It Was Oil, All Along
Saturday 28 June 2008
by: Bill Moyers and Michael Winship, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Bill Moyers. (Photo: Peter Krogh / AP)
Oh, no, they told us, Iraq isn't a war about oil. That's cynical and simplistic, they said. It's about terror and al-Qaeda and toppling a dictator and spreading democracy and protecting ourselves from weapons of mass destruction. But one by one, these concocted rationales went up in smoke, fire and ashes. And now the bottom line turns out to be ... the bottom line. It is about oil.
Alan Greenspan said so last fall. The former chairman of the Federal Reserve, safely out of office, confessed in his memoir, "Everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil." He elaborated in an interview with The Washington Post's Bob Woodward, "If Saddam Hussein had been head of Iraq and there was no oil under those sands, our response to him would not have been as strong as it was in the first Gulf War."
Remember, also, that soon after the invasion, Donald Rumsfeld's deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, told the press that war was our only strategic choice. "We had virtually no economic options with Iraq," he explained, "because the country floats on a sea of oil."
Shades of Daniel Plainview, the monstrous petroleum tycoon in the movie, "There Will Be Blood." Half-mad, he exclaims, "There's a whole ocean of oil under our feet!" then adds, "No one can get at it except for me!"
No wonder American troops only guarded the Ministries of Oil and the Interior in Baghdad, even as looters pillaged museums of their priceless antiquities. They were making sure no one could get at the oil except ... guess who?
Here's a recent headline in The New York Times: "Deals With Iraq Are Set to Bring Oil Giants Back." Read on: "Four western companies are in the final stages of negotiations this month on contracts that will return them to Iraq, 36 years after losing their oil concession to nationalization as Saddam Hussein rose to power."
There you have it. After a long exile, Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total and BP are back in Iraq. And on the wings of no-bid contracts - that's right, sweetheart deals like those given Halliburton, KBR and Blackwater. The kind of deals you get only if you have friends in high places. And these war profiteers have friends in very high places.
Let's go back a few years to the 1990's, when private citizen Dick Cheney was running Halliburton, the big energy supplier. That's when he told the oil industry that, "By 2010 we will need on the order of an additional fifty million barrels a day. So where is the oil going to come from? While many regions of the world offer great oil opportunities, the Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."
Fast forward to Cheney's first heady days in the White House. The oil industry and other energy conglomerates were handed backdoor keys to the White House, and their CEO's and lobbyists were trooping in and out for meetings with their old pal, now Vice President Cheney. The meetings were secret, conducted under tight security, but as we reported five years ago, among the documents that turned up from some of those meetings were maps of oil fields in Iraq - and a list of companies who wanted access to them. The conservative group Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club filed suit to try to find out who attended the meetings and what was discussed, but the White House fought all the way to the Supreme Court to keep the press and public from learning the whole truth.
Think about it. These secret meetings took place six months before 9/11, two years before Bush and Cheney invaded Iraq. We still don't know what they were about. What we know is that this is the oil industry that's enjoying swollen profits these days. It would be laughable if it weren't so painful to remember that their erstwhile cheerleader for invading Iraq - the press mogul Rupert Murdoch - once said that a successful war there would bring us $20-a-barrel oil. The last time we looked, it was more than $140 a barrel. Where are you, Rupert, when the facts need checking and the predictions are revisited?
At a Congressional hearing this week, James Hansen, the NASA climate scientist who exactly twenty years ago alerted Congress and the world to the dangers of global warming, compared the chief executives of Big Oil to the tobacco moguls who denied that nicotine is addictive or that there's a link between smoking and cancer. Hansen, whom the administration has tried again and again to silence, said these barons of black gold should be tried for committing crimes against humanity and nature in opposing efforts to deal with global warming.
Perhaps those sweetheart deals in Iraq should be added to his proposed indictments. They have been purchased at a very high price. Four thousand American soldiers dead, tens of thousands permanently wounded, hundreds of thousands of dead and crippled Iraqis plus five million displaced, and a cost that will mount into trillions of dollars. The political analyst Kevin Phillips says America has become little more than an "energy protection force," doing anything to gain access to expensive fuel without regard to the lives of others or the earth itself. One thinks again of Daniel Plainview in "There Will Be Blood." His lust for oil came at the price of his son and his soul.
-----------
Bill Moyers is managing editor and Michael Winship is senior writer of the weekly public affairs program Bill Moyers Journal, which airs Friday nights on PBS. Check local airtimes or comment at The Moyers Blog at www.pbs.org/moyers.
Editor's Note: This Bill Moyers comment on America's oil policy was presented on Friday 27 June 2008 on Bill Moyers Journal. Other portions of the program can be viewed here TO/vh


Comments
This is a moderated forum. Â It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.
Of course this is true in
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 17:38 — anglohistorian (not verified)CORRECTION: It was about
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 18:30 — JOHN DORAEMI (not verified)The cheney administration is
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 18:33 — Van (not verified)Of course it is about oil.
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 18:33 — Frank (not verified)I was in the US State
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 19:02 — Anonymous (not verified)Where were you and your
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 19:30 — Bruce (not verified)All true in it's way. But
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 19:48 — lao_ren100 (not verified)Yo Bill We Love You. Keep
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 19:55 — Anonymous (not verified)Smart men use information to
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 19:59 — amilius (not verified)I have said it before and I
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 20:01 — badbf (not verified)Saddam was all you say back
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 20:16 — Anonymous (not verified)Of course it was for oil.
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 20:37 — Anonymous (not verified)Please Give Moyers the Meet
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 20:57 — kellygrrrl (not verified)What else would it be about?
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 21:15 — stemp (not verified)Big oil is back in Iraq, but
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 21:34 — Anonymous (not verified)That Bush, Cheney and their
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 21:36 — Terry (not verified)The truths are being
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 21:39 — Anonymous (not verified)I blame the Congress for
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 21:45 — Rowland (not verified)That's old news. The real
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 22:20 — Anne (not verified)No intelligent and
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 22:39 — voltairetoday (not verified)Document reveals Nixon plan
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 22:40 — Anonymous (not verified)Duh!
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 22:45 — Anonymous (not verified)Can you say BOYCOTT??
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 22:46 — Ezekiel on the Tower (not verified)What doe's it take to get it
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 23:41 — robert w. becker (not verified)Does this mean my patriotism
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 23:58 — Anonymous (not verified)Mighty Brazen.. Cheneys
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 00:02 — Clint Mcclintic (not verified)To read the 'all about the
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 01:04 — Gary E. Andrews (not verified)Let me raise the bar a bit
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 01:09 — Anonymous (not verified)The real question to ask is
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 01:23 — remoran (not verified)The piece needed drastic
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 01:51 — Anonymous (not verified)Ditto "Duh." I been saying
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 02:10 — rttedrow (not verified)Underlying the convergence
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 02:43 — Anonymous (not verified)" These secret meetings took
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 03:40 — Anonymous (not verified)Remember, the 2003 ruse
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 06:17 — Brian Donahue (not verified)your just realising this
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 06:27 — Anonymous (not verified)What do we do now other than
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 06:54 — Anonymous (not verified)Buy a car that doesn't run
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 08:14 — Francis Micickus (not verified)It's a shame the media
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 09:17 — pagesvoice (not verified)A brief examination of the
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 12:29 — petrblt (not verified)What should WE do?
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 13:22 — john hammond (not verified)Stopping the flow of oil was
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 14:07 — Richard Ray Harris (not verified)Lao-Ren is right: "So what
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 16:43 — Anonymous (not verified)Bill Moyers for President.
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 17:11 — lawlessone (not verified)DARFUR an OIL ISSUE? You
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 20:38 — Bindlepete (not verified)are you telling me there
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 21:59 — Anonymous (not verified)It was mostly about Bush
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 22:12 — Anonymous (not verified)Unfortunately, there is only
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 22:24 — The Oil Drum (not verified)I encourage you to check out this post of five videos, of which one of them is the Moyers video...others include Krugman, Rubin, and Kunstler. Taken together, these videos paint a very gloomy picture:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4226
I encourage you to learn more about our plateauing oil supply with this overview:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4172
If we don't get our
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 22:33 — storm petrol (not verified)Boycott or GENERAL STRIKE?
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 23:10 — Tara Mandura (not verified)It was all about shutting
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 04:30 — Bob Carman (not verified)You're wrong! Look at the
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 04:45 — Anonymous (not verified)Yea, nice for all of you to
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 04:51 — Anonymous (not verified)Why did Bush invade Iraq?
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 12:29 — Daniel (not verified)As I read all these post I
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 13:16 — Eddie B (not verified)Big Oil drinks our
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 14:10 — Anonymous (not verified)duh.
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 16:35 — Armen Donelian (not verified)Psst. They were planning
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 18:47 — Anonymous (not verified)The lure of oil was the
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 18:58 — Anon (not verified)20 year old news. Not
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 19:18 — Scott Fox (not verified)It's not about oil - it's
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 20:09 — Mark (not verified)Unbeknownst to the general
Mon, 06/30/2008 - 22:25 — Anonymous (not verified)Living in the past
Tue, 07/01/2008 - 03:29 — Frust-rated (not verified)BOYCOTT, YES, not a general
Tue, 07/01/2008 - 04:05 — Ezekiel on the Tower (not verified)I'd be willing to bet that
Tue, 07/01/2008 - 14:21 — kl (not verified)It's about Zionism. There
Tue, 07/01/2008 - 14:59 — Dave Kersting (not verified)Well. unfortunately you are
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 01:48 — Anonymous (not verified)Oil is the tip of the
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 03:23 — James (not verified)Big brother is watching
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 10:27 — Anonymous (not verified)Remembering back after 9/11,
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 12:55 — Anonymous (not verified)One thing americans can do
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 12:59 — Calvin Davis (not verified)Wow. This is a tough one.
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 13:22 — Joe Kim (not verified)Iran is a immoral state that
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 13:24 — Anonymous (not verified)AIPAC & Zionists are the
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 13:49 — Anonymous (not verified)This is typical of the
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 14:10 — Brianna (not verified)Of course this is only the
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 14:30 — Nufsed (not verified)Even though I agree with
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 14:53 — Anonymous (not verified)Bill, if global warming
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 15:01 — Jacques (not verified)Look closely and you might
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 15:05 — Len (not verified)the lies of Iraq start in NY
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 15:19 — Anonymous (not verified)Look...all of you need to
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 15:32 — Dick Cheney (not verified)stargates. emp from central
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 16:13 — Anonymous (not verified)These posts, if not the
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 16:43 — V (not verified)How many years did it take
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 16:49 — Anonymous (not verified)War for oil is the cover
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 17:25 — Patrick Sullivan (not verified)It was never about securing
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 17:26 — Cadavre (not verified)zeitgeist
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 19:41 — Anonymous (not verified)Does anyone notice that
Wed, 07/02/2008 - 21:14 — Anonymous (not verified)Bill Moyers seems to mean
Thu, 07/03/2008 - 03:43 — David (son of a Jewish mother) (not verified)I'm still not convinced this
Thu, 07/03/2008 - 14:52 — Kevin (not verified)Yesh, it was about oil
Thu, 07/03/2008 - 16:06 — Anonymous (not verified)Want to know the truth?
Thu, 07/03/2008 - 17:27 — Ron Ray (not verified)A Canadian author, Linda
Thu, 07/03/2008 - 19:37 — Anonymous (not verified)Amy Goodman writes a great
Thu, 07/03/2008 - 22:12 — lost_souls (not verified)Is an OIL BOYCOTT in the
Fri, 07/04/2008 - 22:09 — Ezekiel from the Tower (not verified)The bloody hands of the U.S.
Sun, 07/06/2008 - 02:55 — Clifford J. Wirth (not verified)Well duh, you'd have to be
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 19:40 — Justin (not verified)Wrong. Iraq invited the oil
Mon, 08/04/2008 - 06:49 — Dan (not verified)