News

EPA Tells Its Staff: Don't Answer Watchdogs' Queries

»

by: Renee Schoof, McClatchy Newspapers

photo
President Bush and EPA administrator Stephen Johnson, seen here in a May 2007 photo, have been accused of stifling opposition to the administration's environmental policies. (Photo: Ron Edmonds / AP)

    Washington - The Environmental Protection Agency has told its staff not to answer questions from the agency's internal watchdog, news reporters or the nonpartisan investigative arm of Congress, according an internal memo that an environmental group released Monday.

    The June 16 memo to the staff of the EPA's enforcement division told them that if they're contacted by the EPA inspector general's office, an independent internal watchdog that monitors the agency, or by the Government Accountability Office, the investigators who work for Congress, they're to forward the call or e-mail to a designated person.

    "Please do not respond to questions or make any statements," it adds. The memo sets down the same procedure, with different contact people, for queries from reporters.

    EPA spokeswoman Roxanne Smith wouldn't say whether any specific incident triggered the memo, but said it was consistent with existing policies and intended to coordinate responses.

    John Walke, a former EPA air pollution attorney, said the inspector general's office ordinarily has unfettered access to agency employees so they can speak candidly and anonymously.

    The memo appeared as the Senate Environment and Judiciary committees are trying to get EPA to release information about its global warming policies, and after EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson declined to testify this week before the two committees.

    Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said last week that he was instructing the EPA inspector general's office to investigate whether there was any wrongdoing in failing to cooperate with Congress.

    Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility obtained the memo and released it to reporters.

    "The intent was to control any unscripted release of information to an investigator or to a reporter," said Jeff Ruch, the director of the environmental group. "We're not sure what the specific triggering event was, but there's so much chum in the water that they were certainly biting at something."

    The EPA's Smith said that Robbi Farrell, the chief of staff of the enforcement division, sent the memo to managers in her office "to ensure consistency and coordination" among staffers who respond to the inspector general and the congressional investigators. It will help with "tracking and record-keeping obligations," Smith said in a statement.

    Smith also said the procedure was developed in part as a response to a 2007 inspector general report about follow-ups on audits at EPA. That report, however, didn't critique EPA staff members' contacts with reporters and investigators.

    "There is nothing in the procedure that restricts conversation between enforcement staff, the press, GAO and the IG and the procedure is consistent with existing policies," Smith's statement said.

    But Walke, who worked for the EPA as an attorney from 1997 to 2000 and now works for the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council, said, "If the agency has advance notice of who they want to talk to and about what, it allows them to do spin control and manage the damage fallout."

    The EPA inspector general's office conducts audits, evaluations and investigations of the EPA and its contractors "to promote economy and efficiency and to prevent and detect fraud, waste and abuse," its Web site says.

    Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., the chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, has criticized Johnson for not testifying about alleged White House interference with the EPA. Boxer has called on Johnson to release a finding the EPA prepared and sent to the White House in December that found global warming endangers the public welfare.

    "Stephen Johnson is turning the EPA into a secretive, dangerous ally of polluters, instead of a leader in the effort to protect the health and safety of the American people," Boxer said in a statement Monday in response to reports about the memo.

A copy of the memo as released by PEER:

    Robbi Farrell/DC/USEPA

    /US 06/16/2008 11:22 AM

    To

    Betsy Smidinger/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    Christopher Knopes/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    David Hindin/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    James Edward/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    Karin Koslow/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    Kenneth Gigliello/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    Linda Flick/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    Lorna Washington/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    Michael Alushin/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    Richard Colbert/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    Robert Mcnally/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA

    cc

    Lisa Lund/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    David Hindin/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA,

    David Piantanida/DC/USEPA/US(at)EPA

    Subject PLEASE REMIND STAFF re: RESPONDING TO GAO, IG AND PRESS

    Please remind your staff at your next staff meeting of the following policies and procedures.

    1. If you are contacted by a reporter, please forward the call or email to Laura Gentile and Roxanne Smith, cc Robbi. Please do not respond to questions or make any statements.

    2. If you are contacted directly by the IG's office or GAO requesting information of any kind, please forward their call or email to Gwen Spriggs, cc Robbi. Please do not respond to questions or make any statements.

    Thanks very much for your continued attention to these important procedures.

    Robbi

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

I wonder if telling one's

I wonder if telling one's employees to refrain from speaking to investigators from the Inspector General's Office and from the congressional oversight branch may constitute obstruction of justice if it is being done to hide illegal activities?

This at a time when the EPA

This at a time when the EPA has lowered the calculated value of a human life by $1 million, and the Vice President is censoring out information on the health impacts of global warming. We wrote about it on the CA NOW blog here: http://www.canow.org/canoworg/2008/07/the-federal-gov.html

Add a comment:

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
The following question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Please enter the two words seen below. If you cannot read them you may use the button with circling arrows to get a new one.