News
Justices Cut Damages Award in Exxon Valdez Spill
Wednesday 25 June 2008
by: | Visit article original @ The Associated Press

Nancy Bird shows oil-soaked soil collected from Prince William
Sound in Alaska on May 20, 2007. The US Supreme Court ruled that Exxon will
only have to pay $500 million of the $2.5 billion punitive damages awarded to
victims of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil-spill disaster that contaminated Prince
William Sound with 11 million gallons of crude oil. (Photo: Al Grillo / AP)
Washington - The Supreme Court on Wednesday cut the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster to $500 million.
The court ruled that victims of the worst oil spill in U.S. history may collect punitive damages from Exxon Mobil Corp., but not as much as a federal appeals court determined.
Justice David Souter wrote for the court that punitive damages may not exceed what the company already paid to compensate victims for economic losses, about $500 million compensation.
Exxon asked the high court to reject the punitive damages judgment, saying it already has spent $3.4 billion in response to the accident that fouled 1,200 miles of Alaska coastline.
A jury decided Exxon should pay $5 billion in punitive damages. A federal appeals court cut that verdict in half.
The court divided 5-3, with Justice Samuel Alito taking no part in the case because he owns Exxon stock.
Exxon has fought vigorously to reduce or erase the punitive damages verdict by a jury in Alaska in 1994 for the accident that dumped 11 million gallons of oil into Prince William Sound. The environmental disaster led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of seabirds and marine animals.
Nearly 33,000 Alaskans are in line to share in the award, about $15,000 a person. They would have collected $75,000 each under the $2.5 billion judgment.


Comments
This is a moderated forum. It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.
It seems that Exxon Mobile
Thu, 06/26/2008 - 14:56 — Radline9 (not verified)No corporate malfeasance
Thu, 06/26/2008 - 15:15 — doubter (not verified)OK so this farce of justice
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 10:27 — Bearzerker (not verified)