Share

US: Soaring Rates of Rape and Violence Against Women

by:   |  Human Rights Watch

photo
New report shows significant increase in US domestic violence. (Photo: thephoenix.com)

    More accurate methodology shows urgent need for preventive action.

    New York - A new government report showing huge increases in the incidences of domestic violence, rape, and sexual assault over a two-year period in the United States deserves immediate attention from lawmakers and the incoming administration, Human Rights Watch said today. The statistics show a 42-percent increase in reported domestic violence and a 25-percent increase in the reported incidence of rape and sexual assault.

    The National Crime Victimization Survey, based on projections from a national sample survey, says that at least 248,300 individuals were raped or sexually assaulted in 2007, up from 190,600 in 2005, the last year the survey was conducted. The study surveyed 73,600 individuals in 41,500 households. Among all violent crimes, domestic violence, rape, and sexual assault showed the largest increases. Except for simple assault, which increased by 3 percent, the incidence of every other crime surveyed decreased.

    "The numbers in this survey show an alarmingly high rate of sexual violence in this country," said Sarah Tofte, researcher for the US Program at Human Rights Watch. "This should serve as a wake-up call that more must be done to address the problem in the US."

    The projected number of violent crimes committed by intimate partners against women increased from 389,100 in 2005 to 554,260 in the 2007 report. By comparison, the number of violent crimes against men by intimate partners went down.

    "Domestic violence is often a hidden crime, and these numbers are a stark reminder of how serious and widespread this problem is," said Tofte. "The Obama-Biden administration should make prevention and protection against all forms of domestic and sexual violence a top priority."

    The National Crime Victimization Survey is conducted every two years, with data gathered in phone calls made to a sample of households across the United States. Due to criticism from experts in the subject, the survey's methodology was adjusted in 2007 to capture more accurately the incidence of gender-based violence. The authors say in the report that the higher numbers may reflect the new, more accurate methodology rather than an actual increase. Two major shifts were to describe types of sexual assault to those being interviewed, and to replace "computer-assisted telephone interviews conducted from two telephone centers" nationwide with interviews "by field representatives either by telephone or in person."

    "The new numbers indicate that previously, the government significantly underestimated the number of individuals affected by domestic and sexual violence in this country," said Tofte. "Authorities should urgently adjust public policies, law enforcement, and provision of support services accordingly."

    Human Rights Watch is currently investigating and monitoring the criminal justice response to sexual violence. The organization's recent work includes investigating the backlog in untested DNA evidence collected in rape cases in the US. In Los Angeles City and County alone, there is a combined total of at least 13,000 untested sets of evidence, known as rape kits, sitting in storage.

    Human Rights Watch's national recommendations include:

  • The Obama administration should appoint a special adviser on violence against women in the US;
  • Congress should restore full funding to the Office on Violence Against Women;
  • The Department of Justice, through the National Institute of Justice, should authorize comprehensive studies that more accurately track sexual and domestic violence in the US, especially among individuals who are least likely to be surveyed by the National Crime Victimization Survey;
  • Congress should increase funding for sexual and domestic violence prevention, intervention, and treatment programs;
  • Congress should amend the federal Debbie Smith Act, a grant program designed to eliminate the rape kit backlog, but that states can and have used for other kinds of DNA backlogs;
  • The US should ratify the UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), which obligates states to prevent, protect against, and punish violence against women.
  •   

    Comments

    This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

    The male-oriented/dominated

    The male-oriented/dominated society of the far right has done all it can to brutalize relations between male and female. It can be seen in corporate advertising going back decades, in TV programs in which females are merely useful objects/accessories for males. Letting pornography out of the bottle has resulted in young women experiencing sex as assault and exploitation and young males (and the rest, for that matter) assuming that females are to use, not love and respect. I weep for young women never knowing real sensuality, true love-making, consideration. The far right has done its best to reduce the general population to a brutish state, poorly educated if at all, knowing little except crudity and coarseness. And these people laugh at civilized France. If today's young women only knew what could be, with a real man instead of a would-be porn actor. I was so lucky to have someone who had been taught sex by an older woman, who was sensitive and sensual while not ignoring our natural instincts (nothing like the crude sexuality displayed everywhere one looks today). It will be up to females to force change. Males clearly don't give a damn and never have. Otherwise we wouldn't still be working for poverty pay while males take it all.

    The MORE we allow TV shows

    The MORE we allow TV shows and films that depict women as victim, the more purient interests become stimulated. Men act out... Perhaps our brain chemistry IS so different that we promote violence. I say black out all violence in all media. And punish by example. I remember an old cliche': CRIME Does not pay. Those who rape myst reap the punishment. Who do they think their penis is???

    The system of violence

    The system of violence against women, like every other system in our culture, SERVES those in power. Don't hold your breath while waiting for things to change.

    It's easy to blame this

    It's easy to blame this problem on "right wing elements", but the problem goes far deeper. What concerns me is that the rate of violence appears to have escalated suddenly. Why would that be true?

    This article includes the

    This article includes the statement, “The authors say in the report that the higher numbers may reflect the new, more accurate methodology rather than an actual increase.” Every survey published, regardless of its validity is inevitably considered by its author(s), or at least presented by their client, as being of accurate or “more accurate," methodology. If the authors and/or their client didn’t believe this, or didn’t believe they could get away with it, they wouldn’t have submitted the survey report to public scrutiny in the first place. Poorly designed nationwide surveys are updated annually, using the same deeply flawed methodology, yet they enjoy continued acceptance. They aren’t really questioned. No one bothers to check how the data is collected: What are the actual questions being asked? Who asks, and how? How large is the population, and how was that population selected? Once there is widespread acceptance that specific behavior is actually occurring - especially if there is some sympathy that victims aren’t somehow bad people - some respondents will come to feel less shame, and provide more candid anwers to the survey, yielding a greater number of positive responses. There also comes something of a “bandwagon” effect - Yeah, yeah, that may have happened to me, too - increasing the number of “false” positives. Frequently the problem is one of definition; what exactly constitutes the offensive behavior, and what offensive acts are not included? I accept the author’s claim that the methodology has changed. I would like to see included in all survey reports some detail of the methodology used, and whether any test groups were involved.