Also see below:     
FBI Director Contradicts Gonzales    [

    Counsel Sought to Investigate Attorney General's Testimony
    By David Stout
    The New York Times

    Thursday 26 July 2007

    Washington - Four Senate Democrats sought today to raise the controversy over Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales to a new level as they called for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate whether Mr. Gonzales perjured himself before Congress.

    The senators, all members of the Judiciary Committee, urged Solicitor General Paul D. Clement in a letter to name an independent counsel from outside the Justice Department. "It has become apparent that the attorney general has provided at a minimum half-truths and misleading statements," the senators wrote.

    While the four were asking for a special counsel, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, announced that a subpoena was being issued to Karl Rove, President Bush's chief political adviser, to provide information on the firings last year of nine federal prosecutors. The White House has asserted executive privilege in resisting Congressional demands for testimony by present and former presidential aides.

    The request that the solicitor general name a special counsel to investigate Mr. Gonzales marked a new stage in the long-running controversy over his stewardship of the Justice Department. Mr. Gonzales's most outspoken critics suggested today that the attorney general might have committed crimes, including perjury and obstruction of justice, when he testified about President Bush's domestic-surveillance program and the dismissal of the nine United States attorneys.

    The four senators - Charles E. Schumer of New York, Dianne Feinstein of California, Russell D. Feingold of Wisconsin and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island - zeroed in today on Mr. Gonzales's testimony that there had been no internal dissent over the president's warrantless eavesdropping program, and that an emergency meeting at the White House in March 2004 concerned subjects other than the secret eavesdropping operation.

    "Both of those statements appear to be false," Mr. Schumer said today. "We know from senators who were there, and we know from a letter from John Negroponte," he went on, referring to the former director of national intelligence. "It's in black and white."

    The letter from the four senators was addressed to the solicitor general because Mr. Gonzales has recused himself, as has the outgoing deputy attorney general, Paul J. McNulty.

    A Justice Department spokesman, Brian Roehrkasse, said on Wednesday that Mr. Gonzales stood by his testimony. And the White House spokesman, Tony Snow, said today that Mr. Bush still stood by Mr. Gonzales.

    After Mr. Gonzales's most recent testimony on Tuesday, Justice Department aides acknowledged in a background briefing for reporters that the attorney general had caused confusion by his "linguistic parsing." A special counsel, if one is named, would presumably try to determine if any of Mr. Gonzales's ambiguous statements were outright lies.

    Senator Feinstein said today that Mr. Gonzales has often given "misleading and often untrue statements to Congress," and that she had never seen "an attorney general so contemptuous of Congress and his role as the chief law enforcement officer of the United States."

    A spokesman for the Democratic majority leader, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, told The Associated Press that Mr. Reid supported the request for a special counsel.

    Senator Leahy said he was subpoenaing Mr. Rove because "the accumulated evidence shows that political considerations factored into the unprecedented firing" of the federal prosecutors last year. A subpoena is also being issued for J. Scott Jennings, a White House political aide, Mr. Leahy said.

    United States attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president, and the people in those posts typically change when administrations change. But once installed, United States attorneys have traditionally been free of explicit political interference. Democrats have asserted that the nine who were let go last year may have been victims of cynical political calculations.

    Mr. Leahy has said explicitly that he simply does not trust Mr. Gonzales. Today, Mr. Leahy sent a letter to Mr. Gonzales inviting him to change his testimony to cleanse himself of any possible perjury charges, and to do so by the end of next week.

    Aboard Air Force One on the way to Philadelphia today, the White House spokesman, Mr. Snow, said that, contrary to the Democrats' assertions, Mr. Gonzales has been consistent and that "the president supports him." Mr. Snow suggested that what some see as deliberate inconsistencies in Mr. Gonzales's accounts may be a reflection of the complexity of the issues being discussed.

    President Bush was accompanied on his visit to Philadelphia by Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee. Mr. Specter has been as critical of Mr. Gonzales as have the Democrats, and he told reporters that he might talk to the president today about his concerns, The Associated Press reported.

    Later, after returning to Washington, Mr. Specter declined to discuss what he and the president had talked about. Asked whether he supported the call for a special counsel, which was led by Senator Schumer, Mr. Specter said he did not.

    Regarding Mr. Gonzales's testimony, Mr. Specter said: "There are very complex questions that have to be answered on looking at the record. But Senator Schumer's not interested in looking at the record. He's interested in throwing down the gauntlet and making a story in tomorrow's newspapers."

    Mr. Specter pointed out that Senator Leahy had not signed the letter to the solicitor general.

    Go to Original

    FBI Director Contradicts Gonzales
    By Laurie Kellman and Lara Jakes Jordan
    The Associated Press

    Thursday 26 July 2007

    Washington - FBI Director Robert S. Mueller said Thursday the government's terrorist surveillance program was the topic of a 2004 hospital room dispute between top Bush administration officials, contradicting Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' sworn Senate testimony.

    Mueller was not in the hospital room at the time of the dramatic March 10, 2004, confrontation between then-Attorney General John Ashcroft and presidential advisers Andy Card and Gonzales, who was then serving as White House counsel. Mueller told the House Judiciary Committee he arrived shortly after they left, and spoke with the ailing Ashcroft.

    "Did you have an understanding that that the conversation was on TSP?" asked Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas. TSP stands for terrorist surveillance program.

    "I had an understanding the discussion was on a NSA program, yes," Mueller answered.

    Jackson asked again: "We use 'TSP,' we use 'warrantless wiretapping,' so would I be comfortable in saying that those were the items that were part of the discussion?"

    "The discussion was on a national NSA program that has been much discussed, yes," Mueller responded.

    The NSA, or National Security Agency, runs the program that eavesdropped on terror suspects in the United States, without court approval, until last January, when the program was put under the authority of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

    On Tuesday, Gonzales repeatedly and emphatically denied that the dispute was about the terrorist surveillance program.