News

Facebook DIGG

Justices Cut Damages Award in Exxon Valdez Spill

by:   |  Visit article original @ The Associated Press

photo
Nancy Bird shows oil-soaked soil collected from Prince William Sound in Alaska on May 20, 2007. The US Supreme Court ruled that Exxon will only have to pay $500 million of the $2.5 billion punitive damages awarded to victims of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil-spill disaster that contaminated Prince William Sound with 11 million gallons of crude oil. (Photo: Al Grillo / AP)

    Washington - The Supreme Court on Wednesday cut the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster to $500 million.

    The court ruled that victims of the worst oil spill in U.S. history may collect punitive damages from Exxon Mobil Corp., but not as much as a federal appeals court determined.

    Justice David Souter wrote for the court that punitive damages may not exceed what the company already paid to compensate victims for economic losses, about $500 million compensation.

    Exxon asked the high court to reject the punitive damages judgment, saying it already has spent $3.4 billion in response to the accident that fouled 1,200 miles of Alaska coastline.

    A jury decided Exxon should pay $5 billion in punitive damages. A federal appeals court cut that verdict in half.

    The court divided 5-3, with Justice Samuel Alito taking no part in the case because he owns Exxon stock.

    Exxon has fought vigorously to reduce or erase the punitive damages verdict by a jury in Alaska in 1994 for the accident that dumped 11 million gallons of oil into Prince William Sound. The environmental disaster led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of seabirds and marine animals.

    Nearly 33,000 Alaskans are in line to share in the award, about $15,000 a person. They would have collected $75,000 each under the $2.5 billion judgment.


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

It seems that Exxon Mobile

It seems that Exxon Mobile is the greediest most unpatriotic skull and bones pirate there ever was. Nationalize Exxon Mobile and we could pay off the national debt they helped to create. Exxon Mobile is squeezing every last drop of blood they can out of all Americans. I hope they do not get control of Iraq's oil, but they probably will. They are out of control. They have the US military fighting for them. Down with these dinosaurs before they make us all extinct.

No corporate malfeasance

No corporate malfeasance shall be punished in a free market economy. Those affected (Birds and Fish) must appeal to get full compensation.

OK so this farce of justice

OK so this farce of justice is now 20 years old... 500million from the original 5 billion awarded is a rather large reduction, they should settle on this plus interest though... interest from 1989 till the settlement date... I'm sure the interest garnered from the original award held in trust all these years exceeds 500 million award so if no interest is charged i guess it will prove that it will eventually payoff to litigate for giant oil corporations while is untenable for whom the laws are suppose to protect! this is called justice?... the mess is still there? eventually someone is going to have to clean this mess up... and then who is going to get stuck with paying the bill? what about all the dwindling and collapsing fish stocks... this spill destroyed major herring spawning grounds reducing the supply of food for major salmon stocks of the entire west coast salmon stocks... hatchlings or fry returning from the spawning beds near this spill must endure the toxic sludge as well.... the Pacific west coast is very sick... and it all starts sometime around this spill... do the math and again I ask myself... who's going to be held responsible to fix this again? whats happening to America?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.