Share

Health Care Can't Wait

by: Edward M. Kennedy  |  The Washington Post

photo
Senator Kennedy in an op/ed encourages Obama to act swiftly on healthcare reform. (Photo: Susan Walsh/AP)

    The story of America has been a journey toward being a fairer and more just nation. We have encountered many barriers along the way, and at times we have stumbled. But again and again, we have come together to surmount the obstacles in our path and realize more fully the promise of America.

    Last month, the nation took another major step along this path, when Congress approved historic legislation to end discrimination in health care against the millions of Americans who struggle with mental illnesses. This new law ensures that illnesses of the mind are treated the same as illnesses of the body in insurance coverage.

    It took more than a decade to enact mental health parity legislation. In the end, the stalemate was broken when insurance companies, employers and doctors all agreed with patients that the flawed system of mental-health-care insurance was intolerable. They finally sat down and reached an agreement that is now the law of the land.

    Our success in achieving mental health parity after years of deadlock is a good omen for broad reform of our overall health-care system. And despite the current economic downturn, we must forge ahead with this urgent priority. The system is broken. And it's no longer just patients demanding change. Businesses, doctors and even many insurance companies are demanding it as well.

    Another good omen occurred in 2006 in Massachusetts, when businesses and workers, insurance companies and patients, Democrats and Republicans came together on a practical solution for the state. Since that solution was enacted, Massachusetts has expanded coverage to more than three-quarters of the state's uninsured; the state now has far and away the nation's lowest proportion of medically uninsured people. As a result of the large increase in enrollment, insurance premiums have dropped significantly.

    At the heart of the Massachusetts reform are two principles: Real help for lower-income families to make coverage more affordable and an innovative insurance "connector" program giving individuals access to high-quality, affordable health insurance. Employers are encouraged to continue to offer health insurance to their workers, and more than 150,000 residents have newly enrolled in good employer-based coverage since the reforms were enacted. The reforms demand responsibility from individuals, businesses and government alike, and the foundation on which the reforms rest is an effective set of protections against the denials of coverage that are so common elsewhere.

    President-elect Barack Obama has issued a clarion call for action on health care. His practical and thoughtful proposals draw from our Massachusetts experience and add important measures to improve quality and reduce costs. His plan includes crucial investments in modernizing the use of information technology in health care. He calls for a new emphasis on prevention and wellness, because the best way to treat a disease is to prevent it from striking.

    I'm sure opponents will dust off the same old slogans they have used to try to block every major advance in health care. They will call it "socialized medicine" and a "government takeover," just as they did when they opposed Medicare and the children's health program - and they are just as wrong today as they were then. Such advances are no more "socialized medicine" than is the coverage available to George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and every member of Congress, subsidized by the American taxpayer.

    Opponents also argue that the cost would be too high and that any such reform must be deferred because of the economic crisis. I reject that argument. It is painfully obvious that our health-care system costs Americans too much, costs employers too much, denies too much needed care and leaves out too many Americans. The rising cost of health care is clearly contributing to the troubled economy and needlessly strains family pocketbooks. Even worse, these costs are expected to climb higher, more than doubling in the next 10 years. We can no longer afford not to act.

    The cost will be substantial, but the need for reform is too great to be deflected or delayed. Our recent successes in passing mental health parity for the nation and achieving broad health reform in Massachusetts suggest that most Americans will agree.

    --------

    Edward M. Kennedy, a Democrat, is a U.S. senator from Massachusetts. He is chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

I am an advocate for public

I am an advocate for public education. As a founding board member of a statewide organization in Minnesota, Parents United for Public Schools I have been advocating real reform of healthcare -at the national level. THE INFLATED COSTS OF HEALTHCARE PREMIUMS HAVE BEEN DEPLETING SCHOOL BUDGETS FOR THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS. DOLLARS WHICH SHOULD BE SUPPORTING OUR STUDENTS INTHE CLASSROOM ARE WASTED IN A CORRUPT AND INEFFICIENT SYSTEM. Under this current disastrous 'system' which does not provide helathcare for every person in the United States, every taxpayer pays the infllated costs FOUR TIMES OVER. First with their own insurance premium as an employee Second in their school districts budget Thirdly, for every government employee at the local, county, state and federal level And finally for every uninsured person who recieves treatment at the emergecy room. Four times over.The system is bankrupt. It is robbing hardworking taxpayers. In Minnesota, approximately $1000 of the $5149 per pupil state funding is spent on healthcare premiums. That is money siphoned from the classroom into a broken, costly system.If you want to help our nation's schools (and families and local and state governments) create a single payer healthcare system modeled after Medicare.Fixing healthcare will provide much needed revenue for schools, cities and states. We cannot afford to wait any longer to mend this broken system.No more bandaids.

What is insurance if not

What is insurance if not shared risk with privatized profits? Get the insurance companies out of our medical care. Put the savings from deleting profit and paperwork into our health care. WE are the government, lets take charge of this now. Insurance companies are the problem.

God bless you Senetor

God bless you Senetor Kennedy. You have captured the true urgency of this issue better than anyone. Thank you so much for your salient words and years of service to this country. We would literally stop the economic crisis in its tracks if we covered every man woman and child. It would cost FAR LESS than the current system. People declare bankruptcy every hour around the nation because of health care costs, on top of the housing crisis and the recent price of gas. These un-recovered costs drive up the costs of everything further as the losing companies have to seek more from a dwindling pool of capable payers. (We only cover the rich or healthy now). You'd also have a much more productive work force. This is a no brainer. And thankfully, President Elect Obama does give us hope in this area. Thanks for helping him along in Massachusetts.

Sen. Kennedy and Obama are

Sen. Kennedy and Obama are con-artists w/regards to health care. As the last commenter points out, what we need is what every other advanced industrial country has: single payer health care. Obama has said over and over he is OPPOSED to single payer. And how is Obama's wonderful plan of giving billions of $ to HMOs to buy new computers going to lower premiums? They are for-profit operations... they profit off denying you treatment. That simple. Oh yeah, and they funded Obama's campaign, so unlikely he would challenge them...

Create a single-payer

Create a single-payer health-care system that encompasses Medicare, Medicaid, and Veteran's medical, and put ALL public employees INCLUDING senators, congressmen, state legislators, etc, in the same system. THEN we'd ALL get better healthcare.

Joel, I agree that we seem

Joel, I agree that we seem to have an unwillingness to recognize that a single payer system actually makes the most sense. But it isn't going to happen in our life time. So what Barrack has done is the next best thing, create a single payer of last resort. I recently lost my job. I have 6 months of severance where my health insurance will be covered and my former employer will pay for my Cobra. After that I am facing $1600 per month... since I was a smoker and my son has hydrophelia. I get this to the core. I would love a "socialized medicine" system at this point as would most Americans in my position. But baring that, I'd be happy to pay, say $1,000 per month to just get the same coverage as Barrack Obama (and John McCain) get as member as members of the US Senate. Barack's plan is NOT ideal. But the better is sometimes better than the perfect because it is achievable. jeff

Dear Mr. Obama, We all need

Dear Mr. Obama, We all need health coverage. Please make this happen.

We must eliminate the

We must eliminate the "health insurance" industry. Permitting companies to profit by denying health care is simply barbaric. Your role as a U.S. Senator is the protect us. How can you allow companies, guilty of practicing medicine without a license. harming citizens, even causing death, impunity? Protect us, prosecute the "health deniers", don't buy them computers. We need guaranteed Single-Payer health care. It's the only civilized thing to do.

I can understand why

I can understand why Republicans are squimish when the word Socialism is used, but should we progressive's feel sheepish about it. We want to move toward a more socialist like medical care delivery system. That does not sound so bad!

BLAH, BLAH BLAH.........Sen.

BLAH, BLAH BLAH.........Sen. Kennedy and our new president both favor more taxpayer dollars for the insurance industry. What part of UNIVERSAL, SINGLE PAYER, NOT FOR PROFIT HEALTH CAR SYSTEM are these people not understanding? What part of the concept that is in place in almost every country on the planet are they having a problem with? It is incredible that they intend to blow taxpayer money on computers for the insurance companies and HMOs. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Our country is one step away

Our country is one step away from a huge release of human potential. All it would take is a single payer system in which everyone is insured and yes, all public employees, including our representatives, included. Do you know how many people waste away at jobs they are not suited for because they fear going without health care? Imagine the entrepreneurial spirit that could be unleashed if everyone felt free to do what they do best, or to try something new? Please Senator Kennedy and President-elect Obama, don't listen to the naysayers. Listen to your heart and what common sense tells you. We can learn from what other countries have done right and wrong, but we cannot stand still. Not now! Too much human potential is being wasted and too much human misery results from the patchwork "system" we have now.

The only option that is

The only option that is moral and just--and economically smart as well--is a single payer system like Medicare--but properly funded. A single payer plan takes insurance companies--which contribute nothing at all of value to the health care system--completely out of the picture. Their involvement leads to layers and layers of expensive bureaucracy, resulting in far higher health care costs, bewilders consumers them with endless options, exclusions, deductibles, and denials of coverage for preexisting conditions—and denies millions, exactly those who need it most, from any kind of coverage at all--and are making American companies less competitive in the world economy due to ever increasing health care premiums. The health care situation in this country is therefore an unmitigated disaster and any fix other than a single payer system will leave the basic system with almost all of its problems and inequities unchanged. Therefore, while I voted for Obama, I oppose his health care reforms, which do way too little. He should take on insurance companies head on even if the battle, win or lose, might make him only a one term president. After all, what’s more important, the lives of millions, or one man’s reelection?

Obviously a single-payer

Obviously a single-payer medicare based universal system would be best. But we are probably not yet ready for it (I mean the Republicans will scream so much about it that it won't be feasible). Therefore we need to keep the current stupid system with private insurance BUT give people the option of going for the public system. After a few years the private insurers, if regulation is properly done, will not be able to compete. But we're in America, so we'll let them compete. In fact, in some European countries you can actually have private insurance if you want, or are in certain situations. But 99% of the people go for the public system. Of course we're just talking about a public payor system. The provider system stays the same as now.

I totally agree with the

I totally agree with the member who says: Create a single-payer health-care system that encompasses Medicare, Medicaid, and Veteran's medical, and put ALL public employees INCLUDING senators, congressmen, state legislators, etc, in the same system. THEN we'd ALL get better healthcare.

I absolutely agree with most

I absolutely agree with most of the arguments here. A single payer system is ideal and will do the most to reduce the cost to all Americans. Insurance companies are just leeches for dollars. BUT, the Republicans are going to scream if we attempt to go there right now. The prudent thing to do now is exactly what Obama is suggesting, but make sure that while we are going there, we are clearing the way for step two, a single payer system. That this is just one step on the path towards that which will work best. What always bugs me is the thought that taxes are the enemy. It is how they are spent that is the problem.

My Husband & I have

My Husband & I have Medicare... it is NOT FREE ! We pay premiums that are deducted from our Social Security benefits plus over $300 out-of-pocket per month for additional supplemental insurance (not including Part-D for drugs). These costs increase more than the COLA of our SS, pension & inflation. There is no coverage for basic dental or eye care. I can't imagine how young families manage. I'm not sure how to fix it all, but for starters 1) get congress on the same system as the rest of us, which would get their attention quick and 2) get the insurance companies out of the healthcare business.

My mother died in a hospital

My mother died in a hospital at age 97 of natural causes. All her health care was covered and Blue Cross-Blue Shield sent me a series of "Statement of Benefits" showing a grand total of well over $100,000 in medical expenses for the last few days of her life! She didn't have to pay it and I didn't have to pay it. Everyone in America had to chip in. Why would it take that much money to make a dying person comfortable for about 48 hours? I'm guessing this case was not an aberration, but typical of the American medical establishment's approach to death as a problem to be solved. I'm also reminded of the "cost plus" arrangements made with corporations like KBR for providing services to our military at grossly inflated prices. (Incidentally I just got another bill from Blue Cross-Blue Shield showing that a "provider" was reimbursed for treatment given to my mother one month after her death.) I urge Senator Kennedy and President-to-be Obama to investigate this kind of waste and fraud as part of their effort to reform health care.

For those who claim that a

For those who claim that a universal health plan will be too expensive, I would simply point to Iraq, which is costing us $10 BILLION per month and suggest that that money would make a substantial down payment on a decent health care plan for all of us. If it is run as a single-payer insurance plan, where patients are free to go to their own doctors, etc.,it certainly is not socialism. Neither is raising taxes on the wealthiest among us; progressive taxation is not socialism. Too many people use that word without really understanding what it means.

Health care insurance

Health care insurance companies will not bow out gracefully, they must be beheaded and nationalized.

We can Have Public Schools

We can Have Public Schools but not Public HealthCare??? Whats wrong with the idea that health care is a right for ALL and is not for just those that can afford it? What happens when we have a downturns in the economy and millions are out of work? Are we suppose to just let the sick and infirm die on the streets? Or do we pass the buck to denominational programs like the Faith Based Incentives and other similar type initiatives to clean up after a greed fest corpocrisy implosion which is happening NOW on everyone... except those that can afford to profit from this planned downturn... Health care like education IS GOOD for ALL but is especially good for the country! It should be embraced by everyone regardless of their position in society! JUST GET IT DONE ALREADY!!! IT'S BEEN IN THE WORKS SINCE TRUMAN ANNOUNCED IT BACK IN HIS DAY

I am an American living in

I am an American living in europe for 10 years, I want to go home so bad. All my family is there. I have diabetes and have been told I will not be able to get insurance because its a pre existing condition, and if I got lucky and found a company who would insure me, I wouldn't be able to afford the premiums without giving up things like food, shelter. Currently I have good full coverage medical insurance for 150 euros a month. If other countries can do it, why cant America?