Share

Obama Dismisses Bush Pentagon Appointees

by: Sam Youngman  |  The Hill

photo
Defense Secretary Robert Gates is the only Bush appointee who will be retained at the Pentagon by Obama. (Photo: Tech Sgt. Jerry Morrison / AP)

    Despite keeping Defense Secretary Robert Gates in the Pentagon, President-elect Obama's transition team informed 90 Bush appointees their services will not be needed after Inauguration Day.

    Scott Gration, a senior official on Obama's transition team, called and emailed several of President Bush's Pentagon appointees about 10 days ago to inform them they were being dismissed.

    Those calls and emails were followed up by an email from Jim O'Beirne, the special assistant to the secretary of defense for White House liaisons, who expressed exasperation that Gration informed the employees directly instead of letting O'Beirne's office know first.

    "With regard to the process, I am unable to provide an explanation," O'Beirne wrote on Tuesday in the email, which was obtained by The Hill. "I played no part in it, and I will not speculate why matters were handled as they were."

    A spokesman for the Pentagon said Gates was "absolutely satisfied" with the way the transition was handled.

    Gates "is sensitive to the fact that a number of appointees will not be able to stay on after [Jan.] 20th," Defense Department spokesman Geoff Morrell said. He noted Gates did request many appointees stay on and the "Obama team was able to cooperate."

    But O'Beirne made it clear in the email that in some cases of dismissal, he thinks the employee's politics played a role in their being let go.

    O'Beirne said that Gates had "sought to keep virtually his entire team in place pending the availability of Obama replacements."

    Out of roughly 250 political appointees, 90 were dismissed.

    "Whatever negotiations occurred in pursuit of that goal, the Gration notifications evidently reflected the results of those efforts," O'Beirne wrote.

    Traditionally political appointees resign at the end of a president's term, leaving the new commander in chief to put his own team in place but with Gates staying in the top Pentagon job there was reason to believe many of his staff would also stay.

    The Obama team noted that a majority of the political appointees will remain in place.

    "Given that our nation is at war, we have asked several political appointees at the Department of Defense to stay in their jobs past January 20th to help ensure a smooth transition. We are grateful for the cooperation and professionalism of the men and women at the Department of Defense in support of our men and women in uniform," an Obama transition official said.

    Bush has repeatedly stated that he wanted to see an orderly transition to ensure that the next president would hit the ground running at a time when the country is fighting two wars and weathering one of the most significant economic crises in modern times.

    Until now, that process seemed to be going smoothly as a number of departments have reported efficient and even cordial working relationships between Bush appointees and transition officials. The holiday Pentagon dismissals appear to be the first breakdown.

    In the email, O'Beirne tried to assure the soon-to-be displaced employees that the decisions were based on "policy change in the Obama administration" and not based on performance.

    However, he said, if employees "harbor residual doubts" then they can "content yourself with the likelihood that it was your outstanding performance as a Bush appointee that drew the opposition's attention to you."

    "In that regard, you may take justifiable satisfaction that you were among the first to be chosen," O'Beirne wrote.

    Other reasons O'Beirne cited for employees' dismissal were "politics, matter of policy and availability of qualified replacements and the strength of the permanent career and uniformed staffs."

    Morrell, a political appointee who is staying at the Pentagon, noted that while O'Beirne is usually the liaison for political appointees Gates chief of staff Robert Rangel has taken over that role. Rangel is also staying on.

    "Jim has had to defer many of the things he could normally respond to," Morrell said as a possible explanation for the email.

    --------

    Emily Goodin contributed to this article.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

There's a huge difference

There's a huge difference between 'fighting two wars' and occupying two countries to control their energy resources.

The "war on terror" must

The "war on terror" must end. It is a war for global domination by the "moneied elite." It is a war FOR money.

This is a non-story in

This is a non-story in search of airtime and space. First, as noted, it is common for political appointees to RESIGN and not expect to be retained by a new administration. This has been true for many decades. Second, the Bush administration has been kknown for appointing people more for their ideology than their competence. Therefore, leaving Bush appointees in place for any length of time is likely to be an obstruction and impediment to the change of course needed by the country. The response to the White House argument that political appointees are being let go because of their politics is : "Duh!" The Pentagon is not the Justice Department, where competence is to be based uppon legal acumen instead of politcal allegiance. The job of the Pentagon officials is to carry out civilian directed military policies. Holdovers from the Bush/Cheney ideology will have one hell of a time following orders and implementing new policies.

Anything that frustrates Jim

Anything that frustrates Jim O'Beirne is a good thing. Don't forget that he's the guy who vetted people asking to be involved in Iraq reconstruction to make sure they were good, pro-life Republicans. I hope he's the first one tossed on his backside.

Agreed. As the late, great

Agreed. As the late, great comedian Bill Hicks pointed out about the first Gulf "War", a war is when TWO armies are fighting. All these are is invasions with consequent insurgencies. And FOR WHAT? -Evidently to bankrupt the USA, I think. The real "war" is going to be to keep this country alive. Expect more casualties.

Jim O'Beirne! I still can't

Jim O'Beirne! I still can't believe he still has a job. When he was hiring people for the CPA in Iraq, he asked such important questions like whether they voted for Bush or what views they had on abortion. As a result, he hired unqualified people for important positions. He's one of the people responsible for the chaos today. Did he get fired? If not, why not.

So the Obama team is keeping

So the Obama team is keeping 160 of the 250 political appointments -- way too many considering that they were certainly hired because they were loyal Bushies.

RE: There's a huge

RE: There's a huge difference between 'fighting two wars' and occupying two countries to control their energy resources. HOW ABOUT FIGHTING TWO WARS FOR THE SAKE OF ISRAEL?