Share

White House Takes "Available" Time for Autos

by: Tabassum Zakaria  |  Reuters

photo
Last Saturday outside the office of California Senator Diane Feinstein (D), auto-industry workers and supporters gathered to show their support for a federal deal to rescue GM, Chrysler and Ford. Senate Republicans killed the deal Thursday after no agreement could be reached on union wages. (Photo: Ron Lewis / AP)

    Washington - The White House was studying on Saturday how best to rescue collapsing U.S. automakers, a day after picking up the pieces of a failed congressional bailout plan.

    The Bush administration stepped into the auto fray on Friday, saying it would consider tapping a $700 billion fund set up to rescue Wall Street banks, after Congress failed to pass a bailout.

    Auto company executives and analysts have said that General Motors Corp and Chrysler LLC need immediate help to avoid bankruptcy. Ford Motor Co is in slightly better financial shape but says it needs a major line of credit.

    Bankruptcy of one of Detroit's Big Three would be a body blow to the U.S. economy, which is already in recession, immediately hitting car parts makers and car dealers, as well as manufacturers.

    Administration officials were gathering financial information from the automakers and assessing data such as their cash position, said Tony Fratto, a spokesman for President George W. Bush.

    "We'll be focused on trying to get the policy right while considering the best interests of the taxpayer and our economy, and we'll take the time we have available to do that right," Fratto said. "No decisions have been made."

    "We'll take a look at that information, make some judgments and review our options," he said.

    Also on Saturday, top European car makers warned of a bleak 2009, in growing signs that the industry's troubles went far beyond the life-or-death struggle in the United States.

    A senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said no announcement was expected this weekend.

    "We're considering the full range of options with respect to the automakers, and we haven't indicated what we will do, except to note that disorderly bankruptcy is something we should try to avoid," the official said.

    Unions, Democrats Urge Aid

    Democratic leaders and the main U.S. auto workers union appealed to Bush's Republican administration - now in its final weeks before turning over to Democratic President-elect Barack Obama - to provide emergency funds after a Senate deal to save Detroit's Big Three collapsed in acrimony late on Thursday.

    The failure of the $14 billion bailout plan in Congress set markets reeling around the world. But signs that the White House and U.S. Treasury Department might mount a last-ditch effort to help the carmakers buoyed Wall Street on Friday.

    Before financial markets opened on Friday, the administration said it was considering tapping the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) fund that was set up for the financial industry, reversing an earlier vow to oppose its use for an auto bailout.

    Polls show Americans split on bailing out the U.S. automakers, a highly visible troubled sector in a country grappling with recession. The auto companies say one in 10 jobs in the United States are linked to their industry.

    But the companies are widely criticized for fighting tougher fuel efficiency standards and poor model designs that have left them with big, inefficient vehicles that have lost popularity with consumers.

    In response to the company's many struggles, GM said it would cut its first-quarter North American production by 60 percent.

    Bush can ill afford the failure of one or more of the automakers as he prepares to leave office on January 20 with a presidential legacy already battered by the grim economy and the unpopular war in Iraq. Obama has said he was disappointed Congress did not approve the bailout.

    Even if GM and Chrysler secure a last-ditch loan from the Bush administration, analysts see continued uncertainty ahead. Both will be under intense pressure to cut new cost-saving deals with creditors and the main labor union at a time when U.S. auto sales are at their lowest level adjusted for population since World War Two.

    The United Auto Workers blamed the failure of the congressional bailout plan on Senate Republicans who want more wage concessions from the union. The UAW said it was now up to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to find a way to bail out U.S. automakers.

    Thursday's deal fell apart in Congress over proposed wage concessions by the UAW, including the date at which the autoworkers' would accept pay parity with workers at foreign-owned U.S. auto plants. The Democrats hold a majority in the Senate but needed Republican support for the proposal to succeed.

    -------

    (Reporting by Tabassum Zakaria; Writing by Eddie Evans, Editing by Jackie Frank)

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Once again congressional

Once again congressional Democrats display their weak leadership on another issue of critical importance to the country. Sure glad they have a majority in congress. Is that why Republ can ride roughshod on them? Both Reid and Pelosi have no, nyet, nada, zip for backbone. I suppose when they cave in to the next president as well, at least we will then have intelligent leadership in the new Administration, it appears, so we can hope it will be better and that a couple of Rs will not hold the country hostage for their corporate masters (in this case another attempt to destroy unions). Why isn't Reid calling the Senate back in session until they come up with something? This is much more important than bailing out AIG for $200 Bn plus. The inmates are still running the asylum in D.C. Let's hope it changes big time in January!

One might ask why Mercedes

One might ask why Mercedes left Crysler after spending a great deal of effort to combine with that U.S. automaker? The work ethic and level of professional training of the Mercedes technician may be considerably superior to the average worker found in the typical U.S. auto plant. Years ago a friend who was a European tool and die maker in the auto industry related the following story. Incentive programs were in place but his line kept breaking down. He was lead and thus had to stop production while he opened the presses and and refurbished the surfaces. This was a difficult and dangerous job that took a long time. During this time the crew was excused. Finally one of the crew told him that a worker was shooting rubber bands into the presses which would cause friction and ruin the surfaces. It would then be necessary to stop the presses to get inside and refinish the surfaces. This rubber band shooting was done to stop production because the worker was recently married and wanted to spend the time with his new wife.

Let's hope the Democrats

Let's hope the Democrats don't cave in for a change and support the rights of the workers to have unions. For the last 3o years the rich have been attacking unions and their members as only the unions pose any threat to their quest for profits at any cost. One only needs to look at the huge increases in corporate profits over the last 20 years while workers' real income has declined to see where trickle down economics, tax breaks for the wealthy, and subsidies for corporations has taken our country back to the gilded age of robber barrons and enforcement by Pinkerton thugs (replaced now by Blackwater's mercenaries). CEO's in 1980 earned on average 42 times as much as their workers and by 1990 it was more than 80 times as much and in 2001 it was 525 times much as the average worker. But now when these executives have driven their companies into bankruptcy, Republicans want to cut worker pay even more. This is really class warfare of the rich against the working people of this country.

Of course, auto workers are

Of course, auto workers are demonstrating for a government handout. But if the auto companies cannot cut production costs, the insanity will merely continue. That's the insanity as defined by Einstein: "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." The union and its workers are concerned with the short term and apparently don't care to look much beyond the end of their own noses. But good luck trying to get them to make any financial sacrifice that could possibly save them their very jobs in the long run. Take a look at this little web-site video: http://info.detnews.com/video/index.cfm?id=1189 and listen to what the narrator says about the UAW near the conclusion.

To overcome everyone's

To overcome everyone's hesitation to rescue the car industry, I'd suggest that the rescuer, whether it'll be the Congress of the Treasury, insist that the saved companies produce a series of car models named after their saviors: a Levin, A Dingel, a Paulson, a Reid, a Pelosi, a Bush, a McConnell, etc etc. That would be a way of testing consumer preferences in politics, in transportation and get us all "off the dime", to coin a phrase.

continued arrogance to

continued arrogance to focus is on union wages, to define the problem in labor terms, -can't miss another opportunity to shave on an honest man's work--all the executives and directorate are giving up as much and more as good leaders they are. Real problem is the PRODUCT--compared to what the other CAPITALIST SUCESSFUL AUTOMAKERS OF THE WORLD HAVE ACHIEVED, so this is a leadership, design problem, not a worker problem. the market says usa cars are a failure. les's respect the market verdict and not blame this on the poor smuchk who puts his head down and does what he is told.

Like the nation taken as a

Like the nation taken as a whole, I am of two minds about whether to bail out these companies or not. They have failed to be competitive for many years now, turning out products that even loyal Americans won't buy. They treat their managers and executives like kings and waste millions on them that could go to innovation. Yet I hate to see the workers have no jobs. It will take quite a while to find jobs for all of them. The retirees will lose their health care benefits and most of their retirement. I have no idea what will become of this country if this many people have no income. I am not at all persuaded that the unions killed these companies. Apparently the reason Honda and Toyota is doing so well is they have no retirees to support yet. I don't know if they provide a retirement program or not, but I don't think we should reward the companies that don't have any retirees, by failing to support the the companies that do support them. I guess that I lead slightly toward the bailout, but I am not convinced that those companies will improve if bailed out. Their corporate execs could not be more unimpressive.

The administration gave $2

The administration gave $2 Trillion to somebody and refuses to say who got the money. Then, they refuse a $15 Billion loan to keep the automotive industry alive. Something weird is going on here. It's not the amount of the money. Is it that the greedy Wall Street Republicans can give millions to CEOs who drive their companies into bankruptcy but want to penalize the GM workers, who are certainly not getting rich? Thank goodness we're about to get rid of these guys.

Hey mecedes, Chyrsler was a

Hey mecedes, Chyrsler was a very profitable company with huge cash reserves when it was sold out to Dailmer. Daimler looted Chrysler as is happening to US Taxpayers right now.

Once again the government

Once again the government will not step in to help workers, but they will step in to help Wall Street Billionares. Who is profiting from our present form of government? Not the ordinary citizen, that's for sure. The Wall Street Bailout should have been called The Wall Street Rape of America before Bush leaves office.