Share

Housing Market Meltdown Causes Massive Losses

by: Dean Baker  |  The Center for Economic and Policy Research

photo
The Center for Economic and Policy Research reports that with the loss in home value in the housing meltdown, many families will be left with nothing but Social Security and Medicare to support them in retirement.

    Plummeting house prices will leave millions of homeowners dependent almost exclusively on Social Security in their retirement.

    Washington, DC- As Senators McCain and Obama fine-tune their plans for Social Security in preparation for the 2008 presidential election, a new report from the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) shows that, due to the collapse of the housing bubble, the vast majority of Americans have accumulated little or no wealth. This means that they will be almost completely reliant on Social Security and Medicare to support them in their retirement years.

    The study, "The Impact of the Housing Crash on Family Wealth," analyzed the wealth holdings of families in all age cohorts in 2004 and projected the wealth of these families in 2009. The findings are presented by income quintile under three scenarios- real house prices remain at current levels, real house prices fall by an additional 10 percent, or real house prices fall by an additional 20 percent. In all three scenarios, the vast majority of these families will have little or no housing wealth in 2009.

    "This extraordinary destruction of wealth will have tremendous implications for millions of families," said report co-author Dean Baker. "Coupled with a very low personal savings rate, this means that many people, especially those near retirement will only have Social Security and Medicare to rely on once they leave the workforce."

    The report projects that if house prices stay the same through 2009, the median household headed by a person between the ages of 45 and 54, those in their prime earning years, will have 24.7 percent less wealth than did the median household in this age group in 2004. These households will have accumulated just $113,268 in net worth in 2009, barely $15,000 more than their counterparts in 1989, whose net worth totaled $97,600.

    If real house prices fall 10 percent, the median household in the 45 to 54 cohort will see a 34.6 percent loss in wealth compared with the median in 2004 while families in the 18 to 34 cohort will lose of 67.6 percent. If prices fall by 20 percent, the most pessimistic scenario, families in the 55 to 64 cohort will experience a loss of 49.6 percent of their wealth compared to the same cohort in 2004.

    This analysis should also prompt serious re-examination of policy proposals to cut Social Security and Medicare for near retirees. Baker commented, "policies that perhaps could have been justified at the peak of the housing bubble make much less sense now that tens of millions of near-retirees have just seen most of their wealth disappear."

    In analyzing wealth holdings for these families, the authors used data from the Federal Reserve Board's 2004 Survey of Consumer Finance. The authors also used the S&P 500 and the Case-Shiller 20-City Composite Index to adjust for equity values and home price changes between 2004 and 2009.

    ----------

    The Center for Economic and Policy Research is an independent, nonpartisan think tank that was established to promote democratic debate on the most important economic and social issues that affect people's lives. CEPR's Advisory Board of Economists includes Nobel Laureate economists Robert Solow and Joseph Stiglitz; Richard Freeman, Professor of Economics at Harvard University; and Eileen Appelbaum, Professor and Director of the Center for Women and Work at Rutgers University.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Croak broke. Vote if you

Croak broke. Vote if you care who will be your landlord.

This, in some ways, is no

This, in some ways, is no different than the collapse of the dotcom bubble. Those most seriously affected are the lower and middle classes. For years, they built up "wealth", only to have it taken back from them by a corrupt system that is only interested in corporate and Fat Cat profits. The disparity in personal "wealth" between the very, very few, and the rest of us is wider than at almost any other time in history. We are slaves to a system that feeds on OUR energy to support the ultra-rich.

Social security was intended

Social security was intended to be the third leg of the stool for retirement security, coupled with savings and pension income. Pensions are becoming the exclusive privilege of government employees, funded by taxpayers who have no pensions and are going broke. Let them join us in ths circus.

Just a little over 20 years

Just a little over 20 years ago the Clinton administration precipitated a little thing called the Savings and loan Crisis. Records were missing and presumed simply lost by a person who was just recently eliminated from the current campaign for the Presidency. Tens of thousand of military veterans lost their homes during this government sponsored collapse. A that time I happened to be in the Dallas area reading the local paper on Sunday morning. There were many full pages of property listings by the Veterans Administration that had been foreclosed and were up for auction. Veterans in all areas of the country had been lured into a corrupt banking system designed by government to bilk the taxpayers in yet another area. In a lower corner of the last page of these auction announcements there was sd information block paid for with some of the funds that had been seized from the general taxpayers. It was sponsored by the Veterans Administration again and it announced lower interest rates and lower down payments for veterans seeking homes. In the middle fo one disaster the Government was busily planting the seeds for the next. At least this time they bypassed the veterans and went for the big money – the general public. How many of the thieving bastards from the 1980s are still leaching monies from the public through their offices in the Congress and White House today? The last time a government entity associated with the United States caused this many financial disasters it was called England. I believe the same remedies are long overdue. The US has become England. It started a long time ago and has used the Communist concept of “Two steps forward, one step back” in its quest to totally subjugate the American population. The Second Amendment – The Reset button on the Constitution. Use it before they disconnect it.

re: JUST A LITTLE OVER

re: JUST A LITTLE OVER TWENTY The S&L crises was just a little over twenty years ago. Lots of excellent books on the subject. That was the Reagan Adminestration...hope that was an innocent mistake on you part. GlassStiegal was Clinton was the Clinton Adminestration. It's demise probably has a lot to do with our current crises.

Someone should tell the "gun

Someone should tell the "gun nut" who posted the first comment in this string that Ronald Reagan/George Bush the First was in power in 1988 (when the S&L debacle happened), not Clinton. All of these disasters (S&L, dotcom, Enron, sub-prime mortgages, et. al.) can be blamed on de-regulating our financial markets --- which Republicans and Liberatarians still champion. Wake up, losers! It's your pocket that's being picked.

The definition of a bubble

The definition of a bubble is that it shouldn't have happened in the first place. To say that these poor people are losing their wealth is, in fact, a false statement. It was wealth that was created artificially in the first place. If a family bought at $120,000 home and took out a $100,000 loan in the process, they started with $20,000 in equity. If that home shot up in the bubble to a value of $300,000, and has since fallen to $200,000, we a being asked to now sympathize with them for having lost this $100,000, when in fact their net equity has grown. In the event that the family, being irresponsible, took out a 90%, $270,000 refinance when the value of the home was at it's peak, and then pissed all the money away on cheap imported consumer goods from China, and they are now upside down in their equity, then they deserve their fate. You can't cry about the collapse of a bubble without mentioning the unfair gains earned during the growth of the bubble. It's bad math.

The system feeds itself with

The system feeds itself with greed and laziness from many players, including people like myself who have a mortgage and a car loan. A simple part-start of the solution would be to stop "banking" and supporting the international financial markets, and start using a local credit union if you need to borrow money.

Once again the very real

Once again the very real idea that we will need to be ever more community oriented in the future and self sufficient/sustainable. We still have the ability to herald a new state of civilization but it will not come easy and it will not be done waiting for policy makers to come in and save us. Te biggest dilemma we face in America is by being spoon fed by cheap labor and consuming with value we do not actually have we have become weak and dependent. If we are wanting to see a future in which the newest generations are able to stand tall and proud and not be huddled in masses impoverished and angry we better start to think locally and create systems in which we can trade and sustain our water supplies and food supplies. The time of big brother and the dependency on that big brother will only be over when we take personal responsibility for the mess we contributed to. The future currency will be food grow a garden. peace out!!

Housing market is one who is

Housing market is one who is totally affected and was inflicted badly by the crisis of our economy that due to its rapid meltdown will cause a lot to be homeless and dependent to the Social Security after they retire. The fall of the housing market will left many wealth-empty for the prices of houses might fall 10 to 20 % and luck if it will just be the same. Endless discussions about the status of housing market these days will say the market is down or it will bounce back (good for us) and so may things but for people who don’t see their house as an investment is a different thing. Many see their houses as home where to live, enjoy and raise their family and just to afford that even taking cash advances or payday loans is an option just to pay the mortgage. But take a consideration that your house can be an investment. Sell it at the right time with the right improvement and you can still bag an amount of money if you put your house out to sell on the housing market.