News

Facebook DIGG

Obama Orders Plan to Create 2.5 Million New Jobs by 2011

by:   |  Visit article original @ Agency France-Presse

photo
President-Elect Barack Obama wants his advisors to develop an economic recovery plan that will include 2.5 million new jobs by 2011. (Photo: Getty)

    Washington - US president-elect Barack Obama announced Saturday that he had ordered his economic advisers to produce an economic recovery plan to create 2.5 million new jobs over the next two years.

    "We'll be working out the details in the weeks ahead, but it will be a two-year, nationwide effort to jumpstart job creation in America and lay the foundation for a strong and growing economy," Obama said in his weekly radio address.

    Obama, who has vowed to make the economy his priority when he takes office from President George W. Bush in January, said the effort should produce 2.5 million new jobs by January of 2011 and lay the foundation of the country's economic recovery.

    His announcement came two days after government data showed that new jobless claims had surged to a 16-year high, in a new sign that the world's largest economy appeared to be sliding into a deep recession.

    This year, the US economy has shed 1.2 million jobs, and the president-elect warned millions more could be lost next year without urgent action.

    The Federal Reserve has warned the jobless rate could climb to 7.6 percent in 2009 as the economy struggles with a sharp downturn and a global financial crisis.

    Obama said he intended to put people back to work rebuilding roads and bridges, modernizing schools, building wind farms, solar panels and fuel-efficient cars.

    He also plans to develop alternative energy technologies that he says can free the United States from its dependence on foreign oil and keep the US economy competitive in the years ahead.

    "These aren't just steps to pull ourselves out of this immediate crisis," he said. "These are the long-term investments in our economic future that have been ignored for far too long."

    Obama said his economic recovery plan represented "an early downpayment" on the type of reform his administration will bring to Washington.

    He said he wanted to form a government "that spends wisely, focuses on what works, and puts the public interest ahead of the same special interests that have come to dominate our politics."

    The announcement came amid media reports that the Illinois Democrat had picked New York central banker Timothy Geithner to be his treasury secretary.

    Geithner, 47, is well known to Wall Street from his role as New York Federal Reserve chief and was a career official at the Treasury Department from 1988 to 2001, serving under three administrations and rising to undersecretary for international affairs.

    As the successor to Republican Henry Paulson, Geithner would become the overseer of a 700-billion-dollar bailout package for distressed banks at a time when the world's largest economy is staring at recession.

    "Tim is a great choice because he brings to the job intelligence, a wealth of experience in crisis management, deep knowledge of everything that has been going on in the last year, and an ability to listen and learn," Alan Blinder, a former Fed vice-chairman and now a Princeton University economist, told McClatchy Newspapers.

    The reports of Geithner's selection appeared to have reassured investors, resulting in the Dow Jones industrial stock index jumping nearly 500 points on Friday.

    Former treasury secretary Larry Summers and ex-Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker are likely to play key roles as economic advisors to the new president.

    It was not immediately clear, though, if Summers and Volker would participate in drafting the recovery plan.

    The president-elect predicted in his address that ensuring passage of his plan by Congress would not be easy and he would need the support of both Democrats and Republicans.

    "But what is not negotiable is the need for immediate action," he said. "Right now, there are millions of mothers and fathers who are lying awake at night wondering if next week's paycheck will cover next month's bills."


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

We need well paying jobs

We need well paying jobs with benefits in progressive industries. This country has lost 2.5 million jobs in the past 7 years under the neo-con leadership and many jobs that paid $30 and hour plus with benefits have been replaced with jobs paying minimum wage and with no benefits (the Wal-Mart syndrome). Adding XXX new jobs is not what is needed if it only brings the country back to where it was in 2000 when Clinton left office. Instead of giving $25 billion to Detroit the money should be going to create new industries in mass transit, solar, cogeneration, 100% electric vehicles, and to support family farms instead of companies promoting factory agriculture like Archer Daniel Midland and Monsanto. It is a question of restoring the balance and the quality of life that is being decimated by so called "free trade" agreements which encourages dumping of USA corn in Mexico and rice in Africa, bankrupting family farms and swelling the populations of the city slums and forcing the migration of labor. While this has been great for the large corporations it has been highly destructive to the working people of the world and highly destructive to the environment.

Will these jobs come from a

Will these jobs come from a new war in Afghanistan? Will they derive from maintaining the status quo in Iraq? Or from a massive overhaul and rebuilding of our infrastructure - our schools, roads, hospitals, etc.... The word "jobs" in itself means nothing. Will these jobs enhance and stimulate a much-needed green industry in this country with alternative clean-energy sources, green autos and trucks, or are we going to be the imperialistic loggerheads we've been for centuries. And does Obama understand that "we the people" are fed up with the U.S. government's messing around in Latin American affairs - will he renounce his own economic training as a "Chicago Boy," or are we in for more of the same? Based on his recent appointments, I'm not feeling too optimistic.

Thank God! Finally the day

Thank God! Finally the day care center has moved out of the White House!!!!

I hope Obama can pull it

I hope Obama can pull it off, but anyone who believes the unemployment numbers is fooling themselves. We have a very different economy than we had 15-20 years ago. We have armies of consultants and independent contractors who are not counted among the unemployed even when their work dries up and they have one gig a month or a year! These people are not counted. Check it out with an economist. Ask (or tell!) your representatives.

>Mr. President, can you

>Mr. President, can you detail your economic plan? >> We have ta recognize the gravity of our situation and go forward with a bold and well considered plan. Clean Coal and no hasty tax adjustments, that's our plan, well a major modicum of it. >Mr. President, you share the prominent "ta" with George Dubyah Bush, how do you account for that? >>Ask Molly Ivens. >She's dead, sir. >>I know that, the question was rhetorical.

In the meantime, the current

In the meantime, the current Whitehouse administration is doing what? And over the next 3 years... How many more jobs will be lost? I commend Obama for his optimism... But how will continued outsourcing of our manufacturing productions and importing our commodities increase employment opportunities and health benefits here in the United States? Certainly questionable...But at the current rate of job losses running at 1.2 million per annum... creating 2.5 million by 2011 would only be a dent in the bucket. You want to stimulate the economy...I agree with Bill Maher, write 305 million checks for 1,000,000. and mail em all out to every US citizen in the Nation... Instead of writing blank checks to "Financial Risk Investment Companies and defunct Automakers"... Imagine the wealth of opportunities that would be generated from that economic stimuli's....

It's time for the new

It's time for the new President and everyone else to wake up to reality. The sooner it happens, the sooner we can recover. How are they going to pay for these new jobs? If they raise taxes that'll only hurt the economy more. They can try to borrow, but private domestic investors just took a major hit and don't have the money, and it's unlikely that foreign investors - both private and government - are going to be interested in taking on more US government debt, especially given the increasingly likely scenario that it can't be paid back. That leaves the printing press, which I guess is the way they'll go, which means that we'll be facing some fairly massive inflation and the buying power of our dollars will erode. Clearly the politicians, of both parties, are clueless. What they need to do (but won't, of course) is change the incentives. They need to stop punishing saving and stop encouraging borrowing. And they need to stop the out of control spending.

President Elect Obama's "new

President Elect Obama's "new deal" must create new jobs as well as safeguarding existing jobs. The focus on "maintaining" our infrastructure is necessary, but it is not enough. We need to develop and deliver new infrastructure as well and this is particularly true in the transportation sector. The rebuilding of roads and bridges will only continue our need to cling to the automobile as our primary means of transportation. Our "new deal" must include projects such as suburban-urban light rail and must encourage re-development and if necessary, relocation of offices and industry to our urban centers whenever possible. Public transportation must have a seat at the table and must be considered in our Nation's strategic planning.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.