection organization, filed suit on behalf of several other groups against Coffman to halt the practice and reverse course on other voter purges. According to the suit, 3,291 of these 20-day applicants have been removed since August 2007.

    "We consider these voters to have been registered when they are entered into the SCORE database," Jenny Flanagan, executive director of Colorado Common Cause told the Colorado Independent, referring to the state's new voter database. "They have met the other requirements for registrations and they are taken off when the cards are returned. There are examples of when there could have been an error."

    Individuals ejected by the 20-day rule are among the 30,000 purged voters that make up the basis of the lawsuit. According to the complaint, Coffman also canceled duplicate registrations and registrations of people who moved. The NVRA specifies that the state may only cancel three types of voters within 90 days of a federal election: deceased people, felony convicts, and those who withdraw their own names.

    Flanagan, who is also a plaintiff in the case, says that the 20-day rule is subject to human fallacy. A would-be voter might make a mistake on his or her own address on the form. But so could a registrar at the clerk's office when entering the data. Postal employees aren't immune to slip-ups either.

    "We believe that it should not be allowed any time," she says. "There are efforts to protect voters during this election, but there are some long term solutions we are seeking. We want to end this practice of canceling registrations and get the state in compliance with the NVRA."

    The NVRA does allow for voters to be removed from state rolls, but only after county clerks have sent a forwardable mail confirmation and waited two election periods to see whether the voters shows up to vote, according to Sarah Brannon, staff attorney with the Fair Elections Legal Network, a group acting as legal counsel on the lawsuit. "[Applicants] can't be removed within 20 days," she says.

    Brannon says that the 20-day rule doesn't disproportionately affect one population or another. But a Colorado Independent report published earlier this month showed that homeless people in particular are impacted by the legislation. Many homeless voters register using shelters or day centers as their mailing address. Counties send confirmation forms to these locations. But if homeless people don't turn up within a week or two to pick up the mail, shelters typically return it to the sender. Which means that the homeless individuals are struck from the rolls.

    Colorado isn't the only state with a 20-day rule on the books. In Michigan, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Advancement Project - the same group bringing forward the suit in Colorado - successfully challenged a similar law; the state was ordered to stop purging voters whose confirmation cards were returned to county clerks.

    The case will be heard on Wednesday afternoon.

    Coffman's office did not return repeated requests for comment. He has defended his purges in the past; Attorney General John Suthers has also backed Coffman, saying that the cancellations did not violate the NVRA.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Funny thing. Mike Coffman, a

Funny thing. Mike Coffman, a Republican, was Chief Counsel to former Republican Gov Bill Owens and works closely with the current Republican Gov Bill Ritter. Coffman was directly elected to his current office. 10 min on Google to let the non-Coloradans among us know that Republicans in Colorado are doing their best to see to it that the unwashed lower sorts don't mess up rule by proper respectable folks by voting. Could the rather late start on this "cleansing" of voter registrations have been deliberate? Nah...

First, Bill Ritter is a

First, Bill Ritter is a Democrat, not a Republican. He's VERY democrat. Second, they are following state law. The law needs to be modified to accommodate all voters. I imagine it will happen.

Update to this story: In a

Update to this story: In a late night settlement between the Colorado Secretary of State and voting rights advocates, the 30,000 purged voters will be able to cast provisional ballots. Read more at http://www.coloradoindependent.com Wendy Norris Managing Editor The Colorado Independent

Colorado is a swing state,

Colorado is a swing state, and has been a jewel in the republican's drawer for a good while. It is easy to see why they want to prevent a fair vote.

A l1ttle something from

A l1ttle something from "Video the Vote"" Video the Vote is a nonprofit organization that employs a network of citizen journalists to capture polling place problems on Election Day. The organization works on both an assignment desk and platform model: people can submit videos to their website, and Video the Vote also contacts individuals in their network and dispatches them to document troubles as they arise in precincts across the country. Already, they are documenting issues in machine technology glitches, and are seeing long lines at several polling places. We're working with several Election Protection partners both to highlight issues in election fraud but also to encourage voters to document their voting experience no matter what the result. This will be the most-documented election in history, and we encourage people to submit their videos to our Video Your Vote channel on YouTube, at youtube.com/videoyourvote.

People have died for the

People have died for the right, not the privilege to vote. It should be a capital crime to steal anyones vote. After this election, we should be looking very hard at the people who think they are above the rights of their fellow man. I think they should be taken to the court house and have justice explained to them the hard way.

Are any of these people

Are any of these people guilty of civil law in their actions? These kinds of efforts are not being done in "good faith" but are an undisguised attempt to manipulate an election and deny people their Constitutional rights to vote and participate. -- Can a denied individual sue individually and collectively? --- These "public offic8ials" are actuing unethically, regardless of this supposed effort to "prevent voter fraud. That certainly seems clear enough -- "EHAT FRAUD CAN THEY SHOW??"

To get information on the

To get information on the 1965 National Voting Rights Act go to:www.usdoj.gov/crt/voting/intro/intro_b.php Colorado Secretary of State Mike Coffman has indeed violated this law and it looks like the "Grand Old Party" the party that gave America Abe Lincoln and ended slavery is the same party that then proceeded to embrace bigots of every stripe. When you read the text of this law you will note that the GOP has embraced the very same tactics of the segregationist South. If all else fails, the 30,000 who have disenfranchised in Colorado should show up, after making sure the press knows about it, to demand the right to vote: NO VOTE, NO PEACE! Maybe this can get the rest of disenfranchised across the nation to follow suit. Enough is enough, no?

Well, I guess we all know

Well, I guess we all know which party this will benefit. The muddle of it all will continue, of course, until the election has come and gone. Seems this sort of thing always is reported in some key state where the candidates are running fairly close in the polls. Similar problems were reported in half a dozen other "swing" states some weeks ago. And it's never well-to-do Republicans who ever are disenfranchised--more like the homeless as described in the story above, perhaps some who have lost their homes and moved in with relatives, etc. No fat-cat status-quo sorts among them, that's for sure! Appears too few people have control over too many votes every election year beginning in 2000 when Bush stole Florida. This bit in the story seems to cover the situation: "The NVRA specifies that the state may only cancel three types of voters within 90 days of a federal election: deceased people, felony convicts, and those who withdraw their own names."

It's always the Republicans

It's always the Republicans who are trying to stop voter registration drives and remove voters from the poles. This kind of fraud ought to be treason.

The major problem here is

The major problem here is Coffman and Suthers are Republicans seeing theirs as endangered species and so like McCain have surpassed every level of low in panicked desperation to maintain a seat at the big table

If ya can't win 'em. purge

If ya can't win 'em. purge 'em == that's been the Republican shtick since 2000. Since their data bases are no more accurate than their voting machines, who's to say what a no-match really indicates -- a typo somewhere? Only Republicans claim perfection for themselves and conspiracy for everyone else. There's a diagnosis for that -- paranoia. Do we want those crazies continuing to run the country further into the dumps?

Is this what they call

Is this what they call "democracy" in the USA???

In my talks with Coffman he

In my talks with Coffman he stressed that he was only trying to prevent voter fraud. I asked him if there had ever been a case of voter fraud in Colorado. He said he didn't know of any. He is trying to fix a non-existent problem. Elections should be run by non-partisan officials. Colorado is overdue for a constitutional change. If he wins the congressional seat he is campaigning for then hopefully the governor will appoint State Senator Ken Gordon to replace him. Ken's honesty is unmatched.

The Republican folk have

The Republican folk have turned their campaign and the whole US election process into an international CIRCUS!!