Truthout Original

John Cusack's War

by: Jeremy Scahill, t r u t h o u t | Film Review

photo
John Cusack poses at the premiere of "Grace Is Gone" at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in Beverly Hills, California November 28, 2007. Cusack's new film, "War, Inc.," uses the medium of film to unveil the madness of the war in Iraq. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Back in 1989, in his smash hit, "Say Anything," John Cusack famously stood with a boom box above his head outside the home of the woman he loved blasting Peter Gabriél's "In Your Eyes." With his latest films on the Iraq war, Cusack is standing outside Hollywood with a TV above his head broadcasting his political movies calling on the public to wake up and "Do Something."

    John Cusack began working on his new film, "War, Inc.," which premieres in LA and New York May 23, about a year into the US occupation of Iraq. From the moment US tanks rolled into Baghdad, Cusack was a voracious consumer of news about the war. He took it deadly seriously, regularly calling independent journalists and asking them questions as he sought as much independent information as he could. Watching the insanity of the erection of the Green Zone and the advent of the era of McWar, complete with tens of thousands of "private contractors," Cusack set out to use the medium of film to unveil the madness. He wanted to do on the big screen what independent reporters like Naomi Klein, Nir Rosen and Dahr Jamail did in print. Over these years of war and occupation, Cusack has become one of the most insightful commentators on a far-too-seldom-discussed aspect of the occupation: the corporate dominance of the US war machine.

    Cusack is no parachute humanitarian. While he continues to do the Hollywood thing with big-budget movies, he is simultaneously a fierce unembedded actor/filmmaker who has been at the center of two of the best films to date dealing with the madness of the Iraq war. Without big-money sponsors and the backing of powerful production companies, Cusack has spent a lot of his own money on these projects.

    Cusack's film "Grace is Gone," was one of the most underrated and underviewed movies of 2007. Cusack should have been seriously considered for an Oscar for his portrayal of Stanley Philipps, a man whose wife dies while deployed as a soldier in Iraq. The film centers on Philipps's painful inability to explain to his two young daughters (powerfully played by two amateur actors, Shélan O'Keefe and Gracie Bednarczyk) their mother's death. Instead of telling his daughters the terrible news, he embarks on a surreal road trip to a theme park with the girls as he fights for his own sanity and grapples with his own support for the war that has just taken the life of his wife. The film is a jolting picture of a man caught in the free fall of a nervous breakdown and the ricochet impact of the death of soldiers in the war. It was an outright shame that "Grace is Gone" did not get wide distribution. I was at a screening of the film in New York, and there were not many dry eyes at the movie's conclusion.

    Perhaps the film's lack of commercial success was due to the "Iraq movie fatigue" that took hold in Hollywood a couple of years ago. But "Grace Is Gone" is not simply an "Iraq movie" or a "war movie." It isn't even really an "antiwar" movie. It is a haunting and moving film that cuts across political lines to tell the story of the suffering and shattering of so many US military families with loved ones deployed in Iraq. Had it received the distribution it deserved, "Grace Is Gone" would have resonated strongly with both supporters and opponents of the war, a rare accomplishment.

    "War, Inc." is a radically different kind of movie. In fact, it really defies genre. It is sort of like this generation's "Dr. Strangelove," "A Clockwork Orange" and "The Wizard of Oz" mixed together with the unembedded reporting of Naomi Klein, spiced up with a dash of "South Park." It is a powerful, visionary response to the cheerleading culture of the corporate media and a pliant Hollywood afraid of its own shadow.

    On the surface, "War, Inc." appears to be a spoof of the corporatization of the occupation of Iraq. Cusack plays a hit man, Brand Hauser, deployed to Turaqistan with the mission of killing a Middle Eastern oil baron (named Omar Sharif). Hauser's employer is a secretive, for-profit military corporation run by the former US vice president, played by Dan Aykroyd. We first meet Aykroyd's character as he sits, pants down, on a toilet seat during a closed-circuit satellite videoconference call to give Hauser his mission. Hauser arrives in the Turaqi capital and heads for the "Emerald City" (read: the Green Zone), where his cover is director of a trade show for the military corporation, Tamerlane, which is basically running the Turaqi occupation. Hauser soon falls for a progressive journalist, played by Marisa Tomei, who is in Turaqistan to investigate Tamerlane, and what follows is an insane ride through Cusack's interpretation of the radical corporatization of war.

    Singer Hilary Duff gives a surprisingly fun performance as a pop star, Yonica Babyyeah, who performs a song in the war zone with the lyrics, "You say you want to invade me, baby/Enslave me, baby." As Duff delivers the song, she caresses a phallic gas nozzle decorated with diamonds while singing, "I want to blow you ... up." Obviously, Cusack and his co-writers, Mark Leyner and Jeremy Pikser (REDS/Bulworth), sought to tap into the extreme nature of the corporatized war and take it to another level, but anyone who thinks the premise behind "War Inc." is "over-the-top" has not been paying attention to real life.

    Cusack, Leyner and Pikser are not predicting the future; they are forcefully - and with dark humor and wit - branding the present for what it is: the Wal-Martization of life (and death) represented in the new US model for waging war. With 630 corporations like Blackwater and Halliburton on the US government payroll in Iraq getting 40 percent of the more than $2 billion Washington spends every week on the occupation, Cusack's "futuristic" film is not far from the way things really are. A powerful, for-profit war corporation, run by the former US vice president "owning" the war zone; tanks with NASCAR-like sponsor logos speeding around the streets firing at will; "implanted journalists" watching the war in IMAX theaters in the heavily fortified "Emerald City" to get "full spectrum sensory reality" while eating popcorn; a secretive "viceroy" running the show from behind a digital curtain are all part of Cusack's battlefield in the fictitious Turaqistan. But how far are they from the realities of the radically privatized corporate war machine Washington has unleashed on the world?

    "War Inc." is already an underground cult classic and will likely remain so for years to come. The film is not without its shortcomings - at times it is confusing and drags - but its faults are significantly overshadowed by its many strengths. It also accomplishes the difficult feat of being very entertaining and funny, while delivering a powerful punch of truth. "War, Inc." is a movie that deserves a much wider viewing than the barons of the film industry are likely to give it. But by filling the theaters in the opening days, people can send a powerful message that there is - and must be - a market for films of conscience.

    Visit the official web site of "War, Inc." or John Cusack's web site to view trailers, get info on tickets for the premieres and to read more about the film.

    --------

    Jeremy Scahill's New York Times best seller, Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army, is now available in substantially updated paperback form.

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

the truth is that the merger

the truth is that the merger of neo conism and evangelicals and corporationists is destroying our great country.our great constitution. notice like all truthful venues like this Kusak film does not see the entire light of day. The public has been put in a soporific state driven to using substances which they use as escape from the frustrations caused by situations they feel helpless and impotent to do anything about. This may b the last time we are able to save our democracy, our country. VOTE MCCAIN AND REUBS OUT. VOTE AGAINST BUSHES 5TH TERM, VOTE DEMS IN WHO ARE NOT PART OF THE PROBLEM. YOU KNOW WHO THEY ARE,

visit the new investigative

visit the new investigative news magazine The Public Record at www.pubrecord.org original in depth reporting. the latest article on mccain's ties to enron

We may have free speech, but

We may have free speech, but the military industrial media complex usually control what is seen by the masses.

Add a comment:

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.