Opinion
McCain's Integrity
Wednesday 10 September 2008
by: Andrew Sullivan | Visit article original @ The Atlantic

Senator John McCain at a campaign rally in Virginia. (Photo: Reuters)
Editor's Note: Historically a John McCain supporter, conservative journalist and blogger Andrew Sullivan takes on the issue of John McCain's integrity as he strives to win the presidency. - vh/TO
For me, this surreal moment - like the entire surrealism of the past ten days - is not really about Sarah Palin or Barack Obama or pigs or fish or lipstick. It's about John McCain. The one thing I always thought I knew about him is that he is a decent and honest person. When he knows, as every sane person must, that Obama did not in any conceivable sense mean that Sarah Palin is a pig, what did he do? Did he come out and say so and end this charade? Or did he acquiesce in and thereby enable the mindless Rovianism that is now the core feature of his campaign?
So far, he has let us all down. My guess is he will continue to do so. And that decision, for my part, ends whatever respect I once had for him. On core moral issues, where this man knew what the right thing was, and had to pick between good and evil, he chose evil. When he knew that George W. Bush's war in Iraq was a fiasco and catastrophe, and before Donald Rumsfeld quit, McCain endorsed George W. Bush against his fellow Vietnam vet, John Kerry in 2004. By that decision, McCain lost any credibility that he can ever put country first. He put party first and his own career first ahead of what he knew was best for the country.
And when the Senate and House voted overwhelmingly to condemn and end the torture regime of Bush and Cheney in 2006, McCain again had a clear choice between good and evil, and chose evil.
He capitulated and enshrined torture as the policy of the United States, by allowing the CIA to use techniques as bad as and worse than the torture inflicted on him in Vietnam. He gave the war criminals in the White House retroactive immunity against the prosecution they so richly deserve. The enormity of this moral betrayal, this betrayal of his country's honor, has yet to sink in. But for my part, it now makes much more sense. He is not the man I thought he was.
And when he had the chance to engage in a real and substantive debate against the most talented politician of the next generation in a fall campaign where vital issues are at stake, what did McCain do? He began his general campaign with a series of grotesque, trivial and absurd MTV-style attacks on Obama's virtues and implied disgusting things about his opponent's patriotism.
And then, because he could see he was going to lose, ten days ago, he threw caution to the wind and with no vetting whatsoever, picked a woman who, by her decision to endure her own eight-month pregnancy of a Down Syndrome child in public, that he was going to reignite the culture war as a last stand against Obama. That's all that is happening right now: a massive bump in the enthusiasm of the Christianist base. This is pure Rove.
Yes, McCain made a decision that revealed many appalling things about him. In the end, his final concern is not national security. No one who cares about national security would pick as vice-president someone who knows nothing about it as his replacement. No one who cares about this country's safety would gamble the security of the world on a total unknown because she polled well with the Christianist base. No person who truly believed that the surge was integral to this country's national security would pick as his veep candidate a woman who, so far as we can tell anything, opposed it at the time.
McCain has demonstrated in the last two months that he does not have the character to be president of the United States. And that is why it is more important than ever to ensure that Barack Obama is the next president. The alternative is now unthinkable. And McCain - no one else - has proved it.


Comments
This is a moderated forum. It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.
To hear the plain truth
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 22:19 — Anonymous (not verified)Bravo, well said Mr Sullivan!
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 22:35 — bininsb40tyrs (not verified)A-typical Conservative:
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 22:35 — Anonymous (not verified)Thanks Andrew for your
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 22:44 — Anonymous (not verified)Back in 2000 I thought that
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 22:56 — Joseph Ludi (not verified)I agree completely. I
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 23:12 — OrwellWasAnOptimist (not verified)Cheers to Andrew Sullivan
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 23:15 — Anonymous (not verified)I often support the views
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 23:28 — Darel (not verified)Like Andrew, I'm very
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 23:32 — dtroutma (not verified)It is good to see someone
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 23:33 — Bill Chisholm (not verified)Praise Allah, there are
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 23:39 — George Powell (not verified)Well said Andrew! For
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:00 — Eva Furgason (not verified)The talent of the Republican
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:07 — Anonymous (not verified)Why I am voting Obama over
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:09 — army veteran (not verified)This is all the more reason
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:12 — DorothyK (not verified)Wow. This was tenth inning
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:17 — Kenny Fox (not verified)And now, Mr. Sullivan - tell
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:17 — Anonymous (not verified)I understand your idea of
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:19 — Anonymous (not verified)It appears that a chance to
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:20 — Skeptic (not verified)There was a time when decent
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:22 — Mike Farrace (not verified)The well earned kudos for
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:32 — martin a. scanlan (not verified)I like Andrew Sullivan, I
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:37 — John Smart (not verified)The real pig in this
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:38 — The real pig in this discussion (not verified)It is tough for me to
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:48 — Karen (not verified)Clarity and logic. Thank
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:52 — Macbev (not verified)What is the deal with
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:53 — Anonymous (not verified)You state with clarity what
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:54 — memci (not verified)Mr. Sullivan has authored
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 00:54 — Anonymous (not verified)Better late than never Mr.
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 01:00 — Anonymous (not verified)McCain will only win through
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 01:22 — Anonymous (not verified)I feel sorry for John
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 01:25 — Anonymous (not verified)excellent. the author has
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 01:31 — pennie (not verified)Oprah did NOT say that she
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 01:38 — Anonymous (not verified)The only requirement to be
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 01:54 — Anonymous (not verified)Thank you to Andrew
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 01:57 — Anonymous (not verified)In 2000 I had respect for
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 01:59 — PissedOffVet (not verified)I just finished reading the
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 02:41 — Anonymous (not verified)This is getting so
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 02:44 — Anonymous (not verified)Standing at my desk by the
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 03:56 — tje (not verified)I've never lived in a world
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 04:20 — foolish optimist (not verified)Like many others, I
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 04:40 — Lou R (not verified)Not to sound cynical, but to
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 05:00 — Anonymous (not verified)I came to admire Barry
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 05:07 — JLGraham (not verified)If for no other reason (and
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 05:10 — scottmk (not verified)Andrew Sullivan, you have
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 05:19 — Anonymous (not verified)And the John McCain I
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 05:40 — Javelina13 (not verified)Would you like to see
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 06:17 — Anonymous (not verified)Sad to say, despite Obama's
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 06:55 — Anonymous (not verified)Bravo- After the hatchet job
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 07:01 — pink elephant (not verified)Excellent article, Mr.
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 07:19 — Another Peasant (not verified)