Share

Sadr Followers Protest Iraqi-US Pact in Huge Rally

by: Adam Ashton  |  McClatchy Newspapers

photo
Thousands of followers of Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr converge in central Baghdad, Iraq to protest a proposed US-Iraqi security pact. (Photo: Khalid Mohammed / AP)

    Baghdad - Tens of thousands of followers of radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr packed a central Baghdad square Friday, where they protested a U.S.-Iraq security agreement and likened Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to fallen dictator Saddam Hussein.

    Sheik Abdul Hadi al Mohammadawi read a nationalistic speech on behalf of Sadr, urging a rejection of any pacts with the U.S., charging that approving one would infringe on Iraqi sovereignty.

    The crowd chanted, "Leave, leave, occupier."

    It was a mostly peaceful rally protected by the Iraqi military and Sadr's followers, who frisked people as they entered Firdos Square. Many carried Iraqi flags, portraits of Sadr or colorful prayer mats.

    An effigy of President George W. Bush hung from the pedestal where a famous statue of Saddam once stood. After Mohammadawi's speech, a crowd gathered around the effigy, hurling garbage at it, then pulling it down and burning it.

    Mohammadawi directed part of his speech at Iraqi members of parliament who are considering the security agreement. He said that the U.S. should leave unconditionally and hand over the country to Iraq's military.

    "Our safety cannot be solved by the occupation," he said. "Iraqis are able to protect their country. They will take responsibility by themselves."

    The agreement has cleared Iraq's Cabinet but is awaiting a vote in parliament. It calls for the U.S. to leave Iraq by Dec. 31, 2011, and it gives Iraq much more control of American military operations in the meantime.

    Sadr's political party has tried to derail the pact in parliament, shouting down readings of it over the past two days and pledging to fight it. It has support from an alliance of Shiite and Kurdish parties.

    Men who attended Friday's rally echoed Mohammadawi's view, saying that the exit of American forces would ease tensions among Iraqis rather than inflame them.

    "By God, the violence will not come back, because Iraqis are a united people," said Jasim Kadhim, 35.

    Many were skeptical about the motives of Maliki, who helped broker the agreement. They sang, "Maliki is the new Saddam," as they marched away from the rally.

    "The agreement on the status of forces doesn't help Iraq," said Halim Hafidh, 31. "They will not give us our full rights."

    -------

    Ashton reports for The Modesto (California) Bee. McClatchy special correspondent Laith Hammoudi contributed to this report.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

US out of Iraq! Dismantle

US out of Iraq! Dismantle your Empire!

As one can see, the people

As one can see, the people of Iraq do not want America there. Perhaps this is just one faction, and one of the more radical factions, but remember that the Shi'ite Iraqis are the largest ethnic group in Iraq. I have no doubt that you will find similar anti-Americanism among Sunni and Kurdish peoples. Thus, I rest my case that when people like John McCain claim that the US is welcome in Iraq, it is a lie.

This SOFA agreement was

This SOFA agreement was signed under duress (as in knife at the throat) and therefore should not be valid/legal. It was also signed in secret when a significant number of the members of the Iraqi cabinet were absent.(Somebody please get Bush a horse to learn to ride to occupy his time until January 20.)

Anti-Americanism must be

Anti-Americanism must be exposed for the lie that it is. These people, who are part of a growing crowd across the globe, are not anti-American... They are anti-American Imperialism, anti-state-supported terrorism, anti-military occupation. This nonsense about training the Iraqi army must be placed in the proper context. Iraq had an army before the US disbanded it. And who do the Iraqis need to be defended against? The only real threat they've faced in recent memory has been the United States! It strains logic to assume that the US is training the Iraqis to defend themselves against the US. The US has committed war crimes and atrocities, engaged in torture and collective punishment, and owes Iraq reparations and a sincere apology. The Iraqis are fully within their rights to demand an immediate end to the US occupation, and the US needs to immediately comply with that demand.

too bad Obama isn't going to

too bad Obama isn't going to do anything. he is turning his back on every thing h ever said to us. i mean, he was smart in that he never made promises b/c he knew they would be lies. but still too bad. he's taking us right down that same path.