News

Facebook DIGG

Officials: 30,000 troops heading to Iraq in 2009

by:   |  Visit article original @ The Associated Press

photo
Pentagon preparing to deploy 30,000 troops to Iraq early in 2009. (Photo: Adam Nadel)

    Washington - The Pentagon is preparing to order roughly 30,000 troops to Iraq early next year in a move that would allow the U.S. to maintain 15 combat brigades in the country through 2009, The Associated Press has learned.

    The deployments would replace troops currently there. But the decisions could change depending on whether Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, decides in the fall to further reduce troop levels in Iraq.

    Several officials familiar with the deployments spoke on condition of anonymity because the orders have not yet been made public.

    According to the officials, three active-duty Army brigade combat teams, one Army National Guard brigade and two Marine regimental combat teams are being notified that they are being sent to Iraq in early 2009. Officials would not release the specific units involved because the soldiers and Marines and their families have not all been told.

    The Guard unit, however, is the 56th Brigade Combat Team, 28th Infantry Division, from the Pennsylvania National Guard. Members of that unit -- a large brigade with heavily armored Stryker vehicles -- were told last October that they should be prepared to deploy to Iraq early in 2009. The order this week is the formal notice that includes a more specific time frame.

    Currently, the final brigade involved in the military buildup in Baghdad last year is pulling out of Iraq. That departure will leave 15 combat brigades there -- compared to a high of 20 for much of the past year. Other smaller units are also there, including troops doing security, logistics, air assaults, intelligence and medical aid.

    Overall, there are about 146,000 forces in Iraq, and that number is expected to dip to about 142,000 by mid-July when that last unit is all out. That total is at least 7,000 more than the number of troops in Iraq before the buildup began early last year.

    Petraeus told Congress in May that he is likely to recommend further troop reductions in Iraq, but he did not provide any details. If he decides in the fall that fewer brigades will be needed in Iraq during the next year, there is the chance that brigades could simply be directed to the war in Afghanistan instead.

    There is a broad consensus that more troops are needed in Afghanistan, to both train the security forces and fight the insurgents. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and President Bush, earlier this year, told NATO allies that they would increase troop levels in Afghanistan in 2009 in response to the growing violence.

    ---------

    On the Net:

    Defense Department: http://www.defenselink.mil


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Perhaps, The U.S. is

Perhaps, The U.S. is concerned about the destabilizing effects of an attack on Iran. nothing like first offending the Sunnis by taking out our own sponsored despot, Saddam. We go on to replace him with a shaky Shiia based Government which should deeply resent the continuing Suuni influence on the United States. Especially when al Qaeda is a Suuni organization with ties to the Saudis. The very people whom Bush brown noses to get more oil out of OPEC which is doing no good any more due to overwhelming global demand. In the meantime, Iran gets picked on because they are not an ally like Israel and Pakistan who do have nuclear weapons, not the least, India. Who are we to legislate a nuclear power plant? We just authorized Dubai to build one. Without the military, our foreign policy agenda is a joke. Let us not be bitten again as in 9/11 by the returning strike.

"....one, two, three what

"....one, two, three what are we fighting for?"

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.