Share

Minnesota Senate Race Never-Ending Campaign

by: Patrick Condon  |  The Associated Press

photo
Al Franken. As Minnesota's US Senate race heads toward a statewide recount, the bare-knuckle fight between Republican Norm Coleman and Democrat Al Franken feels like Election Day had never come and gone. (Photo: alfranken.com)

    Minneapolis - There are no voters left to persuade. But as Minnesota's U.S. Senate race heads toward a statewide recount, the bare-knuckle fight between Republican Norm Coleman and Democrat Al Franken feels like Election Day had never come and gone.

    "Franken campaign attempts to stuff ballot box at the last minute," blared a Monday news release from the Coleman campaign. That came just two days after Team Franken characterized a Coleman legal filing as a "sneak attack to stop counting of ballots."

    Election Day, which once promised relief from months of mudslinging, now stands simply as the day the race shifted from the paid airwaves to the legal arena. Both campaigns are still furiously pumping out news releases, calling news conferences, recruiting volunteers and pressing donors for cash to carry on the fight.

    After the two candidates spent nearly $40 million combined - most of it on ads tarring the other - Coleman leads by about 200 votes out of almost 3 million cast. An automatic recount is to start next week.

    "This is an extraordinarily close and bitterly fought election, and both candidates have reason to think that they may have won," said Kathryn Pearson, a political scientist at the University of Minnesota. "They're not going to let the final stage of this go down without a fight as well."

    For both campaigns, that has meant an approach similar to a traditional election campaign: Staking out a message, and repeating it ad nauseam.

    The Coleman mantra is that a small lead is still a lead and the incumbent, at least for now, is the winner. To drive home that point, Coleman's Republican colleagues in the Senate have kept up a steady stream of kudos for his victory.

    "Congratulations to Sen. Coleman on being re-elected by the voters of Minnesota," said a statement from Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., after Coleman's lead survived the results of canvassing by Minnesota's counties (a step that precedes the recount).

    At the same time, the Coleman campaign has kept up a drip of news releases and public comments raising suspicions about a steady erosion of his lead - by several hundred votes over several days. "We're not going to sit idly by, while mysterious, statistically dubious changes in vote totals take place," Coleman's attorney, Fritz Knaak, said over the weekend.

    Franken has his own message: "We don't yet know who won the election, but with your help, we'll make sure that every vote is counted fairly and accurately," read a Tuesday e-mail message from campaign manager Stephanie Schriock asking for volunteers to help watch the recount.

    The Franken team also worked to counter Knaak's suggestions that the shift in vote totals toward Franken were out of the ordinary. They prepared and distributed a series of historic tables showing that such shifts have not been unusual.

    "Norm Coleman knows better" than to label the vote shifts improbable and statistically dubious, the Franken campaign alleged in a press release.

    Keeping the back-and-forth at high boil has required both teams to proceed more or less as if the election never happened. "It feels like it just hasn't ended," said Cullen Sheehan, Coleman's campaign manager.

    Coleman has kept the roughly 30 paid full- and part-time staffers it had before the election. Franken's campaign wouldn't say how many have stayed on, but all the top staffers have. Workers for both campaigns - who already had been "burning the candle at both ends" for months, in Sheehan's words, now talk of having to cancel vacation plans, extend apartment leases and generally juggle their personal lives.

    Jess McIntosh, press secretary for the Franken campaign, said: "Right now everyone is wondering whether we'll be having Thanksgiving turkey at campaign headquarters."

    On Wednesday, Secretary of State Mark Ritchie appointed the members of a board that will make final decisions on disputed ballots. Besides Ritchie, a Democrat, the panel includes two Supreme Court justices appointed by a Republican governor and two district judges whose politics are either independent or unknown.

    Local election officials were due to receive recount training on Thursday, with the actual hand recount beginning next Wednesday. Depending on the size of the county, each local recount will take anywhere from a day to a couple of weeks.

    The counties must report by Dec. 5. Ritchie's board begins the final review Dec. 16.

    Meanwhile, commenting on a subject that emerged late in the campaign, Coleman said he would welcome any investigation into allegations that a friend and political donor attempted to steer $75,000 to him.

    In a Texas lawsuit filed shortly before the election, the former CEO of Texas-based Deep Marine Holdings said Minnesota businessman Nasser Kazeminy used the company to funnel money to an insurance company that employs Coleman's wife. A second lawsuit, filed in Delaware by Deep Marine shareholders, makes similar allegations.

    Coleman, Kazeminy and officials with the insurance broker, Hays Companies, have all denied the allegations.

    "The fact that a United States Senator is being used as a tool of extortion by private parties should be of concern to all Minnesotans," Coleman said. He added, "it is my hope that those who were behind this matter, their motives and what their connections may be to my political opponents be reviewed aggressively by the appropriate authorities and the media."

    Coleman's statement came shortly after a coalition of Democratic-leaning groups held a news conference calling on the Senate Ethics Committee and the FBI to look into the allegations.

    The committee does not release information on whether it's initiated a preliminary inquiry into allegations against a senator. An FBI spokesman in Minneapolis also declined to comment.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

The only reason this race

The only reason this race was close to begin with was the use of electronic voting machines, which, visibly or invisibly, flip thousands of votes to the Republican candidate. Just look what happened in Florida this election. The electronic machines were taken away and the Democrats won by a significant margin. Believe me, people, Al won, whether this Republican loser takes all or not.

We must rid our election

We must rid our election process of all "computer" black box machines. ONE national process: simple paper ballots, placed in simple CLEAR boxes and counted in the presence of the community. That will be a much harder system to fix if we all remember we need to be there to watch and to participate.

The Republican Right will

The Republican Right will spend, and continues to spend an obscene amount of OUR taxpayers money and the money of private, wealthy, white-supremacist donors willing to bend and violate campaign contribution laws to get their G.O.P. ideologue voted back into power. The McCain-Palin campaign demonstrated to the length, depth and breadth they were willing to do this, by promoting the verified use of deception and propaganda against their opponents on a scale never before seen in American history. Based on such a track record, and on the track record of what Bush and Cheney have done to this country, I no longer trust what any Republicans say. I WORKED CLOSELY WITH THESE RIGHT-WINGERS FOR YEARS. Nowadays, whenever I see a REPUBLICAN, I can't help but see a LIAR, a FRAUD, a BACKSTABBER, a GREEDY-POWER-HUNGRY, POLITICALLY NAIVE, ACADEMICALLY-UNDER-EDUCATED, RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALIST who, figuratively-speaking, patriotically wraps himself or herself AROUND THE FLAG and carries a CROSS OR A BIBLE, to protect themselves from having to be held accountable for their NEO-FASCIST, ANTI-LABOR, ANTI-CONSUMER, ANTI-ENVIRONMENT, PRO-BIG-BUSINESS, FAILED-TRICKLE-DOWN, TAX-BREAKS and BAILOUTS FOR THE RICH, ELIMINATE-SOCIAL-SAFETY-NETS, CHICKEN-HAWK WAR-MONGERING, GUN-TOTING, NATIONALIST-ISOLATIONIST, SELF-SERVING, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AGENDA. And how many times have YOU, COLEMAN, sided with, and made decisions in parallel and lock-step, with the likes of KING GEORGE and DARTH CHENEY?

Depend on it, if AP gets

Depend on it, if AP gets hold of a Minnesota story it will get the story wrong. It's so easy to talk about double-mud-slinging matches but in fact Coleman is the one charged with sleazy dealing and the one going around filing frivolous lawsuits. How do you defend yourself against that? Whatever you do, the MSM will say you are slinging mud. Norm also sent one of his flunkies to a Somali polling place where he told voters to vote for Norm in the guise of a "translator" who also was curiously acting as a party watchdog. As Norm always does when caught in a lie he tries to turn it back on his opponent and has succeeded at this often enough to turn the honorable legacy of the Paul Wellstone seat into the worst kind of Bush-Cheney-Rove cabal pandering for the last six years. I also don't doubt that Al won the election but here in Minnesota we actually have paper ballots that can be checked and that is going to happen. Norm is just throwing a hissy fit and it irks me, it really does, that Patrick Condon and his ilk with their lazy reporting and shameless opinion-mongering in the guise of news cloud what is really going on.

The Coleman camp attempts to

The Coleman camp attempts to create suspicion over the fact that post-election day corrections are weighing heavily toward Franken--but has cited no wrong-doing by those who have been checking the count. However, we all know that it's been Republicans doctoring the actual vote count in the past several major elections--as well as disenfranchising college-age, poor and black-neighborhood voters (all likely Democrats) prior to the elections, etc. And this time around, don't forget those voting machines in Jackson County, West Virginia, that were blatantly changing Obama choices to McCain votes. So shouldn't the question be not how come recounting has heavily favored Franken, but how come so many erroneous numbers favored Coleman in the first place? Continuing loud bluster from the Coleman camp should not be allowed to drown out the voice of reason.

Minnesota does not use Black

Minnesota does not use Black Box voting machines. We've used the same optical scan machines using paper ballots for about 20 years. Our system is the best. I don't understand where JailRace gets his data that votes are being flipped (a la the movie Uncounted). The hand count of the paper ballots here proves that there was no flipping! That said, Norm Coleman and his republican ilk have used intimidating statements in an attempt to discredit our secretary of state and the process (like the GOP rabble in Florida in 2000). The local Minneapolis paper echoed them without stating the facts which are: 1. Unlike Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004, our secretary of state was not the chair/co-chair of anyone's campaign. 2. The recount is automatically mandated by law because the margin between the candidates is less than 1/2 of 1 percent. (in fact it is 7/1000 of 1 percent). 3. All recent Minnesota elections have had adjustments due to canvassing counties after election day. Even Norm Coleman experienced several thousand increased lead over Walter Mondale in 2002 after election day when first running for this seat (held by the late Paul Wellstone). Same is true for Amy Klobuchar in her election to the Senate in 2006. Norm Coleman consistently exhibits the behavior of accusing others of exactly what he is doing--which amounts to "shadow projection". The adage: "When you point the finger at others, 3 fingers point back at you." applies here. What he doesn't realize is that he is "telling on himself" in public. We just turn the pronouns around in his sentences and he tells us the dishonorable and dishonest things he is doing. It's plain for all to see he lacks integrity, self-awareness and integrity.