Share

Veepstakes: Obama-Biden

by: John Nichols  |  The Nation

photo
Sen. Joe Biden, in Iraq for parliamentary elections in 2005, holds up an ink-stained finger. Biden's foreign policy experience will prove valuable as he joins Barack Obama in his race for the White House. (Photo: Reuters)

    Denver - And the winner is: Joe Biden.

    It did not take a newfangled text message, just an old-fashioned leak, to identify Barack Obama's running mate.

    Word of the Biden selection spread late Friday night, barely twelve hours before the event in Springfield, Illinois, at which the presumptive Democratic nominee for president was set to introduce the presumptive Democratic nominee for vice president.

    Ultimately, Obama went with the guy who suggested most pointedly during the race for the Democratic nomination that Obama was not quite experienced enough for the presidency.

    It was Biden who suggested in an August, 2007, debate that, "I think (Obama) can be ready, but right now I don't believe he is. The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training."

    Challenged on that statement, the senator said he stood by it.

    Expect to see those comments featured in an ad for Republican John McCain. (At 1:22 a.m. EST, the Republican's campaign released a statement that to theeffect that, "There has been no harsher critic of Barack Obama's lack of experience than Joe Biden. Biden has denounced Barack Obama's poor foreign policy judgment and has strongly argued in his own words what Americans are quickly realizing - that Barack Obama is not ready to be President.")

    But don't expect McCain's attempts to use Biden against Obama to do much damage.

    Democrats, and ultimately Americans, should be able to reconcile themselves to the fact of a No. 2 who suggested Obama was not ready to be No. 1.

    How? By recognizing that in the modern era political-party tickets really do blend into a whole.

    For all the silly talk about vice-presidential nominees being irrelevant, the truth is that they have always mattered - either to party unity or to the broader electorate.

    Presidential and vice presidential candidates run as a team, complementing one another and guarding against the vulnerabilities of their running mates.

    Obama tried to suggest that the 2008 race was a contest between his judgment and John McCain's experience.

    But that sounded a little too much like Democrat Michael Dukakis peddling the notion that his 1988 race with Republican George Herbert Walker Bush was all about assessing the relative competence of the contenders. That line didn't work in 1988 and it wasn't working in 2008.

    With a new Cold War in the offering and a host of global conflicts and challenges brewing, Obama really was facing questions about whether he was ready. He needed some foreign-policy muscle. That knocked out contenders who might have complemented Obama's "Change We Can Believe In" campaign theme, such as Virginian Governor Tim Kaine.

    It is true that Obama might also have gotten what he needed by adding New York Senator Hillary Clinton to his ticket, just as it is true that Obama might have been able to run with Clinton. But he could not run with Bill Clinton, and that was that.

    So Obama was left with Biden. And that made for an acceptable, perhaps even satisfying conclusion to the great veep search.

    For all of Biden's imperfections - a charge of political plagiarism twenty years ago, a reputation for verbosity, a record of gaffes and a wrong vote to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq - the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee gives Obama what he needs.

    And there is the added bonus that Biden loves politics. He enjoys the sport of it. He's good on the stump. He's good in the debates - indeed, when he was competing for the nomination, Biden won several of the debates. And he's comfortable campaigning in industrial cities and rural regions.

    After a weak mid-summer performance by Obama, the scale was tipping McCain's way.

    But when Joe Biden takes Barack Obama's side, the scale may well tip back in a Democratic direction.

    Biden may not have been the perfect choice.

    He may not even have been the preferred choice.

    But he was, at least to Obama's view, the necessary choice.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

  

»


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

wow. all this talk about

wow. all this talk about 'whether or not' obama is ready to be 'presedential.' whenever there's a commercial from the Republicans trying to work that angle... why isn't there some response from the Democrats to the tune of... 'Republicans talk about 'being Presidential. For them, it has meant a President with more vacation days, more foreign policy gaffes, more catering to special corporate interests, more data mining the facts to back oil policies at the expense of millions, and a Vice President called the 'magic man' who really ran the show--than ever before.' hhhm... maybe there is...

Good choice - Biden will

Good choice - Biden will play the attack dog role very well and with humor. My question: Will McSame pick a women VP to reach out to disgruntled Hillary supporters?

JB just better keep that

JB just better keep that foot out of that mouth. Isn't he the guy that suggested Barack was intelligent despite being black? Sane rational people know he understands better but he's a loose cannon and the attack dogs from the other side, and there are a whole network of them at FOX, are gonna party hard with this guys sound bytes. The American people know better than to put another Republican in the White House right now. This is one guy who could derail that. Bizarre choice! Hilary was obvious, if Barack wants to win. It would have been a true super ticket, the likes of which had never been seen. She deserved it after campaigning as hard and as well as she did. She's too conservative for me and for a lot of people, but she's on the right side and she's a winner. I'm not that happy.

Those "feminists" who are

Those "feminists" who are disgruntled and will go to McCain better think LONG and hard about women going back to using wire coat hangers.

How can Simplisticaters call

How can Simplisticaters call Biden racist - on the basis of one stupid remark - when he has consented to play second to a biracial candidate? Will he only talk to and advise Barack's white genes? Biden is known for foot in mouth disease so remember that action speaks louder than words.

Obama may be inexperienced,

Obama may be inexperienced, but he'll be replacing a downright Moron.

could someone in the media

could someone in the media please say something accurate and positive about biden? there must be something? he has been the top sponsor of the violence against women act for 2 decades, for starters it would cheer me up to know more than his foot and mouth disease which is all i see here and in the ny times.

Biden is a solid choice for

Biden is a solid choice for Obama (although I feel Richardson would've made a super ticket). Biden will fight hard for Obama and he understands the importance of team work to get the right things done, once in office. And a message to the campaign - focus on the economy...please!!! As for the previous comment regarding Clinton as possible veep. I think she forfeited that opportunity when she and her 'sides' began the dirty campaigning against Obama. Let's face it, she went way beyond what was necessary, useful and such attacks where aimed to purposely discredit and dismantle a 'fellow' Democrat.

I am little bit apprehensive

I am little bit apprehensive here. From what I have followed through Biden's speeches, press-conferences, and stands he took following 9/11, I hope earnestly that he doesn't turn out to be the Democratic Party's Dick Cheney!

Did this article really come

Did this article really come from The Nation? This is one of the least substantive op-eds I've ever read. There is nothing in about how the Biden pick is going actually going to strengthen the blue ticket. And, well, I suppose that shouldn't surprise me because it won't strengthen the ticket! Biden is a contradiction on the Obama ticket and the reds will relish making spectacle of that. The Biden pick essentially neutralizes much of the brave, enlightened, progressive ideas that made Obama's campaign appealing, those which Obama readily sheds and forgets as he nears the grail.

A long winded orator and a

A long winded orator and a known plagiarist as well as a self-proclaimed Zionist is NOT what the Left, or the COUNTRY needs right now. Obama has proven beyond doubt that he is a 2-bit politician willing to sell his soul for votes. Forget change. Meet the new boss-same as the old boss.

Well, at least APIAC is happy

Well, at least APIAC is happy

Biden is as much a Beltway

Biden is as much a Beltway insider as McCain, he voted for the Iraq Invasion, he threw Anita Hill under the bus giving Thomas passage to judge us for life, he believed Makasey's promises, he always believes a Roberts or Alito will be reasonable and just when on the bench....but if he helps prevent more Republican nonsense and crimes, go. If he is the fire to Obama's cool, the John Wayne to balance the Film Noire, to finally rid this country, this planet from the obstacle to progress, the Republican Party's rigid ideological destructive venal pedantic and cruel rule...go for it and good luck

I am thrilled with a Joe

I am thrilled with a Joe Biden pick. I heard him on the campaign trail in Iowa and would have caucused for him if not for Obama. If Obama was worried about his foot and mouth problem, he wouldn't have selected him. Biden is an EXPERT in foreign policy and a great diplomat. He is respected by our alllies. I am even more excited about an Obama presidency now.

Joe Biden is merely the

Joe Biden is merely the insurance that the corporate sector of the American body politic will remain in control of the nation. Thus, government of the people by the rich for the rich will continue without any threat of unwelcome populist interference.

I don't get most of the

I don't get most of the posters here. Biden is one of the most knowledgeable and respected members of the Senate. That seems to be his biggest drawback. It seems that only neophyte Governors are eligible for the job. Because they have not been stained by Washington. Corruption is not caused by Washington, there are just as many Governors and Attorney Generals that find their way into corruption. Biden has been in the Senate for 36 years and is not rich, Democratic version rather Republican one. How terrible that Obama would use the common sense to get the most qualified person for the job. The foreign relations committee, both Republican and Democratic were advising Obama to take Joe. Who else was he supposed to take? Kane or Seibelious, they are both Governors with almost no experience outside of their parochial areas. The case can be made that they have executive experience as a Governor, like Bush. I saw them both speaking today. They compliment each other in their speaking styles. I hope some of the negative postings are just Repubs causing trouble. This was a great pick. With the current world events, the only realistic option that was open.

Hillary deserves NOTHING.

Hillary deserves NOTHING. She ran a nasty campaign, which included a mailer that had Barack's head superimposed over the end of a sniper rifle! That is probably grounds for a criminal lawsuit (incitement to commit a crime). She's not that smart, and then there's Bill. The Biden pick is a little boring. And not very daring.

I'd like to pose this

I'd like to pose this question: Do you really want four more years of a Repugnantcan president vetoing any progressive legislation that a democratically-controlled house and Senate might pass? Do you not think for a moment that McCain as president won't pick another neo-fascist like Scalia or Alito to the Supreme Court? Do you really want a president who's time as a POWand record in Vietnam makes up much of his ambition to be just as much a "cowboy" as George W. Bush? Do you really want McCain as a president, someone who will make sure that Mobil/Exxon and Texaco/Chevron continue to run the country's energy program: colonial wars for resources? Obama and Biden have a great chance, along with a democratically controlled Congress, to make some real changes in this country. Perhaps the insurance and pharma industries, as well as the oil and gas industry, will be put in their place. Perhaps the emerging "green" industry will gets its share of the corporate subsidy pie, and the US auto manufacturers will start making energy efficient vehicles like the Japanese as a rule, not an exception. Perhaps public transportation will be fully funded and supported by the Federal government. A vote for McCain means nonoe of the above will happen. Get real people!

I agree this was a lukewarm

I agree this was a lukewarm commentary considering the source. However, I am wholeheartedly behind Biden as Obama's #2. I think his working class background, demonstrated dedication to family and dozens of anecdotal stories of his caring ways far outstrip his "plagiarism" incident (about which it should be noted yet again that this was after an incident where he failed to credit the creator after doing so many times previously) and his "mouth" problem. As I posted elsewhere, his big mouth is something I find good about Biden. We need more real people who aren't afraid to say what they're thinking, even if it means having to sift through some political incorrectness to get at the message. It's what we do that really counts. But above all, I believe Biden brings a formidable network of contacts from both sides and a well-oiled knowledge of how to legislate that will bring powerful tools to a new White House occupant. Although JFK didn't really use Lyndon Johnson's extensive legislative abilities to their full extent, Johnson still was responsible for ground-breaking civil rights legislation even before JFK's assassination, and was charged by JFK to power the Apollo space program which he did very effectively. This is proof that an experienced VP-as-legislator can get a hell of a lot done. I, for one, think Biden will embrace Obama's vision and will therefore be exactly the kind of VP that will help this administration put the rubber to the road.

An Obama-Hillary ticket

An Obama-Hillary ticket would have been a kamikaze pact: mutually assured destruction, and they well know it. Why do you think Hillary didn't run for the presidency in 2004? Even though Kerry was such a weak candidate? Because she knew it would take 4 more years of this buffoon rule to run this country completely into the ground before the idiots are ready for change. What we need are at least half-way honest politicians and I think Obama and Biden fit that bill. Biden is a man Obama can work with and consult seriously without worrying about a knife in his back every waking moment.

Biden's favorite lie is that

Biden's favorite lie is that Democrats don't have 67 votes to stop Bush. He wants us to forget that Democrats could've stopped every and each one of Bush's crimes/nominations in the last 7 years by filibustering them. That would've taken only 40 senators. And courage. Democrats never meant to oppose Bush, the bitter truth their retarded voters can't face. Biden is a perfect Democrat, a plagiarist, voted for the war and for the bankruptcy bill, written for and by the credit card companies. In that sense, Biden's the perfect pick for Obama, he lies like Obama and he enables Bush like Obama. The best part of all this was the 3 a.m. text message, a jab at Hillary. That must've made the 18 million who voted for her very happy. Smart move, preacher.

"With a new Cold War in the

"With a new Cold War in the offering and a host of global conflicts and challenges brewing . . . " That's "in the offing," not "in the offering." I like your writings, John, and agree with you most of the time. As an editor, I get really annoyed with smart people who make sloppy or ignorant mistakes and should know better.

Maybe someone already

Maybe someone already pointed this out, but if Biden is supposed to be a "foreign policy EXPERT" then why did he vote for the Iraq war? He's obviously just another corporate imperialist stooge.

Maybe he voted for the war

Maybe he voted for the war because Bush was lying to congress at that time. Go ahead, vote for Nader. Those who fail to remember the mistakes of the past are doomed to vote for Nader.