Share

Gas Underlies the Bolivian Crisis

by: Laurent Tourneux  |  Libèration

photo
"Between the energy interests of some and others' opposition to the 'Yankee' enemy, Bolivia enjoys the 'unanimous' support of Latin American countries," writes Laurent Tourneux. Bolivia's President Evo Morales (left) with Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (center) and Chile's President Michelle Bachelet. (Photo: Reuters)

    Between the energy interests of some and others' opposition to the "Yankee" enemy, Bolivia enjoys the "unanimous" support of Latin American countries.

    If Evo Morales received the unanimous support of his Latino UNASUR (Union of South American nations) homologues Monday in Chile, it's obviously because "no situation of rupture with the Constitutional order" will be tolerated. But there is also a "subterranean" reason: in fact, Bolivia's geologic substratum harbors the continent's second-largest natural gas reserves after Venezuela. Under the circumstances, there can be no question of abandoning such a rich neighbor.

    That's the case most particularly for Argentina and Brazil, since La Paz supplies the bulk of its gas to Buenos Aires and, to a lesser extent, to Brasilia. That is to say that if the present Bolivian crisis were to last, it could have serious consequences for the continent's two biggest economies.

    Moreover, Bolivia's customers have already been scalded by the fall of two of Evo Morales's predecessors, Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada in 2003 and Carlos Mesa in 2005, because of the problem of natural resource redistribution.

    A former coca grower, Morales came to power in January 2006 on the promise of redistributing profits from natural gas of the poorest country in South America to the most destitute populations. But the five opposition governors of the rich provinces of Santa Cruz, Beni, Pando, Tarija and Chuquisaca don't agree. They intend instead to increase their regions' autonomy and prevent any sharing of what they consider "their" wealth.

    Fortunately for Morales, he may count on his South American homologues. Even before the UNASUR meeting Monday, Venezuela, Ecuador, Honduras, Nicaragua and Paraguay had openly taken his side. As did the Rio Group - which brings together 22 Latin American and Caribbean countries - and which reasserted its attachment to the "principle of territorial integrity," tackling Washington - which is close to the Bolivian opposition governors - along the way.

    The point was to communicate its four truths to the Bush administration as it lives out its final days. And, above all, to warn his successor. The days when the United States calls the shots on the Latin subcontinent seem well and truly over. That, in any case, is the message launched at John McCain and Barack Obama.

    --------

    Translation: Truthout French language editor Leslie Thatcher.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Even if the people of South

Even if the people of South America "screw up" everything and there is little evidence-apart from Chile and Brazil and even here the results are inconclusive-to indicate that this won't happen, it is gratifying to see that Tio Sam ain't what he used to be. People should have the right to make their own mistakes with out American meddling. It also warms my heart to see how Bush over extended US military capacity with his war against terror to the point that the" Yankees" are now incapable of raking the leaves in their own backyard. The sad thing is that Narco-traffic is ripping these societies apart. What once was limited to Columbia is now spreading over the continent and while the economics maybe improving rule and human rights are not. Oh well I'm sure Sara Palin will have some interesting comments about our friends South of the border when she is next interviewed.

Let's see we assassinate

Let's see we assassinate democratically elected Allende and replace him with Pinochet. We (via CIA) attempted to kill Hugo Chavez-- one of those dastardly folks who tried to send help to Katrina victims, and was turned away by the USA. We repeatedly have tried to kill Fidel Castro, whose health care system rivals or bests the US system. We want Batista style Cuba back. We have consistently backed the most corrupt and oppressive regimes in Latin America and the Middle East. We now have endorsed torture and invasion of countries to get their energy resources. And we are shocked when we are hated around the world? So it was "only gas"? Really?? There is stupid, and then there is American stupid. We have set a new standard. McCain and Palin are sure to win.

Gas Underlies the Bolivian

Gas Underlies the Bolivian Crisis THIS, for example, is good investigation. You have gone to a source unavailable to many of us and given us information we would not otherwise have had. I regret that the article still limits the number of US presidential candidates to TWO, whereas there are SIX, but if even truthout ignores the other four, how can we expect the French to know about them?