News

Obama Focuses on Turning Red States Blue

»

by: Jennifer Loven, The Associated Press

photo
Presidential candidate Barack Obama will spend the Fourth of July at picnics and parades in traditionally Republican strongholds. (Photo: Reuters / Allen Fredrickson)

    Colorado Springs, Colorado - It will be a red-state Fourth of July for Barack Obama, who hopes to find votes as well as fireworks in places that blue-state Democrats often bypass in presidential elections.

    During the long holiday weekend, Obama is making an All-American swing from picnics to parades in reliably Republican corners of the country, states such as North Dakota and Montana. Both have voted Republican for the White House by hefty margins for almost four decades. Neither state offers many electoral votes - three apiece - but appearances there give Obama the opportunity to argue that he can appeal to voters of all stripes.

    "It may have been Woody Allen who said 90 percent of success is showing up," Obama told a small but enthusiastic crowd of donors at a fundraiser here. "If I didn't show up, I wouldn't get many votes around here. If I did show up, I might get something going."

    Colorado, where Obama spent Wednesday, has unexpectedly tipped from a GOP stronghold into the battleground column this year. Ohio and Missouri, which went Republican in 2004, got Obama visits this week. A second trip to Missouri is scheduled for Saturday, another swing state.

    Democrats have made gains in recent gubernatorial and congressional races in the states. Montana's governor and two U.S. senators are Democrats. North Dakota's governor is a Republican but the state's two senators are Democrats.

    Obama noted this sort of evolution in parts of the West - particularly Colorado - to his supporters Wednesday night, saying that it had been a chief topic of his phone conversation with former President Clinton earlier this week. Clinton told him that he doubted he would have won Colorado in 1992 had independent candidate H. Ross Perot not been in the race and drawn a sizable percentage of voters, mostly away from Republican President George H.W. Bush.

    "You've seen a seismic shift in attitudes here," Obama said.

    As a result, the campaign is making a serious play for red states like Montana and North Dakota, building up an extensive ground operation, buying television time and sending the candidate in for a visit.

    Obama's first two ads of the general election race are running in 18 states - seven of which have gone Republican in the last several elections, including Montana and North Dakota. His visits this week aren't his first to either state, either. Obama has been to North Dakota once and Montana three times, with more expected.

    At a Fargo, N.D., children's museum on Thursday, Obama planned to hold a town-hall meeting with veterans to focus on patriotism, service to country and treatment of veterans.

    Recalling his grandfather's enlistment after the Pearl Harbor attack, Obama said in prepared remarks, "When our troops go into battle, they serve no faction or party; they represent no race or region. They are simply Americans. They serve and fight and bleed together out of loyalty not just to a place on a map or a certain kind of people, but to a set of ideals that we have been striving for since the first shots rang out at Lexington and Concord."

    For Friday's Independence Day holiday, a important symbol for Americans and politicians, the campaign chose Butte, Mont.

    Obama is attending a Fourth of July parade and picnic there with his wife, Michelle, and their two daughters. Friday is his older daughter Malia's 10th birthday, so a private celebration also is planned in the town.

    "The people of North Dakota and Montana are independent-minded voters," said Obama spokeswoman Jen Psaki. "We think we can not only compete, but we can win."

    While Obama was tromping around on GOP turf, his Republican rival John McCain was nowhere near his base of support. McCain spent part of the week overseas, in Colombia and Mexico. He had no plans to campaign on the Fourth of July or all weekend, spending time at his home in Arizona instead.

    The Obama camp sees Obama's huge-margin primary wins over former Democratic rival Hilllary Rodham Clinton in Montana and North Dakota - he drew more than 100,000 votes in Montana - as a starting advantage.

    If nothing else, forcing McCain to compete for those states' electoral votes could be enough to alter the outcome this fall. Obama is able to spend as much as the record-shattering fundraiser can raise, while McCain is limited by public campaign financing to $85 million.

    Still, for all the happy talk about turning these and other red states blue, it will be a very difficult battle for Obama.

    Montana voted for President Bush over Al Gore by a 25 percentage-point margin in 2000 and 21 percentage points in 2004. North Dakota is even tougher, having gone for Bush by more than 27 points in both 2000 and 2004.

    In Montana, the three top Democrats waited until after the state's primary on June 3 to endorse Obama, a sign they didn't want to be his most aggressive and out-front supporters in the conservative state. Gov. Brian Schweitzer has said Obama could be a tough sell for pro-gun Westerners in the state with the highest concentration of gun owners.

    He did have one bit of good news for the Obama team: the perception that McCain is soft on the issue.

    In North Dakota, the last Democratic candidate to carry the state was Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964. Only two other Democrats, Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, have won the state since 1900.

    "Barack Obama is wrong for North Dakota. His values are wrong," Robert M. "Mike" Duncan, chairman of the Republican National Committee, said in a conference call with reporters. "He's turned out to be an old-fashioned politician."

    Even Obama alluded to his difficulties at the fundraiser, and pleaded for help.

    "I'm going to have to be a better candidate," he said. "You are going to have to make sure that over the next four months that outside of your family and your work, this is your project."

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

This comment about Obama is

This comment about Obama is valid in terms of being disingenuous, but when was the last time an ingenuous politician was elected president in this country. I am not a huge supporter of Obama, but certainly found him to be more ingenuous than Hilary "I Don't Regret my Vote on Iraq" Clinton. I am not sure the Bolshevik approach is the best of insuring that things get far worse before they can get better, but that is sadly the one that so many seem to want, let McCain win, let him run the country into the ground and then maybe we'll find some true Democrats. I am hopeful if not overly optimistic that the policy of slowing replacing the "bi-partisan" Democrats with fighters might yield results. Remember that when Barry Goldwater ran in 64, the last time North Dakota voted Dem, political watchers were declaring the conservative movement dead. Now they achieved all their goals, went crazy with power and have ruined themselves. This is certainly not something you can attribute to the Democrats' we can find bipartisan solutions approach to "opposition." I fear the utter ruin of this country, even as the Bolshevik in me recognizes that it might speed our process of humanization. (Of course given what butchers the Bolsheviks turned out to be this is not a fully appropriate metaphor) Obama might very well win and if he does than we can push him to do better. Hopefully it doesn't have to get even worse before it can get better. Obama might end up helping progressive minded folks in the long term by slowly pulling people left without them even realizing it. Note the hostility people often feel when someone tries to convert them. One last thing, can some liberal group begin writing those deceptive, falsified emails the conservatives produce and have suckers forward around? I am tired of getting these asinine forwards that anyone with a brain can see through but that reinforce this warped Right wing perspective on issues.

"When our troops go into

"When our troops go into battle, they serve no faction or party; they represent no race or region. They are simply Americans. They serve and fight and bleed together out of loyalty not just to a place on a map or a certain kind of people, but to a set of ideals that we have been striving for since the first shots rang out at Lexington and Concord." Untrue, despite intent. Our way of life as I know it, our ideals as I know them, is undermined -has been undermined -when said troops murder and rape innocent civilians in a war baselessly begun by preemptive attack to steal oil and to enrich corporations in our name. Our ideals preclude such piracy. Our ideals preclude, disclude, exclude all piracy and duplicity and falsity. This statement by Obama is disingenuous. It is either naive or false. It continues a great and grievous wrong he has campaigned to correct. All I am seeing reported on him now is betrayal of that which he said he stood for. It does indeed seem he is a great sellout, and sadly even that very point is naysayed by such as Amy Goodman, whom I once respected without doubts. Things are *not* boding well at all. Tongue in cheek I might suggest that perhaps those whom wish wrongs to be righted ought not vote for democrats but the very worst of the worst that the dems be forced to stand up for what is right instead of the evil program. For indeed, things cannot get worse. -And, sad to say, certainly such pro right wing votes would not be miscounted...

Add a comment:

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
The following question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Please enter the two words seen below. If you cannot read them you may use the button with circling arrows to get a new one.