News

McClellan Blames Bush, Not Aides, for Disillusionment

»

by: Johanna Neuman, The Los Angeles Times

photo
Scott McClellan made clear today that it was President Bush - not the high-profile aides around him - who left him most disillusioned in the run-up to the Iraq War. (Photo: Ron Edmonds / AP)

    Washington - Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan made clear today that it was President Bush - not the high-profile aides around him - who left him most disillusioned in the run-up to the Iraq War. In an interview on NBC's "Today Show," McClellan called it a "defining moment" when he learned that President Bush had secretly declassified a National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq. The move allowed Vice President Dick Cheney and his top aide, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, to leak information to reporters at a time when the press secretary was at the podium criticizing those who would leak classified information.

    "I was kind of taken aback," he said. "It undermined a lot of what I had been saying."

    He also said he was troubled by instructions from Bush and Cheney to defend Libby and political guru Karl Rove as uninvolved in the leaking of Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA operative. The leaks were an attempt to discredit her husband, who was disputing the rationale for war in Iraq. They later acknowledged their roles and Libby was convicted of lying to prosecutors; his sentence was commuted by Bush.

    With the White House still reeling from the revelations in McClellan's book, "What Happened - Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception," the former press aide who came to Washington from Texas with Bush eight years ago began a media tour explaining how he came to be so critical of the Bush team.

    Asked about Bush's decision-making style, McClellan called the president "largely a gut player" who "very early on, a few months after 9/11, made a decision to confront Iraq's Saddam Hussein" and who showed "no flexibility in his approach."

    In his book, McClellan accused the White House of "manipulating" public opinion in advance of the war. Once the administration had settled on a rationale for the war of ridding Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, he said, the White House message grew more pointed. "As we came closer to war, caveats were dropped" from estimates of Saddam's arsenal and administration statements "made it sound like the threat was more imminent and grave" than it was.

    Pressed on why he didn't resign then or make his concerns known, McClellan said he was impressed by the expertise of the foreign policy team advising the president. "I gave them the benefit of the doubt, just like a lot of Americans. Looking back and reflecting on it now, I don't think I should have."

    But Dan Bartlett, former White House counselor, told the "Today Show" that McClellan was wrong about the war.

    "I think his allegation saying that there was an effort to shade the truth, that propaganda was used to sell the war to the American people, is patently false," he said.

    In his interview, McClellan also sought to wrap himself in the mantle of a reformer, saying that the Bush administration, like others before it, got caught up in the Washington "game" of running the White House like a full-time political campaign. Warning future administrations not to go down that road, he said, was the "larger purpose" in his book.

    "We got to Washington and I think we got caught up in playing the Washington game the way it is being played today," he said.

    Bush once said that he could envision sitting in a rocking chair back in Texas with McClellan reminiscing about their years in Washington. Now, asked if he thought Bush would ever speak to him again, McClellan said, "I don't know. I certainly don't expect it any time soon. I know this is a tough book for many people to accept."

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

Absolutely !

Absolutely ! ................. This isn't news ... it is a case in point that the American media is continuing "an after the fact dialogue" with its consuming public while enabling distraction from real news and events happening currently. The time to have had this discussion/debate ended in March of 2003. It's time to start living life in REAL time, instead of being ambushed and working backwards. Hopefully, Truthout will lead the way in providing relevant, current information and real investigative reporting (i.e. the looting of our Central Bank as it is happening right now.)

If we had a system where

If we had a system where everyone had to vote just maybe we would not get stuck with the likes of Bush and cronies who are experts at knowing how to manipulate the masses.It ought be hart of our democracy. They made a great looking package with nothing but hot air , lies and made us all ashamed to AMericans.

Of course the book will piss

Of course the book will piss off the die-hard Republicans. They're not used to having a member put the truth and the good of the country above the good of the party. The longer one has been buying the Bush/Cheny BS, the harder it is to accept the fact that "one of us had the tenacity to suddenly become hones".

Every corporation or high

Every corporation or high profile personality has their own hired hacks with their major function being to spin and manipulate the media. That is how it is in this country and always has been as far back as memory serves. You can dislike them and hold contempt for them but to trust them to do anything else is our own fault for being so naive. “Damage control” has become a major industry. Not from the damage they cause others but from the damage of accountability for it. Call it a press secretary, spokes person, public relations person or image consultant it is all the same. I think the question of equal importance is why were the mainstream media and many of the people so ready and willing to accept whatever was being said back then? There were many trying to stop the war and even questioning many aspects about 9/11 and most were disregarded as conspiracy theorists out of hand. The media all but went out of their way to look the other way if not to discredit and misrepresent. Those against the war were immediately labeled as anti-patriotic and accused of being against the troops. Anyone who criticized the administration was likely to be run out of town on a rail. Don’t dare wear a controversial t-shirt to the mall or on the streets. Certainly to openly protest got you mistreated and abused by our own government while others in America pretty much ignored that more than was offended by the repression and deprivations of free speech and expression. Many, throughout our history, gave up their lives to sacrifice for and to defend these freedoms and liberty yet many would not even devote a day of sacrificed time to protest in support of stopping or ending the Iraq war. This was the time of “American fries” in a feeble gesture to insult the nation of France for speaking out against the war on Iraq too. Then there was the burning of CDs to punish free speech as well. Few questioned the infamous “no fly lists” and why even a prominent member of Congress found himself to be listed on it. Like it or not, or like McClellan or not, he was doing what everyone knew he was hired to do. I don’t attempt to excuse him or to disagree with any of the comments posted here. I find most of them very insightful and all true. I would certainly agree that Congress has not only failed their duty to execute the Constitution or to check the Executive Branch’s tyrannical abuses and refusal to enforce the Constitution and laws or the Judicial Branch’s failure and refusal to implement it and legislating exceptions and exclusions to derogate the Constitution and laws. It is Congress that not only refuses to impeach but also enables and facilitates the Executive Branch to make a tyrannical mockery of the controlling existing Constitution and laws and to commit, and continue to commit, the same kinds of crimes against humanity in our name that were tried under American law at Nuremberg in the late1940s. Where was the public outcry as our civil rights and civil liberties were systemically ignored and were targeted by the Bush administration similarly to that of 1930s Germany? What this administration was doing was glowingly obvious and brazenly overt. And yet even if the American people and Congress were so blind to the war rhetoric, if they even thought for a minute that the Iraq war was even remotely as justified as WWII then how is it that they didn’t pay very much attention to the hundreds of billions in no bid contracts to their own cronies. Had President Roosevelt tied anything remotely resembling that in the1940s he would have been impeached in a heartbeat.

Dan Bartlett's claim that

Dan Bartlett's claim that the Bush Administration did not use propaganda to push war? Trust your leaders? Get real, or just shut up Bartlett. Propaganda has always been a tool of modern government and the Bush Administration's "Ministry of Truth" have written a new book on how to do it in modern times. Scare the crap out of people and say it over and over and over and over, until they believe it. It is what it is - propaganda to sell a war. At least McClellan is willing to admit he got hood-winked too and feels foolish for it.

He should have resigned at

He should have resigned at once, but at least he has some remorse. He sure looks a lot better than mealy mouthed Ari Fleischer, who is still lying for the administration.

We should stop saying that

We should stop saying that this coming election is some sort of panacea and chance for renewal! Let's face it we are already deep in the gullet of an out-of-control hysterical manipulative group of pyschopaths called the 'neo-cons' that have no intention of letting the "people's will" be fairly expressed in this or any other election. They have already shown to what extent they are willing to lie, cheat and steal in order to remain in power - that took forty years to bring about! I hope that I am wrong but we are alrerady in a quasi dictatorship the likes of which no country has ever seen!Genklag

I think atempts to defend

I think atempts to defend him or anyone who claims they were duped should be rejected out of hand. Millions of us with no special access to information and very little time outside of our 40-plus hour a week jobs, were able to use Google to hear from the career Pentagon and intelligence veterans who were being ignored, fired, and forced out because they knew there wasn't sufficient evidence to go to war. If a normal Joe or Jane can use his or her lowly access to information to clearly understand the dangerous and irresponsible propaganda game being played out from 2002 on, anyone higher up the rung than that simply cannot claim they didn't know or were duped. It's absurd, and if in any cases was actually true, implies a stellar degree of imcompetence. So, the question always remains for these people, were you so ethically and morally bankrupt that you were willing to use lies, cherrypicking and propaganda to plunge so many lives into darkness and death and severely undermine our national security and well-being for decades to come? Or was it that you set a historical record for utter incompetence? Or perhaps a combination of the two?

Too little too late, Scotty.

Too little too late, Scotty. You were the mouthpiece of lies and death, and did nothing to stop it. Writing a book to make some $$$ in the final months of the administration is not commendable. Get impeachment proceedings started and you'll be getting somewhere.

Ya' know, when it was

Ya' know, when it was obvious to all that Libby and Rove were in cahoots in Plamegate, I could see pain in Scott's face --his heart wasn't in it. I think that, as he said, time and other revelations have shown him that he was duped . . . and used, as have others from the Bush Crime Family who have written tell-alls. These writers are not "turn coats", they are trying to save our country while Bush crime Family is still trying to make it a dictatorship. We're in a boatload of trouble in all directions and it will only get worse with McCain serving Bush's 3rd term.

It's important to note in

It's important to note in all of this that typically Press Secretaries don't know more than what they're told or briefed on. They're not some inner-circle type in Washington. They're just a partisan employee, mostly caught in the midst of the (mostly dishonest) communication from a government to its people. And they're not there to make things difficult for the Administration that employs them either.

"his allegation saying that

"his allegation saying that there was an effort to shade the truth, that propaganda was used to sell the war to the American people, is patently false," The Bushies don't seem to learn that lying just makes things worse. The evidence is too strong that they were not just shading the truth, but actually lying. There are the Downing St. memos, there is the doctored NIE that was shown to the Congress before the vote on going to war, there is the attempt to get Wilson for outing their lies about the yellow cake, there is the office that Feith ran which one of the operatives was stating at the time was being run solely to produce "intelligence" that could be used to justify the war, there is O'Neill's (sp?) book saying that in the first week of Bush's reign they were talking about invading Iraq, ...

Even if we all -or even say

Even if we all -or even say a majority-knew they were all lying (president, v.p. cabinet secretaries, generals, colonels, press secretaries, reporters), what could we do about it? I've been in 4 major war protests with (of course) no effect on policy. 70% of the American public is against the war, and heaven knows what other foreign and domestic atrocities this gang has committed. So what? What can we really do when psycho freaks have power? Not much really. Wait 'till the next election to vote (big deal) for the next bunch of miscreants? I guess that's democracy-we're free to have no choice.

OF COURSE we did. And still

OF COURSE we did. And still the American people voted for the guy again. It is the American people who should fall on their collective sword. An it also is the American people who will pay for many years to come.

..And the American people

..And the American people STILL voted for the guy! It is WE voteres who should be falling on our swords. And it will be US who pay.

waaaah! Waaaah! Whine!

waaaah! Waaaah! Whine! Whine! Another "Washington insider" writes a book and tells all a year or two after the fact . Why couldn't he come cleanwhen he left? He could have prevented more lies and b.s. from the Bushies. What a pukey opportunist.

The signs were there

The signs were there from the very beginning. The insanity of Saudi Arabian hijackers morphing into Saddam Hussein; the behaviors of purportedly Christians leaders countering the major tenets of Christ. The ridiculous posturing, reminiscent of 1940's Grade B movies, in captured photo ops and video clips, . The absurd dance around the "outing" of Valerie Plame. That there were so many of us who could see the perfidious behaviors then, makes me wonder why so many could not see them until now, including, the men and women of the legislative branch. Perhaps they did, but thought the Washington "game" too powerful to resist, if they wished to remain "successful". Certainly, the White House is guilty of much that the country will be paying for long after key administrative "players" are dead, but these reprehensible actors are not alone in their culpability, for Congress voted too often in alignment with the White House. It did so without due consideration being given to the essential nature of the tiger at its gates, and without honoring what some believe to be a sacred trust imparted to them, as it was imparted to other national leaders, by the people.

Here he is.

Here he is.

When is anyone in this

When is anyone in this administration going to REALLY "fall on their sword" over these grave and intentional actions and delusions that have cost this country a fortune...well we all get a sense of what this has cost, and don't quite have a picture on the multiple tragedies we've set upon the Iraqi people. WHO will PAY? McClellen, good for you for making this public, but a lucrative book deal and the hope that the future administration will learn from your part in this. What folly! Why aren't you turning yourself in to "the authorities" for high treason. Someone out there, including all the Republicans who voted Bush back in to office in spite of all the truths being revealed...someone PLEASE fall on your sword. Doesn't anyone have any shame out there? Well, you sure learned a lot, Mr. McClellan. Would it have been too much trouble to denounce Bush at the press briefings? You knew. Thanks a LOT. Get responsible. Someone.

this isn't news, the guy is

this isn't news, the guy is just trying to make a buck. Everyone knew that was going on as it happened.

Add a comment:

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
The following question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Please enter the two words seen below. If you cannot read them you may use the button with circling arrows to get a new one.