Share

Mukasey Won't Pursue Charges in Hiring Inquiry

by: Eric Lichtblau  |  The New York Times

photo
Mukasey won't prosecute former Justice Department employees whose hiring decisions were based on loyalty to George Bush. (Photo: politickernj.com)

    Washington - Attorney General Michael Mukasey on Tuesday rejected the idea of criminally prosecuting former Justice Department employees who improperly used political litmus tests in hiring decisions, saying he had already taken strong internal steps in response to a "painful" episode.

    Two recent reports from the Justice Department inspector general and its internal ethics office have found that about a half-dozen officials at the Justice Department - all but one now gone - systematically rejected candidates with perceived "liberal" backgrounds for what were supposed to be non-political jobs and sought out conservative Republicans.

    In a speech Tuesday morning to the American Bar Association in New York, Mr. Mukasey acknowledged that some critics and commentators have called on the Justice Department to take what he called "more drastic steps" in dealing with the scandal, including prosecuting those at fault and firing those hired through flawed procedures.

    "Where there is enough evidence to charge someone with a crime, we vigorously prosecute," he said. "But not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime," he said. As the inspector general's report acknowledged, the hiring violations were such a case, because the wrongdoing violated federal civil service law, but not criminal law, he said.

    "That does not mean, as some people have suggested, that those officials who were found by the joint reports to have committed misconduct have suffered no consequences," Mr. Mukasey said. "Far from it. The officials most directly implicated in the misconduct left the Department to the accompaniment of substantial negative publicity.

    "Their misconduct has now been laid bare by the Justice Department for all to see," he continued. "As a general matter in such cases, where disciplinary referrals are appropriate, they are made. To put it in concrete terms, I doubt that anyone in this room would want to trade places with any of those people."

    Mr. Mukasey also said it would be unfair, and possibly illegal, for the department to go back and reassign or dismiss those lawyers and other employees who were hired in part because they were seen as trusted conservatives. "Two wrongs do not make a right," he said.

    The inspector general is expected to issue at least two additional reports on the politicization of the Justice Department, including his findings on the firings of nine United States attorneys in late 2006 under then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Well, there's a surprise.

Well, there's a surprise. That's why Mukasey was installed into office--to protect his employers. Used to be that public servants had some integrity and did their jobs. Today the questions are who stands to make or lose money and how can we promote a conservative agenda. OOoohhh, negative publicity--take that! That'll learn ya! (wink, wink) And gee, it's unfair to fire people who were hired because of their political views. At least, if they're conservative too.

What a surprise that Mukasey

What a surprise that Mukasey isn't going to prosecute people who broke the law. Maybe someone should prosecute him for violating his employee handbook instructions.

So we're stuck with them?

So we're stuck with them? Mr. Mukasey also said it would be unfair, and possibly illegal, for the department to go back and reassign or dismiss those lawyers and other employees who were hired in part because they were seen as trusted conservatives. "Two wrongs do not make a right," he said. And so these people have gotten their way -- politically-vetted justice department hirees who will be there for a very, very long time. The permanent Republican majority plan will stand unless Dems get a spine about this. Don't hold your breath.

OK. Let's see if I have this

OK. Let's see if I have this straight. They were wrong, and they broke the law, but not the right law, so they get away with it. And they've packed Justice with a bunch of party loyalists, but there's no reason to change things by replacing them with truly independent AGs. And we wonder why our society is in the shape it is? We're basically teaching our children that it's not whether you break the law or not... it's whether you can beat the rap. And when you play ball with those who have rigged the system, you get ahead. Suck it up, toe the party line and have a decent life, or suufer the consequences. When I did move to Russia? ~~ Lane Baldwin - alifewithspirit.com

Maybe the time has come to

Maybe the time has come to rename the justice department. Justice does not seem one of their callings. What we need is an honest "Chief law enforcement" officer.

IMPEACH Mukasey. What a

IMPEACH Mukasey. What a disgusting creature.

Mukasey says, "...I doubt

Mukasey says, "...I doubt that anyone in this room would want to trade places with any of those people." Do quick Google check and you'll find out that one of them, Esther Slater McDonald, currently is an associate at Seyforth Shaun, LLP. Not a bad gig!

***So that's It? I count

***So that's It? I count only 6 people that show they have more than 1/4 oz. of Brains? The Hell's 'W'rong with this Sorry Excuse of a country? Is mcCain not spending Money in Fla. because He Knows the Same Cronies & their "Creative Vote Counting Accountants" are Still In Place & They Know The Drill?

***Cronies For Mukasey!***

***Cronies For Mukasey!*** I Like It! It Sings!

how much more of this do we

how much more of this do we have to take? it's time for this whole group to get out the people to take back their government

The JUST US department does

The JUST US department does not have to obey any laws. It's a nightmare. America is dying.

I remember that Senator

I remember that Senator Charles Schumer was a vocal supporter of Mukasey as an acceptable Bush appointee. Another example of why the two party system doesn't work very well. It becomes like two cronies sharing each others' secrets, while keeping them from the public (those whose business they're entrusted to doing). To a layperson like myself, Mukasey's arguments sound unconvincing and disingenuous. He's a loyal GOP servant providing CYA for the Justice Dept. Too bad he's the highest law officer in the US.

I find it humorous that

I find it humorous that Mukasey calls this a "painful episode". I thought he didn't know what pain meant. Isn't he the guy who wasn't sure whether water-boarding was torture? Who exactly is in pain here? Mukasey? I don't think so.