Share

Environmentalists Say Big Three are Blocking States from Imposing "Clean Car" Standards

by: Tiffany Gabbay  |  Cybercast News Service

photo
CEOs of the three major automakers - GM, Chrysler, and Ford - appear before the House Committee on Financial Services on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Matthew Cavanaugh / EPA file)

    Environmental groups say consumers want to buy cars that get 50 miles per gallon and they want electric vehicles - but Big Three automakers don't want to have to produce them.

    When asked why the Big Three - Ford, GM and Chrysler LLC - should be forced to make cars that the automakers say there is no demand for, Mike Tidwell of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network claimed that the market actually wants environment-friendly vehicles.

    "Detroit claims that consumers don't want these vehicles, while every day Detroit pays thousands of dollars to lobbyists to stop any kind of passage of higher gas mileage standards that would lead to hybrid cars, while it sues states that try to go on their own," Tidwell told CNSNews.com.

    "For Detroit to say that consumers don't want it (fuel efficient cars) while simultaneously trying to stop state houses and Congress from improving standards is a circular and duplicitous argument," he added.

    Tidwell's group, along with the Global Exchange and California Cars Initiative, called on Congress Friday to require automakers to commit to meet fleet-wide fuel economy standards of 50 miles per gallon (MPG) by 2015 and to produce 500,000 Plug-In Electric Vehicles (PHEV) by 2012, and 3 million by 2015 - before any bailout money is made available.

    The groups circled the U.S. Capitol with 25 Japanese electric and hybrid cars as part of a pro-fuel-efficient vehicles demonstration.

    The demonstration took place while the Big Three CEOs testified a second time before Congress to plead their case for a $35 billion bailout.

    The environmental groups demanded that the automakers, as part of any bailout, agree to end legal action against "clean car" state laws in California and 14 other states.

    The laws would require automakers to make significant reduction in the greenhouse gas emissions of cars and light trucks sold in those states, Tidwell said.

    "Why is it that Detroit wants our tax dollars but is suing the states that are trying to make cleaner cars?" Tidwell asked.

    The environmental groups claim the Detroit automakers have been suing "clean car states" in an effort to skirt the laws in place that they manufacture more fuel efficient vehicles.

    When asked why all of the vehicles in the demonstration were Japanese, Tidwell explained that only Japanese automakers are manufacturing cars that get 50 mpg and that American cars have not yet come close to matching that.

    Tidwell told CNSNews.com "The best Detroit car only gets 34 mpg."

    "The problem," he added, "is that I would rather buy a Ford car that gets 50 mpg so I can support an American company."

    When asked if American automakers lacked the same technology used in Japan to manufacture such fuel efficient vehicles Tidwell said that American automakers have "chosen" their path to fall behind in technology and "lease their hybrid technology from Japan."

    He went on to explain that the Big Three had "created their own problem" by not investing in fuel-efficient technologies.

    Tidwell, who said the bailout "might make sense" because he "does not want to see" any auto employees lose their jobs - explained that the groups don't feel their conditions are unreasonable, in exchange for what he called a "$35 billion taxpayer gift."

    "Is that an insurmountable condition?" he asked. "I don't think it is."

    Tidwell, who claims that the corporate culture in Detroit, especially at GM, is one that dismisses climate change and energy security as "real concerns" said that if Detroit would "stop suing" then consumers would "get their hands on the hybrids sooner and they would see the demand they claim is not there."

    When asked if environmentalists were placing demands on the Big Three to produce vehicles that perhaps they cannot afford to manufacture now given their financial woes, Tidwell told CNSNews.com that if Detroit produced 50 mpg vehicles - "We'll buy them."

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

I find it amazing that

I find it amazing that groups like this (and some politicians) will whine and complain about the auto companies resisting fuel economy standards. Do you know Europe and Japan got higher fuel economy vehicles? By heavily TAXING FUEL, and taxing vehicles when registered by engine size, thus creating a market for smaller vehicles. We do neither in the US. If I were cynical, I'd say that was because the environmental' groups (and some politicians) find it easier to blame vehicle manufacturers for making vehicles that customers wanted (until the fuel prices spiked), instead of voting for fuel tax increases. Also, the individual states are free to tax gasoline as much as they please. If they were serious about curtailing greenhouse gas emissions instead of playing politics, they'd pursue that instead of fighting in the courts.

If the parts are made and

If the parts are made and assembled in this country, why would I want to buy from a company paying millions per year to executives, when I can buy a better car from another company whose executives make a much more reasonable wage? Being a patriotic American does not mean making an American CEO fantastically rich, for doing a poor job, that a Foreign CEO will do better for much less money. Stupid is as stupid does.

The Big 3 american Car Mfgs.

The Big 3 american Car Mfgs. have outlived their usefulness. Therefore as painful as it might be - it is time for a change! The Big 3 Car Mfgs. are unresponsive to the needs & demands of the customers. That is exactly why the Japanese Mfgs. garnished so much market share. Fuel efficient cars have been available for > 50 years - see http://byronwine.com Recently Ford & Honda have introduced clean burning diesel engines in Europe. Do a You Tube search & you will find many videos regarding these clean efficient vehicles. Ford is also selling the diesel powered vehicles in Australia. Ford claims there is NO MARKET for this product in the U.S. - this is a bold face lie. Volkswagon & Mercedes Benz have been selling fuel efficient vehicles for decades. The Big 3 is a big disappointment & have conspired to misled the public into believing we travel in "motor vehicles" contrary to the letter & the intent of the law. Instead we travel in "private vehicles". Obviously the Big 3 are working hand in glove with the OIL CARTEL & the DE FACTO CORPORATE GOVT. to maintain low mileage, high taxes, & high costs to the detriment of We the People. Further by converting our "private vehicles" (NOT invloved in commerce or trade) to "motor vehicles" contrary to the letter & intent of the legislature - this has allowed LAW ENFORCEMENT to terrorize US All. Please write to me & I will send a 20 page document that supports this allegation.

db, you did make a good

db, you did make a good point, however you must be a little naive too as you've closed your mind into taking in informations that the auto companies and the oil companies have worked in collusion to discourage independence from automobiles or excessive oil use. In California, going back to the 50's they colluded to systematically remove public transportation. GM had some great electric cars that people that had leased them, because they couldn't buy them, loved them, but they literally killed the electric cars.See: "Who killed the Electric Car". I've heard reports from heirs of people whose ancestors were paid off by car manufactures not to produce fuel efficient and/or electric cars. If it wasn't for the employees, we should let the "big three" go down, so that smaller manufactures could pop up like flowers.

I would add that Congress

I would add that Congress should require that company boards of directors add an additional place at the table, mandated by participation in the bailout. This seat should be occupied by a person agreed upon by Congress as a part of the agreement to accept federal money. The seatholder would be a very special person who has the ability to translate science info to laypeople and who would be required to speak at least twice at every board meeting on topics of environmental implications, world citizenship, and consumer implications.

Sean Hannity and Rush

Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh have been in coordinated lock step, claiming Americans don't want hybrids and smaller cars. Yet all I see out on the road every day is cars getting smaller and smaller. Ditto for dealer lots. We know the Prius has been back-ordered for years, currently over a 6+ month wait to buy one. A new Prius plant being built in Canada will reduce the sticker price, plus new models will integrate solar panels. Corollas and Civics have been the USA's best selling models for decades. The Asian carmakers have been profitable and growing. Toyota makes 85% of their cars here. US carmakers are leasing hybrid technology instead of developing their own. Asian carbuilders have also monopolized trade deals for the raw materials essential to hybrid components. Saudi Arabia is even looking past oil already to solar. Why are we entertaining the Big 3 dead-enders?

If you had bothered to even

If you had bothered to even post the automakers' side of the story rather than relying on a biased third party to (falsely) state their position, I'd be more likely to believe what you wrote. At Ford we are absolutely committed to finding technology solutions that make people's lives better. And whether that's through hybrids, battery electric vehicles, hydrogen fuel cells, or plug-in hybrids, we're exploring many options. In addition, we're making fuel-saving technology available across our fleet, rather than creating a showroom/halo vehicle that only few can afford. You can read about our plan at http://thefordstory.com Scott Monty Global Digital Communications Ford Motor Company

My State will be "free to

My State will be "free to tax gasoline as much as they please" as soon as it's free of lobbyists, too- for the auto sellers, the gasoline companies, truckers, etc. Dream on! By the same token, the Big 3 lobbyists have got some laws passed in Congress to "protect" them from the little cars-- specifically, the used cars in Japan & Europe. There are 10s of thousands of low-mile, gas & diesel, roadworthy ECONOMY cars- & trucks- with diesel engines less than 2L displacement, available now... but the Fed laws will not allow their importation until they're at least 25 years old! So, yes... you can cruise the alleyways of Glasgow looking for a 1928 Rolls "Shooting Brake"- and bring it home when you find it- and drive it all over... but an early 90s diesel Mitsubishi pickup with 85,000 miles that gets 55mpg?- sorry... "against the rules". So, thanks, GM, for the fab product line-- and thanks, Ford, for the 'innovations' (like the marketing genius that sold suburbanites all those Ford Exploders). And THANKS, Big 3 lobbyists, from the stockholders who "must be served first", in the "capital gains is the ONLY investment we need to know" America-- and its raspberry "lip service" to global trade. ^..^

Is Ford sincere about really

Is Ford sincere about really wanting to produce clean and efficient cars? The proof is in whether or not Ford is part of the auto industry effort to sue to stop the implementation of higher standards. The proof is in whether Ford has hired lobbyists to oppose higher CAFE standards. According to this 2006 story from the L.A. Times, the auto companies involved in the suit include FORD, as well as GM, Toyota, Daimlerchrysler, BMW, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Porsche, VW. http://articles.latimes.com/2006/sep/27/business/fi-autos27 Nice try, Scott Monty (first commenter) Plan B: Get Big Oil to fund the Big 3 bailout ! The two were made for each other, right?

Do the research the

Do the research the automakers are trying to pull a fast one on everybody were working at it and the such but the truth is over 109 years ago there was a electric car that could go 50 miles at 15mph but electric car's don't break down near as much as Internal combustion cars heck the GM ev1 got over 100+ miles on a single charge but if they sold them the dealers and mechanics wouldn't have work because they do not have the moving parts that break people you need to do your homework the automakers will lose money with electric vehicles that is why there putting them off as long as possible because the cars will work too well. the billion dollar oil companies and the billion dollar automakers are in it together they are out to make money it takes people willing to take a stand to do anyting about it.