Share

DNC Votes to Seat Michigan, Florida in Halves

by: Christopher Kuttruff, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
Democratic Party officials agreed Saturday to seat Michigan and Florida delegates with half-votes, maintaining Barack Obama's front-runner status as the campaign moves closer to the nomination.
(Photo: LM Otero / AP)

    After contentious discussion, frequently interrupted by protests from the crowd, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) voted Saturday to restore half of Michigan and Florida's delegate votes.

    The decision increases the number of delegates needed to claim the nomination. Senator Barack Obama (D-Illinois) leads Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-New York) by about 185 delegates, with only three primaries remaining.
Obama needs approximately 50 more delegates to become the Democratic nominee. There is a growing consensus among news analysts that Clinton will not be able to overcome the mathematical hurdle, despite the inclusion of Michigan and Florida.

    "Cynics will look at today's proceedings and look only for conflict," DNC Chairman Howard Dean noted, "[but] we are strong enough to struggle, and disagree, be angry, disappointed and still come together at the end of the day and be united."

    The DNC sought a delicate balance that would uphold its prior ruling while not excluding the two states from the national convention to be held in Denver, Colorado, in late August.

    The delegates were originally stripped from Florida and Michigan after the two states moved the dates of their presidential primaries up to before the allowed time. The initial decision to revoke the delegates was meant to send a firm signal to other states that violations of the DNC's timing rule would not be tolerated.

    Saturday's ruling, which also applies to unpledged superdelegates, left Senator Clinton with a net gain of 19 pledged delegates in Florida and five pledged delegates in Michigan.

    The Florida agreement passed unanimously 27-0, and the Michigan motion passed 19-8.

    The decision brought a fierce response from the audience at the meeting as Clinton supporters booed and chanted "Denver," voicing their desire for the nomination battle to continue to the National Convention.

    While the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee erupted with protests by Saturday evening, the meeting had started in a much calmer, more conciliatory manner.

    Chairman Dean opened the Rules Committee meeting with a tone of unity, emphasizing the candidates' commonalities and contributions to the party. "Young voters have tripled and in some cases quadrupled previous turnout," he said. "Over 35 million people have come out to support our candidates all across our country," he added.

    "This is not about our candidates; this is about our country," Dean said. He then outlined his hopes for a compromise, balancing a respect for the voters of Florida and Michigan, the two candidates, and the 48 states that did not violate the rules.

    After Dean's remarks, Jon Ausman, a DNC member from Florida, proposed a compromise to restore 50 percent of Florida's pledged delegates. He also criticized the DNC's move to exclude Florida's superdelegates from the convention. His argument explored rhetorical ambiguities within the DNC rules and charter.

    "I have great respect [for the committee], and I will accept whatever decision it makes. I want this to be a healing process that brings us together," Ausman said.

    The technical challenges Ausman brought forth eventually won over the committee and were adopted without any votes of opposition.

    The mood of the meeting quickly shifted, however, as Clinton supporter Senator Bill Nelson presented his arguments to the committee. Nelson pressed for full seating and voting rights for Florida's delegates. Unlike Ausman, though, Nelson's pleas extended primarily from anecdotal appeals that failed to gather much support when the motion was later called by the committee. Toward the end of his statement, Nelson drew a comparison of the delegate dispute to "the disenfranchisement" of Florida voters back in the 2000 general election between Al Gore and George W. Bush.

    A similar sentiment was raised later by DNC member and Clinton supporter Harold Ickes during his remarks of disapproval of the Michigan agreement. Ickes called the motion inexplicable and said that Clinton stated she "reserves the right to take this to the Credentials Committee."

    It was at this point during the vote that the audience became especially rowdy, frequently heckling DNC members who were speaking.

    James Roosevelt, DNC co-chairman, said during one period of interjections: "You are dishonoring your candidate when you interrupt the speakers."

    Clinton supporter Alice Huffman, attempting a tone of greater unity, stated, "The world is not perfect ... and we must compromise."

    The Clinton campaign released a statement praising the Florida agreement, but had this to say about the Michigan compromise: "We reserve the right to challenge this decision before the Credentials Committee and appeal for a fair allocation of Michigan's delegates that actually reflect[s] the votes as they were cast."

    Obama campaign manager David Plouffe said in a statement: "We're extremely gratified that the commission agreed on a fair solution that will allow Michigan and Florida to participate in the convention."

  

»


Christopher Kuttruff is an editor and reporter for Truthout.

Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Looks like Clinton gets her

Looks like Clinton gets her 5th down. Too bad she's down by 15 with less then a minute remaining

If Hillary is down so much,

If Hillary is down so much, why couldn't they allocate the delegates fairly, and at any time in the past, a race this close goes to the convention.

I find it sad that Clinton

I find it sad that Clinton supporters do not seem to be interested in a fair competition. While the Florida election was foisted on the party by the Republican legislature in that state, the date for the Michigan primary was the choice of the state party there. Both states and their party members knew what would happen and ALL the candidates agreed to the rules prior to the primaries. The allocations for the Florida delegation are as fair as can be allowed under the circumstances, but for the Clinton camp to claim foul over Michigan is the height of hypocrisy and disunity. She was the only one on the ballot and even though some voters voted as uncommitted, many Democrats did not go to the polls in either state because they did not believe that it would matter. This means that because of the state party's decision in Michigan to violate party rules, it is that state's party that disenfranchised its members and for Hillary Clinton to claim that she should get all the votes is ludicrous and dictatorial. It was in essence a rigged election and she broke the rules by participating in it after agreeing not to. The other candidates withdrew their names and did not campaign. While she did not campaign, with your name being the only one on the ballot - why bother to waste the money? It is time for HRC to play by the rules of the game and tell her supporters that the rules are written for everyone, and that means EVERYONE, INCLUDING HER. She cannot cry foul when she broke the rules and just because the majority of the party do not want her in the White House. And for the record, not one person in any state was disenfranchised in the general election, where their vote will truly mean more than just who gets to run. Every Clinton supporter who fails to vote or who votes for someone other than the party nominee will surely be responsible if McCain wins the White House. It is time for Hillary to walk the talk, and work towards party unity now and not personal aggrandizement.

Hilary, This is your

Hilary, This is your opportunity to unit the party and show the honor you are made of. You have many more opportunities to serve our great country in may capacities, including the presidency in a different term. This is the time to shine and make our party proud and united. Watch how you and your supporters conduct themselves. Currently, you are not leaving a very favorable impression on the party.

Soo! Typical of Democrats to

Soo! Typical of Democrats to shoot themselves in the foot. The rules committee by not allocating votes as people voted just arbitrarily gave Obama votes that he didn't earn violated the basic premise of our party. Not one pundit or reporter has asked the Obama campaign why he took his name off the ballot in Michigan. I can only assume it was tactical and the politics as usual they claim to disavow was clearly more important than disenfranchising voters.

As a MI resident, I hope

As a MI resident, I hope that the MI supporters of both Obama and Clinton will eventually demand and get an explanation from MI Dem Chrmn. Mark Brewer and behind-the-scenes Debbie Dingell as to their involvement in the MI fiasco. The DNC has done an admirable job of trying to clean up their impossible mess. It's also time that supporters from both camps pay due deference to the DNC's process (ie, rules spelled out beforehand). Democracy is more about rules, laws and transparency than about candidates and issues. The rhetorical spin about "inclusion" and the selective math that continues to take place within my party is beginning to make me feel as cynical as have the last eight years of Republican anti-democracy dominance. To Clinton's supporters: The DNC has made their decision, exercising flexibility within the DNC's rules to accommodate this avoidable, regrettable and unforeseen situation. Judging from what I heard from Clinton's supporters in the gallery while watching the DNC's deliberations on CSPAN yesterday, I worry that some of you may become what Nader's die-hards were in 2000 if Obama wins the nomination. Please unite with all Democrats for either Obama OR Clinton when all has been said and done, and temper your actions now to enable that unity then. Please do not cut of this nation's nose to spite your own faces. This will be our moment if we join forces, and our ability to join forces after such a hard-fought campaign will put the truth back into our party's bedrock ideal of "inclusion". Democracy is messy by design and requires compromise when it's working as it should.

I live in Michigan and voted

I live in Michigan and voted in the primary. I did not vote for Hillary because of her previous votes on the war. We were told that we could not write in a vote and instructed to vote "uncommitted" if our candidate's name did not appear. In what universe does this translate to giving Hillary all of her delegates and Barack no delegates? How many votes for Hillary were given because there were no other top tier candidates on the ballot? FYI, I am a white woman, over 50, without a college degree -- supposedly Hillary's "base". Will I vote for her if she's the nominee? Of course, because I could never live through for 4 more years of Bush policies via McCain. Will I resent her for changing the rules to suit her ambitions? Absolutely.

How can the Clinton

How can the Clinton supporters even bring up the Michigan primary. SHE WAS'NT supposed to be on the ballot in the first place and I guarantee you that if Obama would have been on the ballot, HE'D HAVE WON THE CONTEST IN THE FIRST PLACE. For him to even offer her MORE delegates in that agreement is a sign of a true peace maker. The more I watch Obama handle the criticizisms, the attacks, the lies and the tactics that have been used against him, the more I realize the extraordinary opportunity we have in his being the Democratic Candidate; i.e.; someone who really cares about someone other than himself. Unbelieveable given the candidates and the intellect of the voting public these days.

One wonders if Hillary left

One wonders if Hillary left her name on the ballot of a disallowed primary just to have this option to challenge the outcome. Claiming that this vote reflects the will of the people when voters knew it would not count is disingenuous at best, and her appeal to the credentials committee will only drag this out further and continue to inflame passions that will harm the Democratic party and the chances for the Democratic nominee.

"Cheaters never prosper," as

"Cheaters never prosper," as we learned in grade school. Clinton cheated. Is that the kind of president we (still) want? Haven't we had enough of that with Bush, Clinton, Bush...(Clinton)? Being a lifelong Democrat, I still have a modicum of hope with Barack Obama in the White House. But, frankly, ALL of the candidates, save Dennis Kucinich, are/were MILES away from the truth telling, honesty, courage and mental clarity of RALPH NADER. If it wasn't for the HORRORS of the last 7 years: indifferent, sadistic mass-murder of 1MILLION Iraqis FOR PROFIT AND POWER, torture, treason, lying, and looting of this nation and Iraq, I WOULD VOTE FOR NADER. If Obama doesn't bring some humanity back to this nation, peace to the world and sustainability to civilization, I'm going to call MYSELF a COWARD for not voting for Nader. Because, then, I WILL be a COWARD for not voting my conscience. And this WILL be my last vote for a Democrat for the rest of my life.

Hillary is a front for the

Hillary is a front for the DLC in their effort to make the Democratic Party the left wing of the Republican Party and their personal DLC plaything. HRC's conduct makes no sense otherwise. The DLC will get what they want or destroy the Party if they don't get their way. They will then say that their sabotage was someone else's fault. The DLC is a blight and a running sore on the Democratic Party and should be excised.

I am a Michigan voter. Of

I am a Michigan voter. Of the 8 Democrats I know who voted in the Michigan primary, only 2 were Hillary supporters. Of the ones who wanted to vote for Obama, 1 didn't bother to vote, 2 voted for Kucinich, 1 voted "undecided" and 2 voted for Ron Paul. THIS is supposed to be a "fair" vote for Hillary???

I am a democrat that will

I am a democrat that will vote for Hillary or Barack, but taking Michigan votes away from Hillary and giving them to Barack is outragious! He doesn't have to do that to win the nomination! It disgraces the Democratic party, a party that should be proud to be democratic. This behaviour was anything but democratic.

This reminds me of when

This reminds me of when there's a lane closure and some folks drive on the shoulder and then expect those who waited to let them cut in. The kindergarten lesson "don't cut in line" just didn't sink in for some people. As far as I'm concerned, FL, MI & Hillary got more than they deserved. The states, voters and candidates who followed the rules should be the ones objecting. HOWEVER, now let's get this behind us, unite and got on with battle to beat McCain!

looks like i will be writing

looks like i will be writing in hillary for president in nov.

A lesson learned: perhaps

A lesson learned: perhaps there will be a process installed whereby voters are not stripped of their votes because of the actions of State legislatures or State Parties. The snide remarks addressed so often in these comments toward a woman who has competently dedicated her life to the service of this country is sad indeed, regardless of where her votes (so similar to Senator Obama's, if one bothered to look) place her on the ideological spectrum. On the other side, I hear a great deal of anger and frustration by Sen. Clinton's supporters here, but it does not seem to be directed at Sen. Obama, as his supporters' anger is toward her. This speaks well for her campaign, but the race comes down to the players themselves. It is clear overall, thoughout the campaign, that both candidates are fine statespersons who will do great things in office if elected. I hope we can all agree to that and work for the election of either or both to the White House this November.

It's not Senator Clinton

It's not Senator Clinton but the DNC itself that has seriously damaged the chances of electing a Democrat to the White House in November! For example, following this weekend's vote by the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee, I am quitting the Democratic Party, after 48 years of voting for Democrats, and will register as an Independent on Monday morning. I will do this because I refuse to be rail-roaded by the DNC power brokers. I will not vote for Sen. Obama in the November election, not because I disapprove of him but because I refuse to be manipulated by the DNC in its attempt to disenfranchise voters and to push through its chosen candidate. That is even more dangerous to our democracy than having McCain win. It is more dangerous than party disunity. Speaker Pelosi, by saying that she will step in to prevent a floor-fight at the convention, is in the forefront of this disenfranchisement effort. I am astonished at those who object to the enthusiasm of the Clinton supporters! What do the DNC power brokers want in a democracy, apathetic voters who will plod obediently along the paths their managers point to? This, apparently, is the wish of the DNC. I find it disgraceful. I am through with the Democratic Party. Mary Troy, NH

Florida and Michigan must be

Florida and Michigan must be punished for violating the rules. If the DNC just slaps them on the wrist, what kink of chaos would you expect 4 years down the road? It sets a very bad precedent and undermines the DNC authority. The Florida/Michigan voters should hold the state reps. accountable and vote them out come their election time for disenfranchising them. Please note, Clinton supporters, Hillary was in full favor of the DNC rules for the primary election. Now she's not? I don't understand how one could be upset with the DNC or Obama. Let's unite under the nominee who gets the designated number of delegates and clobber McFlipFlop!!....for the sake of our country and the world, we cannot afford another 4 years of these republican sociopaths.

This election is a victory

This election is a victory for women no matter who takes the nomination. Hillary Clinton has made History and has "won" as the first woman to get within a nano second of the nomination. Now it is time to look at the serious problems women face world wide.

After all this rancor and

After all this rancor and waste of party resources over this dilemma, where have the Democrats arrived? At exactly the same decision that the Republicans made before the primaries to halve the votes of the line jumping states. The Repubs may be bastards, but at least they have their tactical act together.

The fact that Democratic

The fact that Democratic leaders have come to support Obama as nominee is not evidence of their prejudice against Clinton, but rather evidence of their support for the democratic process. I think what Clinton supporters are ignoring is that the possibility that she could be the party's nominee, after now, June 4, means literally undermining the democratic process to put her in front. There is no compelling reason to do that- saying that her 'better chances against McCain' make her a better nominee is hardly a reason: subverting democracy for political gain is, I think we all agree, detestable .