Share

A Time to Demand a Stand With Workers

by: Isaiah J. Poole  |  The Campaign for America's Future

photo
A union organizing rally in Fresno, California.
(Photo: indybay)

    One year ago today, a Senate Republican filibuster killed the Employee Free Choice Act, and with it died one of the most important things Congress could have done to repair the economic damage done to working-class families caused by decades of conservative economic policies.

    The right-wing effort to keep that legislation from resurfacing continues in over-the-top fashion. One of the most recent jeremiads against the bill - brought to the fore by the discredited Center for Union Facts, the source of a misleading ad campaign against unions - compares union organizing efforts at a Minneapolis hotel, where the card-check provisions of EFCA were in place as a result of a local law, to the effort by strongman Robert Mugabe to keep power in Zimbabwe, calling the efforts "coercive."

    The idea that union volunteers visiting workers' homes and encouraging them to sign union organizing cars is remotely comparable to the brutality of the Mugabe regime points to the hysterical desperation of the right over this issue - and the fact that they have no answer to what workers actually say they want.

    What they want, as our latest Making Sense 2008 alert shows, is that more than half of all U.S. workers - nearly 60 million - say they would join a union right now if they could. Their best opportunity to get ahead is by uniting with co-workers to bargain with employers for better wages and benefits. Working people want that opportunity.

    Plus, the allegations of abuses of union organizers pale in comparison to the abuses of anti-union employers taking advantage of what is now a broken system. Corporations routinely intimidate, harass, coerce and illegally fire people who try to organize unions. Workers are fired in a quarter of private sector union organizing campaigns; 78 percent of private employers require supervisors to deliver anti-union messages to their employees; and even after workers successfully form a union, they can't get a contract one-third of the time. The National Labor Relations Board, once a reliable arbiter of employer-employee disputes, is now so politicized under a Bush administration that is ideologically opposed to unions that it has issued a torrent of precedent-busting anti-union rulings.

    The federal government is blocking the freedom of working people to make their own decisions about joining a union. The current "election" system for union recognition is decidedly undemocratic. One side - the corporation - has all the power, controls the information workers receive, and routinely poisons the process by intimidating, harassing, coercing, and even firing people who try to organize unions.

    Enacting the Employee Free Choice Act would do three simple, fair things for workers: It would make it possible for a majority of employees to sign union authorization cards, validated by the National Labor Relations Board, to have that union recognized by their employer; it would strengthen penalties for companies that coerce or intimidate employees in an effort to prevent them form forming a union; and it would bring in a neutral third party to settle a contract when a company and a newly-certified union cannot come to an agreement after three months.

    Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama supports this legislation, Sen. John McCain does not. This is a good time to ask people running for office whether they stand with workers and their right to form unions or with the corporations and conservative enablers who would block this right.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

  

»


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

TS Tech North America is a

TS Tech North America is a holding company with several subsidiaries, one of which makes the active headrests that go in Honda's current top-end model cars. The last time anyone tried organizing a union there, they fired everyone on the spot (even those who hadn't said a word), closed the plant and moved it elsewhere. I was told, when I mentioned that someone needed to get a union into Michaels' Arts and Crafts, that I could be fired just for saying that. Employers don't seem to understand that when their employees have the money to buy the things they need, they're more likely to buy the things they want, too: a rising tide lifts all boats. Decent pay also increases morale, which tends to lead to better product and better service.

Crooked unions (in bed with

Crooked unions (in bed with management in order to exploit the work force) and stupid, lazy, greedy American workers are really to blame for our current situation. If anyone has the courage to actually speak out against management over unfair labor practices they will soon find themselves ostracized and standing alone! It's a dog eat dog work world out there and many American workers can be likened to the following example: Picture in your mind a man in Nazi Germany operating a large bulldozer as he pushes thousands of dead bodies into a mass grave. You know... one of those horrific scenes right out of WWII. As he goes about this daily grisly task he's daydreaming and has one of those "thought bubbles" over his head. He's thinking to himself: "Geeze... I hope we get a Christmas turkey this year!". There are many people out there that will bury you and your loved ones in a minute - if it will just keep them from being buried along with you! It's this kind of mentality that is our real enemy - and our workforce is filled with people that will do dirty deeds just like this - for a few lousy bucks and a "safe" pass for themselves and their families. Shame on all of them!

What the author neglects to

What the author neglects to mention is that much of the damage done to workers was by none other than Bill Clinton and NAFTA. Obama supports NAFTA. He may claim to support this legislation, but don't count on it. Just look at the millions of dollars he's raking in from corporations and his legislative track record (support for draconian bankruptcy legislation, watering down nuclear plant regulatory legislation, funding hundreds of billions of dollars toward war, and more) and you have a better idea of what to expect. Four more years of a bi-partisan corporate agenda and war, only wrapped in a veneer of populist rhetoric.

I think it's interesting

I think it's interesting that both sides claim the other's approach is "coercive". I suspect they're both right, and that all they're arguing about is who gets to do the most effective coercion. There is no substitute for voters who are actually paying attention, but the presumption on both sides is that the bulk of the workers are *not* paying attention, or, if they are, that they are readily swayed by intimidation (or, more politely, peer pressure). Both sides evidently presume correctly. It's sad. The heaviest price of today's ignorance and lack of dedication to freedom will be paid by future generations, as always. Freedom is not free, and by definition it belongs only to those who think for themselves.