Share

Global Warming Threatens Lake Titicaca, Imperils Millions of Bolivians

by:   |  Univision.com (the United States)

photo
(Photo: bjaglin, Edited: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t)

La Paz, Bolivia - Global warming has accelerated the evaporation of Lake Titicaca, the water level of which has dropped to the lowest point in years, Carlos Andrade, of the Binational Autonomous Authority of Lake Titicaca (ATL), told The Associated Press last week.

"Water levels have fallen 88 cm (nearly 3 feet) this year, far exceeding normal lows," Andrade said. "This is the biggest loss in decades, and it is definitely attributable to global warming," he added.

Thirty-seven miles west of La Paz, Titicaca is a natural wonder: 3,232 square miles of water sitting 2.3 miles up in the Andean Altiplano (highlands). The lake is shared between Bolivia and Peru, and is a major tourist draw. It recently competed to become one of the "New Seven Wonders of the World," but was not selected to be among the finalists.

Lake Titicaca is fed by rain and meltwater from the mountains, but much of the water is being lost at an increased rate due to a rise in solar radiation in the thin Andean atmosphere. Climate disruptions from global warming have also reduced the rainy season from six to three months, said Félix Trujillo, chief of Bolivia's National Meteorological and Hydrological Service.

Large swaths of land, especially in the Andean regions of Bolivia, are experiencing prolonged periods of drought, and the lack of precipitation has jeopardized the water supply of several Bolivian cities, added Trujillo.

A little over half of the Bolivian population, estimated at ten million, live in the Andean highlands, and they rely on meltwater from the mountains for their water supply.

Trujillo said that the rainy season will begin in mid-November this year, but expects that the rains could recede as soon as December. The lack of rain would be accompanied by a heat wave that would speed up the evaporation of reservoir water. This scenario would increase the demand and decrease the supply of potable water.

Environment Minister René Orellana said that Bolivia will need to invest $1 billion over the next seven years to construct dams and ensure an adequate water supply. Experts from ATL are currently looking into the construction of a system of floodgates that would regulate water levels between the upper and lower basins of Lake Titicaca, said Carlos Andrade.

The regions that have been hardest hit by the drought have been the Altiplano in the west, and Chaco in the south, where local authorities have already reported the deaths of thousands of cattle.

Lake Titicaca was the life source of the Incan and Tiwanaku civilizations, whose monuments still stand today in villages where people live off the lake and the surrounding lands.

 

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

  

»


Translation: Ryan Croken. Ryan Croken is a freelance writer and editor based in Chicago. His essays and book reviews have appeared in The Philadelphia Inquirer, Z Magazine and ReligionDispatches.org. He can be reached at ryan.croken@gmail.com.

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

Next to fall, the Great

Next to fall, the Great Lakes levels. Yes, they are high now, but not for long. Projections point to Huron-Michigan levels three feet lower than they are now within thirty years. Will our government do anything to keep levels high--return the water Chicago takes to the basin or install locks on the Detroit River? Not a chance. Costs too much.

The production of dams and

The production of dams and other water control hardware will not alter the total amount of water in this area unless it influences the local rains and other aspects of climate. I would be interested in knowing more about that. I do think, however, that unless these solutions are applied carefully, either upstream or downstream people would be forced to suffer to the benefit of others. In Bolivia, this may mean "indigenous" or "poor" vs. "connected to government" and relatively more "rich". Consider how this situation may set groups against each other, such as this years' conflict of the San Joaquin farmers against the salmon fishermen in California when water was regulated for farming. These conflicts will increase in severity and number if global warming aren't mitigated. One more thing -- let's be smarter about discussing the data, OK? The quote about THIS YEAR's water levels (88 cm down from last year) is not worth reporting as global warming unless it is part of a long-term trend. Ephemeral data can be part of the considerable "noise" in these data; the meaninglessness of one data point can be used by those who decry global warming as a hoax.

Why do you people keep on

Why do you people keep on promoting this BOGUS crap about Global Warming . Back in the 1970's they were promoting Global Cooling , now that the weather is changing and getting cooler , since it does not fit your agenda , they are beginning to call it " Climate Change " Greenland is called Greenland because it was at one time warmer . The weather runs in cycles , you have warm spells , you have cool spells , you have dry spells and you have wet spells . Nothing has changed except we seem to have more hot air coming out of Washington , D.C. , a den of pompous blowhards .

Blaming CO2 is the Hoax, not

Blaming CO2 is the Hoax, not Global Warming. The big money, the Globalist Money, the 'man behind the curtain' money - invested in the CO2 theory. The the research money - the bread is buttered on the CO2 theory side. It is not science. We here are indeed the spoiled ones - so spoiled that we do not have the imagination to understand what foreclosure looks like, what it will be like. Cap and Trade will bring it to us. The International Bankers will step in to save us all, with their single world currency - notice the announcements in the news just today? It's happening, and not one in a hundred people is awake or hip to it. Either say NO, or adjust yourself to becoming a serf. We're in the corral now, just waiting for the gate to shut behind us.

Greenland was called

Greenland was called Greenland only because the exiled Eric the Red wanted to attract new settlers to the island. it was an advertising gimmick. That said, during the "medieval warming period," Greenland was perhaps more green than it is now (or, rather, than it was two years ago). The main issue, however,is that every serious scientific organization has attributed the insanely rapid heating of the planet over the past few decades to anthropogenic factors: mainly the burning of fossil fuels. this is in comparison with the more gradual, less unnatural climate fluctuations of the past, which can be attributed to volcanic activity,solar output, ocean dynamics, tectonic shifts, the size and shapes of continents, etc... that stuff doesn't happen over a period of a few years. What can happen, however, over a period of a few years, is the dredging up of fossil fuels that accumulated over the span of millions of years, burning them for energy, and unleashing them into the atmosphere at a suicidal pace. Razing most of the vegetation to meet immediate human ends doesn't help either. the planet is not equipped for these radical alterations to its equilibrium. this is both common sense and a scientific consensus. How and why someone would want to deny such dangerous realities is beyond me.