Share

Put an End to Election Messes

by:   |  The Boston Globe | Editorial

photo
Universal voter registration is one simple change that could improve national elections. Under this plan the government would be responsible for automatically registering citizens when they turn 18. (Photo: Inhabitat)

    Barack Obama's superior get-out-the-vote operation spared the country from another squeaker presidential election, with the claims of voter fraud and intimidation that have become so familiar in the previous two cycles. But that doesn't mean the problems in the nation's electoral system have disappeared. They're just not as visible at high tide.

    After the 2000 election made the United States look like something out of a Marx Brothers movie, former presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter co-chaired a National Election Commission. Their report concluded that the country has one of the most burdensome voter registration systems - and one of the lowest participation rates - in the developed world. Even with the Obama wave, voter turnout this year was only about 61 percent of registered voters.

    One simple change would solve several problems that have bedeviled recent national elections: universal voter registration. Under this plan, promoted by the watchdog Brennan Center for Justice and others, the government would be responsible for automatically registering citizens when they turn 18. This would eliminate sometimes sketchy private groups, such as ACORN, from the business of registering voters. It would substantially reduce registration challenges - and lawsuits - that can disenfranchise voters. And, by capturing the 28 percent of Americans who are not now registered to vote, it would add almost 50 million voters to the rolls.

    Because the conduct of elections is reserved to the states under the Constitution, each state should develop and execute its own plan for registration, with its own rules and identification requirements. But enabling legislation at the federal level would set deadlines and, importantly, allocate funds. Senator Hillary Clinton is working on legislation to overhaul voter registration.

    State election officials and Republicans resist the idea, for different reasons: election officials fear another unfunded federal mandate; Republicans believe a massive infusion of new voters will tilt Democratic. But support is growing - the chairwoman of the federal Election Assistance Commission supports it, and Michael Waldman, director of the Brennan Center, presented a plan last week to the Center for American Progress Action Fund, a project of the increasingly influential think tank whose director, John Podesta, is heading President-elect Barack Obama's transition team.

    Change is hard to accept for a Congress that, after all, got elected under the current registration system. But any technical or political obstacles pale in comparison with another election marred by fears of ballot-stuffing, voter suppression, and undermined confidence in democracy.

  

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Also: Touch-screen voting

Also: Touch-screen voting systems reported flipping votes. Optical reader errors on paper ballots caused by dust and lack of maintenance. Opaque custom software systems compiling vote totals. All this should stop. Paper ballots counted and tallied by human beings under watchful eyes of observers. Like we did for almost 200 years. Like we do for recounts. Certified results from all precincts totaled on spreadsheets, and make the spreadsheets public. It's not just voter registration. We need to restore complete confidence in the entire voting process.

While the conduct of

While the conduct of elections is generally a state matter (unless a partisan Supreme Court intervenes), the Congress does have the authority to override the states where the election of U.S. representatives is concerned. So it can make uniform national rules for the registration of voters for the U.S. house. States could then either use the same rules for all other elections as well, or go to the trouble and expense of maintaining two separate registration lists.

We also need to ensure that

We also need to ensure that voters are voting for people that represent them, not just for least-worst or best-looking. We can only do that by making candidates anonymous, and having people vote on the platforms the secret candidates write up. Of course we also need the ability to do recall referendums if a candidate flip flops on major positions of his platform. IRV would also be useful, but wouldn't fix the problem of money/fame/other stupid considerations in politics.

An even deeper problem is

An even deeper problem is the yes-or-no character of our balloting process. Preferential voting, in which a vote consists of a ranking of the candidates rather than a selection of just one of them, gives better results (http://www.sciencenews.org/sn_arc98/10_31_98/mathland.htm) . If America used it, third-party candidates could win whenever they are perceived as less obnoxious than both the Republican and Democratic offerings. The Republicans and Democrats will always conspire to prevent any such reform from occurring, which is the very reason why it's vital. Their duopoly has made our democratic republic into a fascist state, and their conspiracy to prevent the rise of any other parties is a key reason for our fascism, our militarism, and the ascendancy of corporate rights over human rights and representative government in present-day America. It's also the reason why Bush and Cheney have never been impeached, despite their numerous and deadly violations of their oaths of office. The fascist stench of America's duopoly is now overpowering, and even Barack Obama's conciliatory talents cannot conceal the rottenness of American democracy. Reform is the only option for Americans with any sense of smell. In the meantime, when you hear the word "bipartisan", try to remember that it means "duopolistic". Policy decisions that are "bipartisan" are not driven by reality; they are driven by a consortium of two corporate entities, neither of which can ever be put in jail, or executed.

you said it, sfrider. It

you said it, sfrider. It doesn't matter how many people vote, or how wisely, if the count is done by a Corporation (Diebold, ESS, Sequoia, etc.) with no possible oversight, audit, or recount. In many states we've given away the keys to the ballot box.

Seems to me the Help America

Seems to me the Help America Vote Act of 2002 was Federal / National. (did it effect your local poll / precint?!) Yet to deal with voter rolls (electronics need to go there too!) and get rid of electronic vote tabulation devices (e.g. scanners, dre's, etc.) somehow can't be national / federal. What LIES!!! It's more like backroom deals controlling the situation!

The democrats have had 8

The democrats have had 8 years to do so but have never even talked about it..universal registration or (heaven forbid) mandatory voting are subjects neither party is willing even to discuss. I have listened in vain to the left & right wing radio shows in hopes hearing at least a conversation on the subject. Nada. not once. Steve Newcomb is absolutely correct. American democracy is an absolute fraud, lacking even the prerequisites, ie 1. informed electorate 2. universal suffrage 3. proportional representation 4. an voting process free from manipulation. We have a bifurcated one party fascist state where opposition has no voice & those who have the power to change it will not. Elections change nothing of substance.

The name of the American

The name of the American Fascist Party is "I & the bipartisan leaders"

The top priority is that

The top priority is that votes are counted correctly. Always. We need paper ballots, like sfrider says. Also, voter registration should also be fixed so that people won't be eliminated arbitrarily from the rolls.

As Stalin said, "It is

As Stalin said, "It is enough for the people to know that there has been an election. Who casts the votes decide nothing. Who count the votes decide everything." Thanks for this insight, Joe.