Ellsberg: Obama Fears Military Revolt
Monday 02 November 2009
by: Sari Gelzer, t r u t h o u t | Report

(Photo Illustration: Troy Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted from: Steve Rhodes, sugarmelon.com, The U.S. Army)
Ellsberg: Leaked Pentagon Papers from Vietnam give clues to why Obama will most likely grant military requests to send more troops to Afghanistan.
Paul Jay, senior producer of The Real News Network, interviewed former military analyst and Pentagon whistle-blower Daniel Ellsberg about the common thread between the conflict in Afghanistan and the war in Vietnam.
Like Vietnam, Ellsberg said "no victory lies ahead [for the US] in Afghanistan" and President Barack Obama knows it.
Still, Ellsberg believes Obama will "go against his own instincts as to what's best for the country and do what's best for him and his administration and his party in the short run facing elections, which is to avoid a military revolt."
That means the president will likely authorize a sizable increase of US forces in the region, Ellsberg said, because Obama fears that top US military commanders will stage a revolt if he rejects their requests for additional soldiers.
Click here to watch Daniel Ellsberg on The Real News.
Ellsberg predicted that Obama will cave in to Gen. Stanley McCrystal's request for as many as 40,000 US troops in order to, "prevent his military from making a political case to his public and to the Congress that he has been weak, unmanly, indecisive, and weak on terrorism, and has endangered American troops."
The Pentagon Papers, which Ellberg leaked to The New York Times in 1971, made public the decision-making details behind the Vietnam War. Ellsberg chose to leak the highly-sensitive papers because they revealed that the government was continuing the Vietnam War despite knowing it would not likely be won.
As revealed in the Pentagon Papers, Ellsberg said that President Lyndon B. Johnson chose to go along with increasing US troops in Vietnam: "To keep the military from resigning and going public with complaints that he had abandoned a winnable war."
President Obama's decision to shield himself from a military revolt, as Johnson chose to do in 1965, will take place at the expense of US troops and Afghani civilians, said Ellsberg.
"Many Americans, many Afghans will die in order to protect the president from that kind of blame," Ellsberg said.
Ellsberg, who used to write about what is now known as counterinsurgency theory, critiqued General McChrystal's approach to Afghanistan. Sending more troops to Afghanistan, said Ellsberg, will only increase the Taliban's strength. Ellsberg said:
"The more troops we put in Vietnam, the more Vietcong were recruited. And, the more troops we put in Afghanistan, the curve shows very clearly from 2005 on, the Taliban has come back having been, as you say, despised and reviled by most of the country. How can it be that they get the degree of support that they do now? One reason only: the number of troops, of US troops that they are fighting."



Comments
This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.
The military must be
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 18:54 β Anonymous (not verified)Chillin, tragic. Fire
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 19:02 β Anonymous (not verified)If the military are brought
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 19:04 β Anonymous (not verified)some folks need transcript
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 19:06 β NYCartist (not verified)As much of the top military
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 19:07 β Linda (not verified)OK, so what if our wars cost
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 19:20 β BillyDoc (not verified)I find it humorous that
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 20:24 β Anonymous (not verified)The military (and their
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 20:25 β Anonymous (not verified)JFK was going to end the war
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 21:00 β bang (not verified)I don't know when the
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 21:00 β elizabeth Bishop (not verified)Barack Obama, as
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 21:11 β Anonymous (not verified)Oh, I get it, now our poor
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 22:44 β Peter Edler (not verified)We have been beholden to the
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 23:03 β Anonymous (not verified)I agree with Harry Truman.
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 23:05 β liznandy (not verified)This and the previous
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 23:17 β AnonymousDV (not verified)We need the executive to
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 23:23 β Anonymous (not verified)IΒ΄m starting to think Obama
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 23:32 β Anonymous (not verified)The President is commander-
Mon, 11/02/2009 - 23:46 β Anonymous (not verified)President Obama is
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 00:08 β Anonymous (not verified)Chill out, Truthouters. We
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 00:18 β Robert Pool (not verified)No additional troops
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 00:34 β Anonymous (not verified)It is time to withdraw our
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 01:26 β Devon J. Noll, MPA (not verified)We have been beholden to the
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 02:16 β Anonymous (not verified)When the 20th century is
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 02:27 β eh, I'm not surprised (not verified)If Congress won't stop the
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 02:40 β Anonymous (not verified)Einstein said that if 2% of
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 02:46 β Anonymous (not verified)Someone in here has already
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 03:18 β Anonymous (not verified)" Ellsberg chose to leak the
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 03:26 β Anonymous (not verified)We have been beholden to the
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 03:41 β Anonymous (not verified)President Obama needs to
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 05:04 β Anonymous (not verified)It is unreasonable to expect
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 05:26 β Anonymous (not verified)The comment starting with
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 05:28 β Anonymous (not verified)I so wish someone would
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 08:00 β borisjimbo (not verified)Obama's Hobson's choice -
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 11:36 β Realist (not verified)Most in the US thinks it's
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 13:55 β Anonymous (not verified)How surprising and
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 14:01 β Julia (not verified)Our massive, bloated
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 14:51 β sharonsj (not verified)I appreciate what Devon J.
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 15:26 β Howard Christofersen, M. D. (not verified)I have a different
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 17:51 β Paul Meuse (not verified)To Anonymous 13:55... "Now
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 18:20 β AnonymousDV (not verified)Let Kazakhstan do it!
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 20:14 β Anarchist 23 (not verified)The object of the war in
Tue, 11/03/2009 - 23:29 β Richard Cummings (not verified)This is UTTER GOOBLY-GOOP.
Wed, 11/04/2009 - 00:22 β Anonymous (not verified)Remember kids... This
Wed, 11/04/2009 - 01:06 β Anon (not verified)There is no way our military
Wed, 11/04/2009 - 05:17 β jdsindc (not verified)Again, this is great news -
Wed, 11/04/2009 - 09:18 β Peter Edler (not verified)Bizzarro world again.
Wed, 11/04/2009 - 14:00 β radline9 (not verified)As retired military, I do
Thu, 11/05/2009 - 12:25 β HighPlainsJoker (not verified)Let's not forget β Obama
Thu, 11/05/2009 - 15:49 β Cliff (not verified)The writer of the book Home
Sun, 11/08/2009 - 01:01 β Retired Officer (not verified)Stupid, stupid, stupid.
Mon, 11/09/2009 - 17:05 β Anonymous (not verified)We don't need an army or
Sat, 11/14/2009 - 16:37 β Anonymous (not verified)