Share

"I Am Waiting. No One Has Ever Said Sorry"

by: Ed Vulliamy  |  The Observer/Guardian UK

photo
Fikret Alic at the Trnopolje Concentration Camp, Bosnia summer 1992. (Video image: Reuters)

In 1992 Ed Vulliamy revealed the existence of the Bosnian concentration camps. The remarkable image of Fikret Alic showed for the first time how Muslim prisoners were being brutalised by the Serbs. In the week of Radovan Karadzic's arrest our reporter returned to find Alic. In this moving dispatch, he - and other survivors - tell of their anger, despair and continued attempts to try to rebuild their shattered lives.

    Most people would not recognise him now - he has a full and manly frame, and a puckish smile; he has even had his teeth fixed. But I would know it anywhere, from the mixture of mischief, a deep inward stare and that mop of hair. Sixteen summers ago next week, Fikret Alic was probably the most familiar figure in the world. His skeletal, emaciated torso and xylophone ribcage, behind the barbed wire at Trnopolje concentration camp, embodied the violence unleashed on Bosnia's Muslim civilians at the orders of Radovan Karadzic, the man due to be taken to The Hague this weekend to answer charges of genocide and crimes against humanity.

    As Karadzic awaits his fate, Fikret Alic is back in Bosnia. Although currently living in Sonderberg, Denmark, he has bought a flat in a block still under construction in Kozarac town centre, and is here to save money to rebuild the nearby family home out of which he was chased in 1992, having completed the foundations. The arrest of the man who organised his torments has left a bittersweet taste.

    "I am happy and I am angry," he says. "For 13 years, he was living protected as a free man. And for the three years before that, all the world knew what he was doing, from my camp to Srebrenica, but did nothing to stop him. So now the truth will be told, but what has happened to us all this time? Now at last I am happy just because I am alive and here, with my wife and children, and not dead like so many others. But while he was free, I was broken, too."

    I came across Fikret Alic in 1992 at the Trnopolje concentration camp, where I had gone at Karadzic's invitation, while trying to inspect the gulag of concentration camps he had set up across northwestern Bosnia - places of reputed mass murder, torture, mutilation and rape - all of which Karadzic denied, insisting: "See for yourself." We took up his suggestion and were directed down a seamless chain of command, first from Karadzic's doorstep to the gates of a place of horror called Omarska, then, after being bundled out before seeing too much, Trnopolje, where Fikret and others languished behind the wire. They had arrived that morning, he said then, from yet another camp, Keraterm, where during a single night 130 men had been massacred in a hangar. Fikret said he had been ordered to help load the bodies on to bulldozers, but, weeping, had his place taken by an older man.

    Now Fikret and I meet again, this time to celebrate the arrest of the man who orchestrated the most terrible days of his life. After the embrace, there's a hollow laugh and a pledge that next time we really must get together for another reason. We are talking in Fikret's native town of Kozarac, a place that the Bosnian Serb leader hoped to wipe from the map. As Karadzic languishes in Belgrade, Friday night is getting into gear, the fairground is grinding into action, children are whooping despite the rain; music is throbbing out of bars and cars on to the warm, wet streets and girls on heels like stilts strut into town. The boys' haircuts are stiff with gel and families of three generations are out for a stroll. It could be a libidinous seaside town in Southern Europe.

    Kozarac now calls itself "the biggest small town in the world." Yet 16 summers ago this week, when I came through here on Karadzic's authority, escorted by his guards, it had been burned to the ground and the stench of charred masonry was still heavy in the air. Its inhabitants - apart from a few Serbs tending their animals as though nothing had happened - were either dead, driven out, or taken to one of the gulag of concentration camps. There was no war here in the Prijedor region of Bosnia, just a sudden, vicious and brazen attempt to eradicate an entire population by killing, incarceration, rape and enforced deportation. According to the masterplan of which Karadzic is accused, all the people on these streets this Friday night, and in these rebuilt houses, were intended to be dead, gone or never born.

    But Kozarac has been rebuilt by the hard work and defiance of a diaspora, some of whom come back for the summer and others who have come back to live - albeit in the Serbian half of Bosnia, the so-called Republika Srpska. The mosques are rebuilt, too. As Edin Kararic, a truck driver living in Watford - an Omarska survivor who has opened the Mustang bar on the main street - said to me a few years ago: "It's not hard to get money for a mosque, but it is extremely hard work to get money to rebuild our houses. I don't go to the mosque, but I like it that they are here, because every minaret is a finger up to the people who tried to put us out. It says: We're back!"

    Every year now, there is a commemoration service at Omarska, making this the gathering of a unique tribe in Europe, Clan Omarska. This year's remembrance takes place next week. A local group called Izvor, formed by camp survivor Edin Ramulic, calculates that for all the thousands of bodies already uncovered 3,205 people are still unaccounted for.

    As the night unfolds around us, Fikret tells about the hunt in Trnopolje, after our visit, for anyone who talked to the press that day in 1992. He talks about how seven people had been killed for doing so, and how he had had to hide for 10 days after our meeting on 5 August, at which point he joined a convoy of deportees on a terrifying mountain exodus at gunpoint across no-man's land and into Muslim-held territory. Disguised as a woman he was saved from being taken into a group to be raped because he smelt so badly.

    Later in the conflict he had tried to fight in the remarkable 17 Krajiske Brigade, based in Travnik, made up of ethnically cleansed men and women from around Prijedor determined to go home. But he kept coughing up blood and was discharged.

    After living in Slovenia and Croatia he had a breakdown. "I was talking to a tree about my time in the camps. I might as well have been in a straitjacket." Then came a chance to go to Denmark, a meeting with a Bosnian woman from Sanski Most, near Kozarac, in 1999, "and when I woke up, I was married," he laughs. Work loading trucks at a slaughterhouse ended in 2000 after an accident in which a 200kg (32st) carcass fell on his back, but although he does not receive disability pension, the couple have clawed together the money to buy the lease on their flat in Kozarac, and are considering rebuilding the family home, which lies in a small hamlet, surrounded by other incinerated houses, a few returnees and their killers and torturers.

    Of his persecutors he now says: "No one has ever said sorry for what they did. I don't know what it is about these people - I can show you five killers any time we go to Prijedor. Either they are proud of what they did, or pretend it did not happen. I am waiting for someone to admit what they did, or apologise, but they do not, they never will. They have built a monument outside the camp where I was, but it is to Serbs who died, not us. I don't know of any Serbs who died there."

    The long road to Fikret, Trnopolje and Omarska - and to being back in Kozarac last week - began in London at the end of July 1992, when my colleague Maggie O'Kane and the American Roy Gutman published reports from fugitive deportees from Bosnia telling of beatings, torture and murder in the camps, among them Omarska - the place that would emerge as the second most deadly killing field in Bosnia's war, after Srebrenica.

    When he invited us to visit the camps, Karadzic greeted us with that professorial, wayward air and faux academic veneer that belied his deranged vision, but left no doubts about his authority over Omarska, promising that we would enter the camp on his word. He sent us down the chain of command to Omarska, first to his Deputy President, Nikola Koljevic, who would be our supervisor, then the crisis staff of the nearest town and administrative centre for Omarska, Prijedor. On the way there we passed the incinerated ruins of Kozarac - "They are the people who fled because they would not accept the peace," said our escort, Colonel Milan Milutinovic of the Bosnian Serb army.

    After hours of obfuscation and failed attempts by the committee to take us to other camps that had already been inspected by the Red Cross, we set out for Omarska, eventually passing through the back gates of the camp and into another world.

    A column of 30 men emerged blinking into the sunlight from the depths of a hangar. They were in various states of decay, some skeletal, with shaven heads. They drilled across a tarmac piste under the watchful eye of a machine-gunner and into a 'canteen', where they gulped down watery bean soup like famished dogs, keeping their bread roll for later. They were told they were allowed to speak freely, but they clearly dared not, the guards swinging their guns; there are few things like the burning eyes of a prisoner who dare not speak what he yearns to say. One man, Dzemal Partusic, said only: "I do not want to tell any lies, but I cannot tell the truth." Another, Serif Velic, replied when I asked him about a wound to his head, that he had fallen - it had happened naturally.

    When we tried to get to the hangar in which the prisoners were held, we were stopped by the commandant and Prijedor's chief of police, Simo Drjlaca, cocking their guns. Time, and subsequent trials at The Hague, would tell what Karadzic wanted to hide - a nightmare of killing, torture, mutilation, starvation, drunken sadism and rape.

    Like Alic, Serif Velic also joined the 17 Krajiske "ethnically cleansed" brigade after suffering in the camps. This week, he, too, was back in Kozarac, living next to a stone marking a mass grave of 456 bodies in the nearby village of Kevljani, and pointing out another likely mass grave in the field behind his house, where the vegetation becomes suddenly uncomfortably lush.

    "I was happier about the rain on my lawn than about the arrest of Karadzic," he says. "It's too little, too late. I have taught myself not to hate, because if I hate, that is yet another burden on my back. I want justice, but not revenge - I just want my soul to be in peace. But I cannot forgive. How can I forgive someone who shows no remorse, like Karadzic and all the little Karadzics around here who did these things to us? How can I forgive things that were done by people who are proud of doing it, would do it again and do not ask my forgiveness?"

    By the end of the war, Radovan Karadzic had for three years had his hand clasped by the leaders of the Western world, as a fellow politician and diplomat. Then, suddenly, after his indictment by the newly established Hague tribunal, he became a wanted war criminal. But while our journey to the camps had taken us down the chain of command from Karadzic to Omarska over four days, The Hague's long road to Karadzic worked the other way round over 13 years, beginning with the minnows.

    In 1996, while 60,000 foreign troops patrolled Bosnia, the fugitive Karadzic moved openly between his home in Pale and the Prijedor area. The first man to be arrested and delivered to the tribunal was Dusko Tadic, a parish-pump sadist from Kozarac, who had kept a cafe called Tibet.

    Tadic had toured the camps to kill and rape at leisure, and became The Hague's first conviction, in May 1997. I had not known him, and testified as an expert witness. But I was curious about the people I had met; much was known about Karadzic by now, but not his middle management, the people we had met that day along the chain of command, on our way into Omarska. I found Deputy President Koljevic in Banja Luka; he had been a mid-ranking Shakespeare scholar before going into politics with Karadzic, but was now mumbling into his cigar about "digging up the bones, we were digging up the bones" - though it was not clear which bones.

    So, finally, in court at The Hague, the story of Karadzic's camps began to be told. Now Mark Harmon and Alan Tieger, the two remarkable Americans who prosecuted Dusko Tadic at the outset, are due to bring the case against Karadzic.

    The survivors' campaign for a memorial at Omarska - which is now owned by steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal, and produces 1.5 million tonnes of iron ore a year - is four years old, led by Satko Mujagic, a survivor living in Leiden, the Netherlands. Satko's foundation, Optimisti 2004, has been building sports and communal facilities in Kozarac, and he is back this week to inaugurate a gym with 49,000 euros given by wellwishers and what Satko believes to be the first and only donation ever made by the Serbian authorities to a returnee project, of 15,000 euros.

    "It is one thing, and a good thing, to arrest the man, Karadzic," he says. "He was the big war criminal, the man with the idea for all that happened. But it is another thing to arrest the idea. Karadzic's ideas live on in the existence of Republika Srpska, and if this is all about joining the European Union, for the Republika Srpska to join the EU would be like Europe admitting a part of Germany that still agreed with Hitler, just because it is in Europe. I have rebuilt the house you are staying in now, but in 1992 it was burned while my grandmother was inside - she is one of the 3,205 people still missing - and I was taken to Omarska. No one has ever said sorry for what they did, no one has ever helped us to return and the authorities oppose outright any monument in Omarska to what they did."

    I remember Satko playing ball with his little girl against the wall of the cells where he was kept in Omarska during a visit when she was two years old. Now she is six, and Satko says: "When I told Lejla that Karadzic had been arrested, she said that if he killed more than one man, he should go to prison for life, but in prison should not be starved like her father - no one should do that."

    Dzemal Partusic - the man who had not wanted to tell any lies, but could not tell the truth in the Omarska canteen in 1992 - has also rebuilt his home here, on a hillside in Kozarac. In the week of Karadzic's arrest, he is free and happy to talk as he feels.

    "It is important that Karadzic has been arrested," he says, above a beautiful view stretching towards Omarska. "I see him as a second Hitler, the person who thought he could do whatever he wanted to us, and did. He was a man the world negotiated with, but I saw him as a man you cannot negotiate with. So that is good. But what are we left with?

    "We can build our houses, we can show them we are back, that this is our country, but we can never get back our lives as they were before. Karadzic being arrested will not give us back our dead."

    Eventually Fikret Alic and I take a drive out of flourishing Kozarac to the hamlet where he grew up and from which he fled into the mountains, only to be captured - while most of his friends were killed. "We found parts of their remains later," he says. We stop at a mosque, where a plaque names the hundreds of dead from just that tiny neighbourhood. "That is my brother," he says, "and that my grandfather." We drive on, past the rebuilt houses, to the cement foundations of what Fikret hopes will one day be his home again, and where he and his mother, sisters, wife and their children were yesterday due to cook a lamb barbecue. I praise the whole, defiant miracle of Kozarac. "Oh," counsels Fikret in reply, "it is not a problem to build a house. It is more of a problem to awake a dead man."

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

What different roles were

What different roles were played in the '90s by Bosnian Serbs & Bosnian Croats? the Serbs were anti -Hitler in WWII and Croatia was pro-Hitler then.

Yes, I admired them too for

Yes, I admired them too for the way they fought the German and Croatian racists during the war and held off the Soviet colonialists afterwards. But in the 1990s the world saw that a core of them – heirs to the Chetniks scorned by Churchill during the war - were no different from the German and Croatian butchers, merely territorial rivals. These are the tribal savages in suits that bewail the arrest of Karadzic and protect Mladic, and no pointing to rival savages can in any way lessen their guilt for mass murder, on racist grounds, of thousands of people who weren't even born when the Axis criminals were at it. The big mistake is going after Mister Big. The Mister Bigs like Milosevic and Karadzic will have covered their links to the scene - best way to deal with them is the way the Italians dealt with Musso and the Roumanians dealt with Ceausescu . The actual perps at the coalface, identifiable by witnesses who watched them march people into sheds for execution or saw them firing cannons at Sarajevo, are the ones that should feel the full brunt of legal retribution to give pause to anyone else ordered to do it anywhere in the world. Karadzic will obfuscate until the court's jurisdiction expires and his Russian mates rescue him with a veto on renewal.

What is the difference

What is the difference between Karadzic, and the Bush administration?

It's more complex and more

It's more complex and more simple than Anonymous tries to make it by condemning all WWII era Croats in a single stroke. The complexities begin with the fact that a majority of Croats supported the Allies during WWII. Else, how do you explain the successes of our troops in northern Yugoslavia during that awful time? True the Cetniks supported Hitler but they were in the minority. Tito's Partisans were clearly the favorites as was demonstrated by his rise to power at the end of the war. There were, also, many Serbs who militarily supported the Nazis, especially in Belgrade, colluding and even fighting shoulder to shoulder with them during the war. So, please, don't try to make this horrible event more distorted than it already has been by an easily duped, lazy and risk-averse western press.* The biggest distortion is that the brutal Serbian incursion comprised several wars that broke out due to ethnic rivalries. This mis-apprehension of the facts is exacerbated early on in this otherwise fine article. "... [Fikret Aric] embodied the violence unleashed on Bosnia's Muslim civilians at the orders of Radovan Karadzic, the man due to be taken to The Hague this weekend to answer charges of genocide and crimes against humanity." It is a true statement, as far as it goes. But, omitted is the fact that that the Bosnian leadership was actually following the lead of Slobodan Milosevic, the Serb strongman who dreamed of a "Greater Serbia" at the expense of her neighbors. Today, the historical facts have been somehow lost. For instance, the first country attacked by Serbia on that fateful summer day of June 25th, 1991 was not Bosnia or even Croatia. It was Slovenia. A few days later, following the humiliating defeat of Serbian tanks in Lubljana, Croatia was brutally attacked by Serb troops who killed all the patients in a hospital who couldn't escape in a raid across the Danube River that separates Serbia and Croatia. The Serb techniques and style of warfare was cowardice personified. They hired mercenary Serbs from rural Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia to literally go in and murder as many civilians as possible using whatever weapons they could get their hands on. This meant that Serbs who were uneducated were told that their neighbors were plotting against them in order to steal their land and kill or drive them away. To prevent that from happening, they should immediately go in and slaughter as many of their non-Serb neighbors as possible. This, of course, was shear nonsense, but it worked, much like that fellow who attacked and killed two Universalist Unitarians last Friday. He "hated liberals." Why? I am quite certain it was because he had been told over and over by talk radio hosts and others that liberals were the cause of everything bad that was happening in this country. And he finally bought into it. Anyway, the Serbs almost to a man in Yugoslavia bought into this myth. Was it a myth? Yes. For example, the inter-marriage rate between Croats, Serbs and Bosnians was easily 30% in 1990. In Slovenia, the Serb community (about 5% of the total population) was happy, and saw no reason to rise up against their non-Serb neighbors. So why and what was Milosevic trying to accomplish with his greater Serbia vision? Very simply, his communistic economic policies were beginning to fall into greater and greater disrepute as a workable form of governance. A young, intelligent and ambitious man who worked for a huge Slovenia company told me that the Serb dominated government was "always standing on our necks," making it very difficult to do business with the free world. Written into the Yugoslavian Constitution was a provision that said any of the five republics that made up the federation could secede if, by popular vote, a majority of the citizens voted in favor of secession. Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia all wanted to secede, to finally taste the same freedoms that their immediate neighbors had in Austria and Italy...and let Serbia pick up the pieces. In late May, Slovenia and Croatia voted. It passed by huge margins in each republic. Bosnia voted about a week later and it passed there, too, although by a smaller margin because the Serbs made up about 30% of the population and they were opposed to abandoning a Serb dominated government that always looked favorably on Serbs, often discriminating in their favor. Milosevic couldn't let this happen. For one thing the northern republics of Slovenia and Croatia were the money makers of the five republics and were heavily taxed for programs and budget shortfalls in the south and east (Macedonia, Bosnia and Serbia, itself). Their taxes also largely supported the Yugoslav armed forces which were the 4th largest in Europe at the time and were largely commanded by Serb generals and the government based in Belgrade, the capital of Yugoslavia and of Serbia. Milosevic turned the Army, the JAL, against it's own citizens which, of course, sparked many desertions by Croatian, Slovenian and Bosnian soldiers. JAL armor and aircraft were used prominently in the siege of Sarajevo a shameful, cowardly and unmitigated act of warfare by Belgrade that lasted for nine months -- the only modern city to actually be under siege since WWII, and the world did nothing. (This was in spite of the fact that whenever a pro-Bosnian plan flew over the mountains in which the Serbs were positioned to fire down on the citizens of Sarajevo, they would flee their posts and hide wherever they could find shelter rather than fight back.) Milosevic not only also lost his tax base, but lost his access to the sea, the warm water ports off Croatia's beautiful Dalmatian Coast on the Adriatic. So, what was Milosevic's vision? A greater Serbia that finally would dominate the Balkans and propel him to economic and political success that would cause him to go down in history as a great man, a leader and liberator of his people? I suppose so. It was his wife who convinced him early in his career that he culd do it. he actively participated in his rise and fall. How much is she to blame? I profoundly hope that this information will come out finally during the trial of Radovan Karadzic and his second in command, general Ratko Mladic. For these two war criminals were the worst of the worse, except for Slobodan Milosevic, of course, and his Serb henchmen who were really responsible for the slaughter and rape of so many innocents in the first place. *While Croats did not believe in Public Relations as needed to "spin" their side during the War, the Serbs did. They hired two major Washington DC PR firms to carry their distorted messages to the press and the public. And our reporters bought into those distortions almost to a man/woman; certainly the main street news did. Further, the reporters based in Yugoslavia were almost always in Belgrade, the Serbian capital because it was also the Yugoslavian capitol and the source of most of their pre-war news. Most international news organizations already had their Yugoslavian news offices there. Following a national trend which has never abated, our increasingly lazy press preferred to take what was spoon fed to them by the very believable Serb PR people. And, because our press was already so uninformed about the true history of Yugoslavia, they did not question the Serb lies, such as, that this was predominantly and ethnic war when, in fact, it was an old fashioned war of aggression with ethnic overtones, that the Croats, Bosnians and Serbs had a long history of bloody rivalry (untrue), that it was Serbia who had gloriously tried to"save" Yugoslavia from being invaded by the Turks and failed in the infamous Kosovo battle on the Field of the Blackbirds (true), and, as such, deserved the respect of an ungrateful world (untrue), that the Serbs were trying to protect themselves from the bloody Croats and Muslim Bosnians who were trying to slaughter them simply because the were "disrespected if not hated Serbs," (untrue). All this can be easily documented. A final note: Ron Paul supported the Serbs and their propaganda machine in the 1990s during the war. He has, to my knowledge, never been publicly asked about that.