Share

TARP on Steroids

by: David Sirota, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

photo
(Photo: f-l-e-x / flickr)

I recall that September day like it was yesterday — the explosion so stunning, so memorable. It wasn't 9/11/01, it was 9/29/08 — a moment when a rare blast of populist democracy briefly singed the economic terrorists who hold the Capitol hostage.

It had been a dark and stormy month of financial collapse, culminating in an attempted power grab. Pushed by his fellow Wall Street Ponzi schemers, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson — a former Goldman Sachs CEO - was threatening Armageddon unless Congress ratified his pamphlet-sized decree for a no-strings-attached bank bailout. The straightforward proposal, backed by President George W. Bush and President-to-be Barack Obama, would have turned Paulson into King Henry — a despot allowed to autonomously dole out $700 billion to any of his business cronies.

This was too outrageous even for a rubber-stamp Congress that had long been ceding power to both the executive branch and the corporate boardroom. And so rank-and-file House Democrats and Republicans, backed by an angry public, overrode their leaders and voted down the measure.

Admittedly, the conflagration was brief. After a few days of industry lobbying, the House ultimately passed the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) bailout — but one with at least some mild restrictions. For a time, 9/29’s fleeting blast of defiance appeared to establish a maximum limit to robbery and presidential authoritarianism.

For a time.

Today, the episode — if considered at all in Washington — seems merely to have set minimum standards for chicanery. As evidenced by two little-noticed sections of the Obama administration's Wall Street "reform" bill, presidents and their bank benefactors are back to thinking they can pilfer whatever they want — only now they have learned to camouflage their demands by burying them in the esoterica of lengthier bills.

Finding this latest giveaway means digging all the way down to sections 1109 and 1604 of the White House's mammoth proposal. These passages look like typical legislative asterisks — perfunctory "oh, by the ways" inserted by some overeager law school intern in the Treasury Department's basement as a matter of meaningless parliamentary etiquette.

They are anything but.

At a recent hearing, Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., called the language "TARP on steroids," noting the provisions would deliberately let the executive branch enact even bigger, more unregulated bailouts than ever — and by unilateral fiat.

Whereas the original TARP included some oversight language and power to limit Wall Street bonuses, TARP on Steroids includes no specific oversight or executive pay constraints. Whereas TARP permitted the government to underwrite both small and large banks, TARP on Steroids allows taxpayer cash to go only to the behemoths (which, not coincidentally, tend to make the biggest campaign contributions). And whereas TARP limited the Treasury Secretary's check-writing authority to two years and $700 billion, TARP on Steroids would let him spend as much as he wants for as long as he wants.

This last point is what poker players call "the tell" — the inadvertent tip exposing a scam. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's tell came when he publicly said the Obama administration would oppose amendments limiting the new bailout power — even if the limit was a $1 trillion cap.

The former financial executives inside the Obama administration have labeled their bill the "Financial Stability Improvement Act," and some might say that's like Bush officials oxymoronically calling their own anti-environment initiatives a "Clear Skies" agenda. But that's not a totally fair comparison because there’s an underlying consistency here: While these new “financial stability” powers may destabilize the nation's finances, they would more than stabilize Wall Street’s larcenous profits.

That thievery, of course, has been the big problem all along — and now, only another 9/29 can prevent it from getting worse.

---------

David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books "Hostile Takeover" and "The Uprising." He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com.

Copyright 2009 Creators.Com

  

»


David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books "Hostile Takeover" and "The Uprising." He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

We seem to be witnessing the

We seem to be witnessing the spectacle of the rich growing exponentially richer as a direct result of TARP. Meanwhile, those of us who labor under what Oscar Wilde called "the curse of the drinking classes" (work) are getting pushed closer and closer to the edge of a precipice the height of which nobody can gauge. As a worker in his early sixties who just may pull off some sort of retirement if I am lucky, I can see very clearly how screwed many of my coevals are under the present system and how much more screwed the masses of younger workers must be by comparison. The screwing process started happening at least as early as 1971 (remember the Nixon recession?) and hasn't let up significantly since. When, I wonder, is anyone at Truthout or Salon going to tolerate a discussion that points straightforwardly at the big gorilla of class warfare that is squatting in the middle of the collapsing social tent, having knocked all the props out from under it? This isn't just one among many issues, nor is it something that can most usefully be countered by emotional "blasts" of moralistic "populist" outrage. It's the only issue--always has been and always will be. It has to be approached with cold, calculating analysis and long-term strategy, on an international basis. Thank you, David Sirota, for pointing out the obvious. That takes extraordinary brains and courage in these times. Now tell us the whole truth and become a real leader. (In the interests of full disclosure: I am not a member of any party or political organization except the Democratic Party, in which I have never had much faith.)

Same ol' same ol'. Nothing

Same ol' same ol'. Nothing has changed since "civilization" was created. There is always some selfish bastard out there, and unfortunately, there are way to many suckers to believe his snake-oil pitch. Perhaps if Man evolves(which the snake-oil salesmen try there best NOT to let happen), this can be a world of peace and beauty. Perhaps I dream too much. Alas.

It is as if we were all hog

It is as if we were all hog tied while these bastards are ransacking our property.