Share

The Next Phase of Health Care Apartheid

by: Norman Solomon, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

photo
(Photo Illustration: Ionia K. / t r u t h o u t)

In Washington, "health care reform" has degenerated into a sick joke.

At this point, only spinners who've succumbed to their own vertigo could use the word "robust" to describe the public option in the health care bill that the House Democratic leadership has sent to the floor.

"A main argument was that a public plan would save people money," The New York Times has noted. But the insurance industry - claiming to want a level playing field - has gotten the Obama administration to bulldoze the plan. "After House Democratic leaders unveiled their health care bill [on October 29], the Congressional Budget Office said the public plan would cost more than private plans and only 6 million people would sign up."

At its best, "the public option" was a weak remedy for the disastrous ailments of the health care system in the United States. But whatever virtues the public option may have offered were stripped from the bill en route to the House floor.

What remains is a Rube Goldberg contraption that will launch this country into a new phase of health care apartheid.

People who scrape together enough money to buy health insurance will discover that they're riding in the back of the nation's health care bus. The most "affordable" policies will be the ones with the highest deductibles and the worst coverage.

We're hearing that large numbers of lower-income Americans will be provided with Medicaid coverage in the next decade. Translation: If funding holds up, they'll get to hang onto a bottom rung of the health care ladder. Many will not be able to get the medical help they need, from primary care providers or specialists.

Not long ago, we were told that the Obama administration was aiming for a public option that could provide coverage to one out of every four Americans. Now the figure is around one out of every fifty.

Not long ago, the idea was that taxpayer-funded subsidies were to be used only for the public option. But now the entire concept has been hijacked by and for the private insurance industry. As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi put it on October 8, private insurance companies "are going to get 50 million new consumers, many of them subsidized by the taxpayers."

Pelosi was making the argument that the least the insurance industry could do, in return, would be to accept a higher level of taxation. But her comment was a telling acknowledgment that all the "public option" proposals now provide a massive funnel from the US Treasury to the insurance conglomerates. The individual mandate is a monumental giveaway to private insurance firms.

The specter of "health care reform" that requires individuals to stretch their personal finances for often abysmal insurance coverage is the worst of all worlds - government intrusion for corporate benefit without any guarantees of decent health coverage.

In effect, the individual-mandate requirement tells people that obtaining health coverage is ultimately their own responsibility - and the quality of the coverage is beside the point. In essence, when it comes to guaranteeing quality health care for all, the gist of the policy is: "Let's not, and say we did."

The predictable result is reinforcement of vast - and often deadly - inequities in access to health care.

With Washington making such a corporate mess of "health care reform," the best way to get what we need - health care for all as a human right - will be to enact single-payer health care in one state after another.

But the House Democratic leadership has not been content to serve up a grimly pathetic "health care reform" bill. Speaker Pelosi has used her political leverage to quash Congressman Dennis Kucinich's amendment - approved months ago by the Education and Labor Committee - that would grant waivers so that states could create their own single-payer system. Pelosi removed the Kucinich amendment from the House bill.

The California legislature has twice passed a strong single-payer bill, both times vetoed by the state's current execrable governor. The official position of the California Democratic Party is unequivocally in favor of single-payer health care. And yet, Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, did what she could to sabotage the single-payer position of her own party in her own state.

Sickening.

  

»


Norman Solomon is co-chair of the national Healthcare NOT Warfare campaign, launched by Progressive Democrats of America. He is the author of a dozen books including "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death." For more information, go to: www.normansolomon.com.

Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

It iS sickening. Just

It iS sickening. Just think, too, what Speaker Pelosi's quashing has done to millions of lower income women across this country. I am truly sorry I voted for her in her earlier years climbing the political ladder in Northern California. She has become a real "aristocrat", along with her presidential elections campaign rhetoric about "the little people" and their shenanigans. All I can say is that I won't be supporting any Democrat who is not a strong single payer proponent, with a record of putting their money where their mouth is -- on votes and amendments and single payer bills in Congress. The Democrats, with Nancy's latest move, have effectively cut off the feet that walked them into office. Without true health care reform, I am truly waving them good-bye. It makes little difference now if a Republican administration moves in, or takes over Congress, to me -- because there is virtually no difference between any of them.

Nancy is the right's

Nancy is the right's darling. She is their flaming sword through the heart of health care. On some of the right wing forums, they are dancing jigs over this. And I say, let them dance away. They are completely right about it, Nancy. I wonder what she used to talk about with George and Dick when she stepped off her throne from time to time to chat with them privately.

Mandates: the new tax code?

Mandates: the new tax code? Traditionally, if legislators decided that something was essential for our nation's citizens, they would provide it with funds raised via the progressive tax system. Congress could have done that with health care, either by providing care directly or by giving each citizen a voucher to purchase a minimal insurance policy. Those who wished could pay more out of pocket for a more comprehensive, and expensive plan. The health insurance mandate, however, bypasses our progressive tax system. Forcing citizens to pay up to 11% of their income to obtain health insurance is an undue burden on the poor and middle class - the wealthy will only need to spend a tiny fraction of their income. Will this become a new precedent for our nation's tax system? Health insurance mandates today - what will be mandated tomorrow?

I always enjoy Norman's

I always enjoy Norman's strong viewpoint. So much of what's written by liberals seems academic these days. Sometimes I get the feeling that most of the pieces I read - not this one for sure - are submissions for a high school essay contest. It's time for more writers, like Norman, to kick Congress' fat, golden ass with accuracy and insult. Shaming is what those glittery reputations respond to. Good work, Norman!

Norman, last year you joined

Norman, last year you joined the "Progressive Democrats of America", campaigned vigorously for Obama, and were even a convention delegate for him. In California, where Pelosi is stabbing you and the rest in the back. So how's that PDA strategy working out for you?

tragic!

tragic!

It is quite simply put: the

It is quite simply put: the Democrats have once again done as the corporate leaders, with their excellent coverage, want and led by the nose of whacked out GOP propaganda and lies, the public has allowed their hope of decent health care to die on the vine. Please, Mr. President, VETO this bill! It is bad legislation put together to insure what? The private insurance agency profits? No, it is to insure that the members of Congress do not lose in 2010. You do not VETO this bad legislation, and Americans will realize that once again they have been sold out by those they elected to lead. When that happens, sir, you and your Democratic Party will be voted out of office, either in 2010 or by 2012. VETO this bill, Mr. President, and then go to the American people and tell them the truth - the bill was gutted by Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats and Cowardly members of the party! Tell them that you will keep your promise of good affordable health care comparable to that of Congress, but let the public know that it needs them to vote in a Congress with a backbone and with principles beyond the corporate pocketbook. Please, Mr. President, VETO THIS BILL!!!!

Wow, sobering. I still hold

Wow, sobering. I still hold out hope that a non-profit like this can speak into the debate and help us find a way to serve those who really need it! http://cli.gs/z3AtaY/

Everyone knows what we must

Everyone knows what we must really be doing. Passing single payer legislation so that Medicare is opened up to ALL.

I called my congressman, at

I called my congressman, at the request of one of those Democrat healthcare action .coms, to support him in voting for the current bill. I was told it was something really good and wanted to believe it. But just now, I am getting it that this bill should not be passed unless the Kucinich amentdment is in it. Single-payer is the only way to go, for all. I have it in my state and it is great, makes you feel like a human being. I will never pay for healthcare insurance from the corrupt system of private insurers, fines or no fines. Someone once said in a better moral time, "Liberty or Death." We are all going to die, like it or not, but living free is a choice, and has a price.

Solomon is a hypocrite. He

Solomon is a hypocrite. He supported Obama and hipped scorn on Nader. What did you expected to happen Solomon?