Share

Obama's Response Ad Reflects Lessons of 2004

by: Jonathan Weisman  |  The Washington Post

photo
Democratic presidential nominee, Senator Barack Obama. (Photo: AP)

    Denver - Sen. Barack Obama's campaign and its allies, mindful of the lessons of the Swift boat attacks of 2004, have begun an aggressive, multi-pronged attack on an advertisement running in swing states that seeks to link the Democratic presidential candidate to former domestic terrorist William Ayers.

    With threats of legal action, boycotts and a response ad launched quietly to avoid publicity, the Obama campaign has put conservative donors and television stations on notice that 2008 will not be 2004, when Sen. John F. Kerry, the Democratic nominee, waited weeks to respond to attacks on his Vietnam War record and ultimately did so ineffectively. Christian Pinkston, a spokesman for the American Issues Project, which is airing the anti-Obama ad, called the response intimidation and harassment.

    Obama campaign lawyer Robert F. Bauer replied: "If someone rides up to a convenience store with a sawed-off shotgun and a prior record, I'm not intimidating anybody by calling the cops. . . . If this [Republican] campaign is going to be run in McCarthyite fashion by lawbreakers in an illegal way, they are going to pay a price."

    Ayers was a member of the Weather Underground, a radical organization that claimed responsibility for a dozen bombings between 1970 and 1974. He is now a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago and an expert on public school reform.

    The ad, financed with a $2.9 million donation from Texas billionaire Harold Simmons, a fundraising bundler for Sen. John McCain's Republican campaign, says that Obama has defended Ayers as "respectable" and "mainstream" and that he launched his political career from Ayers's home. The Obama campaign says the assertions are demonstrably false.

    "Why would Barack Obama be friends with somebody who bombed the Capitol and is proud of it?" intones a voice on the ad, which is running in conservative areas of Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia. "Do you know enough to elect Barack Obama?"

    The ad is no video stunt, said Evan Tracey of the Campaign Media Analysis Group, which tracks political advertising. It began running last Thursday, and as of Tuesday, $360,000 had been spent on 264 showings, 52 of them in the Grand Rapids, Mich., media market, just under 40 around Cincinnati, 18 in Norfolk, and half a dozen around Pittsburgh, a corner of Pennsylvania that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton dominated in the spring Democratic primary battle.

    "Certainly it connects with base voters," Tracey said. "If you can't get excited about voting for McCain, these are the kinds of ads that get them excited about voting against Obama."

    The television spot has left Obama with the same dilemma that Kerry faced four years ago: Respond and risk pushing the issue onto the political talk shows and front pages of newspapers, or ignore it and hope the attack will not sink in. Kerry, convinced that few would believe that a decorated Vietnam combat veteran would fabricate his war record, chose to ignore the group Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. When he finally responded, his national advertisement stoked the issue all over again.

    Obama campaign officials are taking a different tack. They are running an ad to counter the Ayers spot in the same media markets, but they did so with no national media announcement or news conference. The ad itself blames McCain for the independent Ayers campaign, accusing him of "talking about the '60s" and crimes Ayers committed when Obama was 8 years old, instead of war spending, economic crisis and tax breaks for companies that send jobs overseas.

    Simmons, who helped finance the 2004 Swift boat campaign, has raised $50,000 to $100,000 for McCain's bid, according to the campaign's Web site. Ed Failor Jr., who sits on the American Issues Project board, was an adviser and paid consultant for the McCain campaign. A news release announcing Failor's joining of the McCain presidential exploratory committee was recently removed from the candidate's Web site.

    The counter ad is only part of the Obama team's response. Bauer has written legal letters to television stations, asserting that the Ayers ad is illegal and false, and that its airing is subject to a Federal Election Commission penalty. Obama did not call Ayers "respectable" and "mainstream," Bauer said. Those words were used by a journalist in an article that was posted along with many others on the Obama campaign Web site.

    McCain campaign spokesman Brian Rogers called it "100 percent misleading" to blame the Republican for an ad he had nothing to do with. He said the campaign has had no discussions with Simmons about the ad, the issue or the organization. Failor has not been involved in the McCain campaign for more than a year, Rogers said.

    But Rogers made no effort to distance McCain from the Ayers issue. "If he thinks his long association with an unrepentant domestic terrorist is nothing the American people should be concerned about, he's delusional or naive," Rogers said of Obama. "The guy's running for president. It's an issue."

    Ayers did hold a gathering for him in 1995 when Obama first ran for the Illinois Senate, and he later contributed $200 to his reelection campaign. But Bauer said that hardly constitutes launching the political career of a University of Chicago Law School lecturer and the first African American president of the Harvard Law Review, who had just published his first memoir, "Dreams From My Father."

    A Bauer letter to Deputy Assistant Attorney General John C. Keeney challenges him to make good on a promise to vigorously act in the face of "a knowing and willful attempt to evade the strictures of federal election law."

    More than 93,000 pro-Obama e-mails have flooded Sinclair Broadcasting Group stations that are running the ad, many of them threatening to boycott the stations and their advertisers. Obama campaign spokesman Tommy Vietor warned that other stations that accept the ad can expect the same response.

    Efforts to stop the Ayers ad have not come only from the Obama campaign. A film company in Berkeley, Calif., that made an Oscar-nominated documentary in 2004 on the Weather Underground group has issued a cease-and-desist letter to the American Issues Project, saying that it illegally appropriated copyright images from the film for the ad. Brook Dooley, an attorney for the Free History Project, said shots of Ayers speaking into a camera in an interview and the aftermath of a Weather Underground bombing were copyrighted. The group has informed about 150 stations in Ohio and Michigan of its objection, but Dooley said no decisions have been made about legal action.

    Separately, a new effort by Democratic strategist Tom Matzzie, called Accountable America, is aimed at warning conservative donors of the legal thicket they may be entering by financing independent attack ads like the Ayers spot. He said his group's first target is Simmons.

    Pinkston said his group and his donors are undaunted.

    "The Obama campaign has raised this to front-page news, frankly, with this response ad, with these legal attacks, with their outreach to reporters," he said.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

George H.W.Bush gave Orlando

George H.W.Bush gave Orlando Bosch a presidential pardon.Orlando Bosch has a long string of terrorist attacks.He was responsible for blowing up a Cuban airplane killing 76 people.He was responsible for several American embassy bombings.The Bush family ties to terrorists and dictators is well documented from Pinochet,Noriega,Saddam Hussein and the Bin Ladens.Who supports Bush more than John McCain.If you are not familiar with Orlando Bosch I would look him up.

So sad. It has become

So sad. It has become obvious to me that our dumbed-down masses in America are just too stupid - unable to engage in critical thought - to elect Obama. Hence, the last eight years. How could any country country in its right mind allow the same people who gave us Bush, back into the White House? Stupid, stupid, stupid. Sad, sad, sad.

Republicans take the sleezy

Republicans take the sleezy road, again and again and this ad and the response of the McCain campagne is just one more example. They produce little of substance in their ads, rely on the POW thing as The Qualification and seem to ignore an awful lot of REAL issues of this country to slide down the hill in the slime. On the other hand, the absolute ignorance of so many people in this country is appalling. How can the media allow McCain to claim the high road while his campaign is so obviously on the LOW one??? Frankly, I would like to see MoveOn and others of a similar nature do the same thing, focusing on McCain's collusion with his captors in Hanoi and the issues around the USS Forrestal and the death of 130 sailors because of his actions. McCain apparently has a superhighway of negative information that anyone not supporting him can produce...

Americans are being

Americans are being brainwashed daily by the mainstream media, but let's not give up on them too early. More people see through it than you think. They may not read a lot, but more people than you know can see through the shallowness and get it. The tracking polls are completely fixed and totally unscientific. Why anybody pays attention to them is beyond me. They are made up every day to keep the race close for the sake of the ratings of the television networks.

Beyond the seeds of

Beyond the seeds of suspicion, innuendo and general bias put forth on a regular basis by FOX news and the likes of Rush Limbaugh, there is always the outright lying thrown into the mix by Republican radicals come election year. It's as regular as rain. Democrats need only point to the truth in criticizing George Bush, Dick Cheney, John McCain, et al. The Republicans, on the other hand, have adapted and perfected Adolph Hitler's "big lie" system of swaying public opinion--tell a lie often enough and people will begin believing it. Add to that the usual GOP polling-place chicanery, suspect voting machines--and in a real pinch, a right-leaning Supreme Court with a tendency toward corruption. There is no limit, it appears, on the length to which the nation's paranoid "fat cats" will go to preserve their status quo. It doesn't help the situation, of course, that a major portion of the electorate does not bother to properly inform itself much beyond TV news bites.

We'd do well to keep in mind

We'd do well to keep in mind that there exists a segment of the American population that can only be described as extremely ignorant and racist. These illegal ads are designed to appeal to them and to persuade them to vote against their own interests. Most importantly, however, Obama is not Kerry, who waited two weeks to respond to the swift boat ads, but his response was too late and, by the time he actually responded, much damage had already been exacted against his campaign. On the other hand, Obama has come out with an ad challenging the illegal Ayers ad, and has put the Republican party on notice, indicating sleazy Republicans will pay a price for these highly questionable ads in which they spew lies about the democratic contender. Obama's fiesty, but wise, responses to attempts to destroy him and his campaign will serve him well as he is destined to be widely perceived as a fighter who cannot only take a punch, but can also return one that makes the offender think twice about heavily investing in communication containing illegal, unfair messages that tend to appeal primarily to the ignorant among us. The left for a long time has needed a fiesty contender.

The truth about these

The truth about these scurrilous ads, just like the truth about the "Obama's a Muslim" email campaign, could be discovered in two minutes on Snopes-com.

But the people these things are aimed at don't want to know the truth; they want to find any flimsy excuse to vote for someone who looks like them, talks like them, and thinks (or more correctly, fails to think) like them -- even when the people they vote for govern against these fools self-interest.

Why? When you scrape away all the flimsy excuses, it comes down to racism.

The saddest part of all this is that these same folks claim to be good Christians, followers of a dark-skinned Jew who preached a message of pacifism, communalism and love of "the least of these". These fools may profess to be Christians, but they behave more like followers of Satan.

The Re THUG LIE CONS have

The Re THUG LIE CONS have discovered something that the Democrats have yet to exploit in recent years - the public reacts much stronger to an ad that stirs emotion than to one that appeals to their intellect (see Willie Horton, Swiftboaters, etc.). Visceral reaction trumps reasoned arguments. So, an ad full of imagery that creates a negative impression of the opponent will be far more effective than a logical, fact-based argument. Democrats can explain till they're blue in the face but it won't do much good. I hate to say it, but they would be better served to use the same tactic to make McCain into a monster. You could steal a page from the Swiftboaters (only, this time based on facts) and start with his "strong suite" - his war record and aggressive, militaristic response to today's threats and mention the fact that he wrecked three planes as a pilot, gave his captors material they used in their propaganda, and, most importantly, that his instincts have been wrong on many occasions and he and the neoCONS have actually made us FAR MORE insecure and hated in the world. And why not portray Phil Gramm, McLame's "econ" brain as Fortune Magazine calls him, as the freaking disaster that he is starting with mentioning the rider written by Enron that Gramm inserted quietly into a spending bill that allowed Enron to scam the energy markets for an estimated $30-40 BILLION dollars and CREATED the west coast energy crisis.

It's not just the uneducated

It's not just the uneducated knuckledraggers who take this kind of slime seriously. I email with an educated administrator in worker safety who takes this stuff seriously. It really blows my mind because this individual is normally a rational person, but all the garbage about Obama raising everyone's taxes, Obama doing this, Obama doing that, that the rightwing is emailing around is regarded as credible by this person. I suspect that in some cases of knuckledraggers, there is no hope, but in the more educated and experienced people, an education program can be useful.

Interesting article, and

Interesting article, and posts. Already heard about Orlando Bosch, but thanks. People still look at me funny when I say we're ruled by glorified gangsters. (Sigh.) Good to see that Obama is counter-punching and all, but I disagree with some points raised. Tam, I don't think that anybody who buys into lies about Obama, or who has a bad opinion of him, is necessarily racist or stupid. That's too simplistic. Many right-wingers will simply hate his politics. Many fundy Christians will simply fear the very possibility that he may not hate moslems the way they do. Many women of the Democratic Party are still feeling betrayed, but worse, insulted by certain comments against HRC, and do in fact believe that Sen. Obama is a sexist, and are looking for confirmation on that score. I'm honestly not so sure myself, but I'll wait and watch. I myself am a real liberal, and hence feel tremendously let down by the FISA bill vote, so I'll be looking for any other signs of creeping fascism. To brand these many concerns and/or fears as racist is ridiculous. All the criticisms I have heard of Senator Obama focus on his political statements, not his race. Please leave these tactics to the NeoCONS. Also, to the "Republicans take the Sleazy Road" poster, I looked into those issues myself some time ago, and I also have questions about possible McCain / North Vietnam collusion, but on the subject of the Forrestal, I will accept the Navy's version of events, since I was willing to accept it when they said John Kerry did indeed deserve his medal, and confirmed his story. It would be hypocritical of me to question the Navy on the Forrestal incident, especially when the exact same malfunction started a horrible fire on the Enterprise one year later, and John McCain nowhere near it. The pilot in the plane behind McCain's on the deck said he heard a whoosh to one side of him as a missile misfired from a plane in his row, and struck one of the planes in McCain's row. I've watched the grainy black-and-white film of it several times, and it does indeed look like the pilot identified as McCain gets out of his plane exactly as he claimed he did, and also helps drag a deck crewman away from the flames, although it's damned hard to be sure with the film quality and the glare of the fire. I recommend you Google for it, and draw your own conclusions, but I say the Navy got it right. What I'm trying to say is, credit where credit is due, and condemnation where it's provable. So, I think he was blameless, and acted bravely, on the Forrestal, (as did her whole crew), I'm not so sure if we know the whole story of his captivity, but I sure as hell know for a bloody fact that he has collaborated with the NeoCONs to subvert and destroy the Constitution, so why don't we focus on that? Oh, right. Because then we might have to question what the Dems were doing all that time... And speaking of who's a terrorist, to Tom Canfield, given that The Big Lie, broadcast 24-7-365 is so prevalent in NeoCON politics, why is it like spitting in the holy water to most people, to even suggest that maybe, just maybe, they lied to us about the specifics of 9-11? The 9-11 Commission's budget for investigation was LITERALLY less than 1% of what the NeoCONs spent while investigating Bill Clinton's little "indiscretion". -So, how complete an investigation could it possibly have been? What if 9-11 really WAS an inside job? -An excuse for war, and to enact the present police state. It would certainly make William Ayers look like a pretty punk bogeyman in comparison. Speaking of propaganda, BS, and The Big Lie, that is. "But they would never do that, it would be MONSTROUS!" Yeah. Like blowing the limbs off of thousands of Iraqi kids, for oil, ISN'T? How did that go? -"The bigger the lie, the easier it will be for the people to believe." Wasn't that it? That would be a pretty gods-damned ginormous lie, wouldn't it? Hmmm. I believe it. I do.

Democrats are FAIR

Democrats are FAIR pugilists, while Repukes hit below the belt and without any conscience. This is Christian? No thanks. McBUSH probably knows he may not make it the full four years and so he is appeasing the religious wingnuts so can you imagine Palin as president? Perish the thought. She believes the planet is only 4 to 6 thousand years old or less. TALK ABOUT NUTS AT THE NUTTER CENTER.

I would love to see a MoveOn

I would love to see a MoveOn ad with video-footage of McCain addressing his wife by the C-Word at a press conference. Also, does anybody know where to email Sinclair broadcasting to let them know I'll be boycotting their advertisers? Boycotts are about the only thing that work in the short term and it's already September. If these Nazis get away with this, they'll try something bigger. But if they know their going to get sued or boycotted they won't bother. Remember how many leftists thought that Al Gore wasn't worth the trouble of fighting for when W had his little coup? I think the republicans are about as excited about McCain as we were about Gore. Now we all like Gore. Maybe McCain will lose the election, grow a beard, teach some college classes, get humble and learn how to speak in public. Maybe he'll even do something useful with his life.

Another good way to fight

Another good way to fight back is to bring up some more old news of McCain's (what's fair is fair). McCain was one of the Keating Five and was more or less accepting bribes in that scandal. Push back, everybody!