Share

Hagel Says He'd Consider VP Offer From Obama

by:   |  The Associated Press

photo
Senator Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., interviewed Sunday in Washington on ABC's "This Week."
(Photo: Terry Ashe / AP)

    Omaha, Nebraska - Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel said Friday he would consider serving as Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's running mate if asked, but he doesn't expect to be on any ticket.

    Hagel's vocal criticism of the Bush administration since the 2003 invasion of Iraq has touched off speculation that if Obama were to pick a Republican running mate, it might be Hagel. Hagel said in an interview with The Associated Press that after devoting much of his life to his country - in the Senate and the U.S. Army - he would have to consider any offer.

    "If it would occur, I would have to think about it," Hagel said. "I think anybody, anybody would have to consider it. Doesn't mean you'd do it, doesn't mean you'd accept it, could be too many gaps there, but you'd have to consider it, I mean, it's the only thing you could do. Why wouldn't you?"

    In a book published this year, Hagel said that despite holding one of the Senate's strongest records of support for President Bush, his standing as a Republican has been called into question because of his opposition to what he deems "a reckless foreign policy ... that is divorced from a strategic context."

    Hagel wrote in "America: Our Next Chapter" that the invasion of Iraq was "the triumph of the so-called neoconservative ideology, as well as Bush administration arrogance and incompetence."

    He said Friday that he and Obama also have differences.

    "But what this country is going to have to do is come together next year, and the next president is going to have to bring this country together to govern with some consensus," Hagel said.

    He hasn't endorsed Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the presumed Republican nominee, whom he calls a friend. Hagel said Friday he hadn't thought about who to vote for in November.

    In a March appearance on ABC's "This Week, he said he and McCain have "some pretty fundamental disagreements on the future of foreign policy," including the Iraq war.

    McCain has said his goal is to reduce U.S. casualties, shift security missions to Iraqis and, ultimately, have a noncombat U.S. troop presence in Iraq similar to that in South Korea. He has said that such a presence could last 100 years or more.

    Ted Sorensen, a former speechwriter for President John F. Kennedy, said Thursday that Obama should consider Hagel.

    Sorensen, a Nebraska native, said Obama should pick a running mate who can help where he's weakest, and Hagel's national security experience makes him a logical candidate. Obama has a team managing the vetting process that includes former first daughter Caroline Kennedy, and Sorensen said he has spoken to her about the selection.

    Hagel served as an Army sergeant in Vietnam and was twice wounded in 1968, earning two Purple Hearts.

    He was the only member of his party on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to support a nonbinding measure critical of Bush's decision to dispatch an additional 30,000 troops to Iraq.

    "There is no strategy. This is a pingpong game with American lives," Hagel said at the time.

    The rhetoric drew the public ire of Vice President Dick Cheney, who told Newsweek in January 2007 that Ronald Reagan's mantra to not speak ill of another Republican was sometimes hard to follow "where Chuck Hagel is involved."

    --------

    On the Net:

    U.S. Sen. Chuck Hagel: www.hagel.senate.gov

  

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Hagel must be nuts. No

Hagel must be nuts. No presidential ticket has crossed party lines anyway. But he has only the one issue of iraq, and he was merely critical, NOT opposed. If a pres. ticket ever would cross party lines, it should be for RON PAUL, with his populist Libertarian views. But that is highly unlikely, as the bulk of dems and virtually ALL repubs despise liberty. Do NOT expect Ron Paul to endorse McCain. His endorsement or continued candidacy will be a factor in this election, as he is the people's 3rd choice. He could support the Libertarian candidate, or even Obama as the lesser of evils, or his non-endorsement of anyone may be enough.

This is an interesting idea

This is an interesting idea that would change perspectives on the U.S. drastically and quickly. The value of doing this as a world model should not be underestimated. I would see it as Truth and Reconciliation crossing the water, hopefully to cross back over again to places like Kenya and Zimbabwe. Business as usual is not called for in these times. Mary

Webb, Webb, only Webb will

Webb, Webb, only Webb will do.

Chuck Hagel is against the

Chuck Hagel is against the war in Iraq and that is good, but not good enough for Obama, Jim Webb, much better.

...Hagel said that despite

...Hagel said that despite holding one of the Senate's strongest records of support for President Bush, his standing as a Republican has been called into question because of his opposition to what he deems "a reckless foreign policy ... that is divorced from a strategic context." If Hagel’s characterization of himself is accurate; if the choice of a vice president has significance other than symbolism; and, politics is anything more than posturing, this discussion must be viewed as bizarre in the extreme. If nothing else, Obama would be putting targets on his own forehead, heart and back! If Hagel should ascend to the presidency through some tragedy, how will the people who voted for Barak feel when Hagel fills vacancies on the supreme court?

"If it would occur, I would

"If it would occur, I would have to think about it," Hagel said. "I think anybody, anybody would have to consider it. Doesn't mean you'd do it, doesn't mean you'd accept it, could be too many gaps there, but you'd have to consider it, I mean, it's the only thing you could do. Why wouldn't you?" I am not supporting the idea of Sen. Hagel as the VP candidate; however, the above quote from the article is the reasonable answer to the question posed. deathbymagoomba's comments are not reasonable (i.e. "he was merely critical"). While I have many differences with Sen. Hagel, he has been one of the most vocal critics of Bush's policies re. Iraq and foreign policy agenda/methods. More so than most democratic members of congress. I have no problems with giving him credit for this; it is deserved. Broad generalizations and recriminations aimed at anyone other than "my guy/gal" are at best counterproductive. Just sayin'.

I can't imagine what Ron

I can't imagine what Ron Paul's endorsement or non endorsement has to do with anything, as deathbymajoomba suggests here. My word. His 'non-endorsement of anyone may be enough? Who would care a whit one way or the other what Ron Paul does? He's NOT the peoples' 3rd choice of anything. He's a wacked-out repug congressman from a Southern District of Texas. That's all the significance Ron Paul has. So how did HE get in the conversation anyway? Meantime, I think Hagel would be fine. Other's would serve the purpose as well. Some are hollering for Wesley Clark, but I don't get why it's so important to have military experience as a pres or a vp. Isn't it enough to put a military person in charge of the DoD and maybe some other positions? Aren't we trying to get away from all of the aggressive militarism? Don't we just need somebody to give the order to redeploy, and just start packing up, and heading out? How complicated is that? Hell, even I could do that.

Adding Chuck Hagel to the

Adding Chuck Hagel to the ticket will help bring one very significant voting block onto the Democratic side -- the touchscreen vote http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0131-01.htm

To the anonymous commenter

To the anonymous commenter who said: "Obama would be putting targets on his own forehead, heart and back!" Seems like you hit the nail on the head on that one. Along with deathbymagoomba's comment: "[Hagel] was merely critical, NOT opposed." But, his great talk aside, Obama's still an unknown and flipped on public financing. I say "Get the Real Truth - not Real TV - Vote Nader/Gonzales" - if nothing else in this nation, those who really love this country and its founder's dream can at least dream along with them as we all head toward our graves...

Chuck Hagel,

Chuck Hagel, Johnny-come-lately to the anti-war movement, and opposed as he may be to the Bush Mafia crime spree, STILL HAS TO ANSWER FOR HOW HE WON AN ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE, AGAINST A 'WILDLY POPULAR ENCUMBANT" WHO WAS PROJECTED TO WIN, WHILE OWNING THE ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINE COMPANY THAT COUNTED THE VOTES...TWICE! Priceless: OBAMA INVITES REPUBLICAN SENATOR WHO COMMITTED ELECTION FRAUD TO RUN AS VP. THE ELECTORATE WOULD JUST LOVE THAT CHOICE!!