News

Feds to Propose Rules for Squeezing Oil From Rock

Monday 21 July 2008

»

by: Dina Cappiello, The Associated Press

photo
EGL Resources, Chevron USA and Shell Frontier Oil & Gas have been given 10-year experimental leases to mine and produce oil from rocky deposits known as "oil shale" on public lands in the Green River Basin. The basin lies in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah. (Photo: Nathan Bilow / The New York Times)

    Washington - The Bush administration wants to set the stage before leaving office for developing oil shale, rocky deposits in the western U.S. that could eventually yield 800 billion barrels of oil, according to government estimates.

    The Interior Department is scheduled to unveil proposed regulations Tuesday for a program to sell oil shale leases on federal lands, similar to the leases sold now for oil and natural gas both on and offshore.

    The shale is concentrated in the Green River Basin of Colorado, Wyoming and Utah. Developing it has become a hot topic of debate between Democrats and Republicans in response to voter anger over $4-a-gallon gasoline prices this summer.

    President Bush said last month that "one major deposit in the Rocky Mountain West alone would equal current annual oil imports for more than 100 years." The U.S. currently consumes about 20 million barrels of oil per day, about 58 percent of which is imported.

    Oil shale may be the largest untapped source of domestic oil, dwarfing the quantity of oil available offshore and on federal lands currently off-limits. However, it is very expensive to extract. A government program to subsidize its development in the 1980s was shut down when cost figures came in at several times the then-market price for oil.

    Unlike traditional sources of oil, oil shale requires energy to bake the rock and pump the molten oil to the surface. There are also big environmental concerns about the possible effect on the region's water, wildlife and public lands.

    Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., last year inserted language into a spending bill that bars the federal government from issuing final rules for commercial oil-shale development.

    "Tomorrow's announcement does not change the realities," said Matt Lee-Ashley, a spokesman for Salazar. "While the administration can finalize its draft rules, it is premature to move forward with a full commercial leasing program."

    Bureau of Land Management spokesman Matt Spangler said Tuesday's proposal does not conflict with Salazar's provision.

    In late 2006, the government issued leases for 10-year experimental projects to Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Co., Chevron USA and EGL Resources Inc. In testimony before a Senate committee in May, Assistant Interior Secretary Stephen Allred said commercial production of oil shale would not be underway until at least 2015.

»

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

The carbon foot print for

Fri, 07/25/2008 - 01:49 — Anonymous (not verified)
The carbon foot print for this type of mining will be enormous and will cost billions, most likely of our tax dollars, that we don't have. If it is anything like Uranium mining, where only one per cent of the ore is used and the rest, millions of tons of radioactive waste that have been left all over the Southwest in huge uncovered piles blowing in the wind, the environmental impact of oil shale mining will also be an utter disaster.

Oil shale is not oil, it is

Wed, 07/23/2008 - 03:41 — Stefan Albrecht (not verified)
Oil shale is not oil, it is kerogen. A very early stage product of oil formation. It needs to be cooked for 3-4 years at 700 degrees F. to produce a synthetic oil. The formations are 2000 - 4000 feet deep and need an artificial frozen barrier to protect the ground water. The process requires a lot of energy input, the net energy balance is unknown and most likely not very high. Hydrogen produced by wind, solar, geothermal, and wave energy will be much more efficient! The replacement cycle of cars is less then 10 years. Within 10 years we can all have electric or hydrogen cars. Save the hydrocarbons for more value added industrial production. Or way of life will depend on it!!!

Add a comment:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
The following question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Please enter the two words seen below. If you cannot read them you may use the button with circling arrows to get a new one.