Opinion

George W. Bush's About-Face on Iran

»

by: Pierre Rousselin, Le Figaro

photo
US Assistant Secretary of State William Burns's unprecedented participation in this Saturday's Geneva meeting between Iranian nuclear negotiator Said Jalili and the EU's Javier Solana constitutes an "about-face" in US policy with respect to Iran, argues Le Figaro's Pierre Rousselin. (Photo: David Gray / Reuters)

    The United States is taking a very important step in Iran's direction by involving itself directly in negotiations over nuclear issues.

    Saturday, the State Department's No. 3, William Burns, will participate in the meeting in Switzerland between Javier Solana and Iranian negotiator, Saed Jalili.

    The American diplomat's presence is unprecedented. It will not be symbolic only. It's at the Saturday meeting in Geneva that the Iranians will give their formal response to the Western proposals Solana had presented in Tehran in July.

    For European diplomacy, which is the source of the efforts towards a negotiated solution, the fact that the United States is involving itself so visibly is a great success. It addresses a very clear message to the Iranians as to the seriousness of a diplomatic undertaking they could question as long as Washington kept its distance.

    Nonetheless, Americans and Iranians still assert that their positions have not changed. Tehran still refuses to stop uranium enrichment, the precondition established by the United States and the five other countries involved (France, Germany, Great Britain, Russia and China) for real negotiations. Washington proclaims that additional sanctions will be imposed if Tehran refuses to stop enrichment and negotiate.

    Nonetheless, it remains the case that the American administration has effected an about-face: it agrees to participate in discussions - although these are presented as preliminary - even before Iran submits to its conditions.

    If the United States makes such a gesture, it's in the hope of seeing the Iranians grab the opportunity. Western inducements for stopping enrichment will have aroused an internal debate in Tehran that should be fed by betting on the most conciliating voices winning out.

    Six months before stepping down, George W. Bush is distancing - at least for the moment - the prospects of another war in the Middle East. His gesture favors relaxation on the oil markets where speculation is inflaming the price per barrel. Above all, it must be seen in the context of the electoral campaign in the United States. Negotiating with Iran is a demand Democratic candidate Barack Obama has put forward. By taking the initiative, the Republican administration cuts the grass out from under his feet and promotes John McCain.

    After the American about-face, it's up to the Iranians to play. Now they may be conciliatory without losing face. "It's possible to have discussions with the United States on different subjects in the near future," Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared Monday evening, objecting only to any preconditions.

    The Islamic Republic wants to be acknowledged by the United States as an indispensable interlocutor. It can seize the opportunity now or wait for the next American president, but then the escalation in tensions could quickly resume.

    --------

    Translation: Truthout French language editor Leslie Thatcher.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

The US, France, Germany,

The US, France, Germany, Great Britain, Russia and China would love to carve up Iran's vast, easily accessible oil reserves and cut Tehran out of the deal.

This is only the tool to

This is only the tool to FOOL. There is no integrity in this "diplomatic about-face". It is only to show that the US tried diplomacy before poor Israel had to defend herself. It will amount to nothing but propaganda to promote the insane attack Israel is planning. Please look at this "breakthrough" through this link's prism: http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/91978/ And incidently why is the NYT Op-Ed referenced in the above link not included in the Opinions Section of TruthOut? I find it a repulsive yet insightful read.

I only see how Obama's

I only see how Obama's position to negotiate with Iran is anything but strenghtened by Bush's last minute attempt to send a delegate to the Swiss meeting. For the past seven years the only thing we have heard from bush is "axis of evil"; we do not talk with the enemy. Must be the price of oil that caused this about face

I am grateful that diplomacy

I am grateful that diplomacy is being implemented. We have been calling for this for seven + years. I don't believe it pulls the rug out from under Barack. I think is is a testiment to his wisdom. The administration is admitting that he is right. His influence is being felt even before his formal nomination.

The instability of the oil

The instability of the oil markets is connected to the instability of oil producing nations, Iran producing a lot of oil. Taking war off the table with Iran should produce some stability in the oil markets, reducing the cost per barrel of oil. Let's see what happens.

The US has finally realized

The US has finally realized that war with Iran would be disruptive to our interest in controlling Iraqi oil. Both the US and Iran back al-Maliki. This is the common ground for reaching an agreement with Iran that will allow the US to control Iraqi oil, at least in the immediate future, now that we have coerced Iraqis to write a contract with US oil companies that allows them to control Iraqi oil.

Add a comment:

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
The following question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Please enter the two words seen below. If you cannot read them you may use the button with circling arrows to get a new one.