News

How Will You and Your State Cast Ballots in November?

»

by: Kim Zetter, Wired

photo
Map shows voting equipment each state will use this November. Click on the map below to find out how you will cast your ballot this November. (Artwork: Wired)

    This year, as a result of a lot of changes in voting machines around the country, numerous voting districts across many states will be using new voting equipment that has either never been used in an election or has never been used in a national election involving millions of voters.

    When new systems are used, problems often arise either with the equipment itself or with election officials and voters who are unfamiliar with it.

    To see what equipment you and your state will be using in November and to familiarize yourself with it before the election, VerifiedVoting.org, an election integrity group that led the movement to get voter-verified paper audit trails added to touch-screen voting machines, has produced a comprehensive interactive map identifying the voting systems being used in election districts across the country. As far as I know, this is the most up-to-date list of voting equipment that exists.

    The map offers several options for viewing. You can look at systems at a statewide macro level or click on a state to get a micro view of the various systems being used in each county or voting district, including the accessible equipment being offered for disabled voters. At the district level, you'll also find information about the maker of the voting machines and contact information for the election office.

    The voting machine landscape has changed a lot since the 2000 presidential election when punch-card voting systems and dangling chads spawned a heated national debate and Supreme Court battle.

    As a result of the 2000 debacle, the Help America Vote Act was passed in 2002 allocating federal funds to replace antiquated punch-card and lever machines with newer election technologies. Election officials quickly spent millions of dollars to buy paperless touch-screen voting machines - also known as Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) machines - that were touted by their makers as faster, more accurate and easier to use than punch-card machines.

    But in 2003, technical reports began surfacing about serious security issues with the machines as well as reports about breakdowns and other problems. Public opinion has forced some voting districts to back away from the equipment since then. In some cases entire states - such as California and Florida - have outlawed DRE machines for use by anyone other than disabled voters and have recently replaced their touch-screen systems with new optical-scan machines.

    In the last two years, 131 counties across 9 states - California, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia - have abandoned their DRE machines in favor of paper ballot voting systems, according to statistics collected by VerifiedVoting.

    While some states like Nevada and Utah have added paper trails to their DRE machines, the District of Columbia and six states - Delaware, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, New Jersey and South Carolina - still use DRE's without paper trails statewide. A handful of other states use mixed systems - paperless DREs in some districts and paper-based voting systems in other districts.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

You can bet your bottom

You can bet your bottom dollar there will be at least one major controversy in a key state on this coming election day--perhaps Pennsylvania this time, as the GOP already has used Florida and Ohio. In addition to the corrupt machines, one might expect the turning away of legitimate voters at the polling places, where some of the older ones are easily intimidated. Whatever the controversy is, it's going to be something that has given the Republicans a very-suspect advantage. It worked against Gore; it worked against Kerry; hopefully, it won't work against Obama.

i've worked about four times

i've worked about four times on election night at places where voting precincts bring their hand-written ballots,optical-scan cartridge and paper trail, and/or d.r.e. drives (i forget the exact terms. d.r.e. is no longer used here in calif.) when they're through. from those locations, people ferry loads of the stuff in several trips to the county registrar of voters office. every time these operations are unorganized and security of the ballots and cartridges is nonexistant. anybody could get these jobs. one could, e.g., go do this in an area that you know predominantly votes the way that you do not vote, then do something to keep ballots/cartridges from ever getting to the registrar's office. last time, we couldn't account for one of the precinct's box (of ballots and cartridge) and by the end of the night, the supervisor didn't know what to do and probably did nothing. so if you think that the method your county uses for voting is more secure than others', think again. i feel like we're in the 19th century.

The only way to curb

The only way to curb corporate welfare recipients is for regular people not to buy their stuff. The amount of government money that goes to biocides is shockingly high. If fewer and fewer real people buy that stuff, and the people harmed by it sue the manufacturers (which means having to fight the EPA which put hack-science PR into the record), we could divert some money to clean-up. They haven't yet built enough prisons to put all of us in. Much of the change that we need will have to go on in spite of whichever corporate recipient wins.

There will always be an

There will always be an entity eager to intercept ANY legitimate system of voting...........particularly the e-machines...In California, 2004, our secretary of state certified them even before they were built! Besides, if the voting machines themselves are corrupted, it stands to reason that the associated printer function would be using compatable softwear therefore compromising the printout as well... Choices are slim to none....WE'RE SCREWED1

Much as I admire and respect

Much as I admire and respect Verified Voting, I have to say that this is a very misleading map. The dark green states are identified as having "paper ballot voting systems." That is only half of the story. The other half--how many of those paper ballots does anyone ever count?--is the horrifying part, where the rightwing Bushite Corpo control of the 'TRADE SECRET, ' PROPRIETARY programming code, in all these voting machines and central tabulators, opens the system to easy--EASY!--electronic fraud. Some "green" states (on this map--NH, for instance) count NO ballots at all. They do NO audit. The ballots are useless (except as a very weak deterrent). And even the best of states do only a 1% audit (automatic recount)--miserably inadequate in a 'TRADE SECRET' code system. 99% to 100% of the votes in this country are never counted. By comparison, Venezuela uses electronic voting, but it is an OPEN SOURCE code system--anyone may review the code by which the votes are tabulated,--and they handcount a whopping 55% of the votes, as a check on machine fraud. Why didn't our 'TRADE SECRET' code system have an audit like that to begin with? It's all well and good to monitor the progress of election reform with this map. But the American people need to know that, even with a paper ballot backup, our country's vote counting is wide open to insider programming fraud. And we have LOST the right to review that code in the PUBLIC venue. It's gone! Our right to ransparent vote counting is gone!