News

Facebook DIGG

As Campaign Heats Up, Untruths Can Become Facts Before They're Undone

by: Jonathan Weisman  |  Visit article original @ The Washington Post

photo
Sarah Palin and John McCain campaigning. (Photo: Getty Images)

    From the moment Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin declared that she had opposed the infamous "Bridge to Nowhere," critics, the news media and nonpartisan fact checkers have called it a fabrication or, at best, a half-truth. But yesterday in Lebanon, Ohio, and again in Lancaster, Pa., she crossed that bridge again.

    "I told Congress: 'Thanks but no thanks for that Bridge to Nowhere up in Alaska,'" Palin told the crowds at the "McCain Street USA" rallies. "If we wanted a bridge, we'll build it ourselves."

    Palin's position on the bridge that would have linked Ketchikan to Gravina Island is one example of a candidate staying on message even when that message has been publicly discredited. Palin has continued to say she opposed a project she once campaigned for - then killed later, only after support for it had collapsed in Congress.

    As the presidential campaign moves into a final, heated stretch, untrue accusations and rumors have started to swirl at a pace so quick that they become regarded as fact before they can be disproved. A number of fabrications about Palin's policies and personal life, for instance, have circulated on the Internet since she joined the Republican ticket.

    Palin and John McCain, the GOP presidential nominee, have been more aggressive in recent days in repeating what their opponents say are outright lies. Almost every day, for instance, McCain says rival Barack Obama would raise everyone's taxes, even though the Democrat's tax plan exempts families that earn less than $250,000.

    Fed up, the Obama campaign broke a taboo on Monday and used the "L-word" of politics to say that the McCain campaign was lying about the Bridge to Nowhere.

    Nevertheless, with McCain's standing in the polls surging, aides say he is not about to back down from statements he believes are fundamentally true, such as the anecdote about the bridge.

    McCain spokesman Brian Rogers noted an Obama advertisement released yesterday that says, with no citation, that McCain's economic plan would take money away from public schools. "Absolutely, it's a lie," Rogers said.

    Quoting the National Education Association, Obama aides said McCain's plan to freeze discretionary spending would cut funding for local education agencies, Head Start, teacher quality grants and special education.

    John Feehery, a Republican strategist, said the campaign is entering a stage in which skirmishes over the facts are less important than the dominant themes that are forming voters' opinions of the candidates.

    "The more the New York Times and The Washington Post go after Sarah Palin, the better off she is, because there's a bigger truth out there and the bigger truths are she's new, she's popular in Alaska and she is an insurgent," Feehery said. "As long as those are out there, these little facts don't really matter."

    For now, there appears to be little political reason to back down. A Washington Post-ABC News poll taken Sept. 5 to Sept. 7 found that 51 percent of voters think Obama would raise their taxes, even though his plan would actually cut taxes for the overwhelming majority of Americans. Obama has proposed eliminating income taxes on seniors making less than $50,000 a year, but 41 percent of those seniors say their income taxes would go up in an Obama administration.

    McCain's pitch as a reformer - especially as an opponent of pork-barrel spending - does not seem to have been damaged by media reports of his running mate's pursuit of earmarks, first for her home town of Wasilla and then for Alaska. Obama's once-sizable 32-point advantage on which candidate would do more to change government is down to 12 points.

    "We have created a system where there is not a lot of shame in stretching the truth," said Charlie Cook, editor of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.

    A slew of distortions that have spread through e-mail and on the Internet has also put Palin on the receiving end of some of that truth-stretching - so much so that the campaign dispatched a group of supporters yesterday to act as a "truth-squadding team." The unfounded charges include that Palin cut special-needs funding in Alaska and that she was a member of the Alaska Independence Party.

    Palin actually increased special-needs funding and has never been a member of the Alaska Independence Party, according to FactCheck.org, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

    Aside from the dispute over the Bridge to Nowhere, the Obama campaign has also complained about a McCain advertisement that says the Democrat called Iran a "tiny" threat, even though a chorus of media critics noted that Obama had listed Iran with Cuba and Venezuela as countries whose menace was tiny compared with that of the former Soviet Union. On Friday, in Cedarburg, Wis., McCain repeated that Palin had sold Alaska's state jet on eBay, although Palin herself was careful during her vice presidential acceptance speech to say she merely "put it on eBay." It did not sell on the online auction site.

    McCain aides said yesterday that nothing they have said about the bridge is untrue.

    Palin did at one time support the Bridge to Nowhere, and the $223 million earmarked for the project was sent to Alaska. Some of it was used for other state projects, about $40 million was used to build an access road to the now-scrapped bridge project and $73 million is sitting in an account, awaiting some other proposal to link the tiny towns of Ketchikan and Gravina, according to the Alaska Department of Transportation.

    But, McCain aides said, Palin indisputably turned on a project championed by two of her state's Republican legends, Sen. Ted Stevens and Rep. Don Young. Even Alaska Democrats gave her credit for finally ending it.

    "We're not relitigating the 2006 gubernatorial campaign and everything that was said," Rogers said. "We're not talking about that campaign. Were talking about when she got into office and what she did."

    The claim that Obama will raise taxes is based on his support this year of a Democratic budget resolution that envisions all of President Bush's cuts expiring on schedule in 2011, a move that would indeed raise rates for everyone who pays income taxes. Such resolutions are nonbinding and irrelevant in future years, such as 2011, because budgets are passed annually. Moreover, this year's budget runs counter to Obama's tax plan, which would extend all of Bush's tax cuts for families earning less than $250,000 and provide new tax breaks for low-income workers.

    Obama and the Democratic National Committee asserted for months that McCain wanted to keep U.S. troops fighting in Iraq for 100 years, when, in fact, the context of McCain's 100-year statement was a comparison to U.S. bases in Japan and Germany. McCain explicitly said the troops would be there only if the country was at peace and there were no casualties associated with their presence.

    A McCain quote Obama has often used - that the economy is fundamentally sound - is months old. Since he said that, McCain has said almost daily that the economy is struggling. As for exaggerations, Obama said yesterday that he had supported a measure in the Illinois Senate to double the number of charter schools in Chicago. In fact, he was one of 14 state senators co-sponsoring a non-controversial measure that passed unanimously.

    --------

    Staff writer Michael D. Shear, traveling with the McCain campaign, contributed to this report.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

The surge in the polls for

The surge in the polls for the McSame/Palin ticket is nothing but a sure sign of how far down the rabbit hole the American people have descended and gives a top credit to those institutions that have successfully dumbed down the citizenry of this country. It is totally astounding that half of this country wants more of the same traitorous leadership that will obviously sink this country into further debt and all but seal it's fate to become the super power fascist country! We will be the laughing stock of the entire world and our reputation will beyond repair for a long time to come. But then who cares that we will lose our democracy, the chance for justice, the opportunity to rebuild our economy. We're going down the proverbial drain with Mcsame....bring it on!!!!

I'm no fan of Palin, but hey

I'm no fan of Palin, but hey that "Bridge to nowhere." Isn't that Ketchikan airport on Gravina Island? That's how Google earth shows it . . . To nowhere . . . huh!

People in America will

People in America will believe what they are told. And they are spoon-fed right-wing talking points over and over again. Look at how many people still believe that Iraq was/is a threat, that drilling for oil off the coast of Virginia will mean $1.50 gas in a month, that Reagan was beloved by all, that the US is motivated by the best of intentions, etc., etc. The msm, dominated as it is by the far right, is desperately trying to make Obama look bad and McCain look good, and obviously succeeding.

Note that these candidates

Note that these candidates will not come to the great state of California because we will laugh them off the stage with signs that basically read, "liar, liar, pants on fire." They only go to the places that they think will vote for them. PLEASE give them rude awakening that they so richly (and too darn richly) deserve. PRF

Palin has proven her

Palin has proven her value..she can lie with the best of them. This is the most important initiation rite of the team that currently runs the country. Apparently what liberals and psychologists don't yet understand is that there is a segment of society that wants to be lied to effectively. We are not all the same. We do not all act upon what's best for our country or our children. It is the spector of death and the violation of values which fascinates. It is road rage politics.

ALL repiglicans LIE LIKE

ALL repiglicans LIE LIKE RUGS. It is the party of total lies. As to differientiate the Democrat party, of which only about 75% are total liars.

Why was the money that was

Why was the money that was allocated for the bridge - or at least what is left of it - not returned to the Federal government when the bridge project was scrapped? It would appear, if you believe Palin, that she never supported the bridge, and therefore, when she lobbied for it before Congress she was intentionally attempted to obtain money under false pretenses! This is a federal crime - so why is no one investigating her for fraud? Common Congress, do your jobs! She has admitted on television that she was never against the bridge and that she stopped it, so why are no members demanding the money back and an investigation into her actions? And why are no Democrats calling her out on this fraud? Oh, yeah, she is a woman and we do not do that in this campaign! I am a woman, a 56 year old taxpayer, and I want my country's money back from the state of Alaska! So, who is going to call me sexist for demanding the same justice for Sarah Palin that any male governor who had done the same thing would get for committing fraud?

Not surprising for a country

Not surprising for a country where most of the people live in La La land.

With FOX and MSNBC

With FOX and MSNBC broadcasting the "news" many Americans are oblivious to the facts. I expect that most Republican loyalists are happy to see the lipstick and ignore the pig. Big Lies still win elections and it has only gotten easier with the propaganda machines at Fox and NBC pouring gasoline on the fires started by the shameless flacks working for the RNC. At least the average American soldier finally realizes that they have been shafted over the past 6 years and are expected to vote for Obama instead of Mr. Bush Lite.

The Republicans appear to

The Republicans appear to have taken a page out of Nazi general Herman Goering's book: If you tell a lie often enough, you can get the majority to believe it. What really has bothered me about this entire Hillary Clinton/Sarah Palin thing is the fact that so many women are willing to vote for a woman just because she's a woman. That is sexism at its worst. I would never vote for a woman because of her sex. I would if I thought she could do a better job than the man. As smart and savvy as Hillary Clinton is, I thought Barack Obama would be better for the USA than the Clintons would be. I think Sarah Palin would be a disaster for the USA. Her radical Christianity, her utter failure to teach her daughter abstinence, the lies she keeps telling about not taking taxpayer handouts, pretending to have sold the government jet on eBay, her ridicule of Barack Obama's work in community organization...leave me unable to trust this woman.

"Country First"?? This

"Country First"?? This woman, along with McCain and Bush should be LEGALLY held responsible for lying. Our nation and our planet are in such serious trouble that such lies should not be tolerated.

Given that the VP is a

Given that the VP is a heartbeat away from the presidency, the thought that Palin might become commander-in-chief is a horrifying to say the least. Her foreign policy experience is zero, nada. Her far-right views would lead this country into more disastrous adventures. Bush used force to try to expand US influence, whoops I "meant" to say expand democracy, by invading Iraq with a total disregard to rest of the world. With the result that our standing worldwide is now at an all time low. After billions of dollars, 4000+ dead what does Bush have to show for it? A democratic and stable Iraq? Hardly. Iraq will not be democratic for decades any more that any other country in the Near East is, except Israel. One can imagine Palin in the same way ordering troops into Iran or North Korea or elsewhere at a moment's notice rather than considering diplomacy. After all, diplomacy is for liberal wimps.

This article infuriates me.

This article infuriates me. What happened to the charge investigative reporting has on INFORMING the public of the TRUTH? Have you passed the buck? I am NOT INTERESTED in quotes like the following: John Feehery, a Republican strategist, said the campaign is entering a stage in which skirmishes over the facts are less important than the dominant themes that are forming voters' opinions of the candidates. Which PERPETUATE calculated lies. The public is counting on you, Jonathan Weisman, and your colleagues to keep FACTS before us, not this tripe. Enough of catering to the campaigns, pollsters and pundits. Get back to reporting.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.