Share

Bringing the World Out of Denial: The Power of Passion, The Fallacy of Fear

by: World Business Academy, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

photo
(Photo: dev null)

"Santiago never realized that people are capable, at any time in their lives, of doing what they dream of."
-Paulo Coelho  "The Alchemist"

Although most people are aware of the devastating consequences of critical global issues such as oil depletion, climate change, nuclear proliferation, and poverty, why are we are doing so little to address them as the clock ticks forward? Many of us are in disbelief or denial, perhaps hoping there will be no ill effects in our lifetime – if ever.

Why?   

I believe there are three reasons. Consider oil depletion and its impact on energy security and climate change, as viewed on the North American continent and in Europe. First, there is the financial motive - politicians don’t want to lose support from major corporate sponsors. For example, because of financial support from oil companies, some politicians are reluctant to champion non-fossil-fuel, carbon-free technologies, regardless of their potential to mitigate the challenges of energy security and climate change. Only recently - and only subsequent to immense shareholder pressure - did ExxonMobil change its negative posture on the science behind global warming and the realities of oil depletion.
   
Secondly, we don’t easily give up our creature comforts. Americans have received low-taxed, cheap oil for so long that they’re loath to sacrifice their gas-guzzling Sport Utility Vehicles (SUVs). Although declining in numbers due to higher oil prices, in 2008 nearly 50 percent of the 250 million registered vehicles in the U.S. were SUVs. Fortunately, the consequences of increasing energy prices are diminishing auto companies’ status in the marketplace. Once powerful, global, enterprises such as Chrysler and GM are on their way to becoming distant memories.

But there is a third and more fundamental reason for global crisis denial. I call it the Law of Human Survival. This law asserts that human beings under the stress of rapid technological and social change tend to ignore immense global challenges if they are conveniently perceived to occur in the distant future, and particularly if there is even a shred of opposing evidence. This is our great escape clause. There is only so much stress-induced fear we can handle. Fear constricts the human psyche. It creates a vortex of emotional pain from which we must escape. Sure, fear has its place. In the battlefield, "keep your head down or it will be shot off" works quite well. But when it comes to developing creative solutions to challenging problems, fear becomes an impediment. There are few great innovations in this world that have been motivated by fear.

World-renowned Harvard biologist, E.O. Wilson thinks that human beings may be hardwired to avoid worrying about future generations. He points out that, "For hundreds of millennia, those who worked for the short-term gain within a small circle of relatives and friends lived longer and left more offspring—even when their collective striving caused their children and empires to crumble around them. The long view that might have saved their distant descendants required a vision and extended altruism instinctively difficult to marshal." There is only so much fear we can take, and currently there is more than enough to go around without having to overwhelm our spirit with a heavy dose of future fears. Yet in instances such as poverty, energy security, nuclear proliferation and global climate change, we must act now, if we are to have a positive outcome. How do we overcome our protracted paralysis?

The Solution

In my opinion, there is only one force that can erase this self-protecting, laissez faire attitude towards critical global challenges, or any critical change for that matter: the energy of unbridled passion. This creative force is so powerful that it evaporates fear from the deepest level of the human spirit and can literally change the world. It has done so many times before. Most often a passionate vision stems from a single person. Recall Leonardo da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Marie Curie, Thomas Edison, Albert Einstein, Jonas Salk, and thousands of lesser known change-makers who left their indelible imprint on our planet.

Passion is arguably the most significant competitive advantage an individual or a company can have. It has been estimated that most people work at less than 30 percent of their full efficiency. We tend to blame this phenomenon on a lack of motivation, but in fact, it is often due to the fear and anxiety that accompanies a lack of purpose. Although motivation is self generated, passion can be catalyzed by creating an environment that addresses a person’s need for greater purpose. Every one of us is born with this need. This can result in human efficiencies beyond 90 percent. Have you ever engaged in an activity so inspiring that you lost track of time and your desire for food, water or sleep?

Change The World

How do we instill such passion? I think there are three components that must be present. First, and foremost, the challenge must appeal to a person’s need to help the "greater good." This is the key ingredient of unbridled passion. Both Gandhi and Edison, two disparate innovators, thought that their pursuits would change the world for the better. They never had any doubt. Unless people see that mega-issues such as global warming and energy security are going to significantly affect them immediately - in which case they are likely to act out of fear and make ineffective decisions - they are unlikely to do much. Their perceptions must be altered to a passion for action. The Greek philosopher Epictetus once said, "Not by facts, but by perceptions is society governed."  This kind of change only occurs by stimulating and exciting the human spirit.

People must perceive and believe deep down that they are part of a team that will change the world for the better. That is the magic. It has been done before quite successfully. U.S. President John F. Kennedy galvanized Americans after the successful launch of the Soviet’s Sputnik satellite. He roused their passion with his personal commitment to what some saw as a daunting goal: "We must and we will put a man on the moon in less than one decade." And we did. NASA was formed, which not only achieved this goal, but also spawned numerous new technologies and companies, ultimately creating millions of jobs and stimulating the world economy with trillions of dollars of GDP.

Demonstrate A Viable Strategy

Second, even though the big picture might entail a long-term plan of magnificent magnitude, there must be a perceived high probability of a few near-term successes. To use an American baseball analogy, don’t try for all homeruns. Hit a few singles; they come sooner. People need positive feedback. This does a number of valuable things. With companies, it motivates employees, it demonstrates the validity of the corporate strategy, and it always increases the value of the company in the eyes of current and potential shareholders.

Some years ago when I was Chairman of Catalytica, Inc., we had a strategy that was targeted at hitting several "homeruns." For example, in cooperation with PetroCanada and Mitsubishi, we were developing a process that would in a single step inexpensively convert natural gas to a liquid fuel that could be easily shipped anywhere in the world. The new process would negate the need for expensive liquefied natural gas (LNG) transport, which requires special costly refrigerated tankers, and is considered a dangerous technology and security risk. We were also working on a way to combust fuels with no resulting pollution.

These were very challenging technologies - "homeruns" - and we spent millions of dollars in their development. Our stock price languished along the way as investors wondered whether we would ever solve these problems and commercialize the technologies. Finally, we decided to hit a few "singles." We identified the pharmaceutical industry as one where our knowledge in catalytic science could have a quick impact, enabling us to manufacture drugs in a more ecologically friendly manner and at lower cost. We quickly demonstrated our capabilities, which led to a $10 million investment by Pfizer and, ultimately, the growth of Catalytica Pharmaceuticals in less than 5 years from just a few people to a $500-million business with more than 2,000 people at three manufacturing facilities and a market value of more than $1 billion. Our stock price tripled. Ultimately, we hit a home run, but it was the singles along the way that helped us get there. 

Share The Wealth

Third, there should be a perceived and actual benefit for all involved, whether it is financial, ego related or both. You must share the wealth in any successes, whatever that wealth may be. If the populace supports a political agenda such as a strategy to address energy security or climate change, then any tangible successes should bring the people up-front, perceived benefits, such as tax rebates and incentives. When targeting the support of employees, they should be informed from the very start that they’ll be appropriately rewarded - verbally, financially, with promotions and possibly with stock options. The latter is particularly powerful as it provides employees with a sense of corporate ownership. When Catalytica was successful, even the janitors received a few shares of stock options.

Our Global Challenge

In seeking to motivate the citizens of the world, it is imperative to create, articulate and support a clear vision that stimulates in them a passion to participate. Show them how they can make a difference for the greater good. Present a long-term strategy with visible, achievable near-term successes. Let them play a role in developing the strategic plan. This creates ownership and commitment. And be sure there is something in success for everyone. The discovery of America, Marco Polo’s voyage to China and Thomas Edison's invention of the light bulb were based on passion, not fear. The latter rarely works to create something new and innovative.

This is particularly true at this point in our history. As a species, we have not only evolved physically, but also in the nebulous realm of consciousness. Creative and innovative people no longer work well under autocratic command and control. That world is gone forever. At this critical juncture, we desperately need a few courageous leaders stimulating people around the planet with the passion necessary to create a safer, more rewarding future for all.

About The Author:

James A. Cusumano is Chairman and owner of Chateau Mcely, chosen in 2007 by the European Union as the only "Green" 5-star luxury hotel in Central and Eastern Europe and in 2008 by the World Travel Awards as the Leading Green Hotel in the World. He is a former Research Director for Exxon, and subsequently founded two public companies in Silicon Valley, one in clean power generation, the other in pharmaceuticals manufacture via environmentally-benign, low-cost, catalytic technologies. While he was Chairman and CEO, the latter – Catalytica Pharmaceuticals, Inc. – grew in less than 5 years, to a $1 billion enterprise with 2,000 employees. He is co-author of "Freedom from Mid-East Oil," recently released by World Business Academy Press and can be reached at Jim@ChateauMcely.com.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

  

»


The World Business Academy is a nonprofit business think tank founded in 1987 based on the belief that business, as the most powerful institution in society, should assume responsibility for the whole of planetary society. Led by its founder and president, Rinaldo Brutoco, the Academy publishes extensively on renewable energy, sustainable business strategies, and the challenge of innovative and values-driven leadership. The Academy has a unique resource in its many Fellows, who comprise a veritable "Who's Who" of world-class thinkers.

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

This thesis does not explain

This thesis does not explain why we build a military that is so overwhelmingly out of proportion to the actual levels of threat that face us. We have spent a trillion bucks and launched 200,000 soldiers at a time against an enemy that might conduct one terrorist attack every ten years in this country, and slaughtered far more civilians than terrorists will over a century. We are still building a massive military complex to fight a Soviet threat that doesn't exist. There has to be another explanation as to why we overreact to some threats and under react to others. Maybe we just don't believe in climate change. Maybe we really believe a few hundred terrorists can bring down western civilization, as ridiculous as that is, and that throwing our entire military machine at them can defeat them.

The world's crises would not

The world's crises would not be forever expanding and multiplying if some form of birth control had been instituted along the way. What major problem exists today that cannot be easily be connected to over-population--war, hunger, poverty, pollution (and global warming), depletion of resources . . . What we have is an industrial-military-religious complex ever in control, with a hedonistic disregard of the future. A "poster child" would be the nut who sires 10 kids, then drives a hybrid car as if he were helping to save the environment.

This is an excellent

This is an excellent discussion of our problems and places the burden on us of being the Paul Revere's of our time. There is more concern about our future that his when he cried :The British are coming", Our civilization is more in peril, and there is much lethargy to overcome. We must do what we can to stir up the necessary passion of the media, our church leaders, and our politicians to put aside the trivia of much current concern and urge people to deal with the big problems.

Insightful, well-reasoned

Insightful, well-reasoned and solution-oriented. One of few articles that analyzes the reasons that humans destroy the planet and propose ways to change the innate and capitalist-enforced tendencies of humans to kill everything in their quest for survival, toys and pleasure. The way to stop wars, ecocide and other evils is to change the human heart towards a system known in Buddhism as "ahimsa." This system encourages every human to evaluate their actions and intentions to determine the level of harm that could be caused to the individual, other humans, the earth, and other organisms. When people embrace ahimsa, they give up a lot of harmful behaviors and thoughts. They regain a conscience. They use a broom and rake instead of a leaf blower. They get rid of polluting toys, such as jet skis and ATV's. They stop hunting, fishing, and trapping. They plant gardens. They refuse to assist the war machine. There's hope for our planet, but only if humans embrace a non-harm way of life.

Besides overlooking the fact

Besides overlooking the fact that the world has been cooling for four years, the author does not address anything financial. It is wonderful to think "creative and innovative" can somehow do their own thing. The problem is that the, by far, fastest growing segment of the world's population wants to take the whole planet back to the 13th century. Unless civilized societies somehow rapidly increase their reproduction rate they will be overwhelmed by Muslims. Their are two other possible choices: either try to kill all of the so-called Radical Muslims (our current tact) which will fail because they cannot be recognized; or go for total separation of groups by religion. Financially the United States has been able to outperform its European rivals for a century, mainly because industry here was not burdened by the government imposed social costs of Europe. With our recent actions as a nation we are now joining Europesn social welfare structures, and the less burdened Chinese are and will eat us alive financially, while the Muslims in our midst try to kill as Jewish people here as they can

I and a few others have a

I and a few others have a passion about this. But I don't feel like part of a team. All our efforts and words do no good because we have no real power. The powerful corporations don't care about the future, only about their current bottom line. They control the world, so they always win. If another Edison came along and invented a new solution, it would be just as sidelined as solar power and other existing solutions have been. If a Gandhi came along, the news corporations would give more coverage and legitimacy to the corporate shills, and the movement would never get off the ground. Obama could have been the leader we needed, but, as James Hansen said in his new book, he doesn't get it. The entire system of almost the entire world is rigged to protect and promote corporations and their bottom line. Virtually all our leaders, including Obama, are owned by these corporations and refuse to make the fundamental changes to the system that we need. Let's face it: only a real revolution, an overthrow of the governments of the U.S., China, and many other countries would give us a chance to fix things, and there is no way we can make that happen in time.

This analysis overlooks the

This analysis overlooks the root problem, which is our gross overpopulation of the planet. Nobody will talk about that. And it is clear that humans are not able, as societies, to voluntarily control their numbers. All the other problems will continue to spin out of control in face of the enormous projected population increase in the next 40 years.

These are all very good

These are all very good points that require a much wider debate. I have a MA in Social psychology and there are several theories that come to mind looking at these phenomena. I believe that it's not so much denial that brings people to ignore the daunting facts. Look at the terible record of the laws that Congress and the Senate pass that make a real difference for the environment and society. The trend is obvious: anything that passes, benefits special interests first. Then look at the endless number of NPOs who flood our email with pledges, petitions, contributions, urges to call our DC Reps, who always reply with an anonymous piece of garbage. Denial? People are just desperate. Hope was short lived, and Obama did not turn out to be a hero at all. What were we thinking? I am suggesting all of you to pull up David Phillips Graham's essay http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAphillipsDG.htm The Denial we have to face is related to the fact that Democracy is toast. Since last year I have worked on a visionary project that challenges the definition of Peace and re-brands the symbol to appeal to a new generation. Peace is that force that we need right now to inspire, in a different direction of action, away from the wars and focused on Corruption and greed. But Peace is a rusty old beetle car that needed a redesign and a re purposing. Let's face it, it is not Obama, or a new Independent party that will save us and stop more of the same. It is only that force that will unite the people and empower them to see that their actions and efforts are having an impact that will stand a chance to compete with the masters of propaganda of FOX and Teaparties. Nothing short than a miracle will save this country, which is dragging the rest of the world in the mud, by letting idealogues and war criminals continue their destruction. Look up repeace, help out, spread the word. I can't do it alone

What happens to those who

What happens to those who "passionately" supported Obama when he refuses to sign an international treaty banning land mines? "Oh, we don't mind a hundred thousand or so maimed children as long as our munitions people can make a profit?" What a year ago gave me hope, now makes me sick. I see that it is a trap to be passionate about others. As the environmental and social justice Elder, Joanna Macy, has pointed out, A huge number of passionate individuals, following their hearts is the only force that can turn around this insane juggernaut masquerading as "civilization". And it will!

In answer to

In answer to http://www.truthout.org/1220091: the terrorists have already won- their goal was to ruin the USA and they have succeeded. We are hopelessly in debt and we are borrowing more. Some day this bubble will burst, and it w9ill be the end of the USA as we know it.

The "Seven generations"

The "Seven generations" consideration attributed to The Iroquois Confederation and "We do not inherit the land from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children" referenced as a Native American Proverb, and similar proscriptions refute a biological imperative and give weight to a cultural sunum bonum. The settled agricultural nations as well as hunter-gather nations in pre-conquest America seem to have lived within the resources of the land. The Americas had larger cities and a greater population density than Europe when invaded. Very hard up First Nations men will not work in factory farming, torturing creatures casually. Maybe we can reconnect with the values of many disparate tribes' sense of right conduct. Probably Buddhism is more successfully taken up by Americans and can describe a sane path away from "destroying the material" outlook embedded in Religions of the book.

The main problem, actually,

The main problem, actually, is this: we're constantly being told that in order to survive, we must change our way of life - but no one has yet articulated a clear, concise New Way of Life roadmap, and, most importantly, a Name for this new way of life. We know what way of life won't work - capitalism, communism, etc - but we have no idea what's next. IOW, you don't quit a job until you have another lined up - we humans still don't have another Way of Life lined up, so, naturally, there's no way we can be expected to give up this one... yet...

In lieu of a significant

In lieu of a significant change in human consciousness, or a dearth of personal leadership skills, throw strong support to all the grassroots efforts happening all around you. Change is coming - from the bottom up, not the top down. This means YOU. Yes, you.

To Tom Canfield: Population

To Tom Canfield: Population control is not a problem that yields to direct intervention. Support for women and men, worldwide, would lead to birth control. Many, I think most, educated people who value their lives and futures, want some children but not so many that they can't educate and/or care for them. Also, they would want to pursue their own ambitions, goals and passions. Too many children makes "selfish" pursuit of your own goals difficult if not impossible. We are all so much more than just parents. Also, we need to value - highly - the contributions of non breeders like homosexuals and couples who choose childlessness. We should stop throwing stones at people who are different and don't have our same sense of values. It all comes down to valuing each other and the world's creatures as is. Building self esteem in one another is an important trait for the future of the earth.

Denial is the first stage,

Denial is the first stage, then comes anger, which we are starting to enter, then bargaining and finally we will reach acceptance, when no other alternative is viable. People will change when they see that a currency based economy is not sustainable for it requires infinite growth out of finite resources. Ergo a resource based economy will arise within the next century, people will change at the precipitous, after it's too late for most.

People opposed to a radical

People opposed to a radical climate change agenda are not, in general, selfish idiots who want to steal from their children. On the contrary, most whom I have met want their children to have the same freedoms they have, and not be burdened by a fascist system justified by a climate-change hoax.

Most scares created by

Most scares created by environmentalists have never come to pass, so you cannot blame people for being skeptical today.

NOTHING is being done

NOTHING is being done because its a CORPORATE OWNED PLANET and whatever is not good for the CORPORATE BOTTOM LINE isn't good for the Government Officials who are getting paid by the CORPORATIONS to deny, stall, put off, demand greater proof, inhibit, question or just plain outright vote against getting anything done... MONEY=REALITY=THE MEANING OF LIFE IN THE MODERN, WELL EDUCATED, HISTORY-AWARE 21st CENTURY... :-D~~~ CRAZY huh..?.!...

In one of my local papers, a

In one of my local papers, a fellow named Hans Buhrer applied a technique for summarizing David Limbaugh's column which I will now apply to Midwest Tom's comment: "take the whole planet back to the 13th century; overwhelmed by Muslims; kill all of the so-called Radical Muslims (our current tact) which will fail because they cannot be recognized; industry here was not burdened by the government imposed social costs of Europe; the less burdened Chinese are and will eat us alive financially, while the Muslims in our midst try to kill as Jewish people here as they can".

The deniers and blind ones

The deniers and blind ones visit Truthout!!! You can see from three or four of these comments the exact accuracy of what the article says. We have the person "Midwest Tom" and others who not only refuse to see the obvious fact that humans are eating up the earth and eliminating other life forms while generating huge amounts of toxins, but they also talk about "freedom," which as you can see from what they say really means "I will do whatever I want to do, don't ask me to change, I'm wonderful, capitalism is great, etc." As a matter of polling, it is good to see that the vast majority of people commenting on this article are able to see past their denialism and are willing to look for change. And the change is as easy as reorganizing your lifestyle so your ecological footprint results in a net increase in biodiversity, beauty, quiet places, and blue skies, rather than the continuation of the industrial capitalist death machine.

Saul: You seem astonished

Saul: You seem astonished that anyone who is not a liberal would visit truthout. Non-liberals are often people who like to be exposed to a wide range of viewpoints. And, what you say really means "I am better and smarter than other people, I know what they should do, I can stop them from doing what they want to do, I can take their money for my pet causes, etc."

I believe because of greed

I believe because of greed our current system cannot be fixed, Technology has become to expensive along with healthcare and education which do not give us what even undeveloped countries get for there money. But the only peaceful and effective way out of this system to one that works is through education and better health so we can understand the education, I also believe through the prescription abuse writing by doctors that we will have to retrain doctors and hold doctors responsible for there part in the eventual destruction of America through there abuses. If we settle on A new system it has to include better education and A health care program that prevents bad health and is maintained by good habits not drugs. And we will have to start within this system because If this system colapses before the next system or a technocracy begins we of this generation will not see the results of the knew system.

The fallacy of fear,caused

The fallacy of fear,caused the USA government and other western allies to spend trillions of taxpayers money to shore up the corrupted and unethical banking system, a fraction of this wasted effort,should have fixed the threat to our existence;what would it take the USA government to get that feared?