Share

Palin in Spotlight as Republicans Turn on Each Other

by: Oliver Burkeman  |  The Guardian UK

photo
Many Republicans are pointing fingers at Sarah Palin, blaming her for John McCain's loss. (Photo: Reuters)

    As the implosion of the defeated Republican campaign continued yesterday, the landscape of American conservatism was dotted with signs that these were very strange times indeed.

    Rush Limbaugh, behemoth of rightwing radio, took to the airwaves to declare war on two enemies: Barack Obama and the Republican party. Bloggers at FreeRepublic.com, an internet hub for conservatives, announced a boycott of Fox News and John McCain's aides fell over one another to leak embarrassing details about the campaign to the press.

    Liberals, indulging in what the writer Andrew Sullivan termed "Palinfreude", were presented with a smorgasbord, ranging from the tale of how McCain's pro-Palin foreign policy adviser had his Blackberry confiscated in the closing days of the race, to how the party had paid for Todd Palin's silk boxer shorts.

    The fighting consuming the McCain and Palin camps threatened to derail broader efforts to overhaul the Republican party after Tuesday's decisive defeat, for which some insiders blamed Sarah Palin. Veterans of the right gathered in the Shenandoah Valley, Virginia, on Thursday for a summit on the movement's future, but even as they did so, the blame went on.

    "Ladies and gentlemen, it is worse than I thought," Limbaugh told listeners. "What the Republican party, led by disgruntled and failed McCain staffers, is trying to do to Sarah Palin, is unconscionable ... There are country-club, blue-blood ... Republicans who want nothing to do with a firebrand conservative [who] can fire up people." He added: "We're going to be taking on two things here [over] the next four years: Obama, and our own party establishment."

    John Fund, a Wall Street Journal columnist, said he had received multiple calls from campaign aides wanting "to use me as a conduit for their complaints".

    "Some on the McCain campaign staff seem more eager than most to settle scores," he noted.

    The main ammunition in the war was a lengthening list of allegations against Palin: that she thought Africa was a country; that she failed to inform the campaign about a scheduled call with Nicolas Sarkozy which turned out to be a prank; that she refused to undergo coaching prior to her disastrous interviews with CBS anchor Katie Couric; that she couldn't name the three countries in the North America Free Trade Agreement; and that the party had spent up to $70,000 (Β£45,000) on "wardrobe items" for Palin and "luxury goods" for her husband, in addition to the $150,000 already reported. (Some of the claims were revealed by Fox, hence the boycott.)

    The New York Times reported that when Palin met McCain in Phoenix on Tuesday night, she held the text of a speech she planned to deliver, in defiance of campaign convention, and had to be overruled.

    The attacks are partly ideological: some blame Palin and her social-conservative supporters for blunting McCain's appeal to independents, while others believe Palin could be the populist, hawkish figurehead of a revitalised Republican future.

    But there is plenty of self-interest at stake. "This blame game is the consultants - the people who make their living running campaigns and don't want to be blamed, because they need another job," said Al Regnery, publisher of the American Spectator, and former president of Regnery Publishing, the company behind many recent rightwing bestsellers.

    At Thursday's summit, he said, "there was a lot of discussion about these people, who always seem to come back, whether they win or lose, and get paid a lot of money. We said we thought our side would be much better off without them."

    The sniping at Palin has provoked a backlash. One influential website, RedState.com, announced Operation Leper, designed to blacklist campaign staffers believed to be responsible. "We intend to constantly remind the base about these people, monitor who they are working for, and, when 2012 rolls around, see which candidates hire them," it explained.

    There was speculation that the culprits may be former aides to Mitt Romney, positioning their hero for a future presidential run.

    The collapse of the McCain-Palin alliance began long before election day, Steve Schmidt, a senior McCain adviser, speaking to reporters on the candidate's plane, was making little effort to hide his disdain for Palin. Asked if her presence on the ticket had been a disadvantage, he twice refused to answer.

    Randy Scheunemann, McCain's foreign policy chief, this week denied reports that he had been fired in the final stage of the campaign for siding with Palin and leaking "poison" on McCain to the pro-Palin columnist William Kristol. But even one of his allies, Michael Goldfarb, told reporters that Scheunemann's Blackberry had been confiscated in the days before the election.

    Kristol, who in one column advised McCain to "fire" his campaign, scoffed at reports that he had advised Palin. "I'm afraid it shows how paranoid some of these McCain aides have gotten - they should take a good rest after a tough campaign," he told Fox.

    He had met Palin once in his life, he continued, and interviewed her once by phone. "You know why this is really disgusting and disgraceful?" he said. "It's disloyal to John McCain. Who selected Sarah Palin? John McCain. Who defended Sarah Palin for the last three months? John McCain."

    Returning to Alaska, Palin dismissed the criticisms, attributing them to "a small, bitter type of person". Instead, she has emphasised perhaps the only thing that still unites her and her supporters with McCain loyalists: hostility towards the media.

    She had "a little bit of disappointment in my heart about the world of journalism today", she said, while McCain's closest aide, Mark Salter, told Politico: "Maybe if the media had been fair, we still would have lost. But there were two different standards of scrutiny for us and Obama."

    Palin offered to help reporters confront their problems. "I want to ... help restore some credibility there," she said.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

They made their bed, they

They made their bed, they need to lay in it. I'd throw them a rope but I'm fresh out. Back stab away. Sarah Palin's credentials spoke for themselves, with no help from sniping aids undermining her. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. The American people are intelligent enough to see the difference between a solid candidate of any color with a brain cell and world knowledge (heck, he beat Hillary Clinton in the primaries, which was not trivial), and an uninformed folksy governor with lipstick. One folksy governor in office is enough, thank you very much. (Fool me once, etc.)

The fact is that Obama ran a

The fact is that Obama ran a clean, honest and respectful campaign. It was natural and right that the media coverage should reflect this. It was right also that media coverage should reflect the kind of campaign generated by the McCain/Palin ticket. Readers have a right to know and to trust reportage on every facet of campaigns and governance.

It's finally sinking in...

It's finally sinking in... to the hard-core right-wing, there's no "even-handed" media. It's like Bush said (about All Phenomena, apparently): "You're either with us, or you're against us." So, non-sycophants had better keep their distance, &/or re-examine their "personal values", if they're planning a career in any kind of public-information-related field... ^..^

Rush Limbaugh has always

Rush Limbaugh has always reminded me of someone who escaped from an asylum. He is one of the most misogynistic (that means woman hating) types ever to hit the airwaves. It's a mystery to me who's funding his twisted personality and why people even listen to him. It's not even controversial or thought-provoking. It's deliberate propaganda meant to feed hate and promote injustice. The word 'white privilege' comes to find.

So long as Republican

So long as Republican far-right-wingers are being appointed into power in the corporate boardrooms of America, we'll still suffer from their agenda, while they grant themselves obscenely-high levels of pay and other forms of unfair compensation, as they burrow in and appoint other like-minded right-wingers into the system to watch their backs. I only hope the stockholders have enough money and legal resources to force them out -- because of the way big corporations are set up in the U.S. -- they'll easily resist removal or resist modifications to their pay, and are nearly immune from any annual stockholder's vote. What can we do to get these burrowed-in extremists, out from America's corporate management, I don't have an answer right now. So far, they have been the recipients of a 700 billion dollar bailout, since Bush has rewarded them for being rich white men.

The Republicans hate the

The Republicans hate the media and ultimately blame them for everything. If they had their way, they would remove "Freedom of the Press" from the U.S. Constitution.

Even a blind pig finds an

Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while. Thus Rush Limbaugh hit upon a proper choice of words when he said, "What the Republican party, led by disgruntled and failed McCain staffers, is trying to do to Sarah Palin, is unconscionable ..." However, his inspiration for stating this thought are considerably different than mine. I am not concerned about the manner in which the Republican party is devouring itself tail first. I'm more concerned about continuing to kick this woman when she's down. Especially through the cowardice of anonymity on the part of McCain aides. It serves no purpose; she's no longer a candidate for office. Can't we all just get back now to jobs, the economy and the war in Iraq?

Perhaps the majority of

Perhaps the majority of Americans just plain got fed up with Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the neo-Con/neo-Republican anger and lies. Palin's claim if being 'pro-life' is a plain lie -- she's pro-death penalty and hunts animals from a helicopter -- the cowards way, real hunters are on the ground with a bow and arrow. McCain DID NOT pick her -- he wanted Joe Lieberman but was over ruled -- they really expected Hillary supporters to support her ideological OPPOSITE. How ludicrous this campaign became was on Monday McCain criticized Obama for voting for the bailout and he (McCain) would never sell out the American public that way. He apparently forgot that he suspended his campaign to get the bill passed. Maybe the public just got tired of the bs.

If only it were true! It's

If only it were true! It's mostly a diversionary tactic for public display while they regroup and come up with some other nefarious plan to enrich the upper class and pander to right-wing religious zealots. I'm sure they'll be kissing and making up by the time Obama is sworn in and ready to raise havoc by use of the senate filibuster (you know what Republicans did when they were in the minority and what the wimpy Democrats NEVER did when they were in the minority).

Let's cut to the chase:

Let's cut to the chase: Sarah Palin is as phony as an infomercial sidekick.

If you are ever troubled

If you are ever troubled enough to read the biographies of any of the conservative hatemongers (O'Riley, Limbaugh, and Coulter) you realize that these people grew up in an environment of abuse. Both Rush and Bill admit to having far less than stellar relations with their fathers. A sad fact is that children of abuse tend to be abusers. Couple this with an ideology that promotes absolute power and the need to win at all costs, and you have the ideal mouthpiece to motivate (neo)conservatives. Hate or Love are powerful motivators. If you choose to rule by fear, then hate is a powerful motivator.

Governor Palin, before

Governor Palin, before offering to help restore some credibility to others you might want to memorize some tough-to-recall, but elementary, facts. Here's a quiz that will help you to establish yourself as a credible candidate next time around: 1) Which three countries are a part of NAFTA? 2) How many states are there in these United States? 3) What does Alaska have in common with Venezuela? Answers: 1) Canada, U.S. and Mexico. 2) Fifty. 3) Nationalized Oil.

Question #4: What was the

Question #4: What was the important Supreme Court case to affect Alaska in particular? Answer: Exxon-Valdez.

It's so strange to see the

It's so strange to see the Right partake in public in-fighting. Over the last 8 years, it seemed the Left was the disorganized and divided movement; while the Right was a well oiled machine. It appears a big cog fell off! And they will need to call in some major mechanics...or perhaps build a whole new machine. But alas there is now some American unity in values that I agree with and the uglier meaner campaign lost for once. Justice prevailed! In America no less. Weird....

Limbaugh is just one of the

Limbaugh is just one of the many right wing radio talk show hosts. Compared to some of these raving wackos he sounds like a moderate. A few years ago a couple of stations who's hosts held the opposite or moderate views were established which was a great relief for the propaganda weary listeners. I believe that these left of center people had some influence over the presidential election because listeners were given a different perspective other than that provided by the conservatives.

One problem: we in the lower

One problem: we in the lower 48, at least, have no clue who Palin really is or what she believes. We don't know how much of what she said was completely scripted by others or was an expression of her own bile. If she runs for president in 2012, she will certainly be "managed." Therefore, we are not likely to get a meaningful view of what she would offer or bring to the table, good or bad. I think the major party candidates should have to separately appear with and be questioned by each of the third party candidates for two hours. That would expose their true strengths, weaknesses and views.

One of the side effects of

One of the side effects of always blaming someone else for your failures, is that the circle gets increasingly smaller...

Blame? McCain/Palin were

Blame? McCain/Palin were designed to lose. Why would Bush push through FBI surveillance measures, with 2+months left? Its the same Team.With so many millions of supporters- Obama will have an easier time selling and implementing the Police State. Many of his supporters will be glad to join the Secret Police-- or Security Teams. Excellence is measured, these days, by one's ability to deceive the population. Ah yes, the odor of Betrayal will smell like turkey,this year.

Poor Oxy-Rush,the deflated

Poor Oxy-Rush,the deflated angry junkie who makes his dirty money by being a public liar--the same ideals of the Repub crime family. Steal the country blind and grab the wealth, then hide and spin the truth at all costs. When will We The People flush these disease-ridden rats down the sewers of Washington along with their death-for-profits corporate backers?

2008 will be to repugs what

2008 will be to repugs what 1968 was to Democrats. Give them another 40 years and they'll redefine themselves as well. Mark my words, their next candidate won't be someone who even ran this time. Don't be surprised if it's someone like Tim Pawlenty. Either way, the demographics they are a changin'. Raw naziism is having a more limited appeal than it did a few years ago. So, bye bye Scary Palin. It was fun using your words against you. If we ever need a substitute Ann Coulter we'll give you a call.

Rush Limbaugh was not an

Rush Limbaugh was not an asylum escapee. they threw him out for being a big faker. PF

Long before Sarah came on

Long before Sarah came on the scene I knew I would never vote for McSame, then he picked Appalling Palin. I then worked every which way I could to not get them elected. It was astounding to me when there was this support when Sarah came along. Many more politically involved than me had never heard of her, I had and was horrified by the possibility of her ilk getting that close to our white house. I literally had nightmare, so I kept dreaming her back in Wasilia. MY DREAM CAME TRUE. BYE, BYE APPALLING PALIN, AND DON'T YOU COME BACK NO MORE! SARAH, THERE IS A GOD AND HE ANSWERED MY PRAYERS.

Thank God for Palin. She so

Thank God for Palin. She so exposed the hate politics of the domestic terrorists called Right-Wing Politics. Here the are making war on Obama. She also exposed the disorganization of McCain and how he had not real backbone. The right-wing has thought the American Public was stupid and would keep voting against their self-interest by voting in a party that was dismantling their government and giving it to their friends. Recommended reading: The Predator State by James K Galbraith. How Conservatives abandoned the Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too. Hope trumped fear.

Y'all need to WAKE UP: 2008

Y'all need to WAKE UP: 2008 Republican McCain/Palin was designed to LOSE and get the Republican authors/owners of this 'economical tsunami-- mess they now define it as a natural disaster--AS FAR AWAY in place and time as they can possibly get to rethink what to do. In the meantime they will enjoy their profits and dig further underground. Their 'right wing consipiracy' will relentlessly attack everything Obama does. Your child's teacher, Margaret Myers, Laura Bush, and Dr Condi Rice are all better educated and able than Palin. For good reason, all Republican possibilities withdrew as far back into obscurity as they could. In chosing Sarah Palin, they also furthered the image of women being deficient for public office.

Republicans who blame Palin

Republicans who blame Palin for their defeat have short memories. Don't they recall the position McCain was in before the conventions? If he had chosen someone like Romney or Pawlenty, he'd have lost by 15 points instead of five, and he'd have taken even more senators with him. Palin brought out the knuckle-draggers, and so saved McConnell, probably saved that slime Chambliss, came close to saving Gordon Smith, and may have saved Coleman and Stevens. The catch is that McCain still lost; Palin's way leads to respectable defeat, not to victory. The Republicans need more than just their base.

It looks like Romney folks

It looks like Romney folks are mostly behind the blaming of Palin for the GOP (Grand Oil Party) loss. Romney supporters are emboldened by the success of Prop 8 (banning gay marriage) in California and with the money of Romney (he could write a check for $400 million for his campaign) and the growing alliance of Mormons and right-wing elements of the Catholics and Evangelicals they see 2012 as Romney's opportunity for Prez. They want the public to have even more negative thoughts about Palin so she does not come back in 2012. It will be interesting to see if Palin soon shows up as a US Senator as she replaces Sen. Stevens who will be kicked out because of his 7 felony convictions.

In response to 14:19 β€”

In response to 14:19 β€” Anonarcmous: Do you REALLY think repugs would EVER throw an election? You haven't been paying attention to history since Warren G. Harding. Republicans can view Jr. as a great success, because, even though he is the least popular and objectively worst president in U.S. history, he got NEARLY EVERYTHING HE WANTED ACCOMPLISHED. Open-ended colonization of the middle-east: √; American taxpayers to actually take money out of their own pockets and divert it directly into the pockets of oil execs who demanded the colonization: √; 180-degree reversal of most of the bill of rights (with one notable exception): √; getting the red herring of "big government" out of the business of over-sight for any of his shady dealings:√. All in all a resounding success. He's not concerned with his popularity or with history. Dr. Strangelove and Henry Kissinger shared a lot more in common than strange accents. Modern republican politicians have the same basic philosophy - authoritarian elitism. In the early 90s Newt Gingrich said that Democrats don't understand that politics is a form of warfare. In warfare you don't win by giving an inch. Besides, I'd like an example of ANY time that republicans didn't blame Democrats and the left in general for something. They were in control of congress from 1994 to 2006. Do you think they held themselves accountable for everything during that time? They've been in control of the White House for all but 12 of the last 40 years. Do you think they even accept blame for Watergate or the Iran / Contra scandal? Trust me, they tried to win but failed. They didn't GIVE us the presidency. We snatched it away by voting in such overwhelming numbers that their attempts to steal this one like the last few just weren't enough. I'll take Democratic solutions to republican catastrophes ANY DAY over republicans staying in office and piling on more problems. The Onion did an article once entitled "Democrats Vow Not To Give Up Hopelessness". I think the title says it all. Trust me. I'm related to several repugs. They're eating crow right now, and I for one would like to be their waiter.

One thing though - you have

One thing though - you have to give the right credit for waiting until AFTER the election to begin public in-fighting. I wish we had the same discipline.

Guys, listen in, The Rovian

Guys, listen in, The Rovian strategy for victory was simple: secure the right wing base by pumping up the moral issues and secure just enough of the independent vote to win by pumping up the economy with cheap money and deficit spending. It seemed to work for a while, but the strategy failed with the inevitable collapse of the dollar and the housing bubble. Now the word on every mouth is "bipartisanship", "coming together to heal the economy" and other such platitudes. Yet who does the mellow Obama select for his chief of staff: the Democratic "hammer" Rahm Emanuel. With the repugs flat on their back, the Democrats have a once-in a lifetime opportunity to drive a spike thru their hearts. It is my fervent hope that the "hammer" is poised to deliver the blow.

Palin's personal beliefs

Palin's personal beliefs were of the most ignorant and terrifying of anyone that has come that close to the most powerful office in the world. People that thought Bush and his evangelicalism was bad probably still don't realize the outright dogmatism of Sarah Palin that she kept squirreled away from the MSM while she was candidate. This is a woman that, despite her dad being a science teacher, turned to fundamental Christianity in the form of radical Pentecostalism, believing in the literal word of scripture to the letter, that the universe is 6000 years old and that we are living in the biblical End Times. She has admitted to friends in Alaska that she truly believes that The Rapture is to happen within her lifetime. Can you even begin to imagine the havoc she would wreck if she became president? Her utmost ignorance and incurious nature in foreign policy would make Bush look like the Sun, Moon, and Stars as it wouldn't be difficult seeing her surrounded by advisers from her church that literally believes in 'spiritual warfare' planning the the beginning of their vision of the End Times by hydrogen detonation of those 'evil' colored people of that false prophet of Islam. It would be terrifying, and perhaps even an incentive to move to a remote backwater state like Alaska to avoid the nuclear fallout. For all those that recognized the peril the world would find itself under her leadership and worked so diligently for her defeat, do NOT let up for a moment if you don't want to see this woman on the national political stage again by expressing any sympathy while the GOP'ers are kicking her while she's down. The fact that she remains a champion that the right is hailing to be president in 2012 should scare you enough.

Wasn't John talked into

Wasn't John talked into picking Sarah Palin. Didn't he want Joe Lieberman? All hail the end of the Republican Party!