Share

Franken Posts Newfound Lead Over Coleman

by: Paul Walsh  |  Minneapolis Star Tribune

photo
Al Franken and Norm Coleman observers watch election official Kay Schuch sort through ballots during a recount. (Photo: John Cross / Mankato Free Press / AP)

    The state Canvassing Board's ballot rulings today in the U.S. Senate race have unofficially put challenger Al Franken in the lead by nearly 250.

    The intense scrutiny of "voter intent" resumed this morning by the five-member board charged with directing Minnesota's recount in the U.S. Senate race between incumbent Republican Norm Coleman and Democratic rival Al Franken, and the first 90 minutes of ballot rulings turned the challenger's slight deficit into a growing triple-digit lead.

    Also this morning, the State Canvassing Board sidestepped the Coleman team's proposal to prevent as many as 150 ballots from being counted twice. Talking about instances when a ballot couldn't be run through a voting machine, requiring a duplicate to be made, the Coleman camp said that such ballots should be counted only if an original could be matched with its copy.

    However, board members today ruled that the duplicates should not be addressed by the board but in "another forum," said Board Chairman Mark Ritchie. But it will consider the ballots if there are questions about the intent of the voters who cast them, the board said.

    Later in the morning, Coleman officials requested that the state Supreme Court prevent the Canvassing Board from including these votes in its recount totals.

    In response to the Coleman request, Franken spokesman Andy Barr said: "This is just the latest desperate act by a campaign panicked because it has suddenly realized that it is going to lose the election."

    On Thursday, the board reviewed Coleman's challenges of hundreds of Election Day ballots, and the day's work saw the unofficial margin between the candidates dwindle to within a handful of votes.

    Then, as the board took up and rejected more Coleman challenges today, Franken pulled ahead in the opening minutes and steadily built his advantage beyond 250 by midday.

    Moments after Franken took the lead, Coleman campaign spokesman Mark Drake said in a statement: "While varying headlines and a flurry of different numbers will continue, we encourage everyone to just hang on until the process is finished. When it is finished, Norm Coleman will still lead, and we believe, be re-elected to the United States Senate."

    Franken's move to the lead was no real surprise, given that the vast majority of ballot challenges typically fail. On the previous two days, when the board examined challenges from Franken, most were rejected and Coleman gained.

    Also, thousands of challenges previously withdrawn by the campaigns have yet to be added back into their opponents' columns and will affect the margin in ways that can't yet be determined.

    In court Thursday, the state Supreme Court said that improperly rejected absentee ballots must be counted by the Canvassing Board, something Coleman tried to prevent. But they won't be counted immediately, and Coleman and Franken must agree on which ones are tallied.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

This should serve as a first

This should serve as a first rate example as to how Republicans win elections, when they win. Through the use of caging lists and the massive destruction of discarding of absentee ballots, Republicans thrive on the subversion of democratic elections to eject themselves into critical political seats. I'd like to know just how many elections are stolen each year by Republicans on local and national levels by the kind of tactics Coleman has failed to implement in this election, thanks to a sudden Supreme Court intervention. It must be mind-boggling.

This story just keeps

This story just keeps getting better. Gosh, if Frankin wins that means we just need to get one Republican Senator to leave his demented party and become an independent to finish off this 60 votes nonsense. Hooray! Remember Jim Jeffords? It's time for a re-play!

He's good enough, he's smart

He's good enough, he's smart enough, and dog-on it, people like him.--Go Al.

My prayer of meditation for

My prayer of meditation for this contest is, that the voters intent will decide the winner. Only in that way can the will of the electorate be known. It is the people that must win. The candidates are simply there to serve what ever the mandate of the voters decide.

Go Al. You can do it. Yes

Go Al. You can do it. Yes you can!!

There is no magic in having

There is no magic in having 60 Senate Democrats plus independents, because on various issues some of them will defect, just as some Republicans will. Of course, 60 is better than 59, and 59 is better than 58. And Al Franken is better than Norm Coleman.

I don't know why you print

I don't know why you print this because it's decieveing. Coleman is still going to win. Coleman challenged more ballots therefore these results. Coleman has at least 500 votes that were withdrawn by Franken but not included in these totals. It's a dis-servcie to print a story like this. Franken has never lead in this race. Coleman will pick up votes with the double counts and the rejected absentee's estimated at 1600 will break even. All this does is give the impression and hope of a Franken win, which has little chance. This story is deceiving.

David Spaeth has got it

David Spaeth has got it right. The Rove political machine had almost ruined democracy in this country. This Coleman/Franken fracas is just one of the few that the Repugnantcans could fiddle with, as overwhelming voting by Democrats in most elections put away any chance of Repug shenanigans because just too many people voted Democratic so that the caging and voter challenges didn't do anything. So in a few close elections, Roveian tactics have still been in play. Karl Rove is just one of the Fascist Bushista cabal that needs to be investigated, indicted, prosecuted, and found guilty of crimes against the US Constitution, the Geneva Convention, the US Taxpaying Public, and the Earth's humanity and ecology in general.

One of the sad consequences

One of the sad consequences of this election is that several moderate Republicans lost their seats so those that are winning (honestly) are in extremely conservative states and tend to be more ideologic. There is less crossing of lines to vote on sensible legislation. 60 may not be magic, but it sure helps.

LOL...!!! Well Republicans,

LOL...!!! Well Republicans, you can look at your pain and fear over a possible Franken Win.., and then again, you could also reflect back and think BuSh VS Gore 2000 and....'politicians'... 'phony, staged Republican outrage'... 'lawyers'... 'Republican appointed Supreme Court Judges'... and then ask how ''you folks'' hold your head up and look the people of America and the entire world in the face after 8 years of The BuSh-Cheney 'Foistings' on Planet Earth....... talk about yer pain... '''''ouch!!!''''' x 1,000,000,000 and then some...

For once there'll be a

For once there'll be a professional comedian in the senate! But I doubt Al Franken can make it a bigger joke than it already is...

Such irony... such poetic

Such irony... such poetic justice. Al's persistence has shown the cowards from Florida 2000 that they should not have given in to the hype and the spin

This recount is a true test

This recount is a true test of all kinds of theories and assumptions (mainly statistical) on voting in general. I mean, EVERY vote except for a few, will be counted and verified an dthen certified (a mere legal nicety)... It will be the focus of research for decades - I believe this is the first time a state has had a complete, hand, count which can be compared to the SAME votes as cast on machines...

I'm impressed at being able

I'm impressed at being able to browse an image of every single contested ballot, and then download a pdf file for enlargement. And, it may be more than a cute game the Trib has come up with: Register and be shown a random contested ballot. As few or as many as you dare to inspect. Accept or reject it, and the Trib uses your judgement to update the estimate of the final, \ Extremely informative, to me. For example, seeing a ballot in which it at first looks like the voter has scratched out Coleman's name. But, then, you see that every filled in bubble has a scratch out component. (Missing are the instructions to voters on how to spoil an entire ballot, so maybe that is what this voter wanted to do. I thought otherwise, that he/she simply dialed in circle-filling, or X'd every vote she wanted to cast,and then went back to fill in the circles.) Is this transparency or an entertainment?