Share

Bashing Obama's Dream?

by: Steve Weissman, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
Barack Obama. (Illustration: Hai Knafo)

    Hearing Barack Obama speak last week in Denver, I found it hard to avoid bittersweet memories of Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech at the March on Washington in August 1963. How far our country has come! And how much further we have yet to travel on Dr. King's road to peace and social justice! For me, one memory stands out, a small piece of history that throws new light on why many progressives find themselves faulting Obama for moving toward the right wing of the Democratic Party.

    A few days before the march, a battle-scarred hero of the civil rights movement came to the University of Michigan to practice the speech he planned to give in Washington as chairman of the Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). John Lewis was - and is - an Old Testament prophet, and his words heaped moral fury on President John F. Kennedy, a man whom young civil rights activists at the time did not see as on our side.

    If JFK wanted to support meaningful political and economic rights for the poorest black share croppers, that was good, said Lewis. If JFK did not, the movement would rise up without him like Sherman marching through Georgia.

    Inspired, several of us from Ann Arbor trooped off to Washington. There we were, right in front of the Lincoln Memorial, waiting for Lewis to give his speech and singing, "If Kennedy gets in the way, we'll roll right over him."

    How wrong we were! On that day at least, JFK rolled right over us. If Lewis insisted on giving his speech as he had written it, the Rev. Eugene Carson Blake of the National Council of Churches threatened to withdraw from the list of speakers, as did other Kennedy supporters. Lewis softened his remarks. We continued to sing. And no one heard us.

    I learned a lot about free speech that day, and about the willingness of so many good-hearted liberals to exercise their own power over who should speak and what they should be allowed to say. But something else was so obvious that I did not truly grasp its significance until last week, when I saw and heard the video of Obama's big speech.

    At the March on Washington, John Lewis was speaking for a civil rights movement that JFK had not created and did not control. The following summer, SNCC organizers showed up at the Democratic National Convention with the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party, creating a nightmare for Lyndon Johnson and dramatically breaching the wall of legal segregation.

    Today, the social dynamics are back to front. The civil rights movement has become history. The antiwar movement has grown quiescent. Progressive Democrats of America and other groups are just starting to show their strength. And aside from Netroots Nation and some stirring in the unions and among immigrant groups, the only thing resembling a mass social movement is the awesome electoral campaign that Obama has created around himself.

    A candidate-centered movement can certainly win an election, but can it bring green energy, green jobs and universal health care once the election is over? Obama's recent moves to the right suggest the answer, as does the rightward shift away from Bill Clinton's populist message during his first term. For Obama's hopes to become real, America needs an independent progressive movement that is bigger than even the most inspiring political leader, and powerful enough to counter the inevitable onslaught from Wall Street democrats and foreign policy hawks, neo-libs and neo-cons, and an army of highly paid lobbyists.

    Just because George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are leaving the White House in January, Big Oil will not slip into the sunset; arms makers will not beat their swords into ploughshares, and managed-care conglomerates will not make serious health care a higher priority than their corporate profits. Few on the top want the America that Obama has promised, and even if elected with an overwhelming mandate, Obama cannot deliver on his promises without millions of Americans who know how to keep up the post-election pressure on Congress, on the corporate media and on him.

    Change we can believe in, change that we need, requires a mass movement we can count on. No independent mobilization, no serious change. But the missing movement is not Obama's fault, and organizing it is not his job. It's ours, as progressives. And, in my opinion, it's bogus to bash Obama for giving in to Robert Rubin and Zbigniew Brzezinski if we're not building a political force to outpush them.

    Should we point out where we think Obama falls short? Absolutely. Anything less would distort a reality that's there for everyone to see. But Obama's hope is America's hope, and if we do not work our hardest to elect him president even as we build an independent progressive movement, we will have squandered the best opportunity our country might ever have. So, let's get on with the job. To paraphrase the old rallying cry, "Don't Moan, Organize."

  

»


A veteran of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement and the New Left monthly Ramparts, Steve Weissman lived for many years in London, working as a magazine writer and television producer. He now lives and works in France.

Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Yes. We have to work for

Yes. We have to work for what we need. Obama works. So can we. That's the point of the extensive internet campaign and tools. Who is bashing Obama's dream? Nobody can bash my dream, and I don't like the title of this article.

Obama more or less said it:

Obama more or less said it: it's not about him, it's about us. We must make the changes ourselves.

Obama himself said it "This

Obama himself said it "This election is not about Me, it is about YOU, America!" It is about us and it is about how we are willing to work for what needs to be done in this nation. We used to work hard to build a country,but somewhere in the last 40 years we have forgotten how to work, not for a principle embodied in the words "Liberty and Justice for All". We are the All, and we have an obligation to work for it. Now is the time, and now is our opportunity to show that we are the true descendants of our Forefathers. Work to create the movement at the local level - it is not all that difficult. You want change in your town, then start with your friends, then your neighbors, then your neighborhood, and so on and so on. You start with discussion groups or parties, block parties to get to know your neighbors, and you talk and write to your local papers, attend city council meetings, and you move up the chain. That is how you start a movement, and soon you have other groups who join you, and you suddenly are part of something much bigger. It can be done - it started in a small town in Massachusetts with a small group of men who met in local taverns, and look what they did. Ask yourself: IN this day and age why can't we do the same? Then go do it! Good Luck, America, I have faith in you!

Hasn't parts of Obama's

Hasn't parts of Obama's movement already organized, within his organization, to push for more progressive positions? Nothing substantive may have come of it, but it augurs well for progressives, and the prominent roles of MoveOn and PDA in helping Obama's campaign are also positive signs. Push for progressive policy? Absolutely. Organize progressives, of course. Work for Obama's election? That's an obvious yes. To be elected he's going to have to make moves to the center, but if he owes his election to progressives as much or more than to centrists or corporations, then he will be as receptive to progressive politics as JFK or LBJ, perhaps more so.

I am really puzzled. I

I am really puzzled. I thought I heard him say it was about us, not him; that he was calling for a movement from below to bring change about at the top. For most of the campaign he has talked of change, and when he suggests specifics, he gets criticized. Had he used high rhetoric, he would have been criticized for imitating MLK. I heard him call for sacrifice and the need for us to work together to achieve what we all know is needed.

Yes! Blindly following a

Yes! Blindly following a leader will get you nowhere.. Just ask the Republicans.

For all Obamas moving to the

For all Obamas moving to the right because he has to get elected should be no consequence to us. He has to do it or the point is moot. America is still not ready for a liberal agenda. You have to create that after we get him elected. Steve Weisman is completely right. Obama is our ONLY chance that we could build this movement and I for one am ready to start building. If McCain gets elected, we will be 8 votes short in the senate to pass any meaningful legislation to get past the presidency. If Obama is elected, we won't need those 8 votes. Get behind Obama!

Should be titled;"DENNIS

Should be titled;"DENNIS MILLER, WHAT SAY YOU NOW?"...For being one of the sharpest wits to come down the pike since Groucho,WC Fields,Red Skelton or Lenny Bruce just what did Rove have on this guy to turn his mattress urine stain up? He should be solidly backing Obama and our country`s waning need to roll up our sleeves and fix it!

I agree with Yes We have to

I agree with Yes We have to work. I think the media and spinners from the McCain campaign and the corporate special interests are doing everything in their powers to minimize the promise of Barack Obama as the next President of the United States. (See Frank Rich's column on the "Bloviators.") Not even counting the scurrilous rumor mills, at every turn Obama's real successes are minimized: during the ABC televised "debate" with Senator Clinton, after sewing up the delegate count for the nomination, after traveling to the Middle East and Europe, after taking off the gloves in his powerful Democratic convention speech. Obama is going to win in November because of our boots on the ground working for what we need. And I don't like the title of this article either.

I think one thing everyone

I think one thing everyone is overlooking is that John Lewis raised the same issues in 1963 that the so-called progressives are raising today. It is easy to damn a candidate for trying to win an election, but much harder to achieve meaningful change. Ideological purity is the enemy of meaningful change whether it comes from the progressive left or the fundamentalist right. I have no voted for the Democratic candidate in the last 4 presidential elections (I have not voted for Republicans either). Obama is the first Democratic candidate that I will vote for in some time, because he is running a different type of campaign and I believe he can lead effectively rather than pursuing a narrow partisan agenda.

Thats the ticket Steve. If

Thats the ticket Steve. If Americans want to get those things you mentioned: meaningful jobs, green energy, and medical coverage they have to make democrats fear the wrath of the voters more than they crave the money of the establishment. And that my friend is a daunting task. Liberals have to turn up the heat on BO the way the right wing does in the GOP.

While I fully agree with Mr.

While I fully agree with Mr. Weissman's observations, I think our first job is to get Mr. Obama elected, AND to make sure his coat tails are long and strong. To that end, I would like to see his campaign do what is necessary to solidify and make REAL the convention's UNITY theme. He and Joe Biden should be out making joint appearances with the Clintons and the Kennedys, along with ALL the local Democratic politicians. We NEED major change--and we need to make it AS A UNIFIED PARTY. And for this, we need to LOOK like a unified party!

Yes, it's incredibly

Yes, it's incredibly important to get Obama elected. And yes, we've come a long way. But for all that, Obama's small beer, and not the kind of person who has moved us ahead. Mr. Weissman says, "Hearing Barack Obama speak last week in Denver, I found it hard to avoid bittersweet memories of Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech at the March on Washington in August 1963". Better go back and listen to that speech again, Steve, and compare it to the empty (if smooth) rhetoric that we heard coming out of Denver. Then go and look up - or listen to! - the speeches and sermons that Dr. King gave in 1967: "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence", delivered at the Riverside Church on April 4, 1967; "Why I Am Opposed to the War in Vietnam", delivered at the Ebenezer Baptist Church on April 30, 1967; and "The Trumpet of Conscience", delivered as a Steeler Lecture in November, 1967 - and invite Obama to listen to them with you, since he so often plays the King card, although denouncing his own long-time pastor, Rev. Wright, whose sermons are even better (and actually somewhat milder, on the whole) than Dr. King's. Just think - Obama might learn something about how we really moved ahead (if he's interested)!

The Democratic Party,

The Democratic Party, especially the left wing part of it, is famous for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Why don't you just be patient and give the guy a chance??? You have TWO choices in November. Get real. This is a good article - I would rather you had saved it for later, when you could send it to President Obama.

B O said 'it's not about me,

B O said 'it's not about me, it's about you' you the corporation he meant, since that's who he really represents. Sad he couldn't even mention Martin Luther King's name on the 40th anniversary of the Dream speech instead referencing 'the preacher from Georgia'. I guess that's one way to get the racist white vote. He'd have a better chance if he talked about national healthcare for everyone and an end to the criminal war in Iraq. But only Independents do that. Obama can't do that because he really is, sorry to say, another corporate shill.

after his helping

after his helping evisceration of the 4th amendment taking of money from cong and nukes you folks still think he,s the second coming? somebody,s been drinking the koolaid! no i,m not a right winger just some whose sensibilities a still intact.

Right on, Steve (except for

Right on, Steve (except for the article title). I was there too, listening not only to Martin Luther King saying "I have a dream ...", but to Mahalia Jackson and others saying "Amen" right behind him. Speaking of organizing, what a day of organization! Thousands of us gathering together to protest and then leave in peace, and great dignity. As for today, I'm campaigning for a remarkable new approach to voting reform which, once enacted, will help free us from our bondage to our corporate money-driven two-party system and, like powder-milk biscuits, give us the power to get up and do everything else that needs to be done! See "rangevoting.org". I too believe that Barack Obama can lead us -- with us right behind him, and pushing him as necessary -- despite the compromises he has to make to become and serve as president.

A black family in the White

A black family in the White House will transform America perhaps. Maybe some will see that their fears were baseless. Maybe. This is America, after all, so maybe not. After the last near 8 years, noting that McCain might make Bush seem lucid and a peacenick and Palin is sci-fi extremist scary, he is no where near what him losing will bring us. In many ways we have regressed from King's day, in others there's been progress Obama wouldn't mention King by name, that was overly cautious; doing so would have maybe made his speech historic great. Perhaps

Quote from Obama's DNC

Quote from Obama's DNC speech: "Change happens because the American people demand it - because they rise up and insist on new ideas and new leadership"

To me, this article ends

To me, this article ends with what I'm calling 'the next Obama con.' Obama knows that he is going to massively disappoint a lot of his followers. He's going to win. And the $400 million in his campaign accounts, lots of that from corporations, means we ain't going to see much change. At least not the change we want. So, Obama is already setting up the next Obama con. Because, when Obama gets to DC and pays off the corporations that financed his campaign, when people object, we are all going to be told that its our fault. You see, its going to be our fault that Obama serves his corporate masters. Its going to be our fault because we didn't organize enough. Its going to be our fault because we didn't pressure him enough. Never mind that in the streets of Denver I saw the riot police come out and deal with anyone who tries to organize against or pressure Obama. Never mind that the fences and razor wire and riot police were there precisely to keep the people on the outside and away from Obama and his corporate contributors-sponsers-masters. Yep, when Obama does what the money tells him to do, the next Obama con is going to try to tell us its all our own fault. Yes, we've got to organize. But, if you expect Obama to be at all receptive to that, well, you should have been here to see the fences and the razor wire and the riot police. Or, you can always go see them, because they'll be there to greet you if you dare to organize another March on Washington.

It's telling when the

It's telling when the republicans run MLK image at their convention laying claim to his legacy of struggle, it is also telling that the first image of King the Republicans flashed on their jingoistic video profile of their Party was Dr King's mugshot from his arrest in Birmingham. That's one slick way to coop a legacy and satisfy the cripto fascist neo-cons and white supremacists - better than tip-toeing Obama's mention of a "southern preacher" - racial profiling may not be the buzzword anymore but it sure haunts the demography of poverty and dysfunctional relationships evolved from the Bullwhip days to the house Negro ascending to the Plantation mansion as "Master" of the house.

As noted already, Obama did

As noted already, Obama did say it is about us, not him. So far the "us" has done pretty well in supporting him.... well beyond just big buck donors that characterize Repub campaigns. Obama has many dollars from the grassroots. Money really IS speech, as Mitch McConnell(R-KY) has been saying for years. The McCain-Feingold bill was destined to fail because no law is free of loopholes. What I'd like to see is a $200 tax CREDIT offered on the IRS 1040 for contributing to the presidential candidate, or national party, of your choice. Disband the FEC.

Samson hit the nail squarely

Samson hit the nail squarely on the head: there's only so much the people can do when Obama is already in the hip pocket of the corporations. And what, precisely, does "bashing Obama's dream" mean? What, indeed, IS Obama's dream? He keeps doing these pesky, contrary things that are at variance with the beliefs of his base, like voting the wrong way on FISA and saying that offshore drilling might not be such a bad idea after all. Obama's dream, it appears, is to become president...and if he has to throw your concerns overboard to do it, well, tough shit for you. Everyone has noticed the Democratic candidate's push to the right--some of us discuss it, others pretend it isn't really happening and become indignant whenever it's brought up. But if Obama is victorious in November (and I believe he will be), don't say we "pessimists" didn't warn you that you're going to be disappointed. Heck, don't say that Obama himself gave you no indication of where he was headed policy-wise...because he has, over and over again.

Obama is a moderate but his

Obama is a moderate but his election will give us a chance to pass progressive legislation, and put some decent folks on the Supreme Court. He is going to play to the center - as will McSame in the next eight weeks because the right and the left have nowhere else to go. Our task, as was so aptly pointed out, is to build a progressive movement to end the war in Iraq and get universal health care. I look forward to the next March on Washington.