Share

Afghan Leader Demands Plan for Foreign Forces' Departure

by: Candace Rondeaux  |  The Washington Post

photo
Afghan President Hamid Karzai called for a plan to end the NATO occupation of Afghanistan. (Photo: Reuters)

    Kabul - Afghan President Hamid Karzai has sharply criticized the United States and NATO, demanding a timeline for the withdrawal of foreign forces.

    Karzai's comments came late Tuesday in a speech to a U.N. Security Council delegation visiting Kabul, the capital, this week. He accused the international community of failing "to fight the Taliban properly" since the U.S.-led war in the country began in 2001.

    "This war has gone on for seven years. The Afghans don't understand anymore how come a little force like the Taliban can continue to exist, can continue to flourish, can continue to launch attacks with 40 countries in Afghanistan, with entire NATO force in Afghanistan, with the entire international community behind them," Karzai said. "Still we are not able to defeat the Taliban."

    Karzai spoke days after U.S. President-elect Barack Obama promised to put greater emphasis on security in Afghanistan next year. The two men talked for the first time by phone last week.

    Karzai, whose five-year term ends next year, has become increasingly critical of the international community. He has complained bitterly about mounting civilian casualties caused by U.S.-led airstrikes in Afghanistan and has called for a halt to NATO raids on Afghan villages. In recent weeks, he has become more forceful in his calls for negotiations with the Taliban, saying he would guarantee safe passage to Taliban leader Mohammad Omar if he agreed to talks with the government.

    "If there is no deadline, we have the right to find another solution for peace and security, which is negotiations," Karzai said.

    Karzai, who was elected in 2004 after serving as interim president following the fall of the Taliban in 2002, is facing stiff political competition ahead of the presidential election set for September. With insurgents and criminal groups in control of parts of the country, his political foes have seized on the failure to effectively counter the threat, with some calling for an earlier election.

    According to the constitution, the presidential election must be held 30 to 60 days before the end of the incumbent's term. Karzai's term ends April 22. But the Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan decided this year to delay the vote by six months because harsh winter weather and a lack of security would make it difficult to organize polls in remote provinces.

    Burhanuddin Rabbani, a former president and current leader of the country's largest opposition party, said this week that a traditional loya jirga meeting of Afghan leaders should be held to decide whether to have the election earlier. Rabbani, who was forced to flee Kabul after the Taliban took power in 1996, said postponing the election until September would only delay an inevitable battle over the vote's legitimacy. Although concerns about security during the election are significant, the risk of a deeper conflict looms large if the government fails to heed constitutional requirements, he said.

    "There is no doubt that we are concerned about security, and there are some challenges. But we are also concerned because where is the proof that the country will be more secure in September than in May?" Rabbani said. "The current government doesn't have any role in guaranteeing security. I'm concerned that their only role is to create insecurity."

    Karzai said at a news conference Wednesday that questions about the timing of the election should be resolved by a constitutional commission. "I'm ready -- whether it's in January, February or March," he added.

    Voter registration for the election began last month, and millions are expected to add their names to the rolls in coming weeks. The election commission has arranged for registration to take place in four phases because of the security concerns, with registration first in more peaceful areas, then in provinces with the highest levels of violence.

    About 2.1 million voters have registered in 24 of the country's 34 provinces, according to the election commission. Zekria Barakzai, chief spokesman for the commission, said the final two phases of registration would begin in the remaining provinces in the east and south in December and January.

    Barakzai said the commission is proceeding despite a call from some Afghan officials for an earlier election. He said that security remains an overall concern in the south and the east, where the Taliban insurgency has been strongest, but that talks with local tribal elders, community leaders and authorities have produced a strong registration turnout.

    "We're receiving a lot of encouraging signs from these areas, and we hope it will continue, though security challenges lie ahead," Barakzai said.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Today is Friday. 3 days have

Today is Friday. 3 days have passed without comment from Gates. Isn't it obvious the "Puppet" has quietly received permission, in light of the up coming elections, to start his campaign for re election with a "buttering up" speech hoping to drum up Afghan support? The Puppet Masters are well aware how slim his present level of Afghan support is.

As the U.S. prepares to

As the U.S. prepares to begin another chapter in its capitalist imperialist history under Obama (what I call "same song, 44th verse"), it does bear reflection on Karsai's observation which can be extrapolated from Afghanistan to a global level. Why is it, indeed, that wherever the U.S. is involved 'to help' achieve peace, or reduction in drug flows, or functioning democracy, or economic well-being the results are in fact so often exactly the opposite. On peace, look at the catastrophic U.S. interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as our failed policies in Palestine, Africa, and Asia. On drug control, look at Colombia with it's narco-government, paramilitaries, and massive drug trade. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB131/index.htm At the same time countries showing success in drug control after booting out the DEA (Bolivia and Venezuela) are sanctioned and condemned with classic yanqui propaganda. On democracy, look at any number of U.S. frauds and farces around the world, not to mention its own 2000 and 2004 elections. Look also at U.S. hypocrisy when countries hold democratic election resulting in legitimate victories by people the U.S. opposes. On functioning democracies and economies, look at the U.S. allied near failed state to our south, Mexico, or again look at Colombia. While I distrust Karsai, I do perk up my ears and attention when I hear him repeatedly decrying the disastrous, incompetent and murderous U.S. operations in his country.

For crying out loud people

For crying out loud people Karzi got another buyer for the Opium to be processed into the worlds supply of morphine or don`t any of you recall that even Rumsfeld was sniveling that Afghanistan had produced such record poppy crops they`re threatening profits of big pharmaceutical and there-in is who are behind the whole scam the Petro-Pharma Cartel!

It is interesting reading

It is interesting reading the postings here today. I have one question for the posters: when Bin Laden was in Afghanistan and bragging about killing 3000 + Americans and others on 9/11/01, what would you have suggested as appropriate actions for trying to catch these murderous fanatics? I suspect that most of you along with most of the world were screaming for action and blood. So with the blessings of the world NATO and the US went after Bin Laden. Then Bush decided to become the WAR Chief and we lost sight of the objectives of going into Afghanistan. Now we and our allies are paying the price, and Obama is faced with having to go back to square one and finish the job while trying to extricate us from Iraq. I am so sick of people complaining about our presence in Afghanistan, without out placing the blame for our continued presence there squarely where it belongs: GEORGE BUSH, DICK CHENEY, AND ROBERT RUMSFELD. Perhaps Mr. Karzai would like to explain why he has allowed the regional leaders to continue to grow opium for the markets or why his troops continue to fail to keep control of the areas of his country where the Taliban has been driven out. Maybe he would care to remember that without the help of the US and NATO he would not have been elected President. And, perhaps, Mr. Brookbank, you could try to remember that this nation has had the worst leadership in its history during the last 8 years, and cut the man who is still trying to put together a team to address these problems he is being left, a little slack. Of course, you, sir, are perfect and can find all the right answers, but I suspect that you are someone who wants instant answers to all your demands, and in that you are not unique. It is a truly American and it is what has gotten us into the economic mess we are in, the world mess we are in, and it does not bring peace - it brings war, so stop complaining and placing blame where it does not belong. Look in the mirror and in your own wallet and at your own cars and McMansion home, and then realize that you share the blame with the rest of us for what is going on, and let the new guy on the block try to find some solutions rather than just making assumptions that he is just like the last guy.

To the first commenter:

To the first commenter: Before you trumpet Karzai's divorce from capitalist enterprise, I suggest that you try one of his family's extremely profitable -- but also extremely tasty -- restaurants in Boston, Baltimore, Chicago, and San Francisco.

Hey djnoll I was against the

Hey djnoll I was against the Afghan war from the start, but almost no one in Congress was, including the Dems. No, I don't live in a McMansion as Obama does (I imagine, given that he is a millionaire and in 2007 raked in $4m). And your logic is faulty if you think we should give Obama a "chance" --we already know what he wants, more war in Afghanistan, and we are already against it, so what chance should we be giving him? The chance to screw the world over just like Bush did?

It is also being reported

It is also being reported that Karzai has suggested that if were necessary to bring down U.S. planes to stop the U.S. practice of bombing civilians (a constant in U.S. war practice), he would do so. To understand the sentiment, one might listen to Bruce Cockburn's classic, "If I had a r0cket launcher. Here is the reference to the Karzai coments -- http://www.legitgov.org/#breaking_news Afghan president wishes he could down U.S. planes --If he had something like the rock attached to a piece of string, known as a chelak in Dari, used to bring down kites in Afghanistan--Karzai would use it. 26 Nov 2008 Afghan President Hamid Karzai said Wednesday he would bring down U.S. planes bombing villages if he could, in a sign of growing tension between Afghanistan and its Western backers as the Taliban 'insurgency' grows in strength. As Western dissatisfaction with Karzai has grown over his failure to crack down on corruption and govern effectively, the Afghan president, facing elections next year, has hit back over the killing of dozens of civilians in foreign air strikes. In recent weeks, Karzai has repeatedly blamed the West for the worsening security in Afghanistan... and calling for the war to be taken out of Afghan villages. "We have no other choice, we have no power to stop the planes, if we could, if I could ... we would stop them and bring them down," Karzai told a news conference.

The 2009 Womens' revolt in

The 2009 Womens' revolt in Afghanistan was the solution to the regional problem. Organized in early 2009, the Womens' revolt in Afghanistan spread quickly. Women stormed all Taliban strongholds, sheered the men and made them swear unbreakable allegiance to a social-democratic Afghan state. The foreign troops were expelled, the borders secured, the schools re-opened to all. General prosperity and enlightened government commenced with the Womens' revolt in Afghanistan.