Opinion

Facebook DIGG

Photo ID Hassle Puts One Mom's Vote on Ice

by: Ed Neubaum  |  Visit article original @ The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

photo
One woman in Georgia had to pay $40 to obtain her marriage certificate to enable her to receive an ID from the Georgia DMV. Without the ID, she would not be able to participate in elections. (Photo: People for the American Way)

    Until I read her opinion column, I didn't know Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel was looking for a voter harmed by the photo ID requirement (" 'Partisan bullying' unfounded in state photo ID requirement," @issue, July 28).

    My 73-year-old mother is one.

    After moving to Georgia from Florida, we attempted to obtain a Georgia ID. Based on the then-published requirements on the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) web site, we gathered proof of her new address (bank statement), birth certificate and valid Florida driver's license. At the DMV, we where told that as of May, the secretary of state required her marriage certificate because the name on her birth certificate did not match her driver's license. They would accept a passport with her married name, something she has never applied for.

    The harm:

    Tracking down and paying $40 for a copy of her marriage certificate.

    Two trips to the DMV, time and gas.

    Missing the July 15 primary.

    Fortunately, Mom was savvy enough to track down the marriage certificate and had an extra $40. It is interesting to consider that the requirements for obtaining a U.S. passport are not as stringent for married women as the Georgia requirements for a photo ID.

    So, based on Handel's column in the AJC, I know she will want to mitigate the harm done to my mother and me. Why doesn't she drop a check in the mail for the cost of the marriage certificate (the process really does seem to discriminate against married women) and the time and gas I spent for the extra trip to the DMV.

    I think $75 should cover everything.

    Thanks so much. Apologies accepted.

    ---------

    Ed Neubaum lives in Marietta, Georgia.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

This appears to represent a

This appears to represent a valid surmise on the part of Republicans, ie if they can remove enough women, minorities & younger voters from the pool, there's an outside chance that they'll do fairly well in November. Kudos to Mr. Neubaum for this presentation. ^..^

In Arizona the ID

In Arizona the ID requirements are just one of many obstacles. The registration process favors elderly (sometimes deceased) voters over new voters in different ways. The mail in ballots avoid the polling place documentation hurdle, and the mostly older electorate who get them has a verifiable partisan history, The process of removing dead, incapacited, spouses and persons with multiple addresses/names has major flaws while the disenfranchisement of new voters is assisted by the motor vehicle division which refuses to update records of expunged juvenile records and any hint of vehicle infractions in the issuance of licenses and restrictions on same. Like the lifting of felony voter restrictions, racial profiling (protecting us from a non existant wave of Hispanic voter fraud) is widespread, and many eligible hispanic voters avoid polling places and the over zealous county deportation task forces. As in the state to the east, New Mexico, Arizona has urban areas with mixed racial populations, but by county, the rural far flung tribal populations can be gerrymandered to dilute Democrat strongholds. The election boards are basically by county, but with the blurring of boundaries , precincts are often controlled by distant, larger county boards. In both states county boards are controlled by Republican secretaries of state who may be among the few state elected state officials to not be Democratic. State or Federal challenges to ID discrimination legislation is absent focus on the additional costs to vote, which should be akin to the poll taxes outlawed in the bible belt decades ago. The Secretary of State dicates the methods of balloting and counting results and especially the 'vendors' who supply not only the ballot scanners but the tabulating software and the digital transfer of results to the main computers. Although a recount of the paper ballots is easily accomplished, recent cases of challenged proposition votes were unable to force recounts of improbable reverses of polled results. Many voters are discouraged by polling place/registration difficulties and the over use of 'provisional'ballots which may never be counted even if the results are to close to call just after the polls close. Mail in ballots can be dropped off at any of the precincts in your county up to the polls closing on election day eve, but like the many provisional ballots, they aren't counted in time to effect the prime time coverage, which may or may not allow verification or recounting.

It's called, "VOTER

It's called, "VOTER SUPPRESSION." One of many different ways the Republican-voting neocons in power will impose their will upon us, to prevent Americans from voting. How? By selling their messages of FEAR of what terrible tragedies "MIGHT" happen, if even ONE bad vote gets through. Need proof? Exaggerate the evidence! Invent it if need be! Or, steal enough votes! (Just don't get caught... but if you do, well, that's okay, it's too late anyway, our man King George is already in the Oval Office. The naive Religious Right in this country, our wealthy corporate contributors and big defense contractors from Texas made damned sure of that). 'It's not the people who vote that count; it's the people who count the votes' -- Stalin

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.