Share

Sun Sets on US Power: Report Predicts End of Dominance

by: Julian Borger  |  The Guardian UK

photo
Will Obama be inheriting a weaker America? (Photo: The Economist)

  • US intelligence: "We can no longer call shots alone."
  • European Union will be "hobbled giant" by 2025.
  • Triumph of western democracy not certain.
  •     The United States' leading intelligence organisation has warned that the world is entering an increasingly unstable and unpredictable period in which the advance of western-style democracy is no longer assured, and some states are in danger of being "taken over and run by criminal networks".

        The global trends review, produced by the National Intelligence Council (NIC) every four years, represents sobering reading in Barack Obama's intray as he prepares to take office in January. The country he inherits, the report warns, will no longer be able to "call the shots" alone, as its power over an increasingly multipolar world begins to wane.

        Looking ahead to 2025, the NIC (which coordinates analysis from all the US intelligence agencies), foresees a fragmented world, where conflict over scarce resources is on the rise, poorly contained by "ramshackle" international institutions, while nuclear proliferation, particularly in the Middle East, and even nuclear conflict grow more likely.

        "Global Trends 2025: A World Transformed" warns that the spread of western democratic capitalism cannot be taken for granted, as it was by George Bush and America's neoconservatives.

        "No single outcome seems preordained: the Western model of economic liberalism, democracy and secularism, for example, which many assumed to be inevitable, may lose its lustre - at least in the medium term," the report warns.

        It adds: "Today wealth is moving not just from West to East but is concentrating more under state control," giving the examples of China and Russia.

        "In the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis, the state's role in the economy may be gaining more appeal throughout the world."

        At the same time, the US will become "less dominant" in the world - no longer the unrivalled superpower it has been since the end of the Cold War, but a "first among equals" in a more fluid and evenly balanced world, making the unilateralism of the Bush era no longer tenable.

        The report predicts that over the next two decades "the multiplicity of influential actors and distrust of vast power means less room for the US to call the shots without the support of strong partnerships."

        It is a conclusion that meshes with president elect Obama's stated preference for multilateralism, but the NIC findings suggest that as the years go by it could be harder for Washington to put together "coalitions of the willing" to pursue its agenda.

        International organisations, like the UN, seem ill-prepared to fill the vacuum left by receding American power, at a time of multiple potential crises driven by climate change the increasing scarcity of resources like oil, food and water. Those institutions "appear incapable of rising to the challenges without concerted efforts from their leaders" it says.

        In an unusually graphic illustration of a possible future, the report presents an imaginary "presidential diary entry" from October 1, 2020, that recounts a devastating hurricane, fuelled by global warming, hitting New York in the middle of the UN's annual general assembly.

        "I guess we had it coming, but it was a rude shock," the unnamed president writes. "Some of the scenes were like the stuff from the World War II newsreels, only this time it was not Europe but Manhattan. Those images of the US aircraft carriers and transport ships evacuating thousands in the wake of the flooding still stick in my mind."

        As he flies off for an improvised UN reception on board an aircraft carrier, the imaginary future president admits: "The cumulation of disasters, permafrost melting, lower agricultural yields, growing health problems, and the like are taking a terrible toll, much greater than we anticipated 20 years ago."

        The last time the NIC published its quadrennial glimpse into the future was December 2004. President Bush had just been re-elected and was preparing his triumphal second inauguration that was to mark the high-water mark for neoconservatism. That report matched the mood of the times.

        It was called Mapping the Global Future, and looked forward as far as 2020 when it projected "continued US dominance, positing that most major powers have forsaken the idea of balancing the US".

        That confidence is entirely lacking from this far more sober assessment. Also gone is the belief that oil and gas supplies "in the ground" were "sufficient to meet global demand". The new report views a transition to cleaner fuels as inevitable. It is just the speed that is in question.

        The NIC believes it is most likely that technology will lag behind the depletion of oil and gas reserves. A sudden transition, however, will bring problems of its own, creating instability in the Gulf and Russia.

        While emerging economies like China, India and Brazil are likely to grow in influence at America's expense, the same cannot be said of the European Union. The NIC appears relatively certain the EU will be "losing clout" by 2025. Internal bickering and a "democracy gap" separating Brussels from European voters will leave the EU "a hobbled giant", unable to translate its economic clout into global influence.

      

    »


    Comments

    This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

    What is Wall Street but a

    What is Wall Street but a "criminal network?" The whole idea is to own the legislative process so that your crimes are officially labeled "legal." Isn't that what Phil Gramm pulled off in 1999? What has the history of Mafia crime families in the United States taught us? That there's not ultimately much difference between their tactics which include murder, intimidation, extortion, and various kinds of corruption. Only when the US government under men like Bush and Cheney do it, as Nixon infamously said, "it means it's legal" by administrative fiat. The CIA has engaged in assassination, in corruption by cultivating the vices of foreign leaders [see CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HITMAN]; even today's truthout contains a story about CIA murder of missionaries in South America. The only difference is that the FBI, CIA, &c. wear Brooks Brothers and the Mafia wears Armani. So why should we be shocked that the Russian Mafia exists or that there are Somali pirates. They are only imitating the most successful role-models in the world.

    Thank you very much George!

    Thank you very much George! You and your neocons really did it good, didn't you. Are you satisfied now?

    This is no doubt

    This is no doubt disappointing to many an Obamatard neo-patriot, who naively thought the US could be made into a force for good once the Repub "Nazis" were driven from power. Let's hope that the era of liberal "humanitarian interventions" to come is a mercifully short one.

    the report warns "the

    the report warns "the Western model of economic liberalism, democracy and secularism, for example, which many assumed to be inevitable, may lose its lustre - at least in the medium term." secularism? are we for real here? have we forgotten what happened when bush ran for a second term when the idea that gay marriage could become a reality was floated around? whether it could have happened or not, many americans - both democrat and republican - voted for who they thought might best defend this christian sacrament. not to say others of different faiths voted differently, because i don't know, but we know in which religious camp most americans pitch their tents. with fervor.

    who is in charge of what get

    who is in charge of what get printed here..is material on the new world order too controversial to print...are we so afraid of the possibility of a world governing class that we can not even talk about the possibility of a new american currency. the possibility that the year 2020 will be only vaguely resembling what we have lost so far in the world of geo-politics, is a strong possibility... i am afraid of an aristocracy and I do think that we need to be looking at the notion of a world class of leaders that will dismanle the united states as we have know it.

    "...some states are in

    "...some states are in danger of being taken over and run by criminal networks"? Hell, that happened to us eight years ago!

    Beware self fulfilling

    Beware self fulfilling prophesy. We can predict the future no better than the coin operated fortune teller at the carnival. We need to stop living in fear and start living. We need to evaluate who we are as individuals, small communities, states and a nation. We need to stop thinking that we are better than the rest of the world. We need to help our neighbor. We need to stop looking for the boogie men. I'm not naive.....I'm just tired of the self centered approach to life that most Americans take. OUR government is only as powerful as WE will let it be. If WE don't like it then WE need to take it back. Run for office, even at a small town, small community level. Work up from there. We need to stop complaining and start doing.