Share

It's Liberty at Stake in a Warming World

by: William H. Luers and Amy L. Luers  |  GlobalPost

photo
World negotiations on climate change will be held in Copenhagen this December. (Photo: Wrote / flickr)

New York and Berkeley, California — President Barack Obama opened a new chapter in America’s role in solving global problems in his speech to the U.N. General Assembly. By calling for the U.S. to re-engage in the global community, he has set us on a new course to preserve American liberty. The preservation of liberty has been the most powerful unifying political commitment for generations of Americans. With global warming, the threats to our liberty are now tied more than ever before to the actions of all nations. The climate change negotiations in Copenhagen this December and in D.C. provide a critical opportunity for the U.S. to start down this new path.

Many of us in the United States have not personally experienced the absence of liberty nor the fear of political insecurity. Yet, if we do not act quickly to address global warming, our children and grandchildren will likely confront these challenges with increasing constraints on their choices and their well-being. Decisions underlying our children’s liberty can no longer be governed simply by election cycles. These decisions are upon us today and they cannot wait.

We write this as father and daughter, with different windows on global issues: one with a 50-year career in diplomacy, the other with a 20-year career in environmental science. Despite our diverse backgrounds, we both see climate change as the biggest and most challenging threat on the horizon to American values and liberty.

The struggles for liberty and global security in the 20th century were rooted largely in the oppression within and the conflicts with the closed societies of ideologically driven despotisms — of Fascism, Nazism and Communism.

In the 21st century, the battlefields will be staggeringly more complex. Rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns are already decreasing water availability, reducing air quality, and increasing frequency of floods, droughts and wildfires. If climate change continues unabated, these changes will greatly affect our children’s choices on where they live, what they eat and, most likely, how they are governed and the wars they fight.

The ingenuity of the U.S. and the global community has led to advancements in science and technology that have enabled us to tackle tremendous challenges in the past. We must harness this ingenuity; however, we cannot wait for the scientific or technological breakthrough that could solve climate change. The changes that humans are inflicting on our Earth are destabilizing our life support system. Once this is broken, we may never be able to fix it.

To address the increasingly complex needs of security and liberty, we need international cooperation at a level never imagined in the past. As climate change takes its toll over the coming decades there is no individual future of liberty and no individual national future of security. Security and liberty will be determined by the global community.

After the fall of the Berlin wall, the United States could have chosen to join other nations in building new collective strategies to respond to global challenges. At that moment, the U.S. had the opportunity to deploy its commitment to help the world prepare for these new challenges and preserve liberty in the 21st century. Instead the U.S. chose to continue to deploy liberty as the warrior — as the liberator — rather than collaborator.

If our children are to overcome the hurdles of liberty in this century we will need to cultivate a role for the U.S. as a collaborator and not as the liberator. However, Americans face a particular challenge in taking on this role. Some argue that climate policies represent yet another subterfuge of the state to curb the liberty of individual citizens.

This very American obsession with individual liberty has been an obstacle for the U.S. in playing a leadership role on global issues. Following WWII, the U.S. was the evangelist of international law, agreements and organizations; however, in recent years, we have increasingly operated as a "lone ranger."

The unique American experience with liberty has magnified our obsession with the sanctity of our national sovereignty. The United States has chosen to avoid agreements that would limit individual freedoms. The U.S. Congress has not ratified a treaty for decades and presidents regularly opt out of international negotiations.

Yet, at the U.N. General Assembly, President Obama pledged a reversal of the U.S. spiral into selfish survival. President Obama and the U.S. Congress together must seize the moment at Copenhagen and in Washington to make good on this pledge and establish the U.S. as the credible leader for the preservation of liberty for future generations.

    --------

    William Luers was the American Ambassador to Czechoslovakia and Venezuela and Dr. Amy Luers is a climate scientist and Environmental Program Manager at Google.org. All the views stated here are her own.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

With the release of "An

With the release of "An Inconvenient Truth" in 2006, former Vice President Gore began regularly citing REVELATION 11:18 in his public appearances: "The time has come..for destroying those who destroy the Earth." It has been pointed out by Chip Berlet and others that "Sarah Palin is a 'Dominionist' with an apocalyptic End Times theological viewpoint that sees the war in Iraq as God's plan." If Gov. Palin and her fellow evangelicals are correct that we have indeed arrived at the End of Days, then it would also seem to be God's plan to get rid of "Dominionists" and every other brand of Christian complicit in the destruction of Mother Earth. Perhaps they should heed the warning of Amos: "Woe to you who desire the Day of the Lord!"

A strong contender for this

A strong contender for this year's Orwell Award: Slavery is Liberty! Security is Surrender! Collectivism is Freedom! All hail the EnviroNazi Future!

The is no greater threat to

The is no greater threat to the freedom of U.S. Citizens than the believers in the Global Warming Hoax. Search under GLOBAL COOLING and read the entries quoting both NOAA, and NASA data which clearly show that the earth peaked in temperature in 1998; was about flat from ''98 to ;02 and has ben cooling ever since. This cooling is happening even though the concentration of CO2 has risen from roughly 125 PPM to over 250 ppm (which is equivalent to putting a teaspoon of water into an oOlympic size swimming pool.

"not personally experienced

"not personally experienced the absence of liberty" Possibly you are unfamiliar with the concept of negative liberty, in the words of Hobbes ""a free man is he that in those things which by his strength and wit he is able to do is not hindered to do what he hath the will to do." The American absence of liberty lies far closer to home. In the viral nature of local ordinances, administrative and civil code and the civil "servants" that interpret it. Attempt to employ say rain water catchments in Colorado, or build a rammed earth structure within an incorporated area and you will soon find that freedom from interference even in pursuit of meeting the challenges of climate change with over engineering the best intentions and practices are not enough. Zoning, The International Building and Maintenance Codes, ect are really about job security for bureaucrats, the professions that wrote them, the banks and insurance companies that really own our abodes and the building industries that have transformed our homes into glue, plastic and petroleum byproducts. This sector of our society is a primary means to reduce our impact but innovation is stifled. These laws, largely hidden from the public, arbitrarily interpreted and enforced, with fines of $1000 or 90 days in jail for each and every day outside of compliance are a major impediment to those that would actually invest the time energy and effort to lessen their impact. Go ahead try to build a traditional masonry building, I dare you.

Why does this article seem

Why does this article seem so remarkably void of real meaning? All the "right words" are there, but seemingly as decorations. And some of them are more disturbing than others, like 'Liberty'. What does liberty mean in the US today? Well, everybody can say "I hate the government", but that is about all. Only some groups - the Special Interests = the corporations - can DO something, and they are the factual rulers of the country. They have bought the US political system. The Congress-people are paid to make laws that serve the corporations and some rich people, not laws that protect individual liberty for everybody. A political system founded on bribery (AKA 'campaign contributions') will be a very frail instrument for the fixing that is ahead. The US congress of today has shown itself unable to get some of the most urgent tasks done, like creating a health care system for the whole population. Having this example in mind, it sounds ridiculous to go on ranting about the US playing a 'leading role' in the world for this and that. If the US still have some serious people in power, they ought to stop 'leading the world' and start tidying up at home. There are issues galore to take on, starting with the countrywide pollution and proceeding to eliminate lobbyism from the political system. Then, maybe someday the US could be a role model, showing the world BY EXAMPLE how to repair things, rather than meddling into other countries' affairs. Or maybe it is already to late, maybe the US is beyond fixable.

It's time to take another

It's time to take another look at the case for man made global warming. This is an issue that is not agreed on by all scientists and temperature data collected over the past ten years contradicts the predictions. Before we jump on this international band wagon that will 'globalize' us even more we need to take a better look at the issue.

"another look"indeed, its

"another look"indeed, its time to take a good close look at exactly who is attacking science, cherry picking data and misrepresenting legitimate scientific skepticism to further their own ends. The science is sound, the observed phenomena predicted and accelerating and the consequences dire. We are changing the basic chemistry of the world's oceans, experiencing the 6th major mass extinction event, desertification has accelerated 15>25% since 1990, climatic and ecological anomalies are rampant and we have phased changed a massive amount of ice and water. Scientifically the debate is over, its moved on to the consequences, socially the issue is manipulated for political advantage. Politics which will do little to actually meet the challenge, social change is rarely driven by government, but rather by the populace. The consequences are now, either learn how to sort the truth or make way for those that can.

CO2 does not cause as severe

CO2 does not cause as severe deformities as endocrine disruptors cause. Life is made of carbon, as many learned in school science. Yet Michael Taylor, one of the revolving-door insiders appointed by Obama to a position of power, is closely connected to an elite of the revolving-door that protects harmful monopolies and subsidy-takers. A principal advocate of the ways of ag-biz is supposed to be making our food safe. Insofar as ag-biz can get their spokespeople paid by the government to spread pr stories that portray them as caring about people, we are distracted from the genetic damage and lung damage from big-ag, big-chem, big-pharm, big energy and big banking. They are practitioners of strategic lawsuits against participation (SLAP's) and of obfuscation as opposed to transparency. They have profited from special privileges they have wrung from government and its abilities to use force with impunity against little people. A small percentage of our population will watch Kristof on the Colbert Report and take measures to protect themselves by buying water filters or moving to places with safer air. But some of those who hear these warnings do not have the resources to protect themselves. Mercury and endocrine disruptors scare people. Carbon not so much. Animals change oxygen into carbon dioxide, which benefits plants where there is a balance between plants and animals. D.C., where fish in the Potomac illustrate the damage so graphically, is not a place in balance.

We should all be extremely

We should all be extremely scared by the fact that the last time CO2 was this high, temperatures were 10 to 15 degrees hotter. If only about 1 degree of change has been enough to melt the Arctic ice, melt glaciers all over the world, cause increased droughts and fires in many places, and kill off half of the coral reefs, just wait until we feel the full effect of the CO2 we have released, much less what we are still releasing. Believe me, liberty will not be the first thing on our minds as we struggle to survive through the resulting famines, mass migrations, suffering and death. The scientists have been warning us for more than 20 years, yet virtually nobody takes them seriously. Your children, grandchildren, and other ancestors will blame you for ruining their world, if they survive long enough to have children of their own. I hope there is a record of the people spreading global warming denier lies so that people in the future will know who to blame.