"Major Discovery" From MIT Primed to Unleash Solar Revolution
Thursday 31 July 2008

MIT's Professor Daniel G. Nocera has discovered a way to do
large-scale solar power generation. (Photo: Donna Coveney)
In a revolutionary leap that could transform solar power from a marginal, boutique alternative into a mainstream energy source, MIT researchers have overcome a major barrier to large-scale solar power: storing energy for use when the sun doesn't shine.
Until now, solar power has been a daytime-only energy source, because storing extra solar energy for later use is prohibitively expensive and grossly inefficient. With today's announcement, MIT researchers have hit upon a simple, inexpensive, highly efficient process for storing solar energy.
Requiring nothing but abundant, non-toxic natural materials, this discovery could unlock the most potent, carbon-free energy source of all: the sun. "This is the nirvana of what we've been talking about for years," said MIT's Daniel Nocera, the Henry Dreyfus Professor of Energy at MIT and senior author of a paper describing the work in the July 31 issue of Science. "Solar power has always been a limited, far-off solution. Now we can seriously think about solar power as unlimited and soon."
Inspired by the photosynthesis performed by plants, Nocera and Matthew Kanan, a postdoctoral fellow in Nocera's lab, have developed an unprecedented process that will allow the sun's energy to be used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. Later, the oxygen and hydrogen may be recombined inside a fuel cell, creating carbon-free electricity to power your house or your electric car, day or night.
The key component in Nocera and Kanan's new process is a new catalyst that produces oxygen gas from water; another catalyst produces valuable hydrogen gas. The new catalyst consists of cobalt metal, phosphate and an electrode, placed in water. When electricity - whether from a photovoltaic cell, a wind turbine or any other source - runs through the electrode, the cobalt and phosphate form a thin film on the electrode, and oxygen gas is produced.
Combined with another catalyst, such as platinum, that can produce hydrogen gas from water, the system can duplicate the water splitting reaction that occurs during photosynthesis.
The new catalyst works at room temperature, in neutral pH water, and it's easy to set up, Nocera said. "That's why I know this is going to work. It's so easy to implement," he said.
"Giant Leap" for Clean Energy
Sunlight has the greatest potential of any power source to solve the world's energy problems, said Nocera. In one hour, enough sunlight strikes the Earth to provide the entire planet's energy needs for one year.
James Barber, a leader in the study of photosynthesis who was not involved in this research, called the discovery by Nocera and Kanan a "giant leap" toward generating clean, carbon-free energy on a massive scale.
"This is a major discovery with enormous implications for the future prosperity of humankind," said Barber, the Ernst Chain Professor of Biochemistry at Imperial College London. "The importance of their discovery cannot be overstated since it opens up the door for developing new technologies for energy production thus reducing our dependence for fossil fuels and addressing the global climate change problem."
"Just the Beginning"
Currently available electrolyzers, which split water with electricity and are often used industrially, are not suited for artificial photosynthesis because they are very expensive and require a highly basic (non-benign) environment that has little to do with the conditions under which photosynthesis operates.
More engineering work needs to be done to integrate the new scientific discovery into existing photovoltaic systems, but Nocera said he is confident that such systems will become a reality.
"This is just the beginning," said Nocera, principal investigator for the Solar Revolution Project funded by the Chesonis Family Foundation and co-Director of the Eni-MIT Solar Frontiers Center. "The scientific community is really going to run with this."
Nocera hopes that within 10 years, homeowners will be able to power their homes in daylight through photovoltaic cells, while using excess solar energy to produce hydrogen and oxygen to power their own household fuel cell. Electricity-by-wire from a central source could be a thing of the past.
The project is part of the MIT Energy Initiative, a program designed to help transform the global energy system to meet the needs of the future and to help build a bridge to that future by improving today's energy systems. MITEI Director Ernest Moniz, Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics and Engineering Systems, noted that "this discovery in the Nocera lab demonstrates that moving up the transformation of our energy supply system to one based on renewables will depend heavily on frontier basic science."
The success of the Nocera lab shows the impact of a mixture of funding sources - governments, philanthropy, and industry. This project was funded by the National Science Foundation and by the Chesonis Family Foundation, which gave MIT $10 million this spring to launch the Solar Revolution Project, with a goal to make the large scale deployment of solar energy within 10 years.



Comments
This is a moderated forum. Â It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.
What does this have to do
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 14:08 — Topher (not verified)This is the best
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 14:08 — Sally Buckner (not verified)Glad to see the practical
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 14:11 — Anonymous (not verified)"Until now, solar power
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 14:20 — Dan Foster (not verified)I'm also confused about the
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 14:39 — Mighk (not verified)It'll take less than 5 years
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 15:30 — Stevio (not verified)"The electrical grid is a
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 15:36 — Richard (not verified)This is interesting, though
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 15:41 — Anonymous (not verified)without a financial and
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 15:43 — Hugh Jones (not verified)Duh-uh. This is an energy
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 15:57 — Motorod (not verified)What good news in an
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 16:04 — Michael G-watt (not verified)An MIT professor developed
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 17:02 — Anonymous (not verified)Umm... sorry to burst your
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 18:12 — AdrienneA (not verified)Wonderful news! Within the
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 18:16 — Anonymous (not verified)Hydrogen highway, here we
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 18:52 — Jonesey (not verified)I too love simplicity. If
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 18:56 — Bevan Iredell (not verified)Solar technology works
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 21:25 — SolarInSeattle (not verified)I notice funding didn't come
Sat, 08/02/2008 - 00:44 — Anonymous (not verified)So what does this have to do
Sat, 08/02/2008 - 04:09 — Solar Bill (not verified)And Oh I had not realized
Sat, 08/02/2008 - 04:12 — Solar Bill (not verified)Just a little algebra: Take
Sat, 08/02/2008 - 06:33 — Anonymous (not verified)Yes, I believe that Exxon or
Sat, 08/02/2008 - 10:34 — ZaxNeon (not verified)Actually, the electrical
Sat, 08/02/2008 - 14:20 — Craig H (not verified)While a clean and efficient
Sat, 08/02/2008 - 15:11 — Barry Bookout (not verified)The price per watt of solar
Sun, 08/03/2008 - 00:33 — Anonymous (not verified)Article is very upbeat about
Sun, 08/03/2008 - 01:40 — Anonymous (not verified)There are several ways to
Sun, 08/03/2008 - 01:50 — Anonymous (not verified)Parabolic mirrors focus
Sun, 08/03/2008 - 03:22 — Anonymous (not verified)Maybe you can't reproduce
Sun, 08/03/2008 - 09:45 — Sky dog (not verified)If all this were really
Sun, 08/03/2008 - 15:58 — Carter Newton (not verified)It is funny to read all the
Sun, 08/03/2008 - 16:50 — David (not verified)Congrats to the MIT
Mon, 08/04/2008 - 00:08 — Anonymous (not verified)Our Nations Energy needs are
Mon, 08/04/2008 - 16:56 — AnonymousMrElectricity.com (not verified)A question about this. It
Mon, 08/04/2008 - 21:06 — thump (not verified)Congress created the Energy
Tue, 08/05/2008 - 02:51 — Anonymous (not verified)"Why is MIT proposing a new
Tue, 08/05/2008 - 03:46 — Marksmanwhotakesorders (not verified)In mid-July, an article by
Tue, 08/05/2008 - 18:28 — Anonymous (not verified)"Requiring nothing but
Tue, 08/05/2008 - 18:43 — Mike Ewall (not verified)Abundant? Then why are we facing a problem with "peak phosphorous" -- one that is driving up the costs of the toxic fluoride acids used in water fluoridation (a byproduct of the phosphate mining industry). We used to get a lot of phosphates out of Florida and other southeastern states, but production has fallen after U.S. production of phosphates peaked in 1980. We're now importing from China.
See http://www.actionpa.org/fluoride/chemicals/shortagesandrisingcosts.html and http://energybulletin.net/node/33164 for details.
On cobalt production trends, a quick glance at the USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries shows that U.S. production peaked in 1998: http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/cobalt/
Before you buy this hype about abundant and "non-toxic" materials, visit the USGS site for production and import numbers and look into other aspects of production (like the highly toxic fluoride acids that introduce arsenic and numerous other contaminants to our drinking water when they dispose of it in drinking water systems because it's too expensive to pay for it to be disposed of as hazardous waste if they dumped it anywhere else).
Mike Ewall
Energy Justice Network
215-743-4884
http://www.energyjustice.net
Some Victorian "scientists"
Tue, 08/05/2008 - 19:07 — Anonymous (not verified)We can largely achieve Al
Wed, 08/06/2008 - 14:50 — Heavyrunner (not verified)This article is not overly
Wed, 08/06/2008 - 23:23 — Anonymous (not verified)This article is not overly optimistic or overstated. The cheap, simple and clean catalyst invented at MIT, combined with the simultaneous development of a cheap, simple catalyst to replace platinum that an Australian university invented for converting the gases back to electricity, is the start of the solar power revolution the world has awaited. Economists have realized for decades that we have the technologies to eliminate hunger, poverty, drought--technologies to increase the "economic pie" to bring the world out of privation, strife and war . . . if we only had abundant, cheap, clean energy. This is the key to that energy source. Poor villagers can band together, get a cheap and effective solar power system, and use it to run systems to clean used or contaminated water, farm machinery, tools and homes, and rise up out of poverty. They can use the energy to replace cooking fuels, heating fuels,to drive refrigerators, air conditioners, electric vehicles, or anything else. They can create sources of income, abundant food, freshwater, freeing their children from labor. Homes in the industrialized world can be taken completely off the power grid. Electric cars can be recharged at home. This will tremendously reduce the use of fossil fuels, change economic relationships, and eliminate national and international political strife over oil, coal and nuclear power. Why have "peaceful" nuclear power when you have far more energy, cheaply, cleanly and safely. from the sun?
Got drought? Pump seawater using this power to wherever it is needed and convert it to freshwater (or convert it first and then move it--whichever is better for a given purpose). Worried we will never meet target reductions of greenhouse gases? This will enable far greater reductions, obviating the worst effects of impending climate change.
What is critical is that MIT license this non-exclusively, maybe even for free, and that entrepreneurs immediately begin to develop it for every imaginable use. Climate crisis and economic opportunity can combine to prevent this technology from being bought up and killed by oil, coal, gas, or nuclear interests. This clever, simple invention can change humanity--it is the greatest invention since the wheel. It's the end of the world as we know it, and none too soon.
There never has been a
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 03:30 — Cocklebur (not verified)how are the fuel cells
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 07:03 — Anonymous (not verified)We, every improvement is a
Fri, 08/08/2008 - 22:02 — Anonymous (not verified)I applaud the many
Sat, 08/09/2008 - 06:56 — Paul M. - CEIHG (not verified)If the U.S. had chosen to be
Tue, 08/12/2008 - 20:00 — Uncle B (not verified)I was thrilled when I first
Fri, 08/15/2008 - 19:15 — JSD (not verified)You are going to need
Sat, 08/16/2008 - 13:07 — Chris Rhodes (not verified)Clearly Pt is still required
Sat, 11/15/2008 - 17:14 — d. waldo (not verified)http://www.philosophy.org/ind
Sun, 03/29/2009 - 11:54 — Tony (not verified)my ???? is. this is now
Wed, 06/17/2009 - 02:46 — Anonymous (not verified)