Share

"Major Discovery" From MIT Primed to Unleash Solar Revolution

by: Anne Trafton  |  MIT News

photo
MIT's Professor Daniel G. Nocera has discovered a way to do large-scale solar power generation. (Photo: Donna Coveney)

Scientists mimic essence of plants' energy storage system.

    In a revolutionary leap that could transform solar power from a marginal, boutique alternative into a mainstream energy source, MIT researchers have overcome a major barrier to large-scale solar power: storing energy for use when the sun doesn't shine.

    Until now, solar power has been a daytime-only energy source, because storing extra solar energy for later use is prohibitively expensive and grossly inefficient. With today's announcement, MIT researchers have hit upon a simple, inexpensive, highly efficient process for storing solar energy.

    Requiring nothing but abundant, non-toxic natural materials, this discovery could unlock the most potent, carbon-free energy source of all: the sun. "This is the nirvana of what we've been talking about for years," said MIT's Daniel Nocera, the Henry Dreyfus Professor of Energy at MIT and senior author of a paper describing the work in the July 31 issue of Science. "Solar power has always been a limited, far-off solution. Now we can seriously think about solar power as unlimited and soon."

    Inspired by the photosynthesis performed by plants, Nocera and Matthew Kanan, a postdoctoral fellow in Nocera's lab, have developed an unprecedented process that will allow the sun's energy to be used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. Later, the oxygen and hydrogen may be recombined inside a fuel cell, creating carbon-free electricity to power your house or your electric car, day or night.

    The key component in Nocera and Kanan's new process is a new catalyst that produces oxygen gas from water; another catalyst produces valuable hydrogen gas. The new catalyst consists of cobalt metal, phosphate and an electrode, placed in water. When electricity - whether from a photovoltaic cell, a wind turbine or any other source - runs through the electrode, the cobalt and phosphate form a thin film on the electrode, and oxygen gas is produced.

    Combined with another catalyst, such as platinum, that can produce hydrogen gas from water, the system can duplicate the water splitting reaction that occurs during photosynthesis.

    The new catalyst works at room temperature, in neutral pH water, and it's easy to set up, Nocera said. "That's why I know this is going to work. It's so easy to implement," he said.

    "Giant Leap" for Clean Energy

    Sunlight has the greatest potential of any power source to solve the world's energy problems, said Nocera. In one hour, enough sunlight strikes the Earth to provide the entire planet's energy needs for one year.

    James Barber, a leader in the study of photosynthesis who was not involved in this research, called the discovery by Nocera and Kanan a "giant leap" toward generating clean, carbon-free energy on a massive scale.

    "This is a major discovery with enormous implications for the future prosperity of humankind," said Barber, the Ernst Chain Professor of Biochemistry at Imperial College London. "The importance of their discovery cannot be overstated since it opens up the door for developing new technologies for energy production thus reducing our dependence for fossil fuels and addressing the global climate change problem."

    "Just the Beginning"

    Currently available electrolyzers, which split water with electricity and are often used industrially, are not suited for artificial photosynthesis because they are very expensive and require a highly basic (non-benign) environment that has little to do with the conditions under which photosynthesis operates.

    More engineering work needs to be done to integrate the new scientific discovery into existing photovoltaic systems, but Nocera said he is confident that such systems will become a reality.

    "This is just the beginning," said Nocera, principal investigator for the Solar Revolution Project funded by the Chesonis Family Foundation and co-Director of the Eni-MIT Solar Frontiers Center. "The scientific community is really going to run with this."

    Nocera hopes that within 10 years, homeowners will be able to power their homes in daylight through photovoltaic cells, while using excess solar energy to produce hydrogen and oxygen to power their own household fuel cell. Electricity-by-wire from a central source could be a thing of the past.

    The project is part of the MIT Energy Initiative, a program designed to help transform the global energy system to meet the needs of the future and to help build a bridge to that future by improving today's energy systems. MITEI Director Ernest Moniz, Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics and Engineering Systems, noted that "this discovery in the Nocera lab demonstrates that moving up the transformation of our energy supply system to one based on renewables will depend heavily on frontier basic science."

    The success of the Nocera lab shows the impact of a mixture of funding sources - governments, philanthropy, and industry. This project was funded by the National Science Foundation and by the Chesonis Family Foundation, which gave MIT $10 million this spring to launch the Solar Revolution Project, with a goal to make the large scale deployment of solar energy within 10 years.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

What does this have to do

What does this have to do with solar? This is basically battery technology (which we need). The trouble with solar isn't that it isn't available at night, that is one of its benefits (since electrical demand is highest during the day). The trouble is price per peak watt is still too high.

This is the best

This is the best environmental news I've seen in months--maybe years!

Glad to see the practical

Glad to see the practical application of high school chemistry 101 demonstration of electrolysis coming full circle. We are always looking for complex solutions for complex problems. Often it is the simple solutions that are the most elegant and practical. Why develop complex tools when a paper clip could solve the problem.

"Until now, solar power

"Until now, solar power has been a daytime-only energy source, because storing extra solar energy for later use is prohibitively expensive and grossly inefficient" The electrical grid is a very efficient and cost effective method for storing solar power. Get your facts straight.

I'm also confused about the

I'm also confused about the two-step process. If you pull oxygen out of the water you're left with excess hydrogen. Why is there then a need to use another catalyst to free the hydrogen? Isn't it already freed from its bond with the oxygen?

It'll take less than 5 years

It'll take less than 5 years for the oil people to negate this research through federal oversight that will slow the entire process down until the oil is gone, or until they can figure out a way to remove an integral component of the process to inhibit it's reaching the consumer market.

"The electrical grid is a

"The electrical grid is a very efficient and cost effective method for storing solar power. Get your facts straight." -- Dan Foster Dan, the electrical grid does not store energy.

This is interesting, though

This is interesting, though it should be said that storage is not the only major challenge for solar. A more important challenge for scaling up could be the limited supply of key materials to make photovoltaic cells. There are other solar strategies being researched that skip photovoltaics. One uses mirrors to direct light to heat water. The resulting steam drives turbines. We should not be surprised that the MIT author of the article would oversimplify the situation, but it is a bit of a blemish on Truthout's generally solid record that they published without caveat an article written by someone who has an obvious conflict of interest.

without a financial and

without a financial and physical comparison with classic electrolysis this article lacks a sense of reality

Duh-uh. This is an energy

Duh-uh. This is an energy transfer solution available since the 70s when we were already using solar power to split hydrogen off from water and using it for automotive fuel purposes rather than storing it for off-peak hour energy generation as proposed here. Jack Nicholson drove a hydrogen-powered Chevy in 1978, for Pete's sake. The electrical grid is a very expensive and inefficient method for transmitting solar power or any other form of energy, let alone "storing" it. Get your facts straight. The power grid does however have great potential for use as part of a worldwide power web, much like the internet, to transfer energy from one part of the globe to another. If every home in Southern California had PV solar cells on their rooftops, generating power during peak hours while everyone was at work would seriously bring down the price per peak watt. Intelligent government would subsidize such a project, as it does in other countries, but there isn't much of a chance of that happening here as long as money remains the driving force of politics and unrestrained capitalism is the be-all, end-all of American life.

What good news in an

What good news in an otherwise steady stream of bad news! Decentralized power, buildings like trees, each generating it's own clean power. The implementation can't happen fast enough.

An MIT professor developed

An MIT professor developed ink jet technology for stereolithography in the late '80s. This approach was applied rapidly in industry, dramatically shortening research and development time and cost. Solar power is a lifeline to the earth. Practical application can begin shortly. As "It'll take less than 5 years" for the oil interests to kill this technology warns, we must exercise extreme vigilance to obtain this goal.

Umm... sorry to burst your

Umm... sorry to burst your bubble, MIT, but "homeowners" are not too likely to be making their own hydrogen and oxygen gasses in their backyards. Both H2 and O2 are highly flammable, difficult to store, and extremely reactive with other substances. Technologists will reply that technology will take care of all these minor issues. Real-world events have proven over and over that overhyped technologies usually create more problems than they solve. (e.g. nuclear power, genetically modified organisms, etc.) Much of current scientific research looks at problems in isolation rather than thinking within the context of whole systems. KISS, and be skeptical.

Wonderful news! Within the

Wonderful news! Within the next three years, I hope MIT seriously links with product/service producers -- and gets this going like the wind power sphere is doing and T. Boone Pickens talking it up across America in town meetings too. I can hardly wait! When I read the following I see hope for millions of Americans held hostage by increasing oil greed: "Nocera hopes that within 10 years, homeowners will be able to power their homes in daylight through photovoltaic cells, while using excess solar energy to produce hydrogen and oxygen to power their own household fuel cell. Electricity-by-wire from a central source could be a thing of the past."

Hydrogen highway, here we

Hydrogen highway, here we come! This technology promises to revolutionize transportation fuels, as well. While this technology could be used to power fuel cells for transportation, if it really is this efficient, it stands to reason that it can also be used as an inexpensive way to produce hydrogen for internal combustion engines. The left over oxygen can be used for industrial purposes or just vented to the environment. Automakers have already produced IC engines that can run on either gasoline or hydrogen (e.g. BMW), but the barrier has been the high cost of producing hydrogen on an industrial scale. Now, however, such engines combined with this new technology could be the long-awaited intermediary step that allows the U.S. to wean itself off of gasoline as its primary transportation fuel source. Just imagine it - solar to hydrogen to your fuel tank. It's domestic, renewable and sustainable. DRS. What more could you want? In fact, one day, you could even produce your own hydrogen at home. Now that is true energy independence.

I too love simplicity. If

I too love simplicity. If you make something that uses a resource that is in abundance, you will succeed. Our nation was built on abundant energy giving us everything we have today. The auto industry, the diverse food we eat... and now a painfully simple way of storing energy. Look at the full report and digest the implications. No change to the environment during the manufacturing and disposal of the ingredient in this product. Compare that to all the current storage technologies. Properly marketed and the world cant say no. Big corporate interests standing in the way? Times have changed since the 70s and 80s. The Smart ones will simply step in like every one is jumping on the "Go Green" movement. LOL.

Solar technology works

Solar technology works today, even here in the Emerald City. Using the grid 'as storage' is factually not accurate, but is easy for the average person to understand. You you get a credit for solar electric production by spinning your meter backwards during the day, and you 'buy' back those same electrons at night. The net effect is the same as if you had batteries, but without the cost, maintenance, and hit in performance that introducing batteries into a PV system brings.

I notice funding didn't come

I notice funding didn't come from our government. DOE had nothing to do with it. Doesn't that seem a bit odd? Shouldn't they be involved BIG TIME in developing this? But, alas...there is no big money to be made here. A patent will taken out on the process and then snapped up by Exxon and we will never again hear about it again...like the 100 mpg carb...like the EV-1 electric car...

So what does this have to do

So what does this have to do with photosynthesis? I emailed the "scientist" to ask what was different from the plain old process. I'll post his answer if its worth it. The grid can be a sort of storage in that the places with sun can feed the places in night to some degree, depending on line losses... Personally I'm waiting for a good cheap Battery.

And Oh I had not realized

And Oh I had not realized that solar is a: "marginal, boutique alternative"

Just a little algebra: Take

Just a little algebra: Take the cross sectional are of Planet earth, multiply ist by the 1.35 watts per meter squared ( neglect the albedo), multiply this by 24 hours and 365 days, convert this to Quads of energy. Now get the DOE report on World Consumption of Energy - given in Quads- and compare the two values. Now one is prepared to evaluate this MIT finding accordingly.

Yes, I believe that Exxon or

Yes, I believe that Exxon or the like will most likely buy up all the applicable patents and put them in a vault for the next 100 or so years. Nice thought though.

Actually, the electrical

Actually, the electrical grid does not store electricity, it's just a distribution system. However, the most practical solution may be rooftop solar cells feeding electricity to community or regional fuel cells that can handle the storage of hydrogen. That way, homeowners can use all the electricity they need, sending the excess back through the grid to the hydrogen production facility. The fuel cell would operate at night, putting electricity into the grid. This is a much simpler, elegant solution than having homeowners produce, store, and convert hydrogen into electricity. Wind turbines could also be integrated into this distributed generation and storage system.

While a clean and efficient

While a clean and efficient form of electrolysis is great, it doesn't solve the efficiency problem of solar PV technology. At best one would be storing 25% of the available energy. It would be much more exciting to see a thermal technology for splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen at reasonable temperatures. In the meantime, nanotechnology antenna-based approaches to increasing PV efficiency at lower cost seem like the most promising areas of research. (To "Just a little algebra", I'm not sure where you got the 1.35 W/m^2 figure, but my understanding is that it's closer to 1 kW/m^2 raw solar power density. Solar may not meet all our energy needs, but it seems short-sighted to reject it out of hand.)

The price per watt of solar

The price per watt of solar is about to drop an order of magnitude... http://www.nanosolar.com/

Article is very upbeat about

Article is very upbeat about the ease of implementation for this system. I think that will depend on where you live. System as described will require two materials that are not plentiful and not necessarily available for massive-scale distribution in industrialized countries. One is platinum, which currently trades for over $1600 US. The other is cobalt, which isn't as expensive but is difficult and sometimes dangerous to mine and process. Chances are that the platinum would be coming out of what's left of the so-called Democratic Republic of the Congo. Mineral extraction from this nation has rendered it a total disaster for the Congolese, and a sharp increase in demand for platinum will only make things worse. Whether platinum would even be practical at yet higher prices is unclear. The Congo is presently the world's leading producer of cobalt, and will probably continue to be when demand for it to implement this solar energy net has its effects. I wonder how much more exploitation of the Congo is defensible. It's clear that the capitalists in the mining industry, if left to their own devices, aren't going to give a damn about the Congolese. Will we end users, as in the United States, give a damn? I foresee no sudden rise in our collective ethical standards. Is there ANY limit to the brutality of global exploitation that we will condone? Perhaps there will have to be a UN mandate declaring that the Congo no longer exists, and that the Congolese don't either. We could put it on our foreign policy agenda, right after BOMB-BOMB-BOMB, BOMB-BOMB IRAN.

There are several ways to

There are several ways to create electricity using the sun’s energy. Two common methods are concentrating solar power and photovoltaic. Both applications have their appropriate place for helping meet the future energy needs of Arizona. Solana will use concentrating solar power (CSP) technology with storage capability. Unlike a photovoltaic solar plant, which uses sunlight to produce electricity, CSP uses the sun’s heat. Solana’s parabolic mirrors focus the sun’s heat on a heat transfer fluid. The fluid can reach a temperature of 735 degrees Fahrenheit. To produce electricity, the hot fluid transfers its heat energy to water, creating steam. The steam is then used to run conventional steam turbines. The heat energy in the fluid also can be stored and used at a later time to generate electricity. The Plant Large thermos-like buildings containing molten salt will be located next to the steam boilers. At select times, instead of immediately creating steam, the heat transfer fluid will heat the molten salt. Then, if electricity is needed when the sun is not shining, the fluid can be heated by running it through the hot salt instead of through the mirrors. Using this process, electricity can be made from heat energy that was created up to six hours earlier. http://www.aps.com/main/green/Solana/Technology.html

Parabolic mirrors focus

Parabolic mirrors focus solar energy onto a heat transfer fluid. To produce electricity, the heated fluid transfers its heat energy to water, creating steam. The steam is then used to run conventional steam turbines. The heat energy in the fluid also can be stored and used at a later time to generate electricity. Solar trough technology uses long rows of mirrors which track the sun from east to west in order to best focus sunlight onto the receiver pipes (heat collecting element). The receiver pipes are filled with fluid that is heated by the sun's energy, much like a huge magnifying glass. The heated fluid is then sent to a heat exchanger where steam is created, and that steam is then used to turn a turbine. Large insulated tanks filled with molten salt can be used with concentrating solar power to store the heat from the fluid. This stored heat can then be used to produce energy during periods of low or no sun, including the evening hours. Using thermal storage allows energy provided by the sun to be distributed over a longer window of time. In the example above, the stored energy is used to provide heat for the electricity generation well into the night. APS' peak summer demand occurs in the early evening, often as late as 7 p.m., long after the sun has provided its most intense radiation. Thermal energy storage allows the solar trough to supply electricity when energy is most needed by APS (Arizona) customers. http://www.aps.com/main/green/Solana/Technology.html

Maybe you can't reproduce

Maybe you can't reproduce the exact same standard of living that we enjoy using oil.. but, Solar technology is good because at least we can have some of what we need, and for FREE, and it is CLEAN. No, we probably can't power as many things with solar as we can with fossil fuels, but can we get by with less electric carving knives and annoying streetlights burning all night? Conservation is more the key than trying to reproduce the exact same thing, before anyone ever accepts it, but here they are trying anyway, so that the boneheads will finally get it.

If all this were really

If all this were really such a breakthrough, it would lead all news broadcasts. If is is " so simple and major", why will it take 10 years to come to fruition? Bah humbug.

It is funny to read all the

It is funny to read all the comments of the experts in this discussion. This seems like really good news, the sort of you'd think we'd be very enthusiastic about. Last I checked, MIT was about as respected a research institution as there is, yet I just read several posters essentially dis an MIT professor in terms that made him, the publication, and MIT seem like snake oil men. Sometimes it seems we should acquiesce to those who would appear to know more about some things than we, because there really are some who do. As to the platinum issue, I can tell you first hand from a stolen catalytic converter, pilfered for its platinum content, that there is at least one mass produced technology that utilizes a small amount of platinum in every unit: the catalytic converter that is a required regulator on every new car for the past twenty some years (or so).

Congrats to the MIT

Congrats to the MIT scientists! Mimicking photosynthesis to break apart the H2O molecule into two gasses is a great feat. Too bad that the end-use here is back to hydrogen hallucinations once again. Ever hear of a hydrogen bomb? To store hydrogen, it needs to be compressed from 10,000 to 15,000 psi in specially crafted composite-wound tanks. At that pressure, being the smallest atom on the atomic chart of elements, hydrogen will leak through valves and regulators at every twist and turn. And pressurized hydrogen wants so badly to mate with atmospheric oxygen and form water once again. It is the heat of friction from this pressurized hydrogen leaking from an unpurged regulator that leads to auto ignition and kabooms of extreme magnitude. The general public was sold a story from Dubya just three weeks before he invaded Iraq in a televised State of the Union message. Dubya only read script for 45 seconds or so about our kids driving H2 fuel cell cars and emitting only steam as exhaust vapor. Before he could launch laser-guided bombs on Baghdad three weeks later, the stocks of Ballard and other H2 fuel cell companies working in a stalled H2 economy went wild once again. Hydrogen tags along to balance the electrical valence of carbon atoms. H2 is an energy carrier. It is NOT a viable alternative energy source. Even if hydrogen were free - it still won't work safely from any source within the transportation sector. Why is MIT proposing a new ruse here? I don't get it. Sorry but I don't believe in hydrogen hallucinations. A fellow scientist in alternative energy...

Our Nations Energy needs are

Our Nations Energy needs are already on the grid, paid for in the rate structure and just going to waste during the "off peak" hours. The missing component is Energy Storage. See mrelectricity,com for a off the shelf solution.

A question about this. It

A question about this. It sounds like it still relies on platinum to be the catalyst at the anode to produce hydrogen gas. Is there enough platinum for this to be scaled up to useful amounts? I recall reading that there's not enough platinum to be used as a catalyst in hydrogen-burning fuel cells for that technology go into wide use. One would think the same applies here.

Congress created the Energy

Congress created the Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) in 1975. It was an exempt agency so it could hire scientists and researchers. ERDA was spending $600 Million on solar energy research in 1976 and MIT was the highest benefactor of grants from ERDA, It created the Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI). But SERI was turned into a National Lab called NREL, which has done nothing but make money for the contractor who runs it. Look at the funding and then the resume of the guy who runs this now. That's why we taxpayers have nothing to show for the money spent over the last 33 years with no commercialization.

"Why is MIT proposing a new

"Why is MIT proposing a new ruse here? I don't get it. Sorry but I don't believe in hydrogen hallucinations. A fellow scientist in alternative energy... An answer here is straightforward: paid propaganda (most likely with more grants) for Bush's Hydrogen World. [BTW, you all, platinum is NOT used, I just read the article in SCIENCE. Cobalt IS used.] This article is an amazing piece of hype coming from some supposedly prestigious place like MIT, something which borders on gross negligence with regard to the truth. MIT ought to be ashamed, if not sued. First, fuel cells are likely to operate in practice at about 50% efficiency--batteries should give at least 70% storage efficiency. Second, the electrolysis cell is considerably less than 100% efficient, thus we have further losses, so the overall storage efficiency will be about 40%, maybe less. Third, there is also the problem of storing hydrogen--as the Fellow Scientist notes. A high pressure pump uses considerable energy and reduces storage efficiency even more. Using a battery for storage and dispensing with hydrogen altogether looks better and better. A disadvantage is that batteries are heavy lowering "gas milage" and much is lost when they wear out. Nevertheless, hydrogen may be useful for longer trips and supplying electricity at night--or when the wind is not blowing. Most likely, a centralized hydrogen generation and storage system as proposed above will be useful in some situations. Folks, there is not going to be a silver bullet--one giant solution. Shame on MIT for all the hype.

In mid-July, an article by

In mid-July, an article by Elizabeth A. Thomson in MIT News reported on the invention of "solar concentrators" which would collect solar energy on ordinary window panes -- not solar panels on the roof, no major RETROFITTING of ordinary buildings ! The title of the article was "MIT opens new 'window' on solar energy: cost effective devices expected on market soon". The MIT engineers are Marc A. Baldo, Mapel, Currie and Goffri, and the work was supported by the National Science Foundation. I hope Exxon keeps its hands off of this promising technology!! We the people are ready for this!

"Requiring nothing but

"Requiring nothing but abundant, non-toxic natural materials... the new catalyst consists of cobalt metal, phosphate and an electrode, placed in water."

Abundant? Then why are we facing a problem with "peak phosphorous" -- one that is driving up the costs of the toxic fluoride acids used in water fluoridation (a byproduct of the phosphate mining industry). We used to get a lot of phosphates out of Florida and other southeastern states, but production has fallen after U.S. production of phosphates peaked in 1980. We're now importing from China.

See http://www.actionpa.org/fluoride/chemicals/shortagesandrisingcosts.html and http://energybulletin.net/node/33164 for details.

On cobalt production trends, a quick glance at the USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries shows that U.S. production peaked in 1998: http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/cobalt/

Before you buy this hype about abundant and "non-toxic" materials, visit the USGS site for production and import numbers and look into other aspects of production (like the highly toxic fluoride acids that introduce arsenic and numerous other contaminants to our drinking water when they dispose of it in drinking water systems because it's too expensive to pay for it to be disposed of as hazardous waste if they dumped it anywhere else).

Mike Ewall
Energy Justice Network
215-743-4884
http://www.energyjustice.net

Some Victorian "scientists"

Some Victorian "scientists" invented perpetual motion. The trouble was that it was in the "smoke-ball" class. It this in that same class? Tue 5 Aug 2008

We can largely achieve Al

We can largely achieve Al Gore's 100% renewable sources of electricity in ten years if we devote our resources in the right way. Dispersed photovoltaic arrays, like on people's roofs are an important part of that. Grid tied photovoltaics. That means the array on your house is connected to the power grid. When the Sun is shining the meter runs backwards. When you draw power from the grid, the meter runs forward. You don't need batteries because you are connected to the grid. The idea is that you install an array that is the at least big enough so you produce a small surplus of power over the course of the year. That way you are meeting all of your own electrical energy needs. It's easy to fit that many panels on the average house located in a sunny location. The inverters lose a pretty good chunk of the power. They are necessary because the power grid is AC electricity and the photovoltaic panels produce DC. In order to grid tie you have to have an inverter installed to convert the DC of the panels to the AC of the grid. The technology exists now to transmit power as DC on buried lines. It is the construction of those underground DC lines that Gore is talking about when he says that we need to build a modern grid to carry the renewable energy source power. We also need to convert our transportation system to efficient, steel on steel mass transit. The electric car is still hugely wasteful because it involves moving a ton of steel and glass along with every person, and we are going to have to give that wasteful model up. It puts too much greenhouse gas into the atmosphere to be sustainable if we use fossil fuel and expends too much energy for the less prolific renewables.

This article is not overly

This article is not overly optimistic or overstated. The cheap, simple and clean catalyst invented at MIT, combined with the simultaneous development of a cheap, simple catalyst to replace platinum that an Australian university invented for converting the gases back to electricity, is the start of the solar power revolution the world has awaited. Economists have realized for decades that we have the technologies to eliminate hunger, poverty, drought--technologies to increase the "economic pie" to bring the world out of privation, strife and war . . . if we only had abundant, cheap, clean energy. This is the key to that energy source. Poor villagers can band together, get a cheap and effective solar power system, and use it to run systems to clean used or contaminated water, farm machinery, tools and homes, and rise up out of poverty. They can use the energy to replace cooking fuels, heating fuels,to drive refrigerators, air conditioners, electric vehicles, or anything else. They can create sources of income, abundant food, freshwater, freeing their children from labor. Homes in the industrialized world can be taken completely off the power grid. Electric cars can be recharged at home. This will tremendously reduce the use of fossil fuels, change economic relationships, and eliminate national and international political strife over oil, coal and nuclear power. Why have "peaceful" nuclear power when you have far more energy, cheaply, cleanly and safely. from the sun?

Got drought? Pump seawater using this power to wherever it is needed and convert it to freshwater (or convert it first and then move it--whichever is better for a given purpose). Worried we will never meet target reductions of greenhouse gases? This will enable far greater reductions, obviating the worst effects of impending climate change.

What is critical is that MIT license this non-exclusively, maybe even for free, and that entrepreneurs immediately begin to develop it for every imaginable use. Climate crisis and economic opportunity can combine to prevent this technology from being bought up and killed by oil, coal, gas, or nuclear interests. This clever, simple invention can change humanity--it is the greatest invention since the wheel. It's the end of the world as we know it, and none too soon.

There never has been a

There never has been a “dark side to solar energy.” Storing solar electrical energy in batteries always involves a power loss in the batteries and the manufacture of battery banks is a wasteful and environmentally damaging use of heavy metals. Battery storage never was the only option. Water elevation is another form of storing electrical energy; the water can be used over in a closed recirculating system with a turbo generator/alternator at the low gravity point. Compressed air or water in a pressure tank with an air bladder also will store energy without loss for power generation in the dark hours. This kind of storage works equally well for wind generation. MIT’s Daniel Nocera has proposed the worst possible home storage of power; imagine each house in a community with a pressurized hydrogen-oxygen tank, a community of Hindenburgs each having the potential to level a city block with a static spark in the wrong place. I noticed that Nocera’s project was funded by the National Science Foundation and the Chesonis Family Foundation to the tune of $10 million. Now he’s making fine erudite statements like, “ Multielectron reactions are fundamental to promoting energy conversion transformations such as the oxidation of water and the reduction of hydrohalic acid to hydrogen. The basic redox chemistry of excited states is single electron transfer.” It’s a ruse for more research money. MIT has been leading the fight for the auto- energy cartel and against practical non-hydrocarbon solutions since the time of Tesla. Nocera’s cosmology uses catalysts of phosphate, cobalt and (what was it?) platinum (Yeh, they just give that stuff away.) At some point common sense and economic realities must marry with science. This research also predicates the use of fuel cells which cannot, with heretofore advancments, produce mechanical energy as effeciently as ordinary 4-cycle internal combustion engines converted to hydrogen or HHO. Fuel cells have a flawed cleanliness problem-- that to remain functioning the membrane must be kept unrealistically pristine. Cost, cleanliness and wastefulness are inherient fuel cell blotches that are used to guarantee primacy for petroleum. Is MIT, university science and Congress permanently out- to- lunch? They teach the 19th Century concept that for the water molecule to be cracked to yield its components of hydrogen and oxygen, it must be assaulted with thousands of watts of electricity in a prohibitively expensive process. They will not consider the proven process of a cheap water breakdown using low- powered pulsed radio frequences. A typical auto alternator produces more than enough amperage to break the water molecule. You can go online to order working Brown’s or HHO gas units that are intended for welding. Most wouldn’t dare advertise them to power homes or autos. Some of these must be imported. This unfunded technology, often prohibited by the government declaring the patents military secrets, is called hydroxy. The World Bank and WTO pressure developing countries that have outstanding loans to deny financing to resident inventors who have marketable alternative energy devices. A bunch of alternative inventors or promoters have died mysteriously. Big oil rules! The most elementary engine modification is realized by running the fuel line through the exhaust manifold to vaporize the gas or diesel before combustion. This is called GEET in France and adaptations are openly used, a better transition technology than hybred vehicles. Have someone who has a white gas or gasoline camping stove give you a demonstration. Yellow high- carbon flames leap high enough to threaten your eyebrows before the generator which runs through the flames gets hot enough for fuel vaporization; then when vaporized, the fuel burns blue and completely. The yellow flames represent your auto without a GEET conversion. Such a device can render an efficiency up to 200 mpg for an ordinary internal combustion engine; yet such alteration is prohibited by government imposed catalytic converter laws. This simple technology was advanced in the 1920’s but the patents were bought up and suppressed by the auto-energy cartel, the same corporate outlaws who annihilated street cars, trollies and any kind of efficient public transportation. If fuels were burned completely there would be no need for catalytic converters. If fuels had been burned completely for 80 years or so, atmospheric pollution would be a fraction of that existing today. The choice to have atmospheric pollution by the auto- energy cartel was deliberate; the sheeple just blindly followed.

how are the fuel cells

how are the fuel cells manufactured? how are the electrodes manufactured? how are solar panels manufactured? how are wind turbines manufacturing. of course the manufacturing of these crucial components relies upon cheap fossil fuel energy. if we were smart we would pool all of our remainingg fossil fuel energy into the manufacturing of the necessary components for so called "renewable" energy sources. solar and wind energy are great but it is a fallacy to think that they do not rely upon fossil fuel energy. i see nothing in this article that changes this basic fact. we need to take the blinders off. the clock is ticking...

We, every improvement is a

We, every improvement is a step in the right direction. We are beginning in a few weeks to operate an exhaust cleaner that removes 98+% of all pollutants including CO2. This means we can burn trash cleanly fixing 2 problems at the same time. With our system running, coal produces less pollution than natural gas (even brown coal). Each improvement helps us get closer to a carbon neutral life and saving the environment. We must remain vigilant to insure that these improvements are used to help us develop even greener, friendlier economies to help reverse the damage we (the human virus infecting the earth) have done.

I applaud the many

I applaud the many thoughtful comments on this article. It seems to me that the energy solution is in what many have suggested here, that we need to use whatever natural energy source makes sense in a particular geographic area, be it solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, etrc., or a most probably a combination, with the key being that it all is linked together in a two<->way grid which facilitates the ebb and flow of supply and demand, and the coordination of one technology with another, from one household, one city, one county, one state, one region, and one country to the next. National and even international political boundaries need not, and should not, limit this grid system, and indeed, it will only succeed with the same kind of revolutionary interstate free-trade cooperation which allowed the US to successfully become the UNITED States of America. The real issue in all this is that we need to change the global paradigm from an individualistic competitive focus to a more cooperative communal focus, primarily in regard to energy and transportation policies, but also in other areas as well. This need for a truly communal cooperative solution, and the leadership to facilitate it, is the greatest challenge for our civilization. Up to now, the world has been dominated by what many would call the "Capitalist" model of development, but properly speaking, what has really been going on has been "Monopolism." Only by recognizing and altering the underlying premises of a system which allows nature to be privatized and monopolized by a few at the expense of the common welfare, can we hope to be able to functionally organize ourselves to facilitate the needed changes we have been contemplating here. Paul Martin, Director Instituto Henry George, Nicaragua CEIHG.org

If the U.S. had chosen to be

If the U.S. had chosen to be a moral people, and leaving Iraqi oil alone, and following Al Gore, decided to develop the South Western deserts, with the technology of the times - solar/thermal-molten sodium - electricity installations, for the same amount of money as that war cost, ($650 Billion), today, we would be tapping into the largest, renewable, sustainable, energy source the world has ever known. It would have paid every energy bill in the U.S.A. for maintenance fees only - FOREVER! It would be equivalent to an oil field that can NEVER run dry! Low cost electric power, and storeable hydrogen gasoline replacement from the electricity, for all! After the millions of murders, and $650 billions of dollars, borrowed from our children’s futures and pissed away, with thousands of our own and others maimed and disfigured for life, millions of families utterly destroyed, ours and theirs, we are no closer to Iraqi oil production than the Iraqis are! The next time you hear a blithering idiot spoiled brat, drunken, drug addicted, sociopath, rich Arabic saber dancing daddie’s boy oilman, stand at a microphone and threaten YOUR safety with someone ELSE’S weapons, remember what you lost America, remember, and weep! (also see http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan)

I was thrilled when I first

I was thrilled when I first read of this. After reading a few scientists' comments about problems with the process and other problems, my enthusiasm is somewhat checked. I think that we all (meaning the human race) have to focus on one possibility first: cheap, unlimited production of hydrogen gas, because that is the fundamental promise here that (presumably) was not available to us before this discovery. If this is indeed a feasible reality, we all may be sure that there will be a lot of "running" with this fact by great may player, and very soon. The possibility of cheap, unlimited hydrogen production means the production of a cheap, unlimited source of energy, however it may be best utilized. And, it appears that the 'powers that be,' oil companies or other potential spoilers, will not be able to control the process. This means that the peoples of the world are free to "run" with it to whatever good place they can take it. Of course, the hope is that it can lead to a new energy abundant world with no possibility of any industrial or political entity able to control it. This would revolutionize the world and the lives, potentially, of all the worlds people. One can see the end of 'fossil' fuel-base air pollution, a far distant vision, to be sure, but it is seeable given this new promise. The reversal of 'global warming' then comes into focus. Will there be geo-political consequences? Oh yes, and some quite dangerous ones to watch out for as one can anticipate in light of the world's 'fossil' fuel producers' demise. But, only keep the promise in mind: an unlimited, cheap source of energy. Such a promise, if realizable, is worth the greatest efforts of both peoples and governments to bring to reality.

You are going to need

You are going to need platinum in the final fuel-cell and as the counter-electrode, where the hydrogen is produced. I need to get hold of the paper in Science because it's ambiguous what that oxygen electrode metal is - platinum or cobalt. From what I've read the cobalt metal and the electrode are separate entities, but that may not be the case and the team has been misquoted. Anyway, the device overall still needs platinum. I endorse all comments above about the hydrogen economy and its likelihood, beyond getting research funding, and feel that in fuel cell technology, even if everything else could be solved, platinum is the final fence at which the "hydrogen horse" will fall. There is the timescale problem too - i.e. if work had begun say 35 years ago when the OPEC caused the first oil-crisis, we might have some solutions to oil now. As things stand we are running out of cheap oil for geological not just political reasons and we have very limited time left to work these various technological "solutions" up to commercial and world-scale levels.

Clearly Pt is still required

Clearly Pt is still required (in a different reaction vessel?) to make the H2. So they've got a nice O2 catalyst, that isn't the roadblock to economics or commercialization. i have a different view. Electricity derived from fossil fuels increases at 3-8%/year in real terms forever due to declining natural resources. Electricity from PV decreases at 2-4%/yr for 20 years due to learning curve. Eventually these two curves cross, at approximately .30$/KWH. At that point you coat Nevada with solar cells, split h20, and take the H2 with Co2 and make reduced hydrocarbons for transport. What is the most efficient catalyst for this reaction? Will Pt again play a leading role?

http://www.philosophy.org/ind

http://www.philosophy.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3&Itemid=76 This is nothing new. Go to above link and read what the late Walter Russell said some 70 years ago about hydrogen and "voided hydrogen" and how to utilize it for mankind's benefits and safety. Written by Walter Russell Space and the Hydrogen Age Walter Russell delivered this address at the Hotel Pennsylvania in New York on May 13, 1939, at the annual convention of The Eastern Electronic Association. Hydrogen is the most plentiful substance that the sun generates in its outer atmosphere, and the most plentiful of our outer atmosphere beyond twenty miles. Our oceans are inexhaustible storehouses of voided hydrogen, which can be regenerated to active hydrogen. I shall talk to you tonight about the reality of space as an equal partner with the solids of matter, which float in it. I shall also talk to you about the hydrogen age which is at our door, for an intimate knowledge of space is also at our door and it is that knowledge of space which will give us our hydrogen age. Also it will give us our new cosmogony. In fact, the very secrets of life and death, which have eluded man for ages, lie within a knowledge of space. This subject is very timely because of the concern of the present generation over the fuel problems of future generations. One of our distinguished scientists delivered an address recently, which was pessimistic in regard to future progress.

my ???? is. this is now

my ???? is. this is now 06/16/2009. what is the current subject on this news and were can i find a current link that is up to date on this report? thank you.

10 Cent StĂĽck von 1847

Ian B. aus Shropshire Country, England, hat mit seinem Garrett GTI 2500 mehr als 2.800 r”mische Bronzemünzen aus dem vierten Jahrhundert gefunden.[url=http://www.garrett.ch/ger/products_det.php3?id=40&product_id=159][img]http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/107/l_ee53b4988a13442292b62b784b688590.jpg[/img] garret gti2500 garrett [/url]